A mom trying to get her kids in bed at a reasonable hour is apparently no match for a dog with the nighttime zoomies! Jen Derham caught some great footage of her four-legged friend running around like a maniac just as her children were about to wind down. His boundless energy was contagious! As soon as the pooch decided he wanted to play, all the little humans in the house seemed to get a second wind. These kids were laughing so hard, there was no chance of getting them to sleep anytime soon! Instead of getting upset, Mom decided to post the hilarious situation on social media. Her clip of the dog’s zoomies-fueled antics was way too entertaining! Within moments, he had the kids racing around after him. This pup didn’t seem to realize that he was completely derailing Jen’s efforts to get the children ready for bed. Judging by his wagging tail, he was just happy to have someone to play with. Try not to laugh while watching this dog’s bedtime zoomies! @jenderham #mumlife #fypシ゚ #kidslife #crazykids #dogmum #leo #foryou ♬ original sound – Jen Derham “When you’re trying to settle the kids & the dog has other ideas,” Mom wrote in the caption of her video. Over five million people have watched this hysterical clip online. Commenters loved seeing this goofy dog bounding around with the zoomies. One person suggested that the pooch may have been hamming it up just to keep the kids laughing! “Dogs know when we laugh and they purposely do things that they know will make us laugh which makes this even more precious,” they wrote. Screengrab from TikTok Another marveled, “He’s so big and sooo gentle. You can tell he is living for the giggles. I’m sure this is a core memory to the whole family.” This dog may sometimes make things more difficult for Mom at bedtime, but who can get mad at him when his zoomies bring so much joy to the household? You can find the source of this story’s featured image here. The post Kids’ Bedtime Turns Into Adorable Chaos When Family Dog Gets The Zoomies appeared first on InspireMore.

Just Wemby out here doing Wemby things

This could have big implications for human reproduction in spaceflight.

These gross monstrosities require a surprising ingredient, and new research shows there’s a way to stop it.

When the 13th of November approached, I—along with many others—had high hopes for Congress’s latest UAP hearing, titled “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth.” It’s fair to say that the last few years have been a whirlwind of revelations, half-revelations, and renewed public interest in unidentified aerial phenomena, yet each hearing leaves us wondering if we’ve truly gotten closer to the truth. The second UAP hearing was no exception. Despite an impressive lineup of witnesses and a seemingly serious approach from lawmakers, we ended up with the same lingering questions and a familiar taste of frustration. Setting the Tone for Transparency—or So We Thought The hearing kicked off with Congresswoman Nancy Mace’s statement that set the room’s tone—or so it seemed. She hinted that certain government officials had attempted to prevent the hearing from happening “in fear of what might be disclosed.” It was an ominous assertion, suggesting an internal struggle for transparency that might finally see the light of day. Her words tapped into a deep-rooted suspicion that many of us have: that the truth about UAPs is buried under layers of secrecy, more concerned with self-preservation than public knowledge. Mace even displayed what she called “12 pages of the Immaculate Constellation Special Access Program,” a document reportedly disavowed by the government. It was a bold move, one that made us think perhaps Congress would finally be pushing the boundaries on UAP secrecy. However, as the hearing continued, it became painfully clear that even these “bold” gestures would do little to provide substantial answers. These glimpses into alleged classified programs raised questions but, as is all too common in these hearings, provided few answers. Any part of the federal government knowingly concealing evidence about UAP from the public? "Yes Sir." – Timothy Gallaudet"100%." – Lue Elizondo"Yes." – Michael Shellenberger"Yes." – Mike Gold What do you believe UAP could be or are? "Strong evidence that they are non-human… pic.twitter.com/cAIWgrccu3 — Mike Colangelo (@MikeColangelo) November 13, 2024 Muddled Questions and Missed Opportunities Watching congressional members question witnesses was challenging, to say the least. At points, it was clear that some members didn’t have the background knowledge to ask pointed, necessary questions, or perhaps lacked the verbal finesse to frame them effectively. The dialogue became tangled and disjointed, often leaving witnesses like former Pentagon official Luis Elizondo with only the broadest opportunities to make his points. One of the most glaring missed opportunities involved the issue of “crash retrievals.” Mace made a connection to Elizondo’s non-disclosure agreement, hinting that it might involve the retrieval of UAP debris, though she didn’t explore it thoroughly. More frustratingly, they failed to address the fact that terms like “crash retrieval” could refer to recovering foreign adversarial technology or actual “alien” crafts. This left an ambiguity in the questioning that could have been avoided with clearer communication and knowledge of the topic. Particularly disappointing was how the phrase “Alien Reproduction Vehicle” (ARV) was glossed over in Michael Shellenberger’s testimony. Shellenberger presented it as a term within documents referencing “Reproduction Vehicle,” yet the term’s implications—potentially signifying reverse-engineered alien technology—were not fully unpacked. It was a colossal missed chance to clarify if the government possesses technology directly modeled on or reverse-engineered from UAPs. Witnesses Speak, Yet the Silence Remains Deafening Witness testimonies felt more like reiterations than revelations. Elizondo, as expected, condemned the culture of secrecy around UAPs. He claimed that a “small group of government officials” had knowingly withheld UAP information from the public. Despite giving a direct “yes” to the question of whether the government had secret UAP craft retrieval programs, he carefully avoided confirming any firsthand knowledge, leaving us to wonder if he’s privy to classified information or simply making an informed guess. Retired Navy Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet added a moral weight to the hearing, vouching for the credibility of whistleblowers who’ve risked reputational damage to come forward with their experiences. While his statements were sincere, they felt like echoes of what we’d heard before. Michael Gold, former NASA administrator, argued for NASA’s potential in investigating UAPs, yet his suggestions to reduce stigma and increase scientific inquiry felt like distant promises. Shellenberger, too, had his moment, detailing the supposed “Immaculate Constellation” program, an alleged Pentagon initiative to document and quarantine UAP encounters. His revelations seemed compelling, yet when we remember the Department of Defense’s outright denial of this program’s existence, we are left to decide who we believe: the government or the journalists dedicated to exposing the truth? “A small cadre within our own government involved in the UAP topic has created a culture of suppression and intimidation that i’ve personally been victim to along with many of my former colleagues.” –@LueElizondo #ufoX #ufotwitter pic.twitter.com/0Ds1B6MSOT — UFOs&Disclosure (@uaphenomenon) November 13, 2024 Key Questions Unasked—and Answers Never Explored Beyond the information the witnesses shared, what they didn’t say spoke volumes. Congress missed a crucial opportunity to ask why some of the whistleblowers themselves weren’t present at the hearing. The implications of this are enormous and, sadly, painfully obvious: these individuals likely don’t feel safe or protected enough to testify directly. This oversight by Congress is indicative of a much larger problem—the failure to ensure whistleblowers are safeguarded. If Congress truly wants the truth, they must first create an environment where the truth can be safely shared. There was also a noticeable lack of follow-up on the question of why the “GoFast” UAP video and other key documents seem to have disappeared from government email servers, as testified by Gallaudet. This data loss—convenient for some, frustrating for the public—suggests a disturbing lack of accountability that Congress seemed reluctant to tackle. Once again, we find ourselves at the end of a UAP hearing with a pile of hints but few answers. Congress seems hesitant to pursue the right lines of questioning, opting instead to tread carefully around hard truths. It’s a disappointing pattern we’ve seen before. Though the topic is obviously a sensitive one, this skirting around the edges isn’t doing anyone any favors. At this stage, one wonders if these hearings are more a display of half-hearted curiosity than a genuine attempt to pull back the curtain on the unknown. If these congressional representatives were genuinely committed to uncovering the truth, they would have left no stone unturned. Instead, we’re left questioning the significance of “12 pages of the Immaculate Constellation Program” and the extent of ARV technology without any clear answers. If Congress had thoroughly interrogated the witnesses about the precise nature and scope of UAP retrieval programs, we might be closer to understanding what the government is truly hiding. Another Frustrating Step Toward the Truth As someone who has followed the UAP issue closely, I wish I could say that this hearing had changed my perspective or shed new light on this mystery. Unfortunately, it feels more like we’ve simply returned to where we started. The truth may indeed be out there, but it seems increasingly clear that we won’t find it in a congressional hearing. Instead, the government seems content to offer fragments of information, knowing that piecing them together without clear, honest testimony is nearly impossible. So, what did we learn from this latest UAP hearing? Not much, if I’m being honest. It was a parade of evasions, unasked questions, and overlooked opportunities. Congress needs to push harder, and witnesses need to be ready to answer the questions the public deserves to know. Until then, we are left with the feeling that there’s much more to the story—and that we may never be allowed to hear it. The post What We (Still Haven’t) Learned from the Second UAP Hearing appeared first on Anomalien.com.

When I was asked to spin up Return a couple of years ago, I knew the media landscape had a huge hole where thoughtful, trustworthy coverage of the intersection of tech, culture, politics, and spirituality should be. Despite strong political and economic headwinds, friends, allies, fans, and readers quickly rallied to Return — not just in its online and print forms, but in person, especially in the cities where the brains, muscle, and soul of the new greatness movement were concentrated: Austin, Dallas, Miami, New York, L.A. We knew we were on to something, propelled by the conviction that allies of tech could be more than simps, propagandists, or worshippers — more valuable, more honest, more fun, and more durable. And when Blaze Media agreed — so much so that the company acquired Return with the goal of dramatically expanding our coverage, our reach, and our pathbreaking and beautiful print quarterly — we knew that what we had achieved was just the beginning. Tech was changing fast — not just strengthening and accelerating, but moving intellectually and spiritually in our direction and away from the pink police state about which I had been warning all who would listen throughout the 2010s. American in all its richness: sumptuous, rough and ready, resilient, and possessed of the strange and otherworldly glamor bestowed on our hard-fighting people by the great hand of Providence. And pro-America America was changing too, driven by the fresh tastes and takes of rising digitally native generations — young men and women who knew in their hearts and in their bones that the slick, hollow mantras enforced by the overlords of HR-style modern liberalism couldn’t answer the ultimate, universal questions aroused in the human breast by the growing dominance of technology. For a while now, you’ve seen Return’s online presence deepen, expand, and grow more nimble and muscular here at Blaze Media. What you haven’t seen yet — until today — is the tireless and visionary work Matthew Peterson, Peter Gietl, Katherine Dee, Isaac Simpson, and many others have applied to the noble and thrilling task of transforming Return’s already-great print quarterly into something truly spectacular, brilliantly original, coffee-table gorgeous, and richly rewarding to read, touch, and simply behold. I am tremendously humbled and grateful to present to you, for the first time, Frontier magazine. Ready for your preview and subscription, Frontier is the culmination of the mission and ethos of Return and Blaze Media working in synergy — bursting with sound confidence, hope, and dynamism toward the unfolding American future; intimately plugged in to the people, trends, products, and visions at the epicenter of that new future as well as its bleeding edge; and unfazed and undistracted by the hype, delusion, doomerism, and cultishness cluttering our fresh frontiers online and off. All while delivering a feast for the eyes and the heart — American in all its richness: sumptuous, rough and ready, resilient, and possessed of the strange and otherworldly glamor bestowed on our hard-fighting people by the great hand of Providence. Which is my way of saying, as Frontier’s editorial director but also as your friend and compadre, that you really, really, really want this big, beautiful beast in your home, in your hands, and in your life. Subscribe now! And thank us later. See you on the frontier. It’s a privilege to ride with you all.

More than six years after it first arrived, raucous co-op game Warhammer Vermintide 2 has launched one of its biggest updates. One of the best Warhammer games on PC, this chaotic Skaven-smashing spin on Left 4 Dead is still an absolute blast today, and now developer Fatshark introduces a new game mode and a total progression overhaul. After many months in testing, Vermintide 2 Versus mode is finally available to all, and a huge Steam sale discount means you can get in for less than $2. Continue reading Warhammer Vermintide 2 Versus mode is here, and it’s 95% off if you’re quick MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best Warhammer games, Best Warhammer 40k games, Best sword games

Half-Life 3 is the big one, the gaming culture equivalent of a mythical beast. But I suspect, given the choice, a lot of Valve fans would prefer a new Portal game rather than the return of Gordon Freeman. 13 years since the release of Portal 2, and two years since Aperture Desk Job, and it feels like the world of GLaDOS, Cave Johnson, and Atlas and P-Body is further away than ever. Or maybe not. The new Counter-Strike 2 map, a revival of CSGO classic Train, hides a seriously welcome little secret. It’s unclear if this means anything, but as Half-Life 2 nears its 20th anniversary, it’s good to know that Valve still remembers Portal exists. Continue reading New Counter-Strike 2 map Train hides a mysterious reference to Portal MORE FROM PCGAMESN: CS2 crosshair, CS2 review, CS2 skins

It would not be an exaggeration to say that the late, great Akira Toriyama left an indelible mark on the collective history of pop culture.

While Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 has redefined the wheel in many ways when it comes to gameplay, the game also has plenty of returning features.