How is this remotely acceptable? NBC just informed us that the State of Nevada plans on taking at least one week to count all the votes. Take a look here: NBC says Nevada will take at least a week to count all of their votes. Nevada has a population of just over 3 million. India’s population is almost 1.5 billion and in their elections they count their votes in ONE DAY. America’s elections are a joke.pic.twitter.com/2f1jvXchro — Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) November 4, 2024 A state of just 3 million people could hold up the election for all of us? Or….could SWING the election? Does anyone really trust that this is just for “counting” votes? How is it that for decades we were able to count votes in just one day with no problem, but now the more technology we add the worse things get? Now we need weeks to count with all our powerful computers? Does that make ANY sense to anyone? Perhaps the computers need to go? BREAKING ALERT NBC NEWS “Nevada will take a week to count all their votes — this is going to be lawyers upon lawyers litigating which ballots can get fixed, or cured.” pic.twitter.com/SxiMCid9Aa — SANTINO (@MichaelSCollura) November 4, 2024 Here are more details, from local KTNV: It’s a common complaint: We want Election Day, not election week, election month or even election season. It’s made by people who long for the days when we knew election results on the evening of the election, not a week or more later. But it turns out, delayed results are more normal than you might think. With the prevalence of mail-in voting, they’re probably here to stay. Still, long before mail-in voting — and in the days of paper ballots — election results weren’t immediately known in the presidential election years of 1960 (when John F. Kennedy defeated Richard Nixon), 1968 (when Nixon defeated Hubert Humphrey), 1976 (when Jimmy Carter defeated Gerald Ford), 2000 (when the botched Florida vote delayed George W. Bush’s defeat of Al Gore), 2004 (when Bush turned away John Kerry) and 2016 (when Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton). The fact-checking organization, PolitiFact, looked into the issue in a recent article and found delays are more common than most people think. The investigation found delays were not the result of fraud or election cheating, but a combination of factors including when state law allows ballots to be counted and deadlines for mail-in ballots. In Nevada, for example, county elections officials can start counting mail ballots 15 days before a general election, which this year fell on Oct. 21. But the law also says that mail ballots postmarked on Election Day can be received by the county up to four days later and still counted. (The Nevada Supreme Court recently upheld a law that says mail ballots received without any postmark — or an illegible postmark — can be counted if they’re received within three days of Election Day.) I think that we’re just moving into a different direction where the popularity and love of mail-in ballots has some trade offs. And so with the growing popularity of that method of voting, election officials need more time. But the allegations of stolen elections or cheating persist on social media, fueled in part by elected officials such as former President Donald Trump, who has maintained without evidence that the 2020 election was fraudulent. Now, however, even Trump has changed his tune, encouraging voters to cast ballots in any way they can, either in early voting, by mail or on Election Day. The numbers show that Republicans in Nevada are listening. Nearly 45,000 more Republicans than Democrats had voted as of Friday morning in Nevada, which is unusual. While Democrats still maintain the lead in mail voting, more than 142,000 Republicans have voted by mail. And the GOP is swamping Democrats when it comes to in-person early voting, with a 92,000-vote lead.

Ok this is pretty crazy and I’m not even sure what I’m watching and hearing here…. There is some debate, kind of like the White/Gold dress vs. the Black/Blue dress, remember that? Watch this clip and then we’ll break it down together: HOLY SHLIT What’s going on at Kamala’s rally!? pic.twitter.com/OyxLD2f8wo — American AF (@iAnonPatriot) November 4, 2024 Ok, first off….who made that sign behind her? It looks like something my First Grader would put together in school. Actually, I take that back, my First Grader would do a better job. This is so embarrassing….time to let the adults take back over, Joe and Kamala gotta GO! America is laughing at us. But beyond the sign, now let’s talk about how cringe this was for so many different reasons…. What do you hear in the beginning when the crowd is chanting? Some people say the crowd is chanting “Don-ald Trump!  Don-ald Trump!” Other people hear:  “Kam-a-la!  Kam-a-la!” What do you hear? And then we have the best part of all…. Kamala tries to start a chant and it doesn’t take off. Have you ever seen a failed chant? You have now: This is going to give you 2nd-hand embarrassment. Kamala tried to start a chant and failed miserably. pic.twitter.com/tsJ2IO86Rb — George (@BehizyTweets) November 4, 2024 Even her own crowd of people wanted nothing to do with her obnoxious chant and cackling! Hilarious! Back to the crowd and the debate over what they were chanting….it reminds me of this: It’s The New White-Gold Dress: What Do You Hear? It's The New White-Gold Dress: What Do You Hear? Ready for a fun one? Remember two years ago when everyone on the Internet was talking about the white or blue dress? This picture divided the internet: Was it black and blue...or...white and gold? I'm guessing you see one of those options right know and can't imagine how anyone could see the opposite choice. And yet they did. Split 50/50, people swore they saw what they saw and it didn't seem possible someone else (the other 50% of the world) could see exactly opposite colors. As I type this right now, I see white and gold. Curious what you see? The reason I bring it up is because we have the new version. Check this out: Which one do you hear? This is pretty cool, as you focus on each one, you brain will change what it hears. I think "That is Embarrassing" is the original, but I can hear every single one! How about you? It's the new white/gold or black/blue dress.... pic.twitter.com/AcM3pYqP6c — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) May 22, 2024 Backup video here: Which one do you hear? pic.twitter.com/iAs4WMFDQ0 — Interesting Things (@interesting_aIl) May 20, 2024 Crazy right? Did it work for you? I could hear every single one depending on which I focused on. I think "That is Embarrassing" is the original, but I can hear every single one! Want one more? There's also this one, which is equally freaky! This is a 6 second video that I've probably watched 30 times (and NO pervs, not for the "Hooters Girl"). I've watched it 30 times because I keep switching which word I am reading and without fail I hear a different word each time I switch! Try it for yourself: Ok this is wild.... I literally hear different words depending on which I'm reading....without fail. How about you?#TheNewDress pic.twitter.com/W8R3PSa2YM — ProCoinNews (@ProCoinNews) April 1, 2022 Backup here: https://wltreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/FILE-2022-03-31-182939.mp4 I'd love to know if it worked for you! Leave me a comment below. And if any brainiac out there knows how this is possible, leave a comment about that too

 h/t Liz

This isn’t a partisan issue. It’s a parents' issue. The post Why We Should Build Trump’s Border Wall ASAP appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

Did his attempt to curry favor with Iran work? The post Obama Administration Shut Down Investigation of Hezbollah as Criminal Enterprise appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

John Shindler* discussed the Iranian ties of Robert Malley, Phil Gordon, Mahar Bitar, and  Ariane Tabatabai on his substack. Shindler wonders why people cozy with America’s enemies have top secret clearances. The real mystery here is why the Biden White House, like the Obama administration before it, is crawling with Iranian agents and their apologists. […] The post There Seems to Be a Lot of Iranian Moles in the White House appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

A judge on Monday denied leftist Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner’s request to block billionaire Elon Musk’s America PAC from giving away $1 million to registered swing state voters. Beginning on October 19, Musk’s pro-Trump political action committee began handing out a $1 million check every day to voters in swing states who signed a petition in support of the First and Second Amendments. The final two winners are expected to be announced on Monday night in Arizona and on Tuesday in Michigan, the Associated Press reported. The giveaways were challenged by Democrats, and Krasner called it a “scam,” arguing that it was “designed to actually influence a national election.” The Philadelphia DA also said that the America PAC giveaways are an illegal lottery that violate state law. Musk’s lawyer Chris Gober pushed back on that claim in court, arguing that “the $1 million recipients are not chosen by chance.” “We know exactly who will be announced as the $1 million recipient today and tomorrow,” Gober added, claiming that the recipients “are selected based on their suitability to serve as spokesperson for America PAC.” The director of America PAC, Chris Young, testified that the winners of the $1 million giveaways are vetted before the announcement so the PAC can “feel out their personality, (and) make sure they were someone whose values aligned.” Common Pleas Court Judge Angelo Foglietta rejected Krasner’s argument that the giveaways were an illegal lottery, according to CNN. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ Musk announced the $1 million giveaways at a town hall event in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, last month, telling the crowd, “So, I have a surprise for you, which is that we’re going to be awarding a million dollars randomly to people who have signed the petition every day from now until the election.” While testifying, Young said that “randomly” is not “the word I would have selected” to describe the giveaways, the AP reported. Musk’s lawyers argued that the petition is “core political speech” as it’s signed in support of the Constitution. They also said that Krasner’s attempt to block the giveaways was moot since there would be no more winners from Pennsylvania.

A career national security bureaucrat unleashed a wave of invective after overhearing a black woman in a Washington, D.C.-area coffee shop saying she planned to vote for former President Donald Trump. Annetta Catchings, a former Republican candidate for mayor in Alexandria, Virginia, posted video of Patti Morrissey interrupting her private conversation after overhearing Catchings make a pro-Trump remark. Morrissey then went on a diatribe about how Trump is a felon and said “educated” people should not support him, citing her authority as a “35-year national security expert.” According to a now-deleted LinkedIn profile, Morrissey worked in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the State Department, and the Pentagon through 2019. After online sleuths identified her, Morrissey blamed criticism coming her way on Russia, writing on Facebook that “there is a lot of threatening (most likely Russian) trolling going on right now…make a record of it” before apparently deleting the post. Catchings wrote on X that Morrissey, seated at a nearby table in an Old Town Alexandria coffee shop, shouted at her after overhearing her say “As a conservative woman I could never vote for Kamala Harris because…” The video shows Morrissey lecturing: “I’m shocked…. Educated women.” “Educated? What does educated have to do with it?” someone with Catchings asked. “It means you understand that someone who is a convicted felon who is a sex offender and accused of espionage, indicted for espionage,” Morrissey said. “The only people who ever challenge me are white Democrat women,” Catchings replied. Morrissey then grew angry, shouting “I am a thirty-five year national security expert! National security expert!” “Oh, you’re so smart,” someone with Catchings said. An apparent coffee shop worker then intervened, saying “Everyone can believe what they want to believe.” Morrissey got up and leaned over her and said with disgust: “Absolute denial.” “As a conservative woman I could never vote for Kamala Harris b/c,,,”What happened next was 3 separate attacks from this stranger! Her friend had to hold her back. I was called uneducated as she proceeded to give me her resumé.#Unhinged pic.twitter.com/q1jRO5yUNs — Annetta Catchings for Alexandria (@annetta_of) November 1, 2024 Morrissey did not respond to a request for comment. But she wrote on Facebook that “This weekend the trolls taught me: Insisting our next President NOT be convicted of fraud, bribery & sexual assault, and NOT be indicted on espionage charges and of inciting an insurrection makes you a ‘white liberal’ and a ‘racist.’” After working in federal roles through three years of the Trump administration, Morrissey left government to run a consulting firm called Global Foresight Strategies, which says it “helps government and private sector leadership anticipate and navigate the emerging impacts of global trends on regional security and stability.” Morrissey wrote on Facebook that she would soon be traveling to Ukraine. “If you think the disinformation has been insane so far, it’s about to get much worse in these last four days,” Morrissey wrote in another Facebook post this week. “There will be an onslaught of lies from our strategic enemies to make it look like our election process is unfair and that the Democrats are cheating. brace yourself and don’t believe a word. And ask yourselves, why has Trump had seven phone calls with Vladimir Putin?” She also echoed a false claim from CNN that Trump threatened Liz Cheney, misconstruing Trump’s observation that it is easy for politicians to support foreign wars they don’t have to fight in. Morrissey’s political leanings were no secret during her time in ODNI, which advises the president on national security. She ran for state office in 2001 and 2003, and has continued to mingle with Democrat politicians, posting a photo of her meeting with Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine on September 24. Trump has repeatedly come under fire for observing that career bureaucrats like Morrissey are largely Democratic partisans, who could interfere with presidents with whom they disagree. Another former top ODNI official, Eugene Vindman, is running for Congress in Virginia as a Democrat. During the Trump administration, Vindman and his brother used their status as nonpartisan career officials to give themselves an air of credibility as they leaked information meant to damage Trump. It’s difficult for presidents to fire career employees. But under Trump’s proposed Schedule F designation, a president could more easily replace certain career employees who are in “positions of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character.” This week, the Washington Post wrote that a conservative group, the American Accountability Project, created a “DHS Bureaucrat Watchlist” containing names of high-level career employees at the Department of Homeland Security who have openly expressed animosity towards conservative positions including border control, so that an incoming Trump administration could ensure that they do not thwart its initiatives. “There are a large number of people in the administration who have dedicated their life work to helping migrants settle in the United States,” said the group’s founder, Tom Jones. “These people are not going to do it. They are actually going to undermine it.” The Post said Jones identified them “largely using public social media comments, prior work experience and campaign finance records,” and that it caused them to “fear for their families’ safety.”

Last Saturday, Maye Musk made a plan. The plan was to join a 10-minute “Space” hosted by Mario Nawfal on X to discuss the importance of voting with other women who, like Maye herself, felt abandoned by the Democratic Party. But, like so many of Maye Musk’s plans, this one went astray. The audience had so many questions for her that the 10-minute Space went on for two hours. Maye is used to it. In her 2019 book, “A Woman Makes A Plan,” she describes how she dealt with all the curveballs life threw at her, and how she managed to emerge from these challenges stronger than before. “There is a saying: ‘At twenty-one you are no longer an orphan,'” Maye writes in her book. “This means, you need to take responsibility for your future life. The harder you work, the easier it is for luck to find you.” So, why did the 76-year-old model and dietician decide to enter the social media fray this close to the 2024 election? In an exclusive interview with The Daily Wire, Musk opens up about her decision to get involved, and what she thinks is at stake in the election. In a sense, it all comes back to her son. The mainstream media, she says, “have been so dishonest about Elon, have attacked him with false ‘facts,’” she said. “Seeing the media lie about my son, I wondered—what else, who else are they lying about?”  About two years ago, Maye began taking to social media to defend her son. It was around that time she started looking into the negative press surrounding another mainstream media boogeyman. “They have lied about Trump,” she said, noting that he “has chosen a great team and they really are willing and ready to handle all [the challenges] facing them in government bureaucracy. Whole organizations are corrupted right now, in the government, and need to be addressed,” she said. “This team wants what is best for Americans and that, alone, should make you consider voting — and voting for Trump.” Maye went on to describe what she expected her son to accomplish under a Trump administration. “I know he will help make the government more efficient, focused on caring for the American people and decreasing expenses,” she said. “You know, we just can’t continue to be in this huge debt, and it’s increasing. Our streets are dirty and full of potholes. There’s homelessness and drug addicts—with illegal immigrants now, our cities aren’t safe.” But as frightening as American cities have become, Musk said she’s more worried about what will happen if Vice President Kamala Harris wins the election. “I am more scared of Democrats and their policies,” she said. “Bad people on the street, I can outrun, but you can’t escape bad policies.” Musk also told The Daily Wire how welcoming she’s found Republicans. “This has been such a big surprise, you know, because of all that has been said about them,” she said. “But this is a very diverse group, and they’re happy, not pretentious.” “You know, when I was a Democrat, I thought differently,” about Republicans, she said. “I was wrong—everyone has been so delightful.”  Musk emphasized the need for truth, and recognition when emotions can be manipulated, especially by the media. “If you are intelligent, then you know you cannot rely on emotions. You must do your research and vote for the future of America. You know, if you are smart, you will do the right thing,” she said. “In this election, it is clear that to vote for this — for a happy and better future for America — is to vote for Team Trump.”