In an essay published by The New York Times and titled “Abortion Pills Are Safe. Post-Roe America Isn’t,” Dr. Chavi Eve Karkowsky, a physician who practices maternal-fetal medicine, demonstrates that the campaign for unlimited abortion is as fraudulent and deceptive as ever. From the beginning, the “right” to abortion was built on fraud. Abortion advocates pushed states to repeal their pro-life laws with baseless claims about illegal abortions. The claim that “thousands” of women died from illegal abortions began in the 1960s and persists even today. The National Center for Health Statistics says the real number was just 36 in 1973—the year that the Supreme Court issued its Roe v. Wade decision. The Washington Post’s “Fact Checker” column gave Planned Parenthood its worst rating of “Four Pinnochios” for that lie. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court created a fictional account of abortion history that long ago was exposed as radically revisionist. The strategy behind Roe was built on so-called “scholarship” that even the pro-abortion lawyers believed strained credibility. Pro-abortion historians since Roe have tried to maintain the fiction, deliberately erasing the 19th-century feminists and physicians who opposed abortion from their duplicitous narrative. Since 2022, when the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade with its opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, abortion advocates have achieved most of what they said they want. All but four states banned abortion from conception in 1973; 14 states do so today. No state allowed abortion until birth before Roe; nine states do so now. Even the most restrictive post-conception abortion ban, at six weeks, covers barely half of abortions. The laws in effect in 1973 prohibited more than 90% of abortions; the laws in effect today allow more than 80%. The cataclysmic fallout of Roe’s overturning—a narrative pushed by the abortion lobby—has not, in fact, come to pass. Though based on her writing, one would be hard pressed to think that Dr. Karkowsky thinks otherwise.   Back to Karkowsky’s essay in The New York Times. The physician professes concern that women are using abortion drugs “far from the supervision of qualified medical providers.” But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration previously required such supervision for more than 20 years after approving mifepristone, the primary abortion drug, in 2000. That was the case until the Biden-Harris administration deregulated the abortion pill mifepristone in 2021, ostensibly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, the action made the pill easier to get, more dangerous, and less predictable in its effects. Among the changes: The federal government eliminated the requirement of an in-person doctor’s visit to secure the abortion pill, expanded use of the pill from seven to 10 weeks’ gestation, and allowed women to obtain pills by mail. This was foolhardy. For a drug with known and serious potential side effects (including incomplete abortions, severe bleeding, failed abortions, and infection), the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory determinations made a dangerous pill even more dangerous. In fact, FDA’s own warning label on mifepristone states that complications from using the abortion pill can reach a frequency of between 2.9% and 4.6%. In 2023 alone, that represents nearly 20,000 emergency room visits for medication abortion patients. And now there’s an active disinformation campaign by abortion advocates about what state pro-life laws say and how they apply. Take Kate Cox, for example. The Texas woman claimed the state’s pro-life law didn’t allow her to obtain an abortion after she learned that her unborn child had a serious abnormality. It turns out, as the Texas Supreme Court explained, hers was also a fraudulent tale. Cox’s doctor, an abortion advocate, chose not to make the medical finding that, under the Texas statute, would have allowed her abortion. Cox’s lawyer, supplied by the Center for Reproductive Rights, then filed an unnecessary request for a court order that, thanks to the lawyer’s decision, was certain to be denied. Many people believed Cox’s claim that she had no choice but to leave Texas to get an abortion when the truth is that she participated in a legal hoax to sow seeds of confusion and doubt about the state’s pro-life law. Abortion advocates spin other fraudulent yarns. They claim that laws prohibiting abortion also block medical care for miscarriage or ectopic pregnancies. Others say pro-life laws require that a pregnant woman literally be at death’s door before a doctor may treat her for complications. None of these claims is true. Not one. Although the media often neglect to mention it, every state in America—including states with near-total restrictions on abortion—has an exception for the “life of the mother.” And states uniformly require doctors to use their “best medical judgement” in emergency cases to ensure that the pregnant woman is safe. Abortion advocates such as Karkowsky seek to separate women who want to use abortion drugs from any necessary connection to doctors or medical facilities. Then they complain that women such as Amber Thurman and Candi Miller in Georgia are dying from using abortion drugs without adequate medical attention. That’s like someone killing her parents and then asking for leniency because she’s an orphan. The fact of the matter is that Thurman and Miller died from a combination of complications related to the de-regulated abortion pill (made more accessible and dangerous by the Biden-Harris administration) as well as simple medical malpractice—not from Georgia’s commonsense abortion restrictions. The pro-abortion lobby, legacy media, and abortion practitioners are lying to you—both on the impact of state abortion laws and the purported inability to receive safe “reproductive care.” The entire abortion industry is, after all, built on fraud. Americans would do well to ignore the hype. The post Abortion Is Built on Fraud: A Response to The New York Times appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Trump Derangement Syndrome was apparently on full display at London's Heathrow Airport on Monday when two women got into a brawl over one of them wearing a "Make American Great Again" hat. The U.K. Sun reported that London's Metropolitan Police received a call at approximately 12:45 p.m. regarding an incident...

Motorcycle clubs have long been a part of American culture, symbolizing freedom, brotherhood, and the open road. However, a subset known as “outlaw bikers” or “one-percenter” clubs has garnered significant attention from law enforcement agencies. These groups are often associated with criminal activities, leading to a contentious relationship between them and the authorities. This article delves into the reasons why law enforcement considers outlaw bikers criminals, examining historical context, criminal activities, and the ongoing challenges in addressing this complex issue. Historical Context The term “one-percenter” originated in the 1940s, following a statement by the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) that 99% of motorcyclists were law-abiding citizens, implying that the remaining 1% were outlaws. This label was embraced by certain clubs, including the Hells Angels, Outlaws, Bandidos, and Mongols, who prided themselves on their rebellious image and rejection of societal norms [1]. Over the decades, these clubs became notorious for their involvement in various criminal activities, further cementing their outlaw status in the eyes of law enforcement. High-profile incidents, such as the 1947 Hollister riot and the 1969 Altamont Free Concert violence, fueled public perception of outlaw bikers as dangerous and criminal [2]. Criminal Activities Outlaw motorcycle clubs (OMCs) are often linked to a range of criminal activities that contribute to their negative reputation. Some of the key activities include: Drug Trafficking: Many OMCs are heavily involved in the distribution and sale of illegal drugs, including methamphetamine, cocaine, and marijuana. These operations can be extensive, with members using their network to facilitate drug trafficking across state and international borders [3]. Violence and Intimidation: OMCs are known for their violent tactics, both within their own ranks and against rival clubs. Disputes over territory, drug markets, or perceived slights can lead to violent confrontations, including assaults, shootings, and even murders. Intimidation is also a key tool used to maintain control and deter interference from authorities or rival groups [4]. Weapons Trafficking: The illegal acquisition, possession, and distribution of firearms are common among outlaw bikers. These weapons are often used to protect their drug operations, assert dominance, and engage in conflicts with rivals [5]. Extortion and Racketeering: Many OMCs engage in extortion and racketeering, using threats of violence to demand protection money from businesses or individuals. This can also extend to involvement in other forms of organized crime, such as loan sharking and money laundering [6]. Theft and Burglary: Some members of OMCs participate in theft and burglary operations, targeting vehicles, businesses, and homes to acquire valuable goods. These stolen items can then be sold or used to fund other criminal activities [7]. Law Enforcement’s Perspective Law enforcement agencies view outlaw bikers through the lens of their criminal activities and the threats they pose to public safety. Several factors contribute to the heightened scrutiny and efforts to combat these groups: Organized Crime Networks: OMCs often operate as highly organized crime networks, with hierarchical structures and clear chains of command. This level of organization makes them more challenging to dismantle and necessitates a coordinated response from law enforcement agencies [8]. Threat to Public Safety: The violent nature of many OMCs poses a direct threat to public safety. Incidents involving shootings, assaults, and other violent crimes can spill over into communities, endangering innocent bystanders and escalating tensions [9]. Transnational Reach: Some OMCs have expanded their operations internationally, forming alliances with other criminal organizations and establishing chapters in multiple countries. This transnational reach complicates law enforcement efforts and requires international cooperation to address effectively [10]. Undercover Operations and Surveillance: Law enforcement agencies invest significant resources in undercover operations and surveillance to infiltrate and gather intelligence on OMCs. These efforts are necessary to understand the inner workings of these groups and to build cases against key members involved in criminal activities [11]. Challenges in Addressing Outlaw Bikers While law enforcement agencies have made significant strides in combating outlaw bikers, several challenges persist: Cultural and Legal Hurdles: Outlaw bikers are often deeply embedded in their communities and enjoy a degree of local support. This cultural acceptance can hinder law enforcement efforts and complicate investigations. Additionally, legal protections, such as the right to freedom of association, can limit the scope of actions that authorities can take against OMCs [12]. Resource Allocation: Combating organized crime requires substantial resources, including personnel, funding, and technology. Law enforcement agencies must balance their efforts against OMCs with other pressing priorities, such as addressing gang violence, human trafficking, and cybercrime [13]. Evolving Tactics: OMCs are not static entities; they adapt and evolve their tactics to evade law enforcement. This constant evolution necessitates ongoing training and adaptation on the part of law enforcement agencies to stay ahead of emerging threats [14]. Conclusion The relationship between law enforcement and outlaw bikers is complex and fraught with tension. While motorcycle clubs are an integral part of American culture, the criminal activities associated with certain outlaw groups necessitate a robust response from authorities. Understanding the historical context, criminal activities, and challenges in addressing this issue provides valuable insights into why law enforcement considers outlaw bikers criminals. As society continues to grapple with the balance between individual freedoms and public safety, the efforts to combat outlaw bikers will remain a critical aspect of law enforcement’s mandate to protect and serve. Sources American Motorcyclist Association. (n.d.). History of the AMA. Retrieved from https://americanmotorcyclist.com/history-of-the-ama/ Hollister Riot. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollister_riot National Institute of Justice. (n.d.). Motorcycle Gangs and Drug Trafficking. Retrieved from https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/motorcycle-gangs-and-drug-trafficking Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2019). Violent Gangs. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/violent-crime/gangs Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. (n.d.). Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs and Weapons Trafficking. Retrieved from https://www.atf.gov/our-history/outlaw-motorcycle-gangs United States Department of Justice. (n.d.). Racketeering and Organized Crime. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/organizedcrime/racketeering Criminal Investigation. (n.d.). Theft and Burglary Operations in Motorcycle Gangs. Retrieved from https://www.criminalinvestigation.gov/theft-burglary United States Department of Justice. (n.d.). Organized Crime Networks. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/organizedcrime/organized-crime-networks Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2019). Threats to Public Safety. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/violent-crime/threats-to-public-safety Interpol. (n.d.). Transnational Crime. Retrieved from https://www.interpol.int/en/Crimes/Transnational-crime United States Department of Justice. (n.d.). Undercover Operations. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/undercoveroperations American Bar Association. (n.d.). Cultural and Legal Challenges in Addressing Motorcycle Gangs. Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/legalchallenges-motorcyclegangs National Criminal Justice Reference Service. (n.d.). Resource Allocation in Combating Organized Crime. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/resourceallocation Law Enforcement Training and Research. (n.d.). Evolving Tactics in Combating Motorcycle Gangs. Retrieved from https://www.letr.gov/evolving-tactics-motorcyclegangs

Following Joe Biden referring to his supporters as “garbage,” President Trump wasted little time to pull off a hilarious troll. After landing in Green Bay, Wisconsin, Trump hopped into the ‘Make America Great Again’ garbage truck. Trump gave these remarks before getting off Trump Force One: President Trump is about to get off Trump Force One…and head over to the MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN Garbage Truck here in Wisconsin… pic.twitter.com/XpqvRFqgJv — Dan Scavino Jr. (@DanScavino) October 30, 2024 “How do you like my garbage truck? This truck is in honor of Kamala and Joe Biden,” Trump said. WATCH: PRESIDENT TRUMP: "How do you like my garbage truck? This truck is in honor of Kamala and Joe Biden." pic.twitter.com/7UwMZ8syvx — Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 30, 2024 BREAKING: Donald Trump gets picked up in Green Bay, Wisconsin by a garbage truck, just one day after Joe Biden called Trump supporters "garbage." pic.twitter.com/jqjiX6a43V — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 30, 2024 “Watch as former President Donald Trump makes an unexpected entrance, being picked up by a Trump themed garbage truck at a lively rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin just one day after President Joe Biden stirred controversy by calling Trump supporters ‘garbage,'” Rawsalerts wrote. “While Trump sits in the passenger seat of the garbage truck, Trump addresses the crowd and holds a press conference. Meanwhile, Vice President Kamala Harris responds to Biden’s remark by assuring that the administration aims to ‘represent all Americans,’ attempting to mend the backlash following the comment,” the post added. WATCH: #BREAKING: Watch as Donald Trump is picked up by a garbage truck just one day after President Joe Biden stirred controversy by calling Trump supporters “garbage⁰⁰#GreenBay | #Wisconsin Watch as former President Donald Trump makes an unexpected entrance, being picked up by… pic.twitter.com/PIJoz2a1ZC — R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) October 30, 2024 Trump arrived at the rally dressed as a garbage man. WATCH: NOW: President Trump just walked out at his rally dressed as a Garbage Man, looking happy as hell We don’t deserve this man pic.twitter.com/S6k7dw1Da1 — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) October 30, 2024 From the New York Post: The stunt comes one day after President Biden, 81, referred to Trump supporters as “garbage” on a campaign call at the White House, denouncing comments made by comic Tony Hinchcliffe, in which he called Puerto Rico a “floating island of garbage” at the Republican nominee’s Madison Square Garden rally on Sunday. “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American,” Biden said during a call with Voto Latino Group, as Vice President Kamala Harris rallied at the nearby Ellipse in Washington, DC, pressing how the Democratic Party would unify the country. Republicans blasted the insult and drew immediate comparisons to then-Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s remark in 2016 that half of Trump’s supporters should be “put into the basket of deplorables.” CNN dropped its on-air coverage and immediately cut to President Trump answering questions from reporters from the garbage truck. WATCH: HAPPENING NOW pic.twitter.com/CjpIMhezup — Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 30, 2024 Trump wasn’t the only one who rode in a garbage truck. Vivek Ramaswamy arrived at a Trump campaign event in North Carolina riding in a garbage truck. “America is ready for us to TAKE OUT THE TRASH in this election. Proud to be rolling up in a garbage truck to a Trump campaign event in North Carolina shortly. Going to clean up some actual trash on the streets first,” he said. America is ready for us to TAKE OUT THE TRASH in this election. Proud to be rolling up in a garbage truck to a Trump campaign event in North Carolina shortly. Going to clean up some actual trash on the streets first. pic.twitter.com/FFTqdHzzri — Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) October 30, 2024 Per Forbes: Wisconsin is one of the seven pivotal swing states likely to decide the outcome of the election. Recent surveys suggest Harris has a slim lead over Trump, but many polls there and in other swing states are within the margin of error. Harris leads Trump by 0.7 percentage points in Wisconsin in FiveThirtyEight’s weighted polling average. Trump’s appearance at the rally in an apparent attempt to pay homage to sanitation workers came 10 days after he made a widely publicized appearance at a McDonald’s in Pennsylvania, preparing french fry orders and handing out meals to supporters at the drive-thru window. Video clips and images of Trump at McDonald’s went viral on social media. WATCH:

Former President Donald Trump sent a message to Vice President Kamala Harris by riding in a garbage truck to his Wisconsin rally on Wednesday evening.