Megyn Kelly went viral after she suggested she might enter politics in order to stop a Connecticut lawmaker over his support of transgender surgery for kids. On Wednesday in a post on X, the host of “The Megyn Kelly Show” podcast shared a post from U.S. Senator Chris Murphy [D-CT] who shared a clip of himself on the U.S. Senate floor, celebrating the fact that he’d blocked “a Republican resolution” — which he claimed was a “shameful” move by Republicans “to bully and marginalize” transgender kids. “You make me want to run for office in my new home state of CT and take your job,” Kelly wrote to her millions of followers, who moved to the state in 2020 due to the “woke” leftism and race essentialism in her kids’ New York City schools, as previously reported. At the time of this publication, Kelly’s post has been seen more than 1.6 million times. You make me want to run for office in my new home state of CT and take your job. https://t.co/tLWKNMLOtZ — Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) September 18, 2024 The resolution was originally brought by U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn) to recognize October 10 as ‘American Girls in Sports Day,’” following a move by President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris administration to change Title IX — a policy that was originally enacted in 1972 to protect women and girls — to protect transgender-identifying people. The U.S. Supreme Court later blocked the Biden-Harris administration’s move to change Title IX in a 5-4 decision. “For nearly 50 years, Title IX has represented an American commitment to provide women with equal opportunities in educational programs and activities,” Blackburn said at the time she made the resolution. “Today, the Biden administration is intent on erasing the contributions made by women and changing the world of athletics as we know it,” she added. “Now more than ever, it’s important to celebrate girls and women in sports, and I’m glad to champion this resolution in their honor.” Blackburn later posted that Senate Democrats had blocked the resolution, something former collegiate swimmers Riley Gaines and Paula Scanlan, blasted them over. “Senate Democrats blocked female athletes from celebratory recognition because…they’re not men?” Gaines, who had to compete and change in the presence of trans-identifying male swimmer Lia Thomas, wrote. “If you’re looking for a definition of misogyny, look no further,” she added. “Democrats are lying to you when they claim to be the party for women. @MarshaBlackburn.” “Chris, I’m a girl from Connecticut and I was later FORCED to compete and undress alongside a fully grown man,” Scanlan wrote, who also had to compete and change in front of Thomas-shared. “It’s Democrats like you that bully and marginalize girls into accepting predatory males into their private spaces,” she added. “I’m ASHAMED you represent my home state.” Related: ‘Disgraceful’: Megyn Kelly Slams ABC News Debate Moderators Helping Harris

In a bold and provocative statement, billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel suggested that if the 2024 election comes down to a razor-thin margin, Vice President Kamala Harris will likely "cheat" to secure the win. Thiel, who has been a strong supporter of Donald Trump, made this claim during a podcast at the "All-In" Summit, stirring up significant controversy as the 2024 race heats up. Thiel’s remarks reflect a growing concern among conservative circles about election integrity, particularly in tight races. He emphasized that should the contest be close, Harris and her allies would resort to unethical tactics to tilt the outcome in her favor. Thiel's comments mirror the broader sentiment in certain right-wing communities that Democrats have a history of manipulating elections, a belief that gained traction after the contentious 2020 presidential election. “If you don’t want AI to replace you, be a little bit racist or a little bit sexist or or just really funny. Everybody else will get replaced.” -Peter Thiel pic.twitter.com/shbjBprsuX — ᴍᴇᴅ ɢᴏʟᴅ (@MedGold_) September 14, 2024 The tech mogul argued that unless Trump's victory is decisive, there would be little chance of a fair outcome, accusing Democrats of using every tool at their disposal, including bending or breaking rules, to claim victory. Thiel warned that if Republicans do not secure a landslide, the election results would be vulnerable to manipulation. Thiel's stark view of Harris is nothing new. He previously compared her unfavorably to former President Barack Obama, stating that Harris lacks both his political savvy and public appeal. This recent statement, however, takes his criticism to a new level by directly accusing the vice president of planning to subvert the democratic process​. Peter Thiel would gladly eat ALL THE CATS; dogs, too No pets for you! @_whitneywebb [megalomaniac • swipe left] https://t.co/BFt7ARk7OE pic.twitter.com/I5DvCKkmi4 — Jack (@banteringless) September 12, 2024 While Thiel’s accusations have not been substantiated with specific evidence, they have gained significant attention. His words have resonated with those who believe that the Democratic Party's approach to issues like voter ID laws and mail-in voting opens the door to potential fraud. Figures like Elon Musk have echoed these concerns, pushing for stricter voter regulations to ensure a fair election. The idea that the 2024 election could be rigged isn't new among Trump’s base. Many Republicans continue to challenge the results of the 2020 election, where they believe widespread fraud occurred, especially in swing states like Arizona and Pennsylvania. Thiel’s comments align with a growing push from conservative leaders who want to limit mail-in ballots, require voter ID, and enforce in-person voting on Election Day as ways to prevent alleged Democratic interference. Despite Thiel's strong words, there is little indication that mainstream media or election officials have taken these claims seriously. In fact, similar accusations in the past have been thoroughly debunked by numerous bipartisan investigations into the 2020 election. However, for Thiel and his supporters, the belief persists that Democrats are planning to "fortify" their position, as was alleged during Trump’s 2020 defeat.. With the 2024 presidential election looming, this rhetoric is likely to intensify as both sides gear up for a fierce battle. Republicans will push hard for stronger election security measures, while Democrats will continue to defend the legitimacy of their electoral victories. Thiel’s controversial statement serves as a reminder of how polarized and mistrustful the political landscape has become in the United States. The post Peter Thiel Warns: ‘Kamala Harris Will Cheat’ in a Close 2024 Election appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

EXCLUSIVE: 'Blood Is On Their Hands': Abbey Gate Survivor Describes Coming Face To Face With Joe Biden

'I made more money, I paid less taxes, gas prices were cheaper'

'Excuse me, I'm not speaking to you'

It's better than any movie script or television play I've read!

'Unusually frequent donations'

'have more of these crazy guys'

This episode is “FUNbelievable!”. Join us as we examine XUXA, the bizarre children’s variety show from 1993 starring a millionaire Brazilian media icon, who barely spoke English. Freakish human/animal sidekicks, gaggles of children running amok CONTINUE READING... The post Remember That Show? Ep. 21: XUXA appeared first on The Retro Network.

Kamala Harris consented to a puffball panel discussion with the National Association of Black Journalists on Sept. 17, and it was announced that PolitiFact would engage in live “fact-checking.” Their Twitter feed then displayed 14 checks on Kamala’s answers. The first one was labeled “False,” and all the rest of them were “True,” “Accurate,” or basically okey-dokey. On Sept. 11, PolitiFact hit a new milestone in leftist aggression. Former President Donald Trump was thumped with a “Pants on Fire” tag for the 200th time with “they’re eating the pets” in Springfield, Ohio. He’s been tagged with flaming pants 12 times since June 1. Harris, by contrast, has zero. She was first elected statewide in California in 2010. Your two candidates this year, not exactly “neck-and-neck” at 200 to nothing. Now compare this to national politicians since PolitiFact came on the scene in 2007. Joe Biden has seven “Pants On Fire” ratings, and only one as president. Barack Obama has nine, Hillary Clinton has nine, Bill Clinton has three, and Bernie Sanders has a perfect zero like Kamala. Even Republicans don’t have anything like Trump’s 200. George W. Bush has zero, John McCain had eight, Ted Cruz has 11, Newt Gingrich has 12, and surprisingly, Mitt Romney has 19 — and 18 of those came in 2011 and 2012, when he challenged Obama for the White House. Their weirdest Romney “Pants on Fire” came when he said, “We’re only inches away from no longer being a free economy.” You can argue we didn’t have a free market back under Obama in 2012. Bryan White at PolitiFactBias.com says this harsh flaming rating “counts as substantially if not wholly subjective.” That’s not to say that some lies aren’t whoppers. It’s when they emotionally hate something that’s not as bad as they claim it is. In April, White singled out a “Pants on Fire” for Trump claiming he “did much better” in the Wisconsin election in 2020 than 2016, and “after the wrongdoing was found, people said, ‘Well, he actually did win.'” The second half is false: He narrowly lost Wisconsin. But the first half is mathematically true: Trump’s vote count in 2020 was 1,610,184 in Wisconsin, and it was 1,405,284 votes in the state in 2016. So he had more votes. He “did better.” Except that he won the state in 2016, and lost it in 2020. This sounds like a “Half True,” not a “Pants on Fire.” On Sept. 4, Trump was rated as “Pants on Fire” for calling Harris a “communist.”  It’s like CNN host Kasie Hunt noting during the Democrat convention, “she doesn’t identify as a communist.” Now flip that to the other party. Many Democrats and leftists have called Trump a “fascist.” Search PolitiFact for a harsh rating on that, and you won’t find it. What you will find is a “Half True” rating on Madeline Albright comparing Trump’s “drain the swamp” rhetoric to fascist Benito Mussolini. When Biden compared Republicans to Jim Crow segregationists over their voting-integrity legislation, PolitiFact argued the subject was too complicated for a rating. They claimed: “Some historians say Biden’s rhetorical point was justified as a way of highlighting the dangers of backsliding from hard-won voting rights.” These dramatic double standards on “facts” underlines why so many voters don’t trust “fact-checkers.” Trump has 1,051 fact checks, and 805 of them are “Mostly False” or worse — 76.6% wrong. Bernie Sanders has 176 fact checks, and 44 were on the false side — 25%. Bernie can call Trump a “fascist” and he’s all good. COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post PolitiFact Throws Its 200th ‘Pants on Fire’ Tag at Donald Trump appeared first on The Daily Signal.