After the Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in U.S. v Skrmetti, the case that will determine whether states may ban transgender medical procedures for kids, one mother told The Daily Signal that her child began to transition as a baby. “She knew since birth,” Michelle Callahan-DuMont said of her 10-year-old, a biological male who says he identifies as a transgender female and goes by the name “Violet.” The family traveled from Arizona to Washington, D.C., to join the American Civil Liberty Union’s “Free to Be Ourselves” rally Wednesday outside the Supreme Court. The high court likely will rule by June on the constitutionality of a Tennessee law protecting minors from irreversible transgender medical interventions. CNN interviewed the same family about having a so-called transgender child. What the left-leaning news outlet didn’t mention is that Callahan-DuMont and her husband began to “transition” Violet when he was toddler age, over 1 year old. “Violet told us when she was 1 and a half,” Callahan-DuMont told The Daily Signal. “She’s been telling us since she could speak.” After yesterday's SCOTUS hearing determining if states can ban trans procedures for kids, @DailySignal interviewed a family who claimed their son knew he was a trans girl since BIRTH?Little did we know the family had already used their child for @CNN stardom. https://t.co/ytyWVk77Qn pic.twitter.com/ikwF8sme5l— Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell (@TheElizMitchell) December 5, 2024 In the interview with CNN correspondent Lucy Kafanov that aired, Violet said he is afraid he will be murdered on the street for identifying as transgender. Callahan-DuMont, who appeared in the interview with Violet and four other family members, said that “it’s hard to hear her say that” before detailing the 10-year-old’s response to the results of the 2024 presidential election. “She asked me three questions after she heard who won the election,” Callahan-DuMont said, then quoted her child. “Are we going to have to move? Are they going to take me away from you? And am I not going to be able to get my medicine?” Former Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, signed a bill banning transgender medical procedures for minors in 2022. If the Supreme Court rules that the Tennessee law doing the same thing is unconstitutional, Arizona’s law likely would be overturned as well. Callahan-DuMont appears to have a history of publicly politicizing her child’s story. She runs Instagram and Threads account for Violet, largely focused on advocating for “trans kids.” One Threads post urges people to vote for the Democrats’ Harris-Walz ticket “for Violet’s healthcare & safety.” In the CNN interview, Violet said Republican messaging against transgender ideology in the 2024 election made him feel “dead inside.” “I’ve heard politicians that say, ‘No, you have the wrong gender. You’re confused, Honey,'” Violet said. “No. Myself is a fact, not an opinion, and they don’t get to decide that for me. I get to decide that for myself.” The post ‘She Knew Since Birth’: Family Began Transitioning Child as Baby Boy appeared first on The Daily Signal.

A 14-year-old Pop Warner football player in Connecticut passed away after collapsing during practice. Jahkye Gayle, a member of the Bloomfield Junior Warhawks, collapsed during a non-contact warmup drill at practice. “It was just like a walk through, essentially just light jogging. Nothing strenuous or anything like that,” Trevor Ford, the president of Junior Warhawks Football, said. Emergency medical personnel responded to Gayle immediately after his collapse. 14-year-old Pop Warner football player dies after collapsing during practice. https://t.co/1Ex9dAbSvv — WBRC 6 News (@WBRCnews) December 2, 2024 WFSB reports: On Saturday night, the community came together to honor Jahkye’s memory. Hundreds of his teammates, friends, and family members gathered on the football field. They lit candles and released balloons in the sky to honor him. “It’s hard losing my brother, someone I shared a room with, did everything with, and grew up with. He was overall a great person who changed people with his presence,” said Lamar, Jahkyes’ brother. Jahkye was a talented football player who was known as a jokester among his teammates on the Junior Warhawks Pop Warner Football Team. He was one of the longest tenured players in the youth football program and was scheduled to receive the lifetime achievement award at this year’s banquet. #RIP he was 14! https://t.co/eMsAszQk0t — Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella (@Fynnderella1) December 3, 2024 Per CT Insider: New England Pop Warner Football & Cheer had issued an earlier statement about the death of “one of our own,” extending condolences to Bloomfield and central Connecticut. The statement, shared on Facebook, states Gayle was “more than an extraordinary athlete.” “He was a friend, a source of inspiration and a guiding light for his team,” the statement read. “His impact was felt both on and off the field, and his memory will forever remain a part of us.” Trevor Ford, president of Bloomfield Junior Warhawks Pop Warner, described the student-athlete as a shining star of the program, which launched four years ago. “He was a very bright kid who always took his academics very seriously,” Ford said. “He had a very big personality. He was the sense of humor of the group. It’s always good to have that one individual who is the sun on a dark, cloudy day.” Gayle collapsed during football practice last Wednesday evening, according to Bloomfield officials. When Gayle collapsed, staff and emergency personnel made attempts to revive him, but were unsuccessful, officials said. WATCH: In related news, a 17-year-old hockey player collapsed on the ice during a charity game in honor of a fellow student who died in a car crash. 17-Year-Old Hockey Player Passes Away After Collapsing During Charity Game

Jack Smith wants to be SUPER sure that the Court knows he wants his case against President Trump fully dismissed. Super duper certain! This is pretty hilarious, it’s like the kid who sneaks candy all day and doesn’t brush his teeth ever and then thinks he can just brush 10 times the day before he goes to the dentist and it will all balance out. Sorry bud, it doesn’t work that way…. Not for the kid and not for Jack Smith. Check this out: Jack Smith moves to double-dismiss his case against President Trump, without prejudice. pic.twitter.com/pMxhZndYIW — Melissa Hallman (@dotconnectinga) December 5, 2024 Here’s a closer look: FULL TEXT: On November 25, 2024, on the Government’s Motion, see ECF No. 281, the Court dismissed the operative superseding indictment without prejudice. ECF No. 283. The Clerk acted on the Court’s order and the docket now reflects the absence of any pending charges against the defendant and classifies this case as “closed.” Nonetheless, because certain out-of-Circuit caselaw indicates that a superseding indictment does not void the original indictment, see, e.g., United States v. Vavlitis, 9 F.3d 206, 209 (1st Cir. 1993), the Government now supplements its dismissal motion to avoid any doubt that for all of the reasons set forth in the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, the original indictment, ECF No. 1, is also dismissed without prejudice. The Government has conferred with defense counsel, who does not object to the relief requested. Here was our original report on the original dismissal: IT’S OFFICIAL: Jack Smith Case Is DISMISSED! But There’s One Small Detail… IT'S OFFICIAL: Jack Smith Case Is DISMISSED! But There's One Small Detail... It's official, the lawfare case brought by Jack Smith against President Trump is officially GONE -- dismissed by the Court! It all started this morning when Jack Smith filed a Motion To Dismiss the federal case against President Trump: BREAKING: Special counsel Jack Smith has moved to dismiss his federal election interference case against President-elect Donald Trump due to a long-standing Justice Department policy that bars the prosecution of a sitting president. Read more: https://t.co/QGRgJ2cMqq pic.twitter.com/WJ1FBotMMJ — ABC News (@ABC) November 25, 2024 It became official just about an hour ago when Judge Tanya Chutkan granted the Motion to Dismiss: It is official. Judge Tanya Chutkan grants motion to dismiss J6 case pic.twitter.com/ORi7h0pLvs — Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) November 25, 2024 So that's great news! We knew it from day 1, the case was always bogus and we told you so right from the jump. Now they head off with their tail between their legs losing once again. But....I told you there was one small detail and it's this: the case is Dismissed "Without Prejudice" and the Judge went out of her way to make a big federal case about that (no pun intended): And just like Jack Smith, Chutkan has to take one final shot suggesting the case can be revisited after Trump leaves office in January 2029. pic.twitter.com/VgBxzqRUM7 — Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) November 25, 2024 So what's that mean and why is it a big deal? Because it means the DOJ can refile the case in the future. And look at the highlighted portion below from the Judge's Order: Look, I'm no legal scholar, but that sentence doesn't even make any sense! Immunity afforded to a sitting President expires when they leave office? That is wildly false. Immunity afforded to a sitting President applies to all official duties served while in office and it does NOT expire when they leave office.  That's the whole point!  If it simply expired after they leave office, that would defeat the entire point! Wow, that's a really uninformed sentence to write. And while the case was bogus to begin with, even the flimsy claims in the case apply to when President Trump was in office, not when he was out of office. So what is the point of the highlighted sentence other than to just have one (unintelligent) hissy fit on the way out the door? Wow! I completely agree with Julie Kelly here: I explain why Jack Smith--who burned through an estimated $50 million in two years to pursue Pres Trump--should face an investigation into prosecutorial misconduct, selective prosecution, tampering with evidence, and withholding discovery:https://t.co/qbbNNbfUUP — Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) November 8, 2024 Watch it live on Fox News: THIS AFTERNOON: Jack Smith has dismissed the... Trump Election Interference CaseTrump Classified Documents Case This lawfare was always unprecedented. This lawfare was always wrong. This lawfare was always politically-motivated. And this lawfare MUST NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN. pic.twitter.com/xigUnwjeeu — Byron Donalds (@ByronDonalds) November 25, 2024 Steve Bannon and Mike Davis nail it here: IF IT WASN'T ABOUT ELECTION & LAWFARE, WHY ARE THEY DROPPING CHARGES? Mike Davis questions remarks of Jack Smith and colleagues that case wasn't about lawfare and the election, why are they dismissing case? Davis believes severe charges should be used.@Mrddmia @BANNONS_WARROOM pic.twitter.com/MC4KJLuFKW — Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) November 25, 2024 Here's more, from ABC News: The judge overseeing Donald Trump's election interference case has dismissed the case, after special counsel Jack Smith asked the judge to toss the case due to a long-standing Justice Department policy that bars the prosecution of a sitting president. Smith earlier Monday moved to dismiss Trump's election interference case and the appeal of his classified documents case ahead of Trump's impending inauguration, due to the DOJ's presidential immunity policy and not because the charges lacked merit. U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan dismissed the charges against Trump without prejudice, leaving open the highly unlikely possibility of a future prosecution. In a two-page opinion, Judge Chutkan wrote that dismissing the case without prejudice is "appropriate" and would not harm the "public interest," agreeing with Smith's argument that Trump's immunity would not cover him when he leaves office. "Dismissal without prejudice is also consistent with the Government's understanding that the immunity afforded to a sitting President is temporary, expiring when they leave office," Chutkan wrote. However, it's extremely unlikely that any prosecutor would attempt to bring the same charges in the future, in part because the statute of limitations for the alleged crimes will have expired by the time Trump leaves office in four years. My take? There's no way in hell this case ever gets brought again in the future. This case was brought for one reason and one reason only: to distract President Trump and hurt him in the election. And it failed even at that one job.

Hollywood celebrity Sean Penn has described his friend Hunter Biden as “one of the finest people I know,” and declared that he is “proud” Joe Biden issued him with the most wide-ranging pardon in US [...] The post Sean Penn Praises Hunter Biden as ‘One of the Finest People I Know,’ Defends Presidential Pardon appeared first on The People's Voice.

Muhammad has officially become the most popular name for baby boys in the United Kingdom, according to the latest data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). While traditional names like Noah and Oliver took [...] The post Muhammad Officially Becomes Most Popular Baby Boys Name in the UK appeared first on The People's Voice.

President Biden’s White House is reportedly considering a sweeping preemptive pardon for Dr. Anthony Fauci to protect him from prosecution during the incoming Trump presidency. Key Trump advisers including Elon Musk have repeatedly stated that [...] The post Biden Discussing Sweeping Pardon Covering Fauci’s Whole Career Due To ‘Crazy Conspiracy Theories’ appeared first on The People's Voice.