Catching Pals in Palworld is cool and all‚ but finding and hatching your own Eggs is even cooler. In this guide‚ you’ll learn the first step of hatching Pals in Palworld: finding Eggs. All ways to get Eggs in Palworld There are two ways to get Eggs in Palworld: find them and create them. Eggs can be found all over the open world and you can create a Breeding Farm to create your very own Eggs. Related: How to eat and feed Pals in Palworld Best places to find Eggs in Palworld To get into the Egg business early‚ you need to find Eggs in the open world. The best places to find Eggs are under trees‚ between rocks‚ on high cliffsides‚ and on the coast. The first Egg I found in Palworld was on a beach near the Windswept Hills Flying Fish Coast spawn. You can find Eggs just about anywhere in Palworld if you look hard enough. Keep an eye out for Egg-shaped colored objects in nests. How to use Breeding Farm to get Eggs in Palworl...

Once upon a time‚ constitutional interpretation actually involved interpreting the text of the Constitution. It’s not a blank slate. Its words have actual meanings. While the federal 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recognizes that the Constitution contains words‚ the judges on that court seem to think they can ascribe any meaning—no matter how outlandish—to those words. One of their latest provocations can be found in a series of three cases: Martin v. City of Boise‚ Johnson v. City of Grants Pass‚ and Coalition on Homelessness v. San Francisco. Martin‚ the lead case‚ held that the government may not punish a homeless individual for sleeping on public property if there is no bed in a secular facility for him or her to use free of charge. (The decisions actually go much further‚ but let’s take it slowly.) Now‚ that ruling might surprise most people‚ because the government holds public property for the benefit of the public and has the same right to decide who can sleep (or camp‚ or micturate‚ or do No. 2) on public property that private parties have to protect their own property. Plus‚ there is neither a Homeless Protection Clause in the Constitution‚ nor a Right-to-Sleep-on-Public-Property Clause. To be fair‚ the 9th Circuit did point to a passage in the Constitution—the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause—that the court thought justified its ruling. This provision prohibits the infliction of “cruel and unusual punishments.” (Yes‚ we had the same puzzled look that you now have‚ but read on.) It says nothing about whether the government can criminalize certain conduct. But the 9th Circuit mistakenly thought that the Supreme Court’s decisions in Robinson v. California and Powell v. Texas held that an act must be voluntary for a state to make it a crime and sleeping is involuntary. Accordingly‚ the laws at issue must fall. But legal interpretation is not like Creative Writing 101 or a class on cubism. There is a limit as to how far the Supreme Court’s words can be stretched before the reader distorts their meaning. Robinson held that the state cannot make it a crime to be addicted to drugs (as opposed to possessing or distributing drugs)‚ while Powell held that a state may define public drunkenness as a crime. The latter decision‚ written by Justice Thurgood Marshall (who was hardly an “extreme MAGA” Republican)‚ is particularly relevant because it expressly distinguished being drunk in public from being drunk at home‚ with the former being a fit subject for a criminal sanction. That decision should have made short work of the case‚ but it wouldn’t have given the 9th Circuit the result it wanted. So‚ a little improv was necessary. In the second case‚ Grants Pass‚ the 9th Circuit went even further and held that the city could not enforce criminal or civil penalties in an attempt to enforce the city’s anti-camping laws. And‚ most recently‚ in Coalition on Homelessness‚ Judge Patrick Bumatay‚ dissenting from the decision‚ said the 9th Circuit “let stand an injunction permitting homeless persons to sleep anywhere‚ anytime in public in the City of San Francisco unless adequate shelter is provided.” He went on to say that this “represents yet another expansion” of the 9th Circuit’s “cruel and unusual Eighth Amendment jurisprudence.”  He explained that in reality‚ though‚ the decision itself is “cruel because it leaves the citizens of San Francisco powerless to enforce their own health and safety laws without the permission of a federal judge.” And he said that the decision is “unusual because no other court in the country has interpreted the Constitution in this way.” After all‚ the state’s decision to prohibit sleeping on public property is not an irrational or mean-spirited attack on the homeless. The homeless encampments that have taken over the streets in places like San Francisco‚ Los Angeles and Seattle rob the public of the opportunity to use those areas safely. Plus‚ as Sam Quinones‚ a journalist who has chronicled America’s ongoing drug crisis‚ put it‚ “[t]hough other drugs and alcohol are part of the mix‚ many encampments are simply meth colonies.” Homeless encampments are rife with open drug sales and use‚ along with prostitution and the fact or threat of violence—including violence against the homeless in those camps—and they are governed by the law of the jungle‚ as the strong prey on the weak. Fortunately‚ the U.S. Supreme Court last week agreed to hear the Grants Pass case and has a chance to undo the damage done by the 9th Circuit’s bizarre use of the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause to prohibit cities from protecting their own residents and properties. Whatever you can say about the policy choice reflected by the 9th Circuit’s rulings‚ those decisions make almost no pretense of finding a home in the Constitution. They are result-oriented jurisprudence at its worst‚ proof that an intellectually dishonest judge can reach any result he or she wants just by writing grammatically correct sentences and sprinkling in a few citations to‚ or quotations from‚ Supreme Court decisions. The Supreme Court should reverse the 9th Circuit’s judgment in the Grants Pass case‚ allow public officials to address the problems of homelessness and public safety‚ and order that the judges responsible for that atrocity be publicly (at least metaphorically) spanked—a fitting punishment that no doubt most honest observers would find neither cruel nor unusual. Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post The 9th Circuit Is Wrong: There’s No Homelessness Protection Clause in Constitution appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis hired her alleged lover’s law partner to work for her office at a rate of $150 an hour‚ according to documents obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation—an arrangement that is raising eyebrows among legal experts who question her spending of public funds. Christopher Campbell‚ a partner at Wade &; Campbell Firm‚ has received $126‚070 from the Office of the District Attorney since 2021‚ according to county records. Willis hired Campbell to provide services as a “Taint Attorney‚” reviewing privileged evidence beginning in Jan. 2021 at a rate of $150 an hour‚ contracts obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation show. “Taint attorneys” help sift through files obtained from a search warrant to filter out evidence covered by things like attorney-client privilege and prevent them from being passed to prosecutors. Willis appointed Campbell’s partner‚ Nathan Wade‚ in November 2021 to serve as special prosecutor in the case against former President Donald Trump despite him allegedly being her boyfriend. Fulton County DA Fani Willis falsely stated Sunday that she paid all special prosecutors working on the case against former President Donald Trump the same hourly rate as her alleged romantic partner‚ Nathan Wade‚ documents obtained by the @DailyCaller News Foundation show.?— Katelynn Richardson (@katesrichardson) January 16‚ 2024 A co-defendant of Trump accused Willis in a motion last week of awarding Wade‚ her alleged lover‚ a “lucrative” contract‚ claiming she benefited from it because he took her on trips and cruises using the money he earned from the position. The motion further alleged Willis never secured approval from the Fulton County Board of Commissioners to appoint Wade and paid him using funds she requested to clear a backlog of cases from the COVID-19 pandemic. The circumstances surrounding the contracts raise concerns about Willis’ allocation of funds‚ legal experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation. John Malcolm‚ vice president for The Heritage Foundation’s Institute for Constitutional Government and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s Criminal Division‚ told the Daily Caller News Foundation that payments to Campbell could pose additional problems for Willis if his work as a taint attorney was for the Trump case. (The Daily Signal is the news outlet of The Heritage Foundation.) “It’s not just the issue about Wade being her paramour and the issue of kickbacks‚ but she also got the funds by misleading the Fulton County commissioners about what the funds were going to be used for‚” he said. “In addition to that‚ it would enrich [Wade’s] firm.” Willis hired three outside attorneys to work on the Trump case—Wade‚ John Floyd‚ and Anna Cross. Willis claimed that she paid all three special counsels on the Trump case the same hourly rate‚ though billing statements obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation revealed she was paying Floyd a lower hourly rate than Wade‚ her alleged lover. Campbell’s contract‚ which spans from Jan. 25‚ 2021‚ to Jan. 25‚ 2022‚ places him at the same hourly pay rate Willis initially awarded Floyd‚ who’s known as Georgia’s top racketeering expert‚ in his contract beginning in April 2021. Other billing statements and contracts show Floyd was later paid $200 an hour. Willis also contracted with Cross‚ a prosecutor with 20 years of experience who has represented Georgia in multiple high-profile homicide cases‚ to work at a rate of $250 an hour‚ according to contracts obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. Wade’s contracts starting on Nov. 1‚ 2021‚ and billing statements reveal he received $250 an hour for his work as special prosecutor‚ $100 more than his partner‚ Campbell. Wade has received nearly $654‚000 from the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office since the start of 2022‚ according to county records. Wade and Campbell’s former law partner‚ Terrence Bradley‚ has also been paid $74‚480 by the District Attorney’s Office since 2021‚ according to county records. Under a separate contract spanning from March 1‚ 2021‚ to April 30‚ 2021‚ Campbell was also hired to provide services as a “First Appearance Attorney” at a rate of $65 an hour‚ according to the document. The job is to represent the District Attorney’s Office at a defendant’s “first appearance” hearing‚ which is held before a judge within 72 hours of arrest to consider the issue of bond and notify the defendant of charges. “This is a mystery in and of itself‚” Atlanta-based criminal defense attorney and legal analyst Philip Holloway told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “I have no clue why any DA’s office needs to pay a private lawyer to handle ‘first appearance’ calendars. Any assistant DA could easily do that. They are already on the payroll and it is the most simple of all tasks.” Holloway said it seems to be a “conflict of interest” for Campbell to work as a taint attorney—what is supposed to be a neutral third-party seeking to determine whether privileged material should be withheld from the prosecutor—while simultaneously working as a “de facto” prosecutor representing the District Attorney’s Office in handling the regular court calendar. “I think there’s a lot of questions that have to be answered‚” Holloway said. While it is unclear what cases Campbell was working on from the contracts alone‚ Malcolm said there would likely be a need for a taint attorney on the Trump case. “Certainly there are going to be a lot of privilege issues with respect to the Trump case—attorney-client privilege matters and executive privilege matters—so there would be a need for a taint attorney‚” Malcolm told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Malcolm noted that it “might be a bit of a problem that he is at the same firm” as Wade‚ adding you would normally “expect a totally outside lawyer” to review for these kinds of issues. Campbell’s contract to work as a taint attorney says‚ “Services to be rendered are of a special and temporary nature which has been determined to be in the best interest of the public to be performed under contract by professional personnel.” Another contract spanning from Feb. 1‚ 2022‚ to Oct. 31‚ 2022‚ reflecting similar duties to “receive and review law enforcement records and review in a confidential manner” is also set at a $150 hourly rate. “I am not sure how often Fulton county hires out on that sort of thing but those rates strike me as reasonable‚” Atlanta-based criminal defense attorney Andrew Fleischman told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “I don’t know whether they’re connected to [W]ade or to efforts to address the COVID backlog.” Wade &; Campbell‚ the firm the two operate‚ handles cases relating to personal injury‚ family law‚ contract law‚ and criminal defense‚ according to its website. Wade’s experience prior to joining Willis’ Trump probe was primarily in private practice‚ dealing with contract disputes and family law‚ along with serving as a municipal judge dealing with traffic tickets‚ according to The Washington Post. Neither the District Attorney’s Office nor Campbell responded to requests for comment. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post Fani Willis Handed Lucrative Contracts to Her Alleged Lover’s Law Partner. It’s Starting to Raise Eyebrows. appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Concerns About North Korea Are Gaining Attention

Second Thoughts on Nikki Haley and Her Way Forward?

The Do-or-Die Moment for America

Ford Hits the Gas on Assembly Line Shifts

A European politician with an anti-free speech track record has new‚ scarier propaganda to justify crushing speech. European Commission Vice-President for Values and Transparency Vera Jourová previously touted European Union (EU) censorship legislation at Davos 2023‚ and this year she doubled down on her anti-free speech stance. “Disinformation is a security threat‚” Jourová announced during a panel at the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos 2024 conference. Jourová continued by trying to associate the so-called “threat” of disinformation — which has typically indicated any speech that offends leftists — with Russian propaganda. “Maybe not many noticed‚ but it was part of the Russian military doctrine‚ that they will start information war. And we are in it now‚ and disinformation is a very powerful tool‚” she claimed.  She then explained how EU officials “think about” this. “We are focusing on — ah — improving of the system where people will get the effects right‚” Jourová rambled. “We don’t speak about opinions‚ we are not correcting anyone’s opinions or language‚” she falsely asserted. “This is about the facts.”  This falls right in line with the left’s behavior indicating that they somehow have a monopoly on “facts.”  Activists both in Europe and America often define opinions they don’t agree with as lies that must be suppressed‚ such as viewpoints that question the left-wing orthodoxical positions on climate change. Among the censorship legislation pushed by Jourová in the past is the EU Digital Services Act (DSA)‚ which classified so-called “extremist” content and “hate speech” as illegal content. The Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) warned in 2022 that the DSA was a threat to freedom of expression. As far back as 2018‚ Reuters reported that Big Tech companies were censoring more speech after EU pressure to do so‚ with Jourová specifically mentioned as actively exerting the pressure. Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency and an equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored‚ contact us at the Media Research Center contact form‚ and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

North and South Yemen no longer exist. During the Cold War‚ North Yemen had ties to the West‚ and South Yemen had Marxist leadership‚ branding itself as totalitarian regimes often do‚ the “People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen.” With the collapse of the Soviet Union and communist subsidy‚ North Yemen finally sought a merger with South Yemen in what is now known simply as Yemen. Yemen is the second-largest country on the Arabian peninsula and also the poorest of the Arab nations. Its unification and ties to its Arab neighbors presented a threat to Iran because North Yemen‚ not having been a Marxist-run state‚ was more stable‚ more prosperous‚ and had close ties to the United States and Saudi Arabia. Among the many tribes and peoples in Yemen are the Houthi. Unlike most of the population‚ which is Sunni‚ the Houthi are Shiite Muslims‚ like Iran. Iran embraced the Houthi and has turned them into a terrorist regime at war both with Yemen’s government and its neighbors. Provoked to believe the United States is the “Great Satan” and Saudi Arabia is our helper‚ the Houthi have waged war with arms and funds supplied by Iran. The Houthis are not just terrorists. They are also slavers in the real‚ literal sense. The Houthis practiced slavery and traded slaves. They keep captives to tend to Houthi tribal leaders and their families. The captives‚ as the word implies‚ are held against their will and treated horribly. During the Trump administration‚ the State Department designated the Houthi a foreign terrorist organization. Progressives and global humanitarians opposed the designation because Yemen‚ at the time‚ was suffering a famine‚ and the designation complicated assisting people in Yemen. The Houthi’s assets were frozen with the designation‚ and criminal charges could be pressed against any individual or organization that assisted them. One of the very first actions the Biden administration took in January of 2021 upon taking office was ending the terrorist designation for the Houthi. It was‚ like electing Biden himself‚ a regrettable mistake. The Biden administration sought to reorder our Middle Eastern relations. The Saudis were now the bad guys. The Iranians were now our peace roundtable partners. In hindsight‚ the Biden administration had been infiltrated by individuals sympathetic to and possibly under the direction of the Iranian regime. The Biden administration‚ knowing Iran uses its money to fund terrorism globally‚ freed up frozen bank assets for Iran‚ allowed Iran to sell oil‚ and turned a blind eye to Iran’s various revenue streams. All that money did not go to Iran’s people but to Hamas‚ Hezbollah‚ and the Houthi. On Oct. 7‚ 2023‚ Hamas invaded Israel and killed thousands. The Houthi began firing Iranian-supplied missiles at Iran and shut down shipping through the Red Sea. Without access to the Red Sea and Suez Canal‚ container ships must add 15 to 20 extra days sailing all the way around the African continent. In response‚ the Biden administration launched countermeasures against the Houthi in the form of press statements and hashtags. The Houthis were undeterred and stepped up their attacks on cargo ships and American warships. The Americans‚ Brits‚ Australians‚ and several Arab countries finally bombed Houthi positions after telling the Houthi that the attacks were coming‚ giving them time to move their munitions and people. After the allied strikes against the Houthi‚ the Houthi stepped up their attacks in the Red Sea‚ and Iran started firing missiles at American positions in Iraq. The Biden administration has signaled weakness time and time again‚ provoking further bullying by Iran and its terror allies. Now‚ the Biden administration claims it will redesignate the Houthi as terrorists but will not reinstate the more serious Foreign Terrorist Organization designation. These half-measures and scowls do nothing to restore global shipping channels or eliminate a terrorist organization at war with our allies. Joe Biden and his diplomatic agents signal American weakness to our allies and enemies. Iran is metaphorically giving National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan a swirly while the dementia patient prone to wander off the campaign stage is causing American leadership to wander off the world stage at the time it is most needed. To find out more about Erick Erickson and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists‚ visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

Joe Scarborough's tactic is pathetically transparent. The biggest knock on Joe Biden is that he is too old to be president. A recent Associated Press poll found that 77% of Americans believe that—including an astounding 69% of Democrats! So for some time now‚ Scarborough has been on the counter-attack‚ trying to paint Donald Trump as also enfeebled. Scarborough's crusade continued on today's Morning Joe‚ with Scarborough repeatedly describing Trump as "shuffling around‚" "losing it‚" "looking lost‚" "in decline‚" having lost "5‚6‚7 steps‚" "not well." etc. And as you'll see in the screencap‚ the segment's running theme was about Trump‚ "Dazed and Confused." Jonathan Lemire chipped in‚ saying that he had covered Trump for the New York Daily News 15 or 20 years ago‚ and "it's very clear he's not the guy he was then."       Look. Trump is 77. It wouldn't be surprising if he were not the same guy he was years ago. But Scarborough is playing a dangerous game. By raising the issue of Trump's mental acuity‚ Scarborough inevitably makes people think about Biden and his blatant decrepitude.  Does Scarborough really want to make this a race about who is more physically vital and mentally sharp? That is a game Biden is sure to lose. Here's the transcript. MSNBC Morning Joe 1/19/24 6:00 am ET JOE SCARBOROUGH: We'll get to the Hitler stuff in a second. But let's start‚ though -- MIKA BRZEZINSKI: I'll make a chart. SCARBOROUGH: -- with the fact that Donald Trump is not well. We know this. But this guy‚ he's looking so old. He's shuffling around. And he really does think that Barack Obama is still President of the United States. . . .  What do they say if someone says‚ well‚ then Joe Biden could order Seal Team Six this morning to assassinate Donald Trump? And he would be immune‚ by Donald Trump's arguments. It is pure‚ sheer‚ authoritariasm and tyranny. So we have that part of it. It is Trump at his most dangerous. But also‚ Trump at his most detached from reality. He's really losing it. You‚ you‚ we've been getting glimpses now of him shuffling around‚ and‚ and‚ and looking lost. And getting up on stage‚ talking about World War II‚ talking about President Obama. Gene‚ this is‚ this is again‚ this is Donald Trump detached from reality. Again‚ thinking‚ you know‚ that World War II is upon us and he's running against Barack Hussein Obama.      That's one part of it. And we've seen images of him over the past couple of weeks. He's not‚ he's just not doing well‚ it doesn't seem‚ physically. Trump has lost so many steps. You know‚ we always talk about long we've known him. Reverend Al‚ how long we've known him. We've known him a long time. MIKA: Yes we have. SCARBOROUGH: That guy‚ that I'm watching now. I‚ that guy hasn't lost one step. That guy's lost five‚ six‚ seven steps. And he still thinks he's running against Barack Obama.      And‚ and so‚ I mean‚ he's shuffling around. I guess I‚ really‚ I seriously‚ I‚ I‚ I think it's going to be harder and harder for the campaign to manage this guy who‚ it's just my opinion‚ looks like he's in a serious state of decline‚ and seriously‚ is so confused. . . .  JONATHAN LEMIRE: Yeah‚ I mean I was a Metro reporter at the New York Daily News‚ covered Trump from time to time 15‚ 20 years ago. And it's very clear he's not‚ he's not the guy he was then.