Who Is Actually Running The Country?

The UN’s DARK Agenda: What You’re Not Being Told About Agenda 2030

Now They Are Floating Ominous Warnings About the Election

USA Today, 2020: Trump Is Dangerous. USA Today, 2024: Pass!

Lots of the time, there's a perfectly mundane explanation for supernatural sightings.

What is Peto's paradox – and what does it mean for cancer risk in the animal kingdom?

The PRIMA implant is being developed by Neuralink competitor Science Corporation.

On Monday, CNN NewsNight with far-left pundit Abby Phillip (who pretends to be a journalist) descended into chaos when our friend and conservative panelist Ryan Girdusky quipped to former Al Jazerra and MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan that “I hope your beeper doesn’t go off,” in reference to the exploding beepers across Lebanon targeting members of Hezbollah. Following an explosion of hurt feelings and pearl-clutching by Phillip, Hasan, and far-left commentator Ashley Allison, Phillip threw to a commercial break and, after returning, announced Girdusky was kicked off the panel for having “crossed” “a line” that was “not acceptable to me” in terms of fostering “civility.” CNN subsequently announced Girdusky was banned from the network. Of course, there was way more to this, starting with the build-up. Watch the video and click “expand” to read the transcript of how the panel falsely claimed – despite insistences from Girdusky and former Congressman Scott Taylor (R-VA) – that the media have resorted to not only calling former President Trump Hitler, but his supporters as well and especially those who attended Sunday’s Madison Square Garden rally: Here was what happened on CNN right before @RyanGirdusky made the beeper comment to Mehdi Hasan. Abby Phillip gaslit vieweres by shouting at Girdusky when he noted the media are calling Trump supporters who attended the MSG rally Nazis, claiming NO ONE has said that. pic.twitter.com/mZSBIPHx3Q — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) October 29, 2024 TAYLOR: Listen, I think emotions are very high. We're eight days out from – from a camp – from the election, right? No question about it. I don't think either side is innocent of inflammatory rhetoric, for sure. I mean, look what, look what's happened. I don't think the President could have expected not to do this massive rally, which quite frankly, was historic, came out there and the media is just, oh, you know, he's a Nazi, it's Hitler and all this crazy stuff that they were saying. So, I think, in many respects, that rhetoric is much, much worse than what you just played there. ABBY PHILLIP: Well, first of all, just to be clear, the – Hitler has entered the conversation because his chief of staff said that Trump, not the media, but Trump was the one who brought up Hitler. RYAN GIRDUSKY: And five people who were there who said it didn't. ASHELY ALLISON: Actually – actually Hitler – Abby – PHILLIP: You're mixing, you're mixing anecdotes. That's not what happened. ALLISON: – actually, Hitler entered the conversation because his running mate actually compared him to Hitler. PHILLIP: There’s that too. There’s that too. GIRDUSKY: That’s not why it happened. ALLISON: That's when it actually entered the conversation years ago. No, that's how we brought Hitler into this conversation, because the person that Donald Trump pick to be his running mate compared to him to Hitler and then he changed his mind. Fine, change your mind. But then, somebody else verified. You know, take comedians for where they were. Bad choice, disgusting language. I would never buy a ticket to his show, but do it on a comedy stage. Not the president of the United States rally. And if you do it on the stage of a rally and the President, the responsibility of the person who wants to be the leader of the free world is to come out like John McCain did when somebody wanted to call Obama, what, a derogatory name said no, because that's what leaders do. But you know what? Nobody did that after he did it. People came out and they pout on and they pout on and they pout on and they pout on, but I'm not surprised, and I'm glad that the backlash actually came because some people – I was in Philly all day today. And believe it or not, even though Philly is in – and tomorrow's last day to vote early in Philly, so vote today, Philly, vote tomorrow, today, or on November 5, but if – if nobody – if you haven't been paying attention, I'm glad you start to pay attention now and see these people for who they are and what they think of you, what they think of black people, what they think of Jewish people – GIRDUSKY: Oh my God. ALLISON: – what they think of women – GIRDUSKY: Okay. ALLISON: – because they said it out of their mouth. GIRDUSKY: Okay, that's not true at all. The fact is that they – PHILLIP: I mean, but hold on, but they did – they did say – GIRDUSKY: They weren’t calling – they weren’t calling – PHILLIP: – look, we played the clips, Ryan. GIRDUSKY: Okay. PHILLIP: They said all of those things. GIRDUSKY: But the media did not just say that Trump was Hitler. The media was saying that everyone who attended was Hitler. TAYLOR: They were. They were. PHILLIP: No, they didn't. GIRDUSKY: Yes, they did. Yes, they did. TAYLOR: Yes, they did, Ryan. GIRDUSKY: Yes, they did over and over. PHILLIP: Excuse me, Ryan. GIRDUSKY: They called them – PHILLIP: Hang on just a second. GIRDUSKY: – anyone who attends are Nazis and fascists and Hitlers. PHILLIP: Hang on just one second, one second, okay, because it's the hyperbole that's getting me. You said the media called everyone who attended – GIRDUSKY: Yes, yes they did. PHILLIP: – that rally Hitler? GIRDUSKY: Yes, they did. Yes, they did. PHILLIP: Okay. So, when we're off the show – GIRDUSKY: They said, if you attend that rally, you are a fascist. PHILLIP: – okay. ALLISON: Well, let's talk about this table right here. GIRDUSKY: I don't know what everyone said yesterday. I wasn’t on your Twitter accounts. ALLISON: I didn't say anything. GIRDUSKY: Okay. ALLISON: I just watched [inaudible]. PHILLIP: Ryan – Ryan, that did not happen. GIRDUSKY: Yes, it did. Yes, it did. Abby Phillips [sic], it 100 percent happened. ALLISON: And waiting for someone like you to say something crazy. PHILLIP: Mehdi, go ahead. GIRDUSKY: It 100 percent happened. Hasan finally chimed in and argued the Madison Square Garden rally speakers would have destroyed past Republican presidential campaigns with heated controversy, but Trump has skated by. Hasan stirred the pot by comparing other speakers to Nazi leaders, including Joseph Goebbels and said they were, in fact “Nazis.” Girdusky first clapped back that “[y]ou're called an anti-Semite more than anyone in this table” given his virulently anti-Israel views and support for Palestinians. Girdusky then dropped his little quip, which Hasan took to mean he should be killed on live TV: “Well, I hope your beeper doesn’t go off.” The remaining few minutes of the block were in a perpetual state of cross-talk. After a break, a very shaken and upset CNN host Abby Phillip repeatedly apologizes to Mehdi Hasan after @RyanGirdusky made the beeper comment in the last block. Phillip announces she's kicked Girdusky off the show, insisting she believes in civic discourse...including calling… pic.twitter.com/o142FVkwyk — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) October 29, 2024 Girdusky apologized, but the damage was done with Allison calling him “disgusting” and Hasan lashing out that he’s “a racist, violent person inciting violence against me.” “This is America in 2024. Forget the racism. It’s that I should die,” Hasan declared at one point, adding Girdusky’s apology was “fake” and “ignorant” Hasan was incensed Girdusky was still there, lamenting: “Good job, CNN. CNN, let's have first bloc, say the Muslim guy should be blown up on TV!” Phillip screeched that was Girdusky said was “completely out of pocket”, repeatedly telling him to shut up. Click “expand” to read more of the back-and-forth we transcribed: PHILLIP: You know that. HASAN: – on TV. GIRDUSKY: Then I apologize. I apologize. PHILLIP: Okay. Don't say then I apologize. You literally accused him – ALLISON: Don’t say it. GIRDUSKY: I thought he said, Hamas. I apologize. HASAN: You didn't think I said Hamas. ALLISON: No, you didn’t. HASAN: I said I'm in support of Palestinian rights. GIRDUSKY: Yes, I did. ALLISON: Why? Because when you hear Palestinians, you think Hamas? HASAN: What's funny is Rudy Giuliani said this yesterday, so you're a great guest to be here to defend Rudy Giuliani's racism. PHILLIP: No, give me – give me – ALLISON: Alright, I told myself I wasn’t going to entertain nonsense right now. PHILLIP: – give me one second. ALLISON: And so, at this point – HASAN: This is what we're in now. ALLISON: – I can’t do this. GIRDUSKY: Okay! HASAN: This is America in 2024. ALLISON: Here’s what I will say – HASAN: Forget the racism. ALLISON: – here’s what I’ll – that’s right. HASAN: It’s that I should die. ALLISON: That’s right. GIRDUSKY: I didn't say that you should die. HASAN: What does beeper mean? Don't give me a fake, ignorant – GIRDUSKY: I did not say you should die. PHILLIP: – guys – guys, give me a – HASAN: – why did you say my beeper goes off? ALLISON: What did you mean? HASAN: What did you mean by the beeper? What did you mean by the beeper? PHILLIP: – guys – ALLISON: No, no, no, no, no. GIRDUSKY: Do you support Hamas? HASAN: No, you said, I hope your beeper doesn't go off. PHILLIP: Ryan, stop talking, alright? HASAN: At least have the guts to support your racist comment. ALLISON: I'm so sorry. I’m sorry. TAYLOR: Gotta bring it back. PHILLIP: Alright – hang on. ALLISON: This is why yesterday's rally was disgusting. HASAN: Don't call us Nazis, but I'm going to threaten the brown guys – ALLISON: This is why – HASAN: – that terrorism killed him. ALLISON: – because I didn't ever say Donald Trump was Hitler – HASAN: Man. ALLISON: – but do you know who sat on a stood on a stage yesterday and said I want to come to the Nazi rally? I don't have to make up words and call you something. You're saying it for yourself. HASAN: And Kamala Harris is a pimp! ALLISON: And what you just said right here, apologize, but I will tell you I don't accept that apology, and you didn't even say it to me. GIRDUSKY: But that's fine. I didn't say it to you. ALLISON: That was disgusting. But I can be offended when you don't even say it to me. GIRDUSKY: That’s – ALLISON: I'm not Puerto Rican, but I was offended by what he said yesterday. GIRDUSKY: – okay. ALLISON: And I'm offended that the former President and potentially future president would allow it and go for 12 hours and not say, I don't care, because you know what, when Kamala Harris put out statements about switching up opinions. It wasn't good enough for Republicans. TAYLOR: Why are you looking at me? ALLISON: Because you said it. Taylor tried to have people calm down and told Allison to let Phillip “take this” show “back a little bit” since she was “monopolizing her show” feigning outrage for Hasan even though the comment wasn’t directed at her. Allison was incensed, yelling at Taylor for not joining her in this rhetorical browbeating because “that says a lot about your character too. A shaken Phillip addressed viewers going to break: We have a lot of heated conversations on this show. That is true. But one of the things that I do not appreciate is when we cross the line, okay? I don't appreciate that. And I appreciate the apology, but I don't want a conditional apology for saying something that is completely – it is not civil in the slightest….We got to – we got to stop this stuff. We have to stop this stuff, okay? We're going to go to the break now because I don't think anybody was served by what just happened. But let this be a reminder that there is a too far. There's a too far in our politics and there's a too far at this table, okay? Let's not let that happen again. After the break, Phillip made the hushed and shaken apology to Hasan and offended viewers (click “expand” to read it in full): After a break, a very shaken and upset CNN host Abby Phillip repeatedly apologizes to Mehdi Hasan after @RyanGirdusky made the beeper comment in the last block. Phillip announces she's kicked Girdusky off the show, insisting she believes in civic discourse...including calling… pic.twitter.com/o142FVkwyk — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) October 29, 2024 We're back here, and before we get started, I want to just address what happened in the last segment. First, I want to apologize to Mehdi Hasan for what was said at this table. It was completely unacceptable. When we get this discussion started, you'll see that Ryan is not at the table. There is a line that was crossed there, and it's not acceptable to me. It's not acceptable to us at this network. We want discussion. We want people who disagree with each other to talk to each other. But when you cross the line of a complete lack of civility, that is not going to happen here on this show. It's a heated time. We're in the middle of a political season. We are eight days from a presidential election. But we can have conversations about what is happening in this country without resorting to the lowest of the lowest kind of discourse. I want to address that and I want to apologize to the viewers at home because we want to be able to hear each other, we want to be able to talk to each other, and we plan to do that in this next segment. To see the relevant CNN transcript from October 28, click here.

CBS’s Stephen Colbert did not appreciate the Washington Post’s “extra sinister" decision to refrain from endorsing Kamala Harris. On Monday’s edition of The Late Show, Colbert railed against the paper and declared it is failing to uphold its stated commitment to democracy and warn “about a looming fascist regime.” Colbert began, “Kamala Harris has been racking up major endorsements, but this weekend, she didn't get a big one because the Washington Post announced it will not endorse a presidential candidate in the upcoming election. Explains, yeah, I agree, explains why they changed their slogan from ‘democracy dies in darkness’ to “democracy dies or doesn't. We can't tell because it is so dark in here.”     He then quoted opinion editor David Shipley as saying, “The Post was no longer going to tell people how to vote, a posture that would reflect the papers independent bona fides.” An animated Colbert ranted, “Okay, counterpoint, you are the opinion editor. Your whole job is to have an opinion about stuff like this. That would be like a movie critic writing, ‘I give Megalopolis thumbs. To say how many or which direction they’re pointing would ruin my independent bona fides. Adam Driver gives a performance.’” Colbert then switched his ire to owner Jeff Bezos, “What’s extra sinister about this is the paper had an endorsement for Harris already written and ready to go, but at the last minute it apparently got yanked by the paper’s owner, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.” After a moment of self-awareness where he pretended to buy a paper shredder from Amazon to shred his Washington Posts, Colbert turned to the reaction to the Post’s non-endorsement, “Turns out refusing to express an opinion about a looming fascist regime is unpopular among newspaper subscribers because as of this taping, more than 200,000 people have canceled digital subscriptions to the Washington Post. 200,000 gone. 200,000. You can't lose those kind of people. If this keeps up, it could destroy the Washington Post. Now, is that a good thing or a bad thing? I have no opinion.” People like Colbert did not read previous Washington Post presidential endorsements to get informed opinions of the two candidates. Instead, they read them because cocooning oneself in an echo chamber feels good and contrary to Colbert's protests, democracy will survive the paper not endorsing Kamala Harris. Here is a transcript for the October 28 show: CBS The Late Show with Stephen Colbert 10/28/2024 11:46 PM ET STEPHEN COLBERT: Kamala Harris has been racking up major endorsements, but this weekend, she didn't get a big one because the Washington Post announced it will not endorse a presidential candidate in the upcoming election. Explains, yeah, I agree, explains why they changed their slogan from “democracy dies in darkness” to “democracy dies or doesn't. We can't tell because it is so dark in here.” WaPo’s opinion editor said “The Post was no longer going to tell people how to vote, a posture that would reflect the papers independent bona fides.” Okay, counterpoint, you are the opinion editor. Your whole job is to have an opinion about stuff like this. That would be like a movie critic writing, “I give Megalopolis thumbs. To say how many or which direction they’re pointing would ruin my independent bona fides. Adam Driver gives a performance.” What’s extra sinister about this is the paper had an endorsement for Harris already written and ready to go, but at the last minute it apparently got yanked by the paper’s owner, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.  Well, that’s it. I'm going to shred my collection of Washington Posts. Okay. Amazon.com, paper shredders, and, ooh, two day shipping and you know what, I do need refills on the Nespresso. That is really great just one click right there. Can you make sure that gets charged up? Turns out refusing to express an opinion about a looming fascist regime is unpopular among newspaper subscribers because as of this taping, more than 200,000 people have canceled digital subscriptions to the Washington Post. 200,000 gone. 200,000. You can't lose those kind of people. If this keeps up, it could destroy the Washington Post. Now, is that a good thing or a bad thing? I have no opinion.

Former President Donald Trump and popular podcast host Joe Rogan called out Big Tech’s interference in the 2020 presidential election, predicting a new era where young Americans will break free from censorship and leftist “wokeness.” During Friday’s edition of the Joe Rogan Experience, Trump appeared to reference a 2020 Media Research Center survey, which found Big Tech’s influence titled the election in favor of Joe Biden.  According to the MRC, one in six Biden voters (17%) said they might not have supported him if they had known about Biden-related controversies, including the Hunter Biden laptop scandal revealed by the New York Post. “Fifty-one intelligence agents came up that the laptop was from Russia. They lied. … It was Hunter’s. It was from his bed. It was Hunter’s laptop. They said it was created by Russia!” Trump said, referring to the infamous Politico letter that influenced social media companies to censor the laptop exposé just before the election. Trump added, “They said it made a 17-point difference. That’s a big difference.” This comment appeared to cite MRC data indicating that 45.1 percent of Biden voters were unaware of the laptop scandal, with 9.4 percent stating they would not have voted for Biden had they known. This margin would have tipped Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin toward Trump. Read the full report here: https://t.co/y8Zfb5rCx8 — Media Research Center (@theMRC) October 26, 2024 Earlier in the podcast, Rogan scolded leftists for abandoning the First Amendment. “The rebels are Republicans now. They're like, ‘You want to be a rebel? You want to be punk rock? You want to, like, buck the system? You're a conservative now,” Rogan said. “Then the Liberals are now pro-silencing criticism. they're pro-censorship online. They're talking about regulating free speech and regulating the First Amendment. It’s bananas to watch.” Trump agreed, contrasting the leftist shift on free speech with their willingness to use the justice system to crack down on their opponents. Specifically, Trump affirmed he has been targeted more often than the notorious, violent criminal Al Capone. Trump has positioned himself as the pro-free speech candidate ahead of the 2024 presidential election. In a 2022 video, he said, “The censorship cartel must be dismantled and destroyed — and it must happen immediately.” Now, Trump has made it clear that maintaining free speech is more important than ever.  After all, Trump is the only sitting U.S. president ever banned by Big Tech companies. Twitter banned his account on Jan. 8, 2021, while allowing global dictators, such as Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Madur, to remain active. Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on hate speech and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable