YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
29 w

The Secret Network of Diddy. Documentary by Volksgeist 1,813,846 views 11-9-2024
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

The Secret Network of Diddy. Documentary by Volksgeist 1,813,846 views 11-9-2024

The Secret Network of Diddy. Documentary by Volksgeist 1,813,846 views 11-9-2024 - 1,813,846 views Nov. 9, 2024 Volksgeist - Watch ad-free on Nebula: https://nebula.tv/videos/volksgeist-t... More here:   / volks.geist     / volks.geist   philip@volksgeist.org for business http://volksgeist.org - Well, if you already felt that P. Diddy was a scumbag, this video will amplify that by about 100 x. - This guy is evil to the core and I don’t understand how beautiful woman like Jennifer Lopez, who I once viewed as classy, kept going back to his parties. - It hard saying how many people he has murdered and we know for sure he has paid over $30 in settlements so people would just shut up and not prosecute. - He was a thief, a rapist and murderer – not proven in court yet, but it sounds like it is coming. - About Sean Combs – “Puff Daddy” – P. Diddy - Born in Harlem and raised in Mount Vernon, New York, Combs worked as a talent director at Uptown Records before founding his own record label, Bad Boy Records in 1993. He embarked on his recording career following the success of his first signee, the Notorious B.I.G., for whom he served as manager and hype man. Combs's debut studio album, No Way Out (1997), received critical acclaim, peaked atop the Billboard 200, and received septuple platinum certification from the Recording Industry Association of America. Two singles from the album, "Can't Nobody Hold Me Down" and "I'll Be Missing You", topped the US Billboard Hot 100—the latter was the first hip hop song to debut atop the chart. His second and third albums, Forever (1999) and The Saga Continues... (2001), both peaked at number two on the Billboard 200, while his fourth, Press Play (2006), peaked atop the chart. Combs then formed the musical group Diddy – Dirty Money with R&B singers Kalenna Harper and Dawn Richard to release the collaborative album Last Train to Paris (2010), which peaked at number seven and was supported by the single "Coming Home". His fifth studio album, The Love Album: Off the Grid (2023), received moderate critical and commercial response. - He has worked as a producer for other media, including MTV's reality series Making the Band. He launched the clothing retailer Sean John in 1998, for which he won Menswear Designer of the Year from the Council of Fashion Designers of America in 2004, having previously been nominated in 2000. Combs served as brand ambassador for the liquor brand Cîroc from 2007 to 2023, and co-founded the television network Revolt in 2013. He is one of the wealthiest musical artists. - Source: Volksgeist -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elcrKExoo-0 ================================ FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES Mirrored From: https://rumble.com/c/WakeUpWorld - PROTECT YOURSELF: Protect yourself, your children and loved ones from the harmful EMF from the newly installed 5G Towers. We are constantly being Bombarded by Harmful Radiation, being hit from all directions, every single day. Up to 75% OFF! -
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
29 w

TikTok 'no-buy quarter' trend is inspiring some brilliant ideas to save money in 2025
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

TikTok 'no-buy quarter' trend is inspiring some brilliant ideas to save money in 2025

As we move into the middle of December and hopefully start winding down the annual holiday spend-a-palooza, many are already looking ahead to their 2025 savings goals. In the spirit of Movember or Dry January — those feel-good challenges that mix self-improvement with a bit of group accountability — TikTok has given us a viral phenomenon: the “no-buy quarter.” But, as the name implies, this time the challenge goes beyond a single month. Participants commit to three months of reduced spending, with some hardcore enthusiasts even extending it for a whole year! If you went a little too hard on spending during the holiday season, think of this as the perfect detox for your battered finances. What is a no-buy quarter? At its core, the no-buy quarter isn't about cutting out essential purchases. Groceries, medical expenses, and other necessities remain untouched. Instead, the goal is to reduce or eliminate non-essential spending. Think fewer splurges on coffee, takeout, home decor, or trendy gadgets. @MckenzieMack For TikTok creator @stephen_spann, a no-buy plan begins with making the most of what you already have. “Use up the food we already have before buying more,” Spann advises, noting the often-forgotten freezer items many households accumulate. He also emphasizes tackling beauty and health products stockpiled in bathroom cabinets before succumbing to the allure of the latest trends. "If I see something new in the store, I get sucked into that... I need to use up what I already have first." — @stephen_spann Save with intention For TikTok creator Mckenzie Mack, the no-buy quarter is a powerful tool for meeting ambitious financial goals. Mack plans to use the first three months of the year to frontload contributions to her 401(k). @MckenzieMack Her method? Increasing contributions to 26% during January through March to take advantage of a large bonus and reduce her contribution rate to 6-7% for the rest of the year. “To max out your 401(k) in 2025, you need to contribute $23,500,” Mack explains. “By committing to a no-buy quarter, I’m ensuring a large chunk of my bonus goes directly toward my 401k.” "This is a use-it-or-lose-it situation... I’m leaving a little extra in my fun money bucket, but once it’s gone, it’s gone." — @MckenzieMack Break free from spending cycles Both Mack and Spann point out the emotional and behavioral shifts that come with embracing a no-buy lifestyle. Mack recommends cutting down on streaming services and finding joy in low-cost hobbies like hiking or game nights. @stephen_spann Spann, on the other hand, calls attention to the subtle temptations of shopping apps and notifications. “Remove shopping apps from your phone,” he says. “They’re just tempting me.” "Just because I can get it on sale doesn’t mean I should buy it." — @stephen_spann Both creators agree that breaking the consumerist cycle is about appreciating what you already own. By doing so, they say, you save money and cultivate contentment. How to start your own no-buy quarter If the idea of a no-buy quarter appeals to you, here are some steps to get started: Identify your essentials: Separate necessary expenses (groceries, rent) from discretionary ones. Set clear rules: Decide what’s off-limits — dining out, clothing purchases, or subscription services. Create a goal: Link your savings to something tangible, like paying down debt or increasing your emergency fund. Track progress: Monitor your spending and celebrate milestones, no matter how small. Find support: Share your plan on social media or with friends. Accountability can help you stay motivated. Choose a cheat: Research shows that making a new routine too difficult is a recipe for bailing on it. Choose one spend to keep you sane. From clearing out freezers and unsubscribing from services to making coffee at home, the no-buy quarter trend is more than a fleeting challenge. It’s a chance to rethink your relationship with money and discover the joys of intentional living. via GIPHY Whether you take it on for three months or use it as a launchpad for a year of mindful spending, it could be the reset you need to make 2025 your best financial year yet.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
29 w

Golden Retriever's unbridled excitement over new dog bed is too sweet not to watch
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Golden Retriever's unbridled excitement over new dog bed is too sweet not to watch

Dogs of every breed tend to get excited over the littlest things, but Golden Retrievers are just a bit extra whether its with their favorite toys, snacks, or in this case, their beds.One proud goldie named Winston is winning hearts online thanks to his adorable reaction to a dog bed upgrade. It's honestly understandable—the bed is more of a mini couch. Who wouldn’t be excited? Winston’s mom, Ashley Jance, not only manages to capture the wholesome moment, but provides the perfect narration. "This is my old bed... and THIS is my new bed!" Jance says as, indeed, we see Winston jump on one bed then bound to the other as though he were a kid on Christmas showing off his new toys. And, just like a kid, Winston doesn’t love the idea of sharing as indicated by his playful growls when Dad tries to sit on his new plush throne.“He’s like, ‘get up!’” Jance says through giggles. Down in the comments, viewers seemed to catch Winston’s enthusiasm.“I love this for you Winston!” one person exclaimed.Another added, “that is the cutest thing I’ve seen in a long time.” @wackowinston im very proud and excited ♬ original sound - Winston The Golden Of course, not all dogs might take to dog beds as happily as Winston did. A 2012 survey by the American Pet Products Association found that 62% of small dogs, 41% of medium-sized dogs, and 32% of large dogs sleep with their owners. It's a trend not soon to break. In 2022, Psychology Today reported that 76% of American dog owners allows their dogs to sleep with them. Still, even for pups who don’t take to their own bed immediately, there are certain steps to take to make their beds seem a bit more appealing. Mostly, it takes establishing routine and safety along with some patience as a pet owner. Of course, if traditional training doesn't work, pet owners could just show their furry friends this video of Winston because boy is his energy contagious!If you're interested in getting your own pup a bed like Winston's, they're available on Amazon. This article originally appeared March.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
29 w

Michael Anton: Trump’s ‘George Kennan’ Pick for Cold War II
Favicon 
spectator.org

Michael Anton: Trump’s ‘George Kennan’ Pick for Cold War II

President-elect Donald Trump’s selection of Michael Anton to be the State Department’s director of policy and planning bodes well for the country’s foreign policy as we enter what could be some of the most dangerous years of the 21st century. Trump’s national security team will inherit from the Biden administration a world in turmoil — especially in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and the Indo-Pacific. The Eurasian landmass is aflame with wars and conflicts that some experts worry will develop into World War III unless wiser heads prevail. From 1945 to 1991, we avoided World War III and won Cold War I (against the Soviet Union) by generally following the outlines of a foreign policy formulated by the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff in the late 1940s, then headed by George F. Kennan. We can avoid World War III and win Cold War II (against Communist China) if the Trump administration formulates and implements a foreign policy that, like Kennan’s, mixes toughness with prudence and patience. Michael Anton is famous in conservative circles for his 2016 essay in support of Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy titled, “The Flight 93 Election,” wherein he urged conservatives and Republicans to charge forward like the brave passengers on that doomed airplane to save the country from the rot of progressivism. Anton noted that the deck was stacked against conservatives because of the Leftist bias of the educational, cultural, and media intelligentsia; the Right’s unwillingness to fight the Left on their own terms; and the “ceaseless importation” of immigrants that are “more Democratic, less Republican, less republican, and less traditionally American with every cycle.” Of the many GOP candidates in 2016, Anton wrote, “Trump alone … has stood up to say: I want to live. I want my party to live. I want my country to live. I want my people to live. I want to end the insanity.” Trump, he wrote, was “more prudent — more practically wise — than all of our wise-and-good who so bitterly oppose him.” It was a stirring call for an America First agenda at home and abroad. Interestingly, like Kennan’s “X” article in Foreign Affairs, Anton’s “Flight 93 Election” essay was written pseudonymously in the Claremont Review of Books. Anton served on the National Security Council in Trump’s first term. Of more relevance to Anton’s selection to head the Policy Planning Staff is an essay he wrote in the Winter 2022-2023 issue of the Claremont Review of Books titled “The Containment of George Kennan.” In that essay, Anton reviewed Frank Costigliola’s biography Kennan: A Life Between Worlds. Anton noted that in the early years of Cold War I, Secretary of State George Marshall established the Policy Planning Staff unit and named Kennan to head it. There, Anton wrote, Kennan and his staff “actually planned policy.” However, he noted that after Kennan’s brief tenure there (during which he recommended the policy of containment) and that of his successor Paul Nitze (the principal author of NSC-68, which recommended a more offensive version of containment), foreign policy planning was done elsewhere in the government. (RELATED: James Burnham: the Sage of Kent, Connecticut) Although Anton noted that Kennan was an elitist who thought that foreign policy was too complex to be subject to democratic whims, Kennan nevertheless held views about foreign policy that would align with Trump’s America First agenda. First, Anton noted that Kennan was a foreign policy realist who abhorred nation-building and crusades for democracy. He quoted Kennan: “The aptitude for democracy is not something just born into people … but has to attain the quality of habit.” Kennan, Anton wrote, “scoffed at the idea that Russia … would or could ever democratize,” and in his later years vigorously opposed George W. Bush’s efforts to spread democracy in the Middle East. Second, Anton noted that Kennan was one of the first foreign policy “wise men” to oppose NATO enlargement after the end of Cold War I. Kennan accurately predicted that NATO enlargement would lead to Russian nativism and imperialism. Third, and related to his opposition to NATO enlargement, Kennan understood Russia’s preoccupation with having a friendly government in Ukraine and, Anton believes, “would almost certainly oppose the Western aid that keeps [the Ukraine war] going.” Kennan, Anton wrote, would (like Trump) advocate negotiations to end the war. Fourth, Kennan the realist would pour cold water on the notion that the United States should carry on an ideological crusade against “autocracy.” Anton noted that Kennan opposed U.S. efforts to pressure European empires to decolonize and supported engagement with Spain’s autocrat Francisco Franco. Fifth, Kennan worried, Anton wrote, about the negative impact that mass immigration would have on America’s “political unity and cultural cohesion” — a unity and cohesion that would be necessary to effectively contain Communist China and eventually achieve victory in Cold War II by what Kennan would describe as the “break-up or the gradual mellowing” of Communist Chinese power. Anton characterized Kennan as a “Machiavellian,” which Anton defines as “clear-eyed and hard-headed about the cold realities of international relations and his country’s true, core interests.” Kennan, he wrote, had an “instinctual conservatism” which led him to share “more opinions with today’s populist Right than with the contemporary Left.” Michael Anton appears to be intellectually well-positioned to not only revive the importance of the Policy Planning Staff but also to steer it in a direction that will carry out Trump’s America First agenda. He could become the George Kennan of Cold War II. READ MORE from Francis P. Sempa: Approach Syria With a Tragic Mind We Live In the Age of Trump The National Endowment for Democracy Should be Defunded on Principle The post Michael Anton: Trump’s ‘George Kennan’ Pick for Cold War II appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
29 w

Pete Hegseth, Rachel Levine, and the Promising Return to Normalcy
Favicon 
spectator.org

Pete Hegseth, Rachel Levine, and the Promising Return to Normalcy

The accusations against Trump’s nominee for secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, are lamentable but, in a strange way, oddly refreshing. They represent a return to normalcy in Washington after four years of the bizarro world of the Biden administration and its unprecedented cast of oddballs. The rumors of Hegseth’s carousing are regrettable because, if true (a big if), we really should prefer men of character and order in our highest positions of power and responsibility, particularly heading up the world’s mightiest military machine. This august magazine became famous in the 1990s for its epic exposés exposing Commander-in-Chief Bill Clinton exposing himself to everyone from the girl interns to the lunch ladies. One recalls the sage advice of the little general, H. Ross Perot, saying of Bill Clinton that if a man will lie to his wife, well, he’ll lie to you, too. The venerable Harry Truman, renowned for his character, said the same. The man from Independence, Missouri was loyal to his wife Bess, and to his country. He tapped from the Army a man of unimpeachable character, the legendary George C. Marshall. That said, I do regret to concede that the days of such sterling individuals seem to have long passed us. There simply aren’t many George Marshalls marching around anymore. The accusations of drinking and womanizing leveled at Pete Hegseth remind me of charges back in 1989 against President George H. W. Bush’s nominee for secretary of defense, Senator John Tower. In Tower’s case, however, the charges seemed hard to believe. Sure, one could imagine Tower, a Texan, slugging down shots of whiskey. But the nerdy, pudgy, stiff-looking, short — Texas Monthly magazine described him as “phenomenally short” — chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee didn’t have the physical appearance of a man who could have his way with the ladies. If you were casting actors to play John Tower in a movie, you wouldn’t choose Gary Cooper or Brad Pitt. Pete Hegseth, however, strikes observers as a lady’s man who better looks the playboy part than John Tower did. Hegseth looks like he could hold his own with the high-caliber FoxNews babes. Emily Compagno or Carley Shimkus probably wouldn’t be out of his league. But if you wedged John Tower into the center seat among “The Five,” he would come off as an ogling, drawling, dirty old man, perhaps earning a slap backstage after pinching Kayleigh McEnany. One would imagine that John Tower was no more appealing to the ladies than the un-dashing Captain of Chappaquiddick, Senator Ted Kennedy. Ted’s way of picking up girls was to toss them on the table at a Washington restaurant (La Brasserie), making “waitress sandwiches” for himself and his womanizing buddy Senator Chris Dodd. (Click here for the late, great Michael Kelly’s legendary profile for GQ magazine in February 1990.) Teddy was a cad, a lout, a bum — truly the runt of the Kennedy litter. His older brothers Bobby and the philandering Jack were cooler with the ladies. Ted was just an intoxicated, porky slimeball. Anyway, Pete Hegseth is a guy’s guy with bona fides to fit the part of both the carouser and combat veteran. A young guy in his early 40s, he not long ago earned two Bronze Stars for valor in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan. He’s also a smart guy and an athlete. He went to Harvard and Princeton, and at Princeton played D-1 basketball — no small achievement. Princeton is that team that always sneaks into March Madness as a 16th seed and around 11:00 p.m. has everyone around the country riveted to their TV screens as they nearly knock off Duke or North Carolina or whatever No. 1 seed by somehow holding the offensive juggernaut to 55 points. Hegseth actually played for one of those Princeton teams. Yes, a guy’s guy Pete Hegseth is. And that brings me to the oddly refreshing part of his nomination. No, we certainly shouldn’t approve of Hegseth’s misguided marital behavior. The man is already on his third marriage and is plagued by charges of infidelity and mistreatment of previous wives (even by his own mom). If he did that to my daughter, I’d slug him in the nose. But at least the kind of charge of corruption that Hegseth is facing offers a return to more normal times and conventional types of scandal. Unlike the Biden administration. As a case in point, think and picture Rachel Levine. Levine is what passed for a four-star admiral in the bizarre Biden administration. After a hideous, if not deadly performance, as secretary of the Department of Health here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania during COVID (which should have forever banished Levine from any public health position), Sleepy Joe ludicrously tapped Levine to be his assistant secretary of health. Why? Because the cultural revolutionaries staffing his White House wanted a “transgendered” individual high up in the administration. But alas, even that position wasn’t high enough, and thus our intrepid president made Levine no less than a literal “admiral” in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. The omniscient Wikipedia hails Levine as “the first openly transgender four-star officer in the nation’s eight uniformed services.” Quoting Wikipedia in Levine’s case further underscores how utterly abnormal the last four years have been under the Biden administration, and how barking-mad crazy the whole culture has gone. If you read Levine’s Wikipedia page, you’ll see something surreal, namely: There is no reference to Levine’s original male name or upbringing. Every reference is to “her.” To be clear, I do understand that the insane ideological left believes that the birth names of “transgendered” individuals are “dead names.” They banish the names as if they’re dead to the person. It’s actually a dastardly affront to the poor parents of these individuals. The mother and father who bestowed these names upon the precious infant to whom they granted the gift of life are treated as non-entities whose say in the naming of their children is forever blacklisted. The maniacs who created Levine’s Wikipedia page have banished all history of Levine’s male “identity.” It’s such a bizarre thing. In the biographical history of a life, no sane person would eliminate the individual’s basic facts of existence — the person’s story. But Levine’s are purged. Seriously, liberals, ask yourselves: Is there something wrong with mere acknowledgment of the rudimentary facts of a person’s life? One would think that the LGBTQ lobby would welcome that conversion narrative as part of its celebration of Levine’s gender “transformation.” In their warped ideological calculus, however, that is a moral no-no. Their ideology has made them insane. All of which is to say, it’s refreshing to once again have political appointees with normal scandals — dudes like Pete Hegseth. Had Kamala Harris won the election, perhaps Rachel Levine could have been nominated as the next secretary of defense. The first transgendered Sec-Def! Yahoo! Hey, why not? After all, Levine is a four-star admiral in the nation’s eight uniformed services. That’s an impressive credential for damned sure. Personally, I prefer Pete Hegseth. Or perhaps I should say, I prefer the return to normalcy. READ MORE from Paul Kengor: ‘We Win, They Lose’: Remembering Richard V. Allen Justice Comes to HHS: Trump Taps Kennedy That’s How You Overturn an Election The post Pete Hegseth, Rachel Levine, and the Promising Return to Normalcy appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
29 w

Bidding Adieu to a Pioneering Poet of Racial Grievance
Favicon 
spectator.org

Bidding Adieu to a Pioneering Poet of Racial Grievance

I first encountered Nikki Giovanni, who died on Monday at the age of 81, in the pages of the 1973 edition of the Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry. It was the mid-1970s, and I was an undergraduate English major, and that thick blue paperback was the textbook for one of my classes. Arranged in chronological order by the birth date of the poet, it began with works by Walt Whitman, Emily Dickinson, and Thomas Hardy (who would become my favorite poet) and moved on through dozens of others, ranging from William Butler Yeats and Robert Frost (both of whom I loved) to William Carlos Williams and Ezra Pound (both of whom left me cold), and ended with two poets born in 1943: Nikki Giovanni and James Tate. Tate, who died in 2015, was just fine. But Giovanni? Well, she was my introduction to the Black Arts Movement, which was then a decade or so old. The anthology — I still have my half-century-old copy, which is lying open on the desk in front of me — contains three of Giovanni’s poems, prefaced by a nearly page-long introduction. “Nikki Giovanni,” it begins, “is very clear about whom she writes for and what she writes about, and she says so with care and intimidating directness. She writes out of the experience of a black American woman, and she is willing to share that experience only with those who recognize it as their own. White readers are warned away.” In short, whites are not welcome. Nowadays we’re used to this kind of thinking — the word for which is racism — on the part of black entertainers and race hustlers. But in the 1970s it was still a relatively new phenomenon. Indeed, Giovanni’s desire to be read only by people in her own demographic was the very opposite of the attitude toward literature and race that had previously been voiced by black writers and thinkers. The Souls of Black Folk, the 1903 book by W.E.B. Du Bois, the author, intellectual, and pioneering black civil-rights advocate, contains a famous passage about the fact that great literature knows no color, and no color line: I sit with Shakespeare, and he winces not. Across the color line I move arm and arm with Balzac and Dumas, where smiling men and welcoming women glide in gilded halls. From out of the caves of evening that swing between the strong-limbed Earth and the tracery of stars, I summon Aristotle and Aurelius and what soul I will, and they come all graciously with no scorn nor condescension. These are stirring sentences, and they express a beautiful sentiment. It was, of course, such thinking on the part of both black and white Americans that helped our country move beyond the era of racial segregation and prejudice. But Nikki Giovanni wasn’t having it. “Nikki-Rosa” (1969), the first Giovanni poem in the Norton Anthology, begins with a flat-out declaration of radical differentness: “childhood remembrances are always a drag / if you’re Black.” Why a drag? Because, she explains, “if you become famous or something / they never talk about how happy you were.” Giovanni goes on to describe, rather affectingly, a childhood lived in poverty – “you got your bath from one of those / big tubs that folk in chicago barbecue in” — but redeemed by love: “everybody is together and you / and your sister have happy birthdays and very good christmasses.” Now, this is a poem, I would submit, to which anyone who grew up poor but happy could relate. It’s not about being black. It’s about being a famous person who grew up poor. But for Giovanni, race is all: “and I really hope no white person ever has cause / to write about me / because they never understand / Black love is Black wealth.” Black, black, black. Got that? Black! How, may I ask, is black love different from white love? Another early poem, “The Great Pax Whitie” (1968),  doesn’t just push white people away, it’s full of raw racial rage: “In the beginning was the word / And the word was / Death / And the word was nigger / And the word was death to all niggers.” But the rage here is directed not just at whites but at capitalism (“Lot’s wife is now a product of the Morton company”) and at America (“Where war became peace / And genocide patriotism”). Giovanni equates the Nazis’ Holocaust with America’s involvement in the  Korean War and attributes both to capitalistic motives: “And they barbecued six million / To raise the price of beef / And crossed the 38th parallel / To control the price of rice.” And just for good measure, she brings in the assassinations of JFK and Martin Luther King, Jr.: “So the great white prince / Was shot like a nigger in texas… / While our nigger in memphis / was shot like their prince in dallas.” It’s an awful poem — a shrill, shallow, sloppy, stupid mishmash of Allen Ginsberg and Amiri Baraka, a grab-bag of stale 1960s slogans, a would-be statement punctuated with words intended to shock. Not all of Giovanni’s poems are so racially charged. Yes, her first two poetry collections, both published in 1968, were entitled Black Feeling, Black Talk and Black Judgement; but over the ensuing decades, her work mellowed — for the most part, anyway. To be sure, she continued to posture occasionally as a rebel, a malcontent, and an ally of thugs, but more often she chose to rejoice in blackness without banging away about whitey. Her 2002 poem “BLK History Month,” which begins as follows, might have been written by Maya Angelou: “If Black History Month is not / viable then wind does not / carry the seeds and drop them / on fertile ground / rain does not / dampen the land / and encourage the seeds / to root.” And her 2009 inaugural poem for Barack Obama might have been written by, well, pretty much any third-rate rapper: “I’m Barack Obama / And I’m here to say: / I’m President / Of the USA.” (No kidding — that’s really the first stanza, and take my word for it, the rest of the poem isn’t any better.) Like many other black writers, artists, and activists of the 1960s and 70s who were part of the Black Power and/or Black Arts Movement and who made their names by depicting themselves as estranged from the white man’s world — and, in some cases, as openly hostile to honkies — Giovanni ended up having a successful career in the academy, spending 35 years as a professor at Virginia Tech. Also like many other blacks who proclaimed their alienation from white people, she was, throughout her career, showered by white people with awards: While still in her twenties, she was named Woman of the Year by both Mademoiselle and Ladies’ Home Journal and her website lists honorary degrees from no fewer than 27 different colleges. Yes, she actually listed them on her website. She was proud of her laurels. Her website also includes a brief autobiographical sketch in which she brags: “I have been awarded an unprecedented 7 NAACP Image Awards which makes me very very proud. I have been nominated for a Grammy; been a finalist for the National Book Award. I am very proud to have authored 3 New York Times and Los Angeles Times Best Sellers, highly unusual for a poet.  I am a University Distinguished Professor at Virginia Tech.” In 2020, she even published a poem, “Biography,” in which she boasts: “There is a plaque / In Lincoln Heights / Where I went / To school / And a Plaque / In Knoxville / Across the street / Where my grandparents lived.” Notice something about this poem? It’s not much of a poem. It’s broken up into lines, and that’s about it. She capitalizes “plaque” in one line but not in another. Does this have any significance? I doubt it. I think such inconsistencies are part and parcel of the offhand manner that characterizes all of her work. Indeed, politics entirely aside, to read through Giovanni’s oeuvre is, most of all, to become increasingly frustrated at the dull, dreary, deadening sameness of it all — the meager intellectual content, the banal assertions of the vital importance of racial identity, the addled doses of generic nostalgia (“I always like summer / best / you can eat fresh corn / from daddy’s garden / and okra / and greens / and cabbage / and lots of / barbecue”). To eschew rhyme and meter is one thing; but, for heaven’s sake, it’s possible for even the freest of free verse to contain striking, memorable lines — familiar sentiments articulated in a fresh and surprising manner that opens one’s eyes and is pleasing to one’s ears. But that wasn’t Giovanni’s bag. It’s almost as if she was determined to avoid expressing anything in a remotely arresting way — as if extreme plainness were some kind of religion or a guarantor of emotional authenticity. Alas, it isn’t. Perusing Nikki Giovanni’s poetry, one can’t help wondering how long it will continue to be read in an era that seems finally, perhaps, to be moving beyond the obsession with identity politics that made her famous. READ MORE from Bruce Bawer: The OxyContin Story A Quarter Century of Entertainment — and Propaganda Sandra Gilbert and Feminism’s Endless Rage The post Bidding Adieu to a Pioneering Poet of Racial Grievance appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
29 w

Americans Need Brendan Carr as FCC Chair to Rein in Big Tech
Favicon 
spectator.org

Americans Need Brendan Carr as FCC Chair to Rein in Big Tech

Big Tech has grown accustomed to operating without limitations. The lack of necessary oversight is most evident in their efforts to censor and block users for speech they don’t like. With President Trump’s election victory, Big Tech will soon learn that Americans do not appreciate being muzzled. This lesson will be taught by Trump’s pick for FCC chairman, Brendan Carr. At the helm of the agency, he will bring much-needed reform to the digital space that has been under the boot of Big Tech for too long. In his statement announcing the selection of Carr for the role, President Trump called FCC Commissioner Carr a “warrior for Free Speech.” This title is well earned since, just days before the announcement, he sent a letter to Big Tech CEOs asking for answers relating to their reliance on the “Orwellian-named” company NewsGuard, which advertises itself as an unbiased rater of news organizations. Carr rightly points out that NewsGuard betrays their self-righteousness by “[operating] as part of the broader censorship cartel.” He backed up his rhetoric by pointing to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the protections it affords for good faith actions taken by Big Tech. Since the FCC has jurisdiction over the implementation of those protections, Carr can leverage Section 230 to get Big Tech to respect the free speech of Americans. He posted on X that “Any tech company that continues to rely on NewsGuard is putting its Section 230 protections in serious jeopardy.” Carr is also outspoken about the “messy, delayed rollout” of high-speed internet to Americans provided for in the 2021 infrastructure bill. The bill specifically set aside $42 billion for this purpose — money that has not been used to connect a single home or business. He called out the Biden administration for its focus on rewarding political friends rather than helping tax-paying Americans get online. Additionally, Carr brought up how an $885 million infrastructure award won in the 2020 FCC auction by Starlink to connect rural homes and businesses was revoked by the FCC for seemingly no good reason. A Facebook post calling out the egregious behavior of the Biden administration was censored by the company at the behest of a third-party fact-checker. Carr blasted the decision and called for the platform to stop censoring posts on behalf of the government. Broadcast media is also in Carr’s sights. In the lead-up to the election, NBC gave airtime to Kamala Harris by featuring her on “Saturday Night Live” the weekend before the election. Carr called out the behavior citing the FCC’s Equal Time rule which is intended to stop “a licensed broadcaster using the public airwaves to exert its influence for one candidate on the eve of an election.”  Broadcast media’s privileged use of limited airwaves requires them to respect the public interest. Carr posted on X that he intends to enforce the requirement. Outlined by Carr in the Heritage Foundation’s presidential transition publication, Project 2025, is a whole host of necessary FCC reforms. Some examples include expanding transparency rules to cover Big Tech and updating the “Covered List” of risky communication equipment to better protect national security. Carr is meticulously aware of what needs to be reformed and prioritized if the FCC is going to be successful in achieving its mission. Carr is laser-focused on restoring fairness and free speech to the internet and other communication networks. As chairman of the FCC, he will be in a perfect position to do just that. By stopping the abuses of Big Tech, holding broadcast media to higher standards, ending the political abuse of the FCC, and implementing other necessary changes, Carr will be able to make sure that Americans are free to generate and consume content online without fear of censorship or punishment. Americans needed a free speech champion at the helm of the FCC and President Trump delivered exactly that. Caleb Larson is a cybersecurity researcher, policy analyst with the Internet Accountability Project, Heritage Foundation alum, and contributor at The Federalist where he writes about cybersecurity-related issues facing the United States. READ MORE from Caleb Larson: Close the AI Cloud Loophole Google Controls the Internet … and Us! Amazon Should Be Pro-America, Not Pro-China The post Americans Need Brendan Carr as FCC Chair to Rein in Big Tech appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
29 w

Joe Biden’s COVID Nation
Favicon 
spectator.org

Joe Biden’s COVID Nation

WASHINGTON — “Washington is still operating as if it’s March 2020. The headquarters of most agencies remain largely abandoned,” Sen. Joni Ernst wrote in a report released Thursday that paints a dystopian picture of the federal workforce inside the vaunted beltway. It’s been nearly five years since COVID knocked on America’s door. Most schools and businesses opened up years ago. But federal government operations in Washington, D.C. are behind the flyover states. Because of COVID, President Joe Biden campaigned from home in 2020. But after American classrooms and businesses reopened, Biden has been a frequently absent executive since he took the oath of office. Ernst figured Biden “was out of office 532 days over the last three-and-a-half years, about 40 percent of the time he was expected to be in the Oval Office.” The no-show mentality has filtered from the top down. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin didn’t bother to inform Biden when he was hospitalized for days. Defense Deputy Secretary Kathleen Hicks ran the Pentagon while on a beach vacation in Puerto Rico. Moscow and Beijing must be gleeful. In the past, when partial shutdowns shuttered agencies and curtailed services because Congress was dithering, instead of passing funding measures, the press went into overdrive with warnings of dire consequences. But when agencies that are supposed to serve the public — inspecting baby formula, screening calls from veterans who desperately need mental health services, processing student aid applications — don’t have enough working staff, Americans don’t get time off from paying taxes. Ernst is a founder and member of the DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) caucus that is preparing to go after the worst abuses in the federal workforce. According to Ernst, “the nation’s capital is a ghost town, with government buildings averaging an occupancy rate of 12 percent.” The Biden administration has been in no hurry to get federal workers back to the office — to the displeasure of D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, as well as area eateries and businesses. An updated contract between the Social Security Administration and the American Federation of Government Employees extends work-from-home policies — reporting to the office between two and five days a week — into 2029. TrumpLand has a better take. In a piece that ran in the Wall Street Journal last month, DOGE czars Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy wrote of commonsense reforms that should send a thrill up voters’ legs — most notably, a requirement that federal workers in the D.C. area come to the office five days a week. The DOGE duo expects that the policy “would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome.” Federal employees who show up for work and do their jobs diligently must be enraged at these abuses. According to Ernst, 3 percent of the federal workforce teleworked daily before COVID; now 6 percent report in-person on a full-time basis, while nearly a third work entirely remotely. The arrogance of those who abused COVID measures can be breathtaking. A Veterans Administration manager dialed into a meeting from his bathtub. He took a selfie of himself in the tub with the headline, “My office for the next hour.” “Instead of pulling the plug on these ‘bubble bath bureaucrats,’ taxpayer dollars keep going down the drain paying their salaries and maintaining their empty offices,” Ernst wrote. I’ve been in this business for so long that I remember when partial government shutdowns generated horror stories about the disasters about to fall upon a vulnerable public. Now we learn that nearly a third of the government workforce is entirely remote. Sort of like Joe Biden. Contact Review-Journal Washington columnist Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@reviewjournal.com. Follow @debrajsaunders on X. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM READ MORE from Debra J. Saunders: Smear the Conservative: Episode 2761, Pete Hegseth Don’t Be a Turkey on Thanksgiving Sabotaging Trump: Abolishing Migrant Restrictions The post Joe Biden’s COVID Nation appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
29 w

The Real Scandal of Hunter‘s Pardon
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

The Real Scandal of Hunter‘s Pardon

by Ron Paul, Ron Paul Institute: Politicians and pundits spent much of last week commenting on President Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter for lying on a federal gun purchase form, failing to pay taxes, and any other offenses he may have committed over the past decade. Much of the controversy is because President Biden […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
29 w

Understanding the Implications of the CME’s New 1 oz Gold Futures
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Understanding the Implications of the CME’s New 1 oz Gold Futures

by Jesse Colombo, The Bubble Bubble Report: The CME is launching a gold futures contract to meet surging demand from retail traders, but it will only flood the market with more ‘paper’ gold. CME Group Inc., the parent company of COMEX, the leading U.S. exchange for gold and silver futures, will introduce a one-ounce gold futures contract […]
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 364 out of 56666
  • 360
  • 361
  • 362
  • 363
  • 364
  • 365
  • 366
  • 367
  • 368
  • 369
  • 370
  • 371
  • 372
  • 373
  • 374
  • 375
  • 376
  • 377
  • 378
  • 379

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund