“The Sisterhood Did Not Stand Up”: 45% of Women Voted for Trump

Scientists from the Institute of Fundamental Physics in Madrid, Spain, recently observed the Taurus Molecular Cloud—a nearby region where new stars are forming—using the Yebes telescope. They identified two nitrile-containing molecules, malononitrile and maleonitrile, whose presence could shed light on the chemical processes that may have led to the origin of life in the universe, as reported by Space. The Taurus Molecular Cloud is an interstellar gas and dust cloud, and the discovery of these nitriles highlights that complex chemical reactions are happening in space, potentially mirroring those that gave rise to life on Earth. According to researchers, nitriles are crucial in the prebiotic synthesis of purines and pyrimidines, the building blocks of RNA and DNA, making this finding significant for understanding life’s chemical origins. Typically, nitriles in space contain carbon-nitrogen triple bonds, which are highly stable. However, interstellar chemistry differs from that on Earth. In space, reaction outcomes are often governed by speed or probability rather than stability, favoring reactions that produce easily formed, resilient compounds like nitriles. This abundance and resilience of nitriles support the idea that they could have played a role in early prebiotic chemistry. To understand the formation of these molecules, the team explored possible interstellar reactions that could create nitriles. Data analysis revealed that malononitrile and maleonitrile are significantly less abundant than similar molecules containing a carbon-carbon triple bond. Reactive carbon radicals—often found in these interstellar clouds—are more prevalent than nitrile radicals, suggesting that carbon-based molecules form more readily than nitrile-based ones. The team notes that breaking the stable carbon-carbon triple bond is challenging, which could explain the prevalence of hydrocarbons in the Taurus Molecular Cloud. Despite extensive simulations, the researchers were unable to identify reactions that could easily form nitriles under the cold conditions of interstellar space. They believe that uncovering these processes will require further study of newly discovered reactions in interstellar chemistry. This research contributes to our expanding understanding of life’s origins, potentially guiding future discoveries of life beyond Earth. The post Molecules Found in Space Could Reveal the Secret to Life’s Origins appeared first on Anomalien.com.

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has launched a new experiment focused on collisions of heavy ions rather than the usual protons. The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) shared the details of this groundbreaking study, which started at 11:13 a.m. on November 6 and will last for about three weeks. This experiment aims to generate vast amounts of data for physicists to analyze, hoping to reveal insights into the Universe’s earliest moments. Unlike typical experiments with protons, this time scientists are observing collisions of lead ions, which contain 208 nucleons (82 protons and 126 neutrons). These ions are accelerated to energies of 5.36 TeV per nucleon pair, creating conditions similar to those just after the Big Bang. The preparation for this experiment involved significant upgrades to the equipment. For instance, the CMS detector’s data collection rate was increased from 20 to 30 gigabytes per second, and the ATLAS detector was made more sensitive to detect ultra-peripheral collisions—when heavy ions pass close without colliding head-on. The ALICE detector, specifically designed for heavy-ion measurements, was also enhanced to gather double the data it could in previous experiments. According to ALICE spokesman Marco van Leeuwen, scientists are “looking forward to the large data sample from this experiment,” as it should allow for the first direct measurement of the temperature of the quark-gluon plasma and enable precise study of its properties. Quark-gluon plasma is a unique, high-energy state of matter that existed in the very early Universe, just a fraction of a second after the Big Bang. In this state, protons and neutrons break down into a “primordial soup” of their fundamental components—quarks and gluons. By recreating this plasma through heavy-ion collisions, scientists hope to understand the behavior of matter under extreme conditions similar to those that shaped the early Universe. The post New Large Hadron Collider Experiment to Reveal the Universe’s Birth appeared first on Anomalien.com.

A study from the University of Jyväskylä shows that emotional connections between dogs and their owners affect both heart rate variability and physical activity levels, indicating a deep physiological bond similar to that between humans. Heart rate variability, or the time interval differences between heartbeats, reveals the state of the autonomic nervous system. Higher variability signifies relaxation, while lower variability suggests stress. The study found that when dog owners displayed high heart rate variability, their dogs often showed similar levels, and both their activity levels aligned during shared tasks like play. During relaxed, unstructured times, heart rate variability between owners and dogs was especially synchronized, suggesting that when neither partner is focused on external activities, they naturally tune into each other’s emotional state. This connection likely reflects emotional synchrony rather than physical activity alone, as the strongest variability links were observed in resting periods, rather than active play. The study also revealed that a dog’s heart rate variability may be linked to the owner’s temperament. For instance, dogs with owners who had high negative affectivity, a trait involving a tendency toward worry, often displayed higher heart rate variability. These owners’ strong bonds with their dogs could contribute to a heightened sense of safety in their pets. Surprisingly, the dogs influenced their owners as well. The owner’s heart rate variability was better explained by the dog’s variability than by other factors, like the owner’s own activity level or body mass index. This mutual influence underscores the bidirectional nature of the bond, which goes beyond what was previously understood. The research, funded by the Research Council of Finland and the Agria & Svenska Kennelklubben Research Fund, involved 30 dog-owner pairs, mainly breeds like sheepdogs and retrievers, known for their sensitivity to human cues. Study leader Miiamaaria Kujala notes that examining both the dog’s and owner’s heart rate and activity simultaneously offered a unique view into cross-species interaction, building on prior studies by providing a more complete picture of emotional synchronization between humans and their pets. This research highlights that the emotional bonds that reinforce human attachments also strengthen connections between dogs and their owners. Such insights deepen our understanding of cross-species relationships and underline the significant role emotional synchronization plays in bonding across species. The post Unexplained Emotional Bonds Between Dogs and Humans Do Really Exist appeared first on Anomalien.com.

Friday’s PBS News Hour didn’t take Donald Trump’s re-election well, continuing to blame "racism and sexism" for the abject failure of Americans to elevate first Hillary Clinton and now Kamala Harris to the highest office, picking instead the sexist male ogre Donald Trump (who, incidentally, just appointed the first female chief of staff in presidential history). Even with two guests, there was no departure from the show's monotone liberalism, no actual debate on this ostensibly objective, taxpayer-funded newscast.     Far-left reporter Errin Haines of The 19th (founded to “empower…women, women of color and the LGBTQ+ community”) first agreed with PBS host Amna Nawaz regarding the perfidies of the white women voters who repeated their 2016 error by refusing to vote in lockstep for the female candidate. NAWAZ: For the second time in eight years, a woman ran for president and lost to the same man. Despite strong support among women of color, Vice President Kamala Harris lost ground with nearly every other demographic group compared to Joe Biden in 2020. A number of factors separate Hillary Clinton's run from Harris's, and a number of factors went into Donald Trump's win. But, once again, the question is being asked: Is America ready for a woman in the White House?...There's a number of factors at play, we know, the economy, a truncated campaign, frustration with the incumbent. But what do you take away from what we saw with voters in terms of how much gender played a role, that there was a woman at the top of the Democratic ticket? HAINES: Well, you know, I wrote about how this election, how elections are not just about either of the candidates, but really about who we are as a country. And, again, what do we know about who we are as a country this year?That America is still not yet ready to elect a woman to lead our country…. Haines is a familiar liberal journalistic face on the News Hour, constantly rambling about “lived experience” and crying racism and sexism. In August 2023, she appeared to hurl the disgusting claim that Florida’s Republican Governor Ron DeSantis was “at least partly responsible” for a racist murderer who killed three blacks in Jacksonville. A Nawaz question about the 53 percent of white women who voted for Trump went Rutgers University Professor Kelly Dittmar, sho smeared her fellow white women from the opposite angle -- for her, it was less about women opposing a woman president (which Dittmar offered the useful reminder that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2016), but more about them voting for an awful man like Trump: But to really understand both white women's voting behavior and voting behavior across the board is to look at, what are the racism and sexism in our electorate that is allowing us to continually vote for somebody who's proven that he is misogynist in both his own personal behavior, but also in his policy priorities, has tapped into racial resentment within our communities, and that these things aren't disqualifying? And for white women, in particular, we have seen time and again, it's not disqualifying enough in part because they have a racial privilege that is being protected by this brand of politics. Nawaz doubled down with an incredibly leading question to Haines: "What role did you see that both racism and sexism that we know are still very real animating forces in America played in this election?" Haines responded by complaining that "white women choosing between their race and their gender" had made the wrong choice. The segment wrapped with Nawaz and Dittmar expressing their grave disappoint with the American populace for its "inability...to see women as leaders." Dittmar even stooped to the comical low of defending transgenderism (click "expand"): NAWAZ: Is it reluctance that you see or an inability, largely, among the general population to see women as leaders? DITTMAR: Yes, I think, as you know, we have made progress. I think it's a little bit of both, but it's also some backlash. You know, Susan Faludi wrote a book called Backlash that we can tap into again and look at in this election and in how Donald Trump waged his campaign, which was in fact taking that progress that you have pointed to and reminding a subset of voters that this is somehow threatening, right? And that's true along lines of race as well. Since the day Donald Trump began campaigning, he tapped into white male grievance politics, saying, for example, you know, society is becoming too soft and feminine. That's something his supporters are more likely to believe, based on Public Religion Research Institute data, or men are being punished just for being men, gender is a binary, and we shouldn't move beyond that. So, we saw that in the anti-trans rhetoric throughout the campaign for Donald Trump and other Republicans down the ballot. And so, while we see these gains, we have to remember that progress is not inevitable. It takes the effort and — and momentum from everybody, including groups like white women, to push back against those who are saying that this progress is somehow bad and threatening to their own communities. This segment was brought to you in part by BDO. A transcript is available, click “Expand.” PBS News Hour 11/08/24 7:28:13 p.m. Eastern AMNA NAWAZ: For the second time in eight years, a woman ran for president and lost to the same man. Despite strong support among women of color, Vice President Kamala Harris lost ground with nearly every other demographic group compared to Joe Biden in 2020. A number of factors separate Hillary Clinton's run from Harris's, and a number of factors went into Donald Trump's win. But, once again, the question is being asked: Is America ready for a woman in the White House? Errin Haines editor-at-large for The 19th News, and Kelly Dittmar is with the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. Welcome to you both. And, Errin, I will start with you. There's a number of factors at play, we know, the economy, a truncated campaign, frustration with the incumbent. But what do you take away from what we saw with voters in terms of how much gender played a role, that there was a woman at the top of the Democratic ticket? ERRIN HAINES: Well, you know, I wrote about how this election, how elections are not just about either of the candidates, but really about who we are as a country. And, again, what do we know about who we are as a country this year? That America is still not yet ready to elect a woman to lead our country. The issue of gender, not necessarily something that Vice President Kamala Harris was emphasizing, but it was absolutely looming over this race. And — and when you think about, you know, American voters really prioritizing the economy, immigration, maybe not seeing a woman as — as the person that embodied the characteristics of strength or power around those issues, I think that this was absolutely an election that was gendered. We definitely saw former President Trump coming back into the White House on a message of his particular brand of masculinity. I think that we cannot have a conversation about this election without having a conversation about the role — the ongoing role of gender in our politics and continuing to ask the question, what is it going to take for a woman — for this country to ever elect a woman president? NAWAZ: Kelly, pick up on that point that Errin made about Trump's campaign, which was clearly geared to appeal towards men. And he did very well with them. He won some 54 percent of the male vote. But it was one group in particular, white women, which is the single largest voting bloc at some 40 percent of the electorate, who did help propel him to victory, some 53 percent of white women voting for him. What did you see in that? What fueled that vote? CENTER FOR AMERICAN WOMEN AND POLITICS's KELLY DITTMAR: We need to kind of shift away from the question of, is America ready for a woman? I mean, the majority of women voted — or majority of voters voted for a woman in 2016. But to really understand both white women's voting behavior and voting behavior across the board is to look at, what are the racism and sexism in our electorate that is allowing us to continually vote for somebody who's proven that he is misogynist in both his own personal behavior, but also in his policy priorities, has tapped into racial resentment within our communities, and that these things aren't disqualifying? And for white women, in particular, we have seen time and again, it's not disqualifying enough in part because they have a racial privilege that is being protected by this brand of politics. And we're going to have to grapple with that, I think, continually to get to the point not only where we can elect a woman, but where we can elect candidates wo are trying to move us forward when it comes to racial and ethnic inclusion, gender progress, and — and gender equity. NAWAZ: And, Errin, I know you have reported on this and written on this extensively. This is the second time there's been a woman at the top of the ticket, but the only first time that there's been a Black woman at the top of the ticket. What role did you see that both racism and sexism that we know are still very real animating forces in America played in this election? HAINES: I think they definitely played a role. But I do want to talk about, I mean, the 92 percent of Black women that showed up to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris, how excited and energized they were about her unprecedented campaign, how hard that they worked to try to get her elected. I mean, Black women have long been regarded as the backbone of the Democratic Party. And so to see somebody who shared their lived experience at the top of the ticket felt for a lot of the Black women that I talked to, a lot of the voters, a lot of the organizers, a lot of the longtime kind of political folks that have been around in the Democratic Party, to see that, for them really represented kind of a return on their investment, I mean, their investment being their voting loyalty over so many years to the Democratic Party. And so, circling back with a lot of those same Black women, you know, where they are right now is that they are feeling abandoned by a party that they have supported so heavily and so loyally for so long, and really wondering what it is, you know, about — about Black women that other groups somehow are not necessarily able to stand with, and white women, in particular because I think that we saw, when Vice President Harris became the candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, there were some white women who were publicly kind of reckoning with 2016. White women did not in the majority support Hillary Clinton then, somebody who shared their lived experience, and wondering if they were going to make a different choice this time around and stand with Black women and other Democrats in voting for Kamala Harris, but that did not end up being the case. And you have to ask, how much of that — I mean, we know the history of white women and what they have chosen to do with suffrage since they got it, they first got it in 1920, and, frankly, at the expense of so many Black women suffragists who also stood shoulder to shoulder with them, but were then thrown under the bus when the 19th Amendment was passed more than a century ago. I think that that history absolutely looms over this election for so many Black women. You know, when it came down to white women choosing between their race and their gender, I think we see how that played out. NAWAZ: Kelly, it is worth taking a look at the last 50 years in the U.S. Yes, gender equity has made a lot of progress, right? But facts are still facts. Women are still paid some 84 cents on the dollar compared to men. Women make up less than 12 percent of C-suite roles. Women are half the U.S. population. They only make up less than a third of Congress. Is it reluctance that you see or an inability, largely, among the general population to see women as leaders? DITTMAR: Yes, I think, as you know, we have made progress. I think it's a little bit of both, but it's also some backlash. You know, Susan Faludi wrote a book called Backlash that we can tap into again and look at in this election and in how Donald Trump waged his campaign, which was in fact taking that progress that you have pointed to and reminding a subset of voters that this is somehow threatening, right? And that's true along lines of race as well. Since the day Donald Trump began campaigning, he tapped into white male grievance politics, saying, for example, you know, society is becoming too soft and feminine. That's something his supporters are more likely to believe, based on Public Religion Research Institute data, or men are being punished just for being men, gender is a binary, and we shouldn't move beyond that. So, we saw that in the anti-trans rhetoric throughout the campaign for Donald Trump and other Republicans down the ballot. And so, while we see these gains, we have to remember that progress is not inevitable. It takes the effort and — and momentum from everybody, including groups like white women, to push back against those who are saying that this progress is somehow bad and threatening to their own communities.

Donald Trump's presidential victory last week has instilled a much-needed sense of hope among border and immigration agents.Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers told Fox News Digital that morale within the agencies has completely turned around since Trump won. They also applauded the president-elect's decision to name Tom Homan as the incoming "border czar," noting that he is widely respected among agents. 'There are a lot of agents that had originally said that they would retire if President Trump did not win. ...They're going to hold back on their retirement because they want to serve under this administration again.'A Massachusetts ICE officer told the news outlet, "It's a total 180. Troops are finally feeling like the sun is coming out after a very long storm.""People are fired up to have support," the ICE officer continued. "It's amazing because we all became so numb. I don't think we realized how bad until we finally have hope again. Everyone is so happy about Homan's return."A New York ICE officer stated that morale within the law enforcement agency is "super high, especially with the Homan news, too."An Arizona Border Patrol agent told Fox News Digital that they are now "ecstatic to go to work," adding that morale within the CBP is "even higher than the first time he [Trump] won."A senior ICE official told the news outlet, "I feel that people know now they will get to do the work they signed up to do and that they want to do.""They know they can get the bad guys now. Public safety threats, national security threats, gang members, here we come," the official said.National Border Patrol Council President Paul Perez also confirmed the uptick in agents' enthusiasm, stating that "morale is through the roof.""We've received hundreds of calls, texts, emails just saying how happy the agents are," Perez stated.Just last month, several CBP agents warned about a potential staffing crisis in the event that Vice President Kamala Harris won the November presidential election, Blaze News previously reported. They told the New York Post that many officers would likely opt to retire, with one agent calling the last four years under the Biden-Harris administration's leadership "hell."One Border Patrol officer told the Post, "Lots of guys who can retire will go. If Trump wins, they'll stay."Perez explained that many of the agents who had planned to retire have decided to remain since Trump's win.He said, "There are a lot of agents that had originally said that they would retire if President Trump did not win. And now those same agents are saying they're going to hold back on their retirement because they want to serve under this administration again, because they know exactly how it was during this first administration, and they know this one's going to be even better."A Texas border agent repeated similar remarks to Fox News Digital, stating, "People who were going to retire are not and everyone is happy."However, a California Border Patrol officer told the news outlet that agents are "hopeful but the give-ups are still trickling in.""Nothing will change until Tom Homan takes the leash off us," the officer remarked.Trump has vowed to "strengthen ICE" by "increas[ing] penalties for illegal entry and overstaying Visas, and reinstat[ing] 'Remain in Mexico' and other Policies that helped reduce Illegal Immigration by historic lows in President Trump's first term."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Stand-up comedian Tony Hinchcliffe refused to apologize for jokes he made about Puerto Rico and many others in his routine at a Donald Trump rally.Hinchcliffe, who made countless headlines after joking about Puerto Rico being an "island of garbage" at Trump's Madison Square Garden rally late last month, addressed the media outrage in a video posted on Monday.An episode of Hinchcliffe's incredibly popular podcast "Kill Tony" was filmed the night after his controversial pre-election appearance. The comedian prefaced it with comments about the backlash.Hinchcliffe explained that the premise for his rally joke had a basis in reality."I don't know if you guys know this. In my speech on free speech, I referenced Puerto Rico, which currently has a landfill problem in which all of their landfills are filled to the brim. I guess I'm the only person that knew about this, unfortunately."Hinchcliffe is right. Well before he made the remarks, environmental websites were bringing up the issue of the island's landfill space, saying the country would soon be at capacity for garbage.The latest piece came from the St. Kitts and Nevis Observer, which said that the comedian's jokes aside, the island's infrastructure is under considerable strain, as many of its landfills are over capacity.'That's what I do. I go hard, and that's never going to change.'Hinchcliffe made it clear that his joke was indeed just a joke and added that he loves Puerto Ricans and believes them to be "very smart people.""They're street-smart, and they're smart enough to know when they're being used as political fodder, and right now that is happening," Hinchcliffe said at the time.Taking a page out of UFC legend Conor McGregor's book, Hinchcliffe added that he wanted to apologize to "nobody.""I apologize to absolutely nobody. Not to the Puerto Ricans, not to the whites, not to the blacks, not to the Palestinians, not to the Jews, and not to my own mother, who I made fun of during the set," the comedian said. Your browser does not support the video tag. Footage by Alex Wong/Getty Images Hinchcliffe said he noticed there were no headlines regarding his jokes about his own mother but later admitted that maybe the presidential venue wasn't the best place to deliver his material.However, the 40-year-old said he doesn't plan on easing up with his jokes."That's what I do. I go hard, and that's never going to change."After the fallout from the rally, several prominent personalities defended Trump and the jokes. Armin Mizani, the mayor of Keller, Texas, who is Puerto Rican, referred to the ordeal as simply a "bad joke by a comedian" that shouldn't overshadow what Trump could do for Americans.Puerto Rican NFL player Jon Feliciano said, "The only Puerto Ricans that are mad about Tony Hinchcliffe's joke, are mad because it helps push their agenda." — (@) Even left-wing Comedy Central host Jon Stewart defended Hinchcliffe, showing that comedy can be bipartisan."Obviously, in retrospect, having a roast comedian come to a political rally a week before Election Day and roasting a key demographic ... probably not the best decision by the campaign politically, but to be fair, the guy's just really doing what he does," Stewart explained."I find that guy very funny. I'm sorry, I don't know what to tell you," he told his audience.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Harris booster Lenard McKelvey — the radio personality who calls himself "Charlamagne tha God" — revealed on the Monday episode of "The Breakfast Club" radio show that the left need indulge transvestites' delusions only if they are political allies. In the show's "Donkey of the Day" segment, McKelvey focused his ire on male former Olympian Caitlyn Jenner over his decision to vote for President-elect Donald Trump. "Now, if there's one thing this election taught me, is people really do vote their interest, and their interest is not attached to their identity," said McKelvey. The woke co-host alluded to Trump's popularity among a voter bloc Democrats have long taken for granted: Hispanics. According to CNN exit polls, 46% of all Hispanics and 55% of Hispanic men voted for Trump. Conflating Hispanic-Americans with illegal aliens, McKelvey insinuated that Latino voters who voted for Trump did so at the risk of deportation. "Okay, most Latino men say they chose Trump because of economy and jobs. Never mind the fact, okay, that Grandma may get sent back to her place of origin," said McKelvey. After lumping law-abiding Hispanic-Americans in with foreign nationals who have flouted U.S. immigration laws, McKelvey suggested that Jenner similarly voted against his supposed identity. 'I can't stop seeing Caitlyn as a rich, white male.' "That is also how I feel about Caitlyn, because Caitlyn is trans, but she is a huge Donald Trump supporter," said the co-host. "She said not only does she support Trump, she wants to work in his administration. Okay?" continued McKelvey. "Caitlyn posted a picture of herself, Trump, his granddaughter Kai, and Elon Musk with the caption, 'Hope is back in America. These two men will single-handedly save western civilization and that starts with a strong United States of America. I am here and at your service and forever indebted to your sacrifice for this country. Let's Make America Great Again!'" McKelvey joked that Jenner "wants his next gender reassignment surgery sponsored by SpaceX" and "wants his testicles replaced for Teslas." After transitioning from using female pronouns to male pronouns in reference to Jenner, McKelvey insinuated that the incoming Trump administration will be hostile to transvestites like the former athlete. Trump vowed in February 2023 to "stop the chemical, physical, and emotional mutilation of our youth because no serious country should be telling its children that they were born with the wrong gender." To this end, Trump indicated that he will: undo the Biden-Harris administration's "cruel policies on so-called 'gender-affirming care'"; bar federal agencies from promoting the concept of gender transition; impress upon Congress the need to defund efforts to promote or subsidize sex changes; ask lawmakers to pass legislation establishing that the only genders recognized by the U.S. government are male and female; help pass a law saving children from sex-change mutilation in all 50 states; and have his Department of Justice investigate the pharmaceutical industry and various hospitals to determine whether they "deliberately covered up horrific long-term side effects of sex transitions in order to get rich." The Republican president's agenda does not appear to contain anything that might interfere with Jenner's lifestyle or rights as an American. Nevertheless, McKelvey suggested, "Caitlyn Jenner, as a transgender you just look like a devil-damned fool glazing Trump and Elon the way you are after hearing stuff like that." The woke co-host suggested his was not wholly an identitarian mindset, but suggested it still did not make sense to him for a transvestite to "support someone that is absolutely trying to erase your existence." McKelvey, his rant far from finished, revealed that by failing to vote for Kamala Harris, Jenner magically became a white man again. "At the end of the day, Caitlyn, you can change the top layer, but you was who you was before you got here, and what you are is a rich, white male," said the woke co-host. "And that's why I keep saying 'him' when I shouldn't be, but I can't stop seeing Caitlyn as a rich, white male, and that identity, pun intended, trumps all." 'Democrats and so-called "allies" are just hypocritical scum.' After McKelvey committed the supposed cardinal offense of what leftists call "misgendering," "The Breakfast Club" played an advertisement for QuickBooks, accounting software owned by the DEI-captive company Intuit, which is apparently big on LGBT activism. Other leftists such as Kyle Kulinski have signaled agreement with McKelvey's suggestion that leftist speech codes apply only when discussing cross-dressers who vote Democrat. Meanwhile, Jenner shared a message from YouTuber David Freiheit, known under his online pseudonym "Viva Frei, who wrote, "You know what's funny: @Caitlyn_Jenner wouldn't mind being 'misgendered' because Caitlyn is not a virtue-signalling snowflake. And even Caitlyn doesn't believe that boys should be allowed to compete in girls sports because Caitlyn is not a delusional idiot."But thank you for confirming that Democrats and so-called 'allies' are just hypocritical scum who only defend minorities when they can exploit them for political profit @KyleKulinski," added Freiheit. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

When it comes to zombie slaying excellence, there are few in the business with a track record as impressive as Techland. The masterminds behind the original Dead Island and two super enjoyable, parkour-infused Dying Light games, the Polish studio is currently cooking up a third game in the series. Originally intended to be DLC for Dying Light 2, Techland has massively expanded its scope to create a whole new experience called Dying Light The Beast, and it’s already broken a series record. Continue reading Parkour zombie slayer Dying Light The Beast hits 1 million wishlists MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best zombie games, Best open-world games, Best co-op games

WHO She Really Is --> What Kamala Harris Did to Buy Wisconsin Union Workers' Votes Was BEYOND Insulting