Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) slammed Vice President Kamala Harris’ billionaire surrogate Mark Cuban over his “insulting” comment about how “you never see him [Trump] around strong, intelligent women. Ever. It’s just that simple.” “First of all, it’s insulting my wife, who’s a very strong and very intelligent woman, and goes to nearly every one of my campaign events with me,” Vance said in a pre-recorded interview for Sirius XM’s “Breitbart News Saturday” with host Matt Boyle. “And it’s insulting to Lara Trump, who’s done an incredible job as co-chair of the RNC,” he added. “It’s insulting to Melania, who has the number one New York Times bestselling book right now. It’s insulting to everybody who thinks that our politics should be about public policy that makes people’s lives better instead of attacking your fellow citizens.” “Whether it’s Mark Cuban or Kamala Harris, or, you know, Joe Biden — why are these people so preoccupied with denigrating and insulting and condescending their fellow citizens?” Vance continued. “If you are pissed off that Kamala Harris opened the border, you have every right. If you’re frustrated that Kamala Harris’ policies have made it impossible for you to afford the price of a home, you have every right.” “Well, first ​of ​all, ​it’s ​insulting ​my ​wife, ​who’s ​a ​very ​strong ​and ​very ​intelligent ​woman ​and ​goes ​to ​nearly ​every ​one ​of ​my ​campaign ​events ​with ​me. ​And ​it’s ​insulting ​to ​@LaraLeaTrump, ​who’s ​done ​an ​incredible ​job ​as ​co ​chair ​of ​the… pic.twitter.com/O5dbD8B1fc — SiriusXM Patriot (@SiriusXMPatriot) October 31, 2024 Trump’s running mate’s comment came after President Biden called tens of millions of Trump supporters “garbage.” It happened on Tuesday during a Zoom call with Latino supporters when Biden referenced remarks an insult comedian made at Trump’s rally in Madison Square Garden. “And just the other day, a speaker at his rally called Puerto Rico a ‘floating island of garbage,'” Biden said in the call. “Well, let me tell you something. I don’t — I — I don’t know the Puerto Rican that — that I know — or a Puerto Rico, where I’m fr- — in my home state of Delaware, they’re good, decent, honorable people.” MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters — his — his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American. It’s totally contrary to everything we’ve done, everything we’ve been,” he added. Cuban has since tried to walk back the comments following a backlash against him. “Let’s clarify something. This is what I said during a conversation about why Nikki Haley was not active in his campaign,” Cuban posted his explanation on X. “‘Donald Trump, you never see him around strong, intelligent women. Ever. It’s just that simple. They’re intimidating to him. He doesn’t like to be challenged by them and, you know, Nikki Haley will call him on his nonsense with reproductive rights and how he sees and treats and talks about women. I mean, he just can’t have her around. It wouldn’t work.'” “I’m happy to clarify that 1. I know many strong, intelligent women voting for Trump. Including in my extended family. I’m certainly not saying female voters are not smart, strong and intelligent. 2. I know he has worked with strong intelligent women, like Elaine Chao, Kelly Anne, Ivanka [Trump] and many others[.] I stand by my opinion that he does not like being challenged publicly,” he added. Related: Vivek Ramaswamy Mans A Garbage Truck: ‘We’re Not Garbage’

Ninety-percent of Americans agree that only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote in American elections, according to new polling first obtained by The Daily Wire. Seventy-seven percent of Americans “strongly agree” that only U.S. citizens should be voting in American elections, polling conducted by CRC Research on behalf of the 85 Fund found, while 13% “somewhat agree,” 7% disagree, and 3% are unsure or refused to answer. Meanwhile, 92% of men and 89% of women agreed with the statement. “This poll tells us loud and clear that Americans continue to overwhelmingly embrace commonsense election rules like proof of citizenship to vote, clean voter rolls, and reject calls for all-mail elections,” said Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project. “Yet even now, liberal groups are fighting to stop states from removing non-citizens from the voter rolls and weaken mail voting safeguards. That’s absurd. Americans want elections they can trust, and they want states to take action to stop fraud and deliver secure, well-run elections.” Broken down into political categories, the polling found that 95% of Republicans, 89% of Independents, and 86% of Democrats agree that only U.S. citizens should be voting in American elections, while 97% of people who identify as conservative, 89% of people who identify as moderate, and 84% of people who identify as liberal agree with the statement. On the flip side, 13% of people who identified as liberals did not agree that only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote in American elections, as well as 10% of Democrats. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ The polling also asked Americans about recent efforts by some states to clean their voter registration files and remove individuals who don’t appear to be citizens. “Do you agree or disagree that states have the right to remove individuals from their voter list if they fail to prove their citizenship?” the polling asked. It found that overall, 84% of people agreed with that statement. Broken down into smaller data: 86% of men, 83% of women, 93% of Republicans, 83% of Independents, and 77% of Democrats agreed with the statement, while 95% of conservatives, 85% of moderates, and 70% of liberals agreed with it. The polling even specifically asked Americans about Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s August move to order the election commissioner to regularly update the state’s voter list to remove people who have been identified as non-citizens. Two lower courts ruled in favor of the DOJ’s request to block the purge, but on Wednesday, the Supreme Court allowed Virginia to move forward with removing about 1,600 non-citizens from voter rolls. “The Department of Justice believes this is a violation of the National Voter Registration Act which does not allow states to conduct voter roll maintenance within 90 days of an election and is seeking a court order to require Virginia to restore voting rights to those affected,” the polling states. “Do you agree or disagree that a state should have the authority to conduct voter roll maintenance at any time to ensure only eligible individuals are allowed to vote?” Seventy-four percent of those polled agreed with this statement. Youngkin applauded the court ruling on Wednesday, calling the news “a victory for commonsense and election fairness.” “Clean voter rolls are one important part of a comprehensive approach we are taking to ensure the fairness of our elections,” he said. We are pleased by the Supreme Court’s order today. This is a victory for commonsense and election fairness. I am grateful for the work of Attorney General @JasonMiyaresVA on this critical fight to protect the fundamental rights of U.S. citizens. Clean voter rolls are one… — Glenn Youngkin (@GlennYoungkin) October 30, 2024 Snead told The Daily Wire that the Supreme Court’s ruling “is a win for election integrity and the rule of law.” “90% of the public opposes non-citizen voting,” he stressed. “Despite a clear consensus, the Biden Administration chose to spend tax dollars on an eleventh hour lawsuit intended to force Virginia to add self-reported non-citizens back onto its rolls. When asked about that case, three-quarters side with Virginia and say that states should be able to clean their voter rolls at any time. By pushing to get non-citizens on the rolls, the Biden Administration is wrong on the law and on the wrong side of public opinion.”

Major Bank Allegedly De-Banked Man Due To False 'Russiagate' Accusations From Left-Wing Blogger

Half of the votes cast

'It's very weird'

'Iran’s response to the Zionist aggression is definite'

The 1980s have been largely forgotten in the history of Western cinema. The genre was on the verge of collapse after the '70s and was given new life in 1992 with Unforgiven, but that doesn't mean the '80s lacked Western substance. On the contrary, the decade was filled with critically acclaimed Westerns that deserve a second viewing for their mastery of the genre. From Pale Rider to Young Guns to... Source

A Preview of Coming Attractions If Harris Wins: Ireland's Hate Crimes Bill Now Law

Former President Donald Trump won a lawsuit in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, alongside the Republican National Committee on Wednesday after law enforcement turned voters away from mail-in voter registration before the original deadline lapsed. As a result, the state ruled in favor of Trump and extended the deadline to request a mail-in ballot from Oct. 29 to Nov. 1. Although this was a victory for the Trump camp as well as for voters, Pennsylvania officials have stayed silent on how this was able to happen in the first place.Shapiro was quick to criticize Trump, who he said has 'attacked our elections over and over,' but has remained silent following the verdict, failing to clarify whether there will be any investigation into the individuals who violated the Pennsylvania election code."Pennsylvania is cheating, and getting caught, at large scale levels rarely seen before," Trump said ahead of the ruling. "REPORT CHEATING TO AUTHORITIES. Law Enforcement must act, NOW!" Prior to the ruling, Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro responded to Trump's claim, saying he is just trying to "stoke chaos" ahead of the election. "Republican and Democratic clerks of elections are doing their jobs here in Pennsylvania — and together with law enforcement, they’re making sure only eligible voters are able to register and vote," Shapiro said in a post on X before the ruling."He's now trying to use the same playbook to stoke chaos, but hear me on this: we will again have a free and fair, safe and secure election — and the will of the people will be respected," Shapiro continued. Shapiro was quick to criticize Trump, who he said has "attacked our elections over and over," but has remained silent following the verdict, failing to clarify whether there will be any investigation into whether individuals violated the Pennsylvania election code.Blaze News reached out to officials like Shapiro, as well as Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmitt, Attorney General Michelle Henry, the U.S. Attorney's Office of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Bucks County Deputy Director of Communications James O'Malley, and Director of Policy and Communications Eric Nagy.As of this writing, none of them have responded to a request for comment from Blaze News. "This is illegal, and [Shapiro] should do something about operatives in his own party depriving people of their right to vote," Trump's running mate, JD Vance, said Thursday of the allegations. "If he doesn't, he is complicit in voter fraud." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

With just days left before the election, Republican former President Donald Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against CBS News and "60 Minutes." The lawsuit, which was obtained by Fox News Digital, accused CBS of "partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference" in an attempt to tip the election toward Democrats. 'Trump brings this action to redress the immense harm caused to him, to his campaign, and to tens of millions of citizens.' The network has been accused of editing an answer by Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris given during an interview with CBS correspondent Bill Whitaker. In one version released on social media, Harris offered a jumbled response to the question while the version aired on television was significantly cleaned up. Trump had previously demanded that CBS News release the full, unedited transcript of the interview before filing the lawsuit. "To paper over Kamala’s ‘word salad’ weakness, CBS used its national platform on 60 Minutes to cross the line from the exercise of judgment in reporting to deceitful, deceptive manipulation of news," the lawsuit read.The former president is demanding at least $10 billion in damages from the "malicious, deceptive, and substantial news distortion calculated to confuse, deceive, and mislead the public," as described in the lawsuit, as well as a jury trial. "President Trump brings this action to redress the immense harm caused to him, to his campaign, and to tens of millions of citizens in Texas and across America by CBS’s deceptive broadcasting conduct," Trump's attorney's wrote. Fox News Digital said CBS News did not respond to its request for a comment about the lawsuit. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!