BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Blood tests are an important diagnostic tool for diagnosing disorders and monitoring health, but the procedure is not enjoyable; It is typically painful and time-consuming. Researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder invented a novel handheld gadget that promises to change that by providing speedier findings from a single drop of blood, potentially revolutionizing blood diagnostics. Traditionally, blood tests involve drawing a sample from the arm using a needle and sending it to a laboratory for analysis. Depending on the test’s complexity, this process can take anywhere from several hours to days. In rapidly changing health circumstances, this wait can be devastating. Additionally, many patients feel pain or even dread during blood draws. However, with this new technology, results might be acquired in as little as one hour, thanks to a simple finger prick. The handheld diagnostic gadget uses what the researchers refer to as functional negative acoustic contrast particles (fNACPs). When put into a blood sample, these cell-sized particles interact with sound waves, collecting specific biomarkers such as proteins or viruses. Once mixed with the blood, the fNACPs capture the target biomarkers and then separate them using sound waves within the device. “We’re basically using sound waves to manipulate particles in order to rapidly isolate them from a really small volume of fluid,” said Cooper Thome, the study‘s first author. The procedure is straightforward: combine a drop of blood with fNACPs and insert it into the handheld gadget. Sound waves then force the particles and biomarkers they’ve caught toward the chamber’s walls, leaving the rest of the blood sample behind. The biomarkers are then labeled with fluorescent markers and lit with lasers, allowing for an accurate count of their presence in the sample. In less than 70 minutes, the test can determine the number of certain biomarkers, providing answers with the same accuracy as traditional lab testing. Innovative application of sound waves for medical testing “This pipette and particle system can offer the same sensitivity and specificity as a gold-standard clinical test but within an instrument that radically simplifies workflows,” said Wyatt Shields, the senior author of the study. Shields highlights that this invention not only saves the time required for results but also allows blood diagnostics to be performed right at the patient’s bedside. The possibilities that this technology opens up are tremendous, particularly in emergency or distant circumstances when quick diagnostic information can save lives. The technology is still in its early phases of development, but first testing has shown promise. The device was used by the researchers to detect antibodies to ovalbumin, a protein present in egg whites that is commonly utilized in vaccine manufacture. Even at low quantities, the device correctly recognized the antibodies, proving that it is just as effective as traditional laboratory tests. Toward real-world uses There are numerous possible uses for this technology. According to the researchers, the device has the potential to detect a wide range of biomarkers, including viral disorders and cancer indicators. Furthermore, the researchers are looking into techniques to test for several biomarkers using a single blood sample. “It gives us the potential to perform blood diagnostics right at the patient’s bedside,” Shields said. While the technology is currently in its early stages, there is hope that it will be scaled up for clinical application in the future. The team is also looking at how to adapt the gadget to examine samples from numerous patients at the same time, which would increase its utility in healthcare settings where rapid diagnoses are in high demand. The study, which appeared in the journal Science Advances, could be a huge step forward in tailored and quick healthcare diagnostics. While additional study is needed before the device can be widely adopted, its ability to improve patient care and minimize the stress associated with routine blood testing is evident. Source study: Science Advances—Acoustic pipette and biofunctional elastomeric microparticle system for rapid picomolar-level biomolecule detection in whole bloodThe post Sound wave device provides one-hour blood test results with a single finger prick first appeared on The Optimist Daily: Making Solutions the News.

Despite its alleged concern for the decline of civility in politics, the New York Times is actually all in on political slander and name-calling lately -- when it’s in the service of defeating Donald Trump. For the second time in under two weeks, the paper reveled in the party’s new tactic of throwing the dirty word “fascist” at Trump to see if it would stick (not that they didn’t do so before but now they’ve turned it up to 11). The Times thinks the plan is working for Kamala Harris – or at least, the Times now considers it politically expedient to claim it’s working for Harris, under the headline “Harris Aides Hopeful That Casting Trump as a Fascist Could Shift Election.” Reporters Reid J. Epstein, Lisa Lerer, and Maggie Haberman led with a lead that will sound either prescient or preposterous in a week (or more?): As the presidential contest enters the final sprint, campaign aides and allies close to Vice President Kamala Harris are growing cautiously optimistic about her chances of victory, saying the race is shifting in her favor. Top Democratic strategists are increasingly hopeful that the campaign’s attempts to cast former President Donald J. Trump as a fascist -- paired with an expansive battleground-state operation and strength among female voters still energized by the end of federal abortion rights -- will carry Ms. Harris to a narrow triumph. Even some close to Mr. Trump worry that the push to label him a budding dictator who has praised Hitler could move small but potentially meaningful numbers of persuadable voters. Officials within the Harris campaign and people with whom they have shared candid assessments believe she remains in a solid position in the Northern “blue wall” states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, saying internal polling shows her slightly ahead in all three -- though by as little as half a percentage point. …. Ms. Harris’s aides believe the argument tying Mr. Trump to fascism is helping her sway moderate Republicans, even though the leading super PAC supporting her bid has raised worries that it is not Democrats’ most effective message. Democratic officials emphasize that they have won -- or overperformed -- in a wide range of contests since 2016 by painting the former president as divisive. The Times tried to recapture some of that famous Harris campaign "joy." For all his bravado in public, Mr. Trump is privately cranky and stressed, according to three people in contact with him, with a schedule marked by chronic lateness. Ms. Harris, aides say, is energized by her crowds, particularly the 30,000 supporters who watched her discuss abortion rights at a rally featuring Beyoncé on Friday in Houston. But not Beyonce actually performing, which angered many in attendance. Some of the reasons for Democratic optimism the Times pushed sounded awfully thin. In Michigan, union organizers have found a sunnier outlook for Ms. Harris than they expected when surveying their members. An internal United Auto Workers poll of the union’s members in battleground states found Ms. Harris with a five-point lead among white voters without a college degree, and a 13-point advantage among men without a college degree -- striking results among types of voters she is not expected to win broadly. The Times let Democratic strategists explain away troubling figures, unconvincingly. While some party strategists are worried about the early-voting numbers in Nevada and Georgia, top officials in the Harris campaign say those figures are not as significant as they might seem. Their vote models suggest that Mr. Trump has successfully pushed many of his supporters to vote earlier, effectively cannibalizing the strong turnout he has usually garnered on Election Day. Eventually the reporters got around to briefly note continuing Democratic uneasiness. And Democrats, even at the top levels of the Harris campaign, worry that the party is not correctly modeling the electorate in its polling, repeating a misstep that led Mr. Biden’s campaign aides to overestimate his strength in the final days of the 2020 race.

If the tone of media coverage decided the election, it would be a landslide for Kamala Harris. The media have never more energetically taken a side for a candidate. This could be happening because:  (A) Trump is considered to be the most horrible person ever.  (B) Kamala is the most horrible Democrat nominee in modern times, and the media need to compensate for it.  MRC founder and president Brent Bozell and I discussed the latest MRC studies proving the worst campaign bias we've ever documented, not only on TV news, but even on TV "comedy" shows. It's a "Brent Bozell Show" crossover episode. It's not remarkable that the latest Rich Noyes study of evening-news shows found  Donald Trump's coverage has been 85 percent negative. What's remarkable is that Kamala's coverage is 78 percent positive.  It's historic -- in the worst way. There has never been network news that looked and sounded more like campaign advertising.  Of the 753 minutes of evening news airtime devoted to Trump since July 21, nearly one-third (230 minutes, or 31%) has been about personal controversies. This compares to barely five percent of Harris’s airtime (28 minutes, out of a total 583 minutes of coverage) spent on similar topics. Just like his presidency, they always create scandals out of things Trump says. Nothing Kamala says is controversial, and they skip all of the personal scandals they could cover -- allegations of plagiarism in her 2009 book, allegations her husband brutally slapped an ex-girlfriend, and how she conspired to hide President Biden's mental decline.  Naturally, then, Gallup reported that they found only a meager 31% of Americans — and just 12% of Republicans — said they had either “a great deal” or “a fair amount” of trust in the media’s ability to report the news “fully, accurately and fairly.” Thern there is Alex Christy's late-night comedy study: The jokes about the presidential contenders looks like a landslide: 98 percent of the jokes are about Trump and two percent for Harris. And the jokes are not soft Johnny Carson kidding. When John Kelly claimed Trump wants generals like Hitler's, the comedians lectured about it. Jimmy Fallon, the softest of the bunch, joked: "This is the first election where reporters have to ask, 'Who'd you root for when you watched Saving Private Ryan?'" Will all this network tilt matter? Axios said "the big media era is over," especially under 35: "Top executives and officials tell us that reaching people ages 35 and under with any message — or even major event — is almost impossible. Or they've seen an eight-second clip with no context, so they have a very different understanding of what happened than someone who saw a mainstream report." Enjoy the podcast below, or wherever you listen to podcasts. For "The Brent Bozell Show" episode on video, click here on Rumble or on YouTube. 

Brett Favre: 'I See Everyday Americans That Make This Country Great'

Biden Bites Babies at White House Halloween Event (and Other Weird Things)

Miriam Adelson, who owns a majority stake in the NBA's Dallas Mavericks, has donated $100 million to her Preserve America PAC in support of former President Donald Trump, Front Office Sports reported Wednesday.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced Wednesday that 90 people across 13 states have contracted E. coli, likely from slivered onions on McDonald's Quarter Pounders, resulting in 27 hospitalizations and one death, CNBC reported.

Initial data from North Carolina's early voting show Black turnout is lagging behind the state's voter registration, which could spell trouble for Vice President Kamala Harris, Politico reported.

Has anyone told Ali Khamenei in Tehran? Hold that thought; we'll get back to it.One front in the wars imposed on Israel by Iran and its proxies may come to a close ... maybe. Lebanese prime minister Najib…

How many teachers in Texas public schools cheated on their certification tests? The answer is as many as 400 or possibly even more. The whole scheme was run by a small crew of teachers/administrators…