Judicial Watch is suing the Biden-Harris administration in order to receive documents on the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) promotion of transgender sex change operations for minors. The suit comes after Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in early July requesting documents pertaining to HHS Assistant Secretary Admiral Rachel Levine’s involvement in pressuring a health organization to drop age requirements for sex change procedures. HHS failed to respond to the FOIA request, Judicial Watch says. “Judicial Watch announced today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,” the organization stated in a press release, adding that the suit seeks “all records of communications of Assistant Secretary Rachel Levine regarding pressure put on an international group of medical experts to remove age limit guidelines on transgender procedures.” “Biden-Harris appointee Admiral Levine, who abused power and is notorious for promoting transgender extremist policies, promoted mutilating surgeries for minors,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton contended. “It is no wonder the Biden-Harris administration wants to cover this up with unlawful secrecy. Judicial Watch’s lawsuit to expose the truth is urgently needed to protect children.” The lawsuit to procure the documents comes after The Daily Wire reported that Levine, a man who identifies as a woman, met with the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), and urged the organization to drop age requirements from its standards of care document. Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here! One member of Levine’s staff warned WPATH that age requirements could contribute to “devastating legislation for trans care,” going on to say that Levine “wonders if the specific ages can be taken out.” Another email, this one from WPATH, thanked Levine for meeting with the organization and explained that it decided to remove the age requirements upon the transgender government official’s request. “We heard your comments regarding the minimal age criteria… Consequently, we have made changes to the SOC8 in this respect… They are now not a recommendation from the SOC-8 anymore,” the email reads. “Assistant Secretary Levine … influence[d] the substantive content of SOC-8 [Standards of Care], based on political goals rather than science,” Psychologist Dr. James Cantor said while providing testimony during legal proceedings that uncovered communications between the HHS official and WPATH. “Specifically, Assistant Secretary Levine, through a staff member, pressured WPATH to remove recommended minimum ages for medical transition treatments from SOC-8.” Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, the Chairman of Do No Harm, similarly criticized Levine, also tearing into WPATH for prioritizing politics over health. “The collusion between WPATH and the administration through Rachel Levine is turning into one of the most disturbing medical scandals of this generation,” Goldfarb told The Daily Wire after the relationship between Levine and WPATH became public. “These documents reveal WPATH knowingly put political considerations over the health and safety of children, destroying what little credibility they once had. This behavior violates the oath we all take as doctors.”

We’re getting to the point where even the most Left-wing news outlets are becoming frustrated with how little Kamala Harris is speaking to the press. Axios for example reported the other day: Exclusive: The Harris-Walz ticket is on pace to do fewer interviews and press conferences than any major party’s presidential pairing in modern U.S. history. According to the data, JD Vance alone has done seven times more interviews and press conferences than Kamala Harris and Tim Walz combined. This near-total media blackout makes it all the more important to pay attention to the very few times that Kamala Harris is willing to speak off-the-cuff. We had one of those moments earlier this week, when Kamala Harris spoke with something called “The National Association of Black Journalists,” or NABJ. It’s still not clear why we have a segregated association of black journalists, or why politicians think it’s important to speak to them. But apparently, this is considered to be a worthwhile stop for every candidate. Donald Trump spoke to the NABJ a few weeks ago. He was heckled throughout his appearance, and the moderators were extremely hostile to him. But he did it. Kamala Harris, on the other hand, was not heckled by the black journalists’ association. Instead, for roughly an hour, she was allowed to lie repeatedly, without being interrupted or corrected a single time, as far as I can tell. And one of those lies was particularly egregious. In response to a question about abortion, Kamala Harris suggested that the so-called heartbeat bill in Georgia — which bans abortion after a heartbeat is detected — was to blame for the recent death of a 28-year-old woman named Amber Thurman. And by extension, Kamala Harris implicated Donald Trump, the Supreme Court, and the entire pro-life movement. Watch: First she portrays Donald Trump as nefarious because he “hand-picked” three Supreme Court justices. I guess he was supposed to just draw their names from a hat or something. And then Kamala Harris launches into a narrative that’s been making its way throughout the mainstream media in recent days. It originated in an outlet called ProPublica, which is best-known for posting a series of recent hit pieces on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Here’s how one news station reported on the story: You’d be hard-pressed to find a more absurd and self-contradictory news segment anywhere on television. The report begins by stating that Amber Thurman died because of a “lack of abortion care access.” According to this report, Thurman’s death was “preventable” because she drove from Georgia to North Carolina to get an abortion when she was about nine weeks pregnant with twins. But because of a traffic jam, she missed her appointment, so she was given abortion pills. Then she drove back to Georgia, where she began suffering serious complications from sepsis, which is a potentially fatal response to bacterial infection. And then, according to this report, doctors in Georgia didn’t perform a so-called “D&C” procedure in order to save the life of the mother. They waited more than 20 hours before significant intervention, supposedly because they were worried that they might be prosecuted under Georgia’s heartbeat law. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show And then, after all of this reporting, they casually mention at the very end of the news report that none of this has anything to do with Georgia’s heartbeat law, which has clear exceptions in emergencies where the life of the mother is at stake. And that’s true. Here’s what the law says, directly from the Georgia Department of Health: The law provides that no abortion shall be performed if the unborn child has a detectable human heartbeat except (a) in the event of a medical emergency or medically futile pregnancy … or (b) in cases involving rape or incest in which an official police report has been filed and where the probable gestational age of the unborn child is 20 weeks or less. The law does not prohibit the removal of a dead unborn child caused by a spontaneous abortion or the removal of an ectopic pregnancy. Anyone connecting this incident to the Georgia heartbeat law is lying. And they’re doing it in the most flagrant and reprehensible way imaginable. They are using the death of a young woman and her two children in order to defame the pro-life movement. The Atlantic, for example, wrote this: Some tragedies are impossible to prevent, or even to predict. The death of Amber Nicole Thurman was not. She was perhaps the first woman killed by the overturning of Roe v. Wade. For her part, Kamala Harris said in a statement: This young mother should be alive, raising her son, and pursuing her dream of attending nursing school. … Now women are dying. These are the consequences of Donald Trump’s actions. Yes, she referred to her as a “young mother,” even as this “young mother” killed her two children. This is a story that Kamala Harris now pushes at every opportunity. Yesterday she sat down with Oprah, for example. And they strongly imply, once again, that Georgia’s law somehow was involved in what happened here. And then they play a montage that contradicts that narrative: Oprah and Kamala blame Amber Thurman’s death on pro-life laws — then play a montage which explains that her death was not, in fact, due to pro-life laws but complications from abortion drugs pic.twitter.com/wo1rapObiu — Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) September 20, 2024 As Erick Erickson has pointed out, this isn’t just a hoax. It’s also a clear example of projection. The pro-life movement didn’t kill this woman — the abortion pill did. These drugs are not, in fact, “as safe as Tylenol,” as Planned Parenthood claims. Researchers have long understood that sepsis is a “rare but potentially fatal adverse effect” of abortion drugs. What can happen is that, in some cases, after these drugs kill the child, there’s dead tissue that remains. And that tissue can cause a serious infection if it’s not expelled from the body. So the pill can cause the intended death of the child, and the unintended death of the mother. Of course, no one at the National Association of Black Journalists pointed this out to Kamala Harris when she spoke with them. Instead they let her continue to ramble for another minute or so. Then they pivoted to a question about why it’s important for her to be joyful. That’s how shameless and embarrassing this whole event was. Here’s the rest of Kamala Harris’ answer, and then we’ll play the follow-up question: So Kamala Harris lies about the death of a young woman and her children in Georgia. Then she says you’re “immoral” if you think that the government should “tell a woman what to do about her own body and her life” and her “best interests.” She also suggests that the Georgia law bans abortion in cases of rape and incest, which isn’t true. And instead of any kind of follow-up, she gets asked about her “joy.” No one at this useless organization of “black journalists” thought to correct the record on Amber Thurman. No one thought to point out that, in fact, the pro-life movement is concerned about the “best interests” and the “body” of the child, in addition to the mother. Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here! In her entire, two-minute-long rambling answer, Kamala Harris didn’t explain why mothers should be able to kill their children if they determine that it’s in their “best interests.” Instead, she simply declared that, if you’re a Christian or a Muslim or any other religious faith, then killing children isn’t really incompatible with your beliefs. Just take Kamala Harris’ word on that. She’s an expert on the topic. She celebrates Kwanzaa, after all. There’s another Georgia woman mentioned in this report from ProPublica, named Candi Miller. She was a 41-year-old mother of three who suffered from diabetes, lupus, and hypertension. Apparently her health was so “fragile” that doctors warned another pregnancy could kill her. According to ProPublica, when she became pregnant anyway in 2022: … she avoided doctors and navigated an abortion on her own … Miller ordered abortion pills online, but she did not expel all the fetal tissue and would need a [D&C] procedure to clear it from her uterus and stave off sepsis, a grave and painful infection. … Her teenage son watched her suffer for days after she took the pills, bedridden and moaning. In the early hours of Nov. 12, 2022, her husband found her unresponsive in bed, her 3-year-old daughter at her side. An autopsy later: … found a lethal combination of painkillers, including the dangerous opioid fentanyl. This situation, again, is being blamed on the pro-life movement and the overturning of Roe. ProPublica, citing a report from a state committee of “experts,” concluded that this was also a “preventable” death, because they determined that Candi Miller was “responding” to the Georgia legislation when she ordered the abortion pills online. But again, that doesn’t make the Georgia legislation responsible for what happened. If doctors — or patients — misunderstand the law, that’s not the law’s fault. If this woman had gone to the hospital instead of taking a lethal combination of painkillers, then doctors could have saved her life. Under Georgia law, they would’ve been able to do that. In reality, abortion pills are what led to the deaths of these women and their children in Georgia. These mothers’ decision to kill their children is the reason that all of this happened. Every reasonable person who looks at these cases will come to that conclusion. And yet the Democrats have found a way to make these deaths an indictment of the pro-life movement. And once again, the media is going along with it. WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI This is how the abortion industry gets away with never grappling with or acknowledging the dangers of abortion. Every abortion-related death is somehow transformed into a death called by a “lack of access to abortion.” Kamala Harris and the National Association of Black Journalists would rather push this false narrative, instead of being honest with women about the consequences of these pills. These are people who would rather see women die than tell them not to kill their children. And as a result, many more women like Candi Miller and Amber Thurman will do just that.

Those who lived through the 1990s have likely seen the family drama 7th Heaven. It revolved around preacher David Camden, his wife, Annie, and their five children, Matt, Mary, Lucy, Simon, and Ruthie. The show was big on family values and teaching lessons, but looking back now, some of the plots were a bit crazy. Thankfully, a TikToker named Robert Anderson, who posts on the app as @heartthrobert, has recently watched several episodes and broken them down. His takes are positively hilarious and will undoubtedly make anyone who has ever seen an episode laugh out loud. @heartthrobert Replying to @useme1234go! #7thHeaven #90s #90skid #90skids #90sthrowback #90stv The 7th Heaven Episode where Simon is in a slow speed car chase ♬ original sound – Rob Anderson The Original “7th Heaven” Cast Has Watched The Videos Beverly Mitchell, 43, who played Lucy, loves Rob’s hot takes. “He’s hilarious,” she shared with People at 90s Con. “It’s so fun.” Barry Watson, 50, who played the eldest Camden, Matt, is also a big fan. “All the stuff he’s done is so good.” Per People, Beverly Mitchell shared during a panel discussion at 90s Con that she and her castmates love what Rob does. “We had some fun with it,” she said of an installment she filmed with Rob where she got into character and summarized her traumas to a therapist. @heartthrobert With special guest THE Beverley Mitchell!! 7thHeaven 90s 90kids ♬ original sound – Rob Anderson The cast is like a family. “I think we appreciate the gift that 7th Heaven was even more because it truly was a magical show. We’re grateful you watched the show, that you’re listening, and that you continue to watch and show up for us. It was our pleasure and honor to play these characters that meant something to you,” Beverly shared. You can find the source of this story’s featured image here. The post “7th Heaven” Goes Viral For Hysterically Accurate Recap Videos appeared first on InspireMore.

The talent on “The Voice” Season 26 is so good that they couldn’t wait to share some of it with us. Although the show doesn’t officially premiere until September 23rd, an early release video shows an incredible four-chair turn performance. Watch as Sofronio Vasquez gets an instant four-chair turn. Instant Four-Chair Turn For Sofronio Vasquez Getting all four chairs to turn is a challenge. You need to have that raw talent and masterful skill over your voice that impresses all four coaches. Well, for Sofronio Vasquez, it seemed as easy as breathing. Upon hearing the first three words, Snopp Dogg immediately pushed his button. It only took seconds before the other three coaches hit their buttons, as well, boom, boom, boom in sequence. This man had a four-chair turn within the first 20 seconds of his audition! His soulful voice masterfully tackled every riff in Mary J. Blige’s I‘m Goin Down, and all four judges seemed star-struck. The Voice Season 26 is going to be no joke. And with talent like Sofronio Vasquez, the coaches needed to act fast. Reba began nodding her head and said, “Oh yeah” as she looked at Snoop Dogg. Snopp then began to motion to himself and said, “Come on home. Come on in,” already trying to encourage the singer where to go even before his performance was through. “The Voice” Season 26 Is Heating Up Sonfronio Vasquez received a standing ovation before the judges began to fight over him. Reba told him, “I could not hit my button fast enough. Your voice is like butter.” Gwen Stefani followed with, “That was a Grammy performance. I want to be inspired by you.” Snoop Dogg even took off his glasses to address him. He told the star “Get in where you fit in,” and argued that his team was the best fit for a soul singer. Michael also had incredibly heartfelt words for the singer. However right as the singer was about to make his choice for who he wanted as his coach…the video ended. If you want to see who Sonfronio Vasquez picked as his coach then you will need to tune in when this season airs. “The Voice” Season 26 premieres on September 23 at 8 PM ET on NBC and Peacock. Be sure to catch this incredible performance and so much more. The source of the featured image is here. The post “The Voice” Audition Blows The Coaches’ Minds In Early Release Video appeared first on InspireMore.

A thousand bottles of lube, a gubernatorial candidate who allegedly loves tranny porn and a ‘you up?’ text from a Marxist.

'Batteries are critical to strengthening the US grid'

'end Harris's chances of winning the White House by just one vote'

News Wednesday Wednesday Season 2 Behind-the-Scenes Teaser Will Almost Make Your Eyes Bleed …but she’s not that generous By Vanessa Armstrong | Published on September 20, 2024 Screenshot: Netflix Comment 0 Share New Share Screenshot: Netflix Netflix released a behind-the-scenes video that gives us a glimpse of the upcoming sets and characters, and confirms the title of Wednesday’s Season Two premiere episode, which is “Here We Woe Again.” Director Tim Burton also makes an appearance in the video, as well as Emma Myers (“Enid Sinclair”), Joy Sunday (“Bianca Barclay”), Catherine Zeta-Jones (“Morticia Addams”), Luis Guzmán (“Gomez Addams”), and, of course, Jenna Ortega (“Wednesday Addams”), who says that if we saw more, “your eyes would bleed, and I’m not that generous.” The second season will see several new actors, including Steve Buscemi as Barry Dort (The Big Lebowski, Boardwalk Empire), Billie Piper as Capri (Doctor Who, I Hate Suzie), Evie Templeton (Return to Silent Hill, Lord of Misrule), Owen Painter (Tiny Beautiful Things, The Handmaid’s Tale), and Noah Taylor (Law & Order: Organized Crime, Park Avenue).  The guest star list is equally impressive, and includes Christopher Lloyd (Addams Family), Joanna Lumley as Grandmama (Fool Me Once, Absolutely Fabulous), Thandiwe Newton as Dr. Fairburn (Westworld, Crash), Frances O’Connor (The Missing, The Twelve), Haley Joel Osment (The Kominsky Method, Somebody I Used to Know), Heather Matarazzo (The Princess Diaries, Scream), and Joonas Suotamo (Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker). Wednesday Season Two is currently shooting in Ireland and will premiere on Netflix sometime in 2025. Season One is currently available to watch on the streamer. Check out the behind-the-scenes video below. [end-mark]   The post <i>Wednesday</i> Season 2 Behind-the-Scenes Teaser Will Almost Make Your Eyes Bleed appeared first on Reactor.

Adam is back and opening up a classic pack of trading cards from 1983 by Donruss, featuring Tom Selleck as Magnum, P.I. in all his mustachioed glory! For more episodes of Wax Pack Flashback with CONTINUE READING... The post Wax Pack Flashback: Magnum, P.I. (1983) appeared first on The Retro Network.

A public school teacher in Fairfax County is suing her school district for withholding public records mentioning her name. Julie Perry, a history teacher at Centreville High School in Northern Virginia, filed a Freedom of Information Act request on May 29 for emails from Assistant Superintendent Penny Gros because she felt like her job was threatened after a controversial tweet about the transgender community targeting autistic kids. The district produced only one document, but Perry knew something was missing. Nine months earlier, Daily Wire reporter Luke Rosiak had submitted a request for documents containing Perry’s name. Rosiak received 14 documents mentioning Perry, thirteen of which were withheld from Perry’s request. Now, Perry is suing the district demanding it hand over all documents related to her FOIA request, pay a civil penalty, and pay Perry’s legal fees. Attorney Hayden Fisher is representing Perry and told The Daily Signal he plans to file another lawsuit soon on behalf of Fairfax County mom who also says the district withheld documents from her FOIA request and overcharged her. Perry told The Daily Signal she feels called to speak up for civil liberties and stand up for kids. “I want people to see that not every teacher is radical left,” Perry said. “I want people to see that there are teachers that are so tired of what’s going on in schools and are not happy about it, and I realize either I speak up or nobody else is going to do it.” Fairfax County said it has not yet been served with Perry’s lawsuit. Fisher filed the lawsuit on Saturday and sent the district a copy of it on Sunday. “FCPS has not been served with the lawsuit and so we cannot comment on a lawsuit we have not received and reviewed,” media outreach specialist Steven Brasley told The Daily Signal. Brasley did not answer The Daily Signal’s question about if the district purposefully withheld documents from Perry. This is not the first time Fairfax County has targeted Perry for her conservative viewpoint. When Perry ran for state Senate, her opponent, Democrat Stella Pekarsky, was involved in discussions about whether to punish Perry for the social media post about transgenderism and autistic kids, the Daily Wire reported. A donor for Pekarsky sent Perry’s high school principal a complaint about her posts, public records show. The principal forwarded the complaint to Gros, who said she would seek guidance about what to do. The records show Gros seems to have sought the guidance from Pekarsky. Perry then received a memo threatening her job. “As an FCPS employee, your posts—whether personal or professional—reflect not only upon you but also upon the school division,” the memo said. “The content of your posts should not impair your capacity to maintain the respect of students and parents, nor impair your ability to effectively perform your job. Any action that brings the school system into disrepute may be just cause for dismissal.” Perry’s tweet, which garnered complaints from fellow staff members, discussed the pattern she has seen in her classes of autistic kids identifying at transgender. “The far-left uses the literal mentality of children with Autism to abuse them in this manner,” the May 6 post on X said. “This is why children with Autism need greater protection.” Vanessa Hall, co-director of Fairfax County’s LGBT Pride club, sent an email to Perry’s principal complaining about the post, which was obtained through Rosiaks’ FOIA request and shared with The Daily Signal. “I need to be clear that I have refrained from contacting you about her numerous social media posts that are homophobic, transphobic, and deeply hurtful to the entire community,” Hall said. “She demonizes so many in the community based on their identity whether it be social, racial, gender, political, or religious identity. I find it upsetting, but I believe firmly in free speech no matter how much I may dislike it.” “However, these tweets below show that she is using students for her political gain,” Hall’s complaint continued. “She has crossed a serious ethical line if she is willing to release personal information about her students to the public on social media in direct violation of school policy and parental rights.” “Part of the reason the Left acts the way they act is because nobody stands up, nobody forces them to face consequences,” Perry told The Daily Signal. “That’s why people need to face consequences when they break the law, and so that’s what I’ve learned,” the teacher continued. “I always give this to God, and I’ve always learned, as long as I’m doing the right thing, God will always provide.” The post Virginia School District Refuses to Give Public Records to Teacher It Opposed in Election appeared first on The Daily Signal.