'zero serious rational plan'

'A burning and fumes, the fumes that kind of rise up, it chokes off your oxygen'

'Very bitter'

'The subject was charged and convicted in North Carolina'

It’s been almost a year since the Hamas terrorist organization attacked Israel on Oct. 7. The massacre left over 1,200 people dead and over 200 kidnapped—including women, men, and children. Since the attack, the Biden administration has made its support for a two-state solution clear. And now, with Vice President Kamala Harris running as the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, it appears nothing has changed. During Tuesday’s debate between the vice president and the Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, Harris restated her support for a cease-fire and two-state solution, which, as Family Research Council President Tony Perkins explained on Thursday’s episode of “Washington Watch,” would ultimately “transfer the geographical heart of the state of Israel, Judea and Samaria, to the Palestinians.” Harris declared, “We must chart a course for a two-state solution, and in that solution, there must be security for the Israeli people and Israel and an equal measure for the Palestinians.” But experts on the ground in Israel like Caroline Glick say that a two-state solution is not a viable option. First, Glick emphasized on “Washington Watch” how Harris’ comments during Tuesday’s debate are likely to “lower her level of support” in Israel. As a senior contributing editor at the Jewish News Syndicate, Glick and her colleagues have been conducting polls “of Israeli sentiments regarding the presidential race.” As she stated, after their most recent update shortly before the presidential debate, “Trump was leading by more than two-thirds of Israelis supporting him over Kamala Harris.” She added, “I assume that next week when we poll that question,” the results will be similar. Glick further noted that Harris made potentially “the most hostile statement ever made by a major presidential candidate, by a nominee of one of the major parties, regarding Israel in history. … Her hostility toward Israel was stunning.” Glick explained how the attack on Oct. 7 was the “most sadistic” slaughter Israel has seen, and yet, Harris’ stance seems to reflect that she sees a cease-fire as a way to “pay the Palestinians.” And while it is true that many Palestinian civilians have died over this past year, Glick asserted that this was still “very much an invasion of Palestinian society into Israel, not just Hamas.” According to Glick, some military estimates found that out of the 10,000 people that entered Israel from Gaza during the attack, 5,000 to 6,000 were Hamas members, and the rest were Palestinian civilians. And so, Perkins noted, when considering the fact that Harris wants a solution that’s in “equal measure for the Palestinians,” it becomes even clearer how the Biden-Harris administration’s “support of Israel has been tepid at best.” Moving forward, he asked, is it possible policies under a potential Harris-Walz administration would be “even more indifferent toward Israel or outright hostile?” In response, Glick emphasized how, should Harris get elected, America could expect to see more hostility toward Israel. “I think that what Kamala Harris showed at the debate … is that an America under her presidency will not allow Israel to do anything beyond intercepting missiles en route to Israel” and will not allow the Jewish state to take “offensive actions against our enemies, whether it’s Iran or the Palestinians or Hezbollah.” Glick pointed out how Harris said she “will always support Israel’s right to defend itself,” but that doesn’t change the fact that “the United States right now continues to embargo 2,000-pound bunker buster bombs to Israel, because they don’t want us to take offensive action that will effectively diminish the capacities of our enemies.” Returning to the topic of the two-state solution, Perkins addressed how the land in question includes a “small strip of the Gaza Strip,” the home of the people attacking Israel. Considering this, he asked, how would Israel be able to defend itself if its land “is given away to a hostile entity?” “It can’t,” Glick said somberly. “It manifestly cannot do so.” Which is “the problem,” she added, because “people talk about the two-state solution as if this is some sort of responsible policy, but it’s not.” Rather, it establishes “a Palestinian state, causing Israel to renounce our rights to our biblical homeland” and paves the way for “Israel to be defeated.” Glick concluded, “[G]iving people whose goal in life is to annihilate the Jewish state and the Jewish people … sovereignty over the West Bank of the Jordan of Judea and Samaria” means “giving them the keys to the realm. You are telling them, ‘Go ahead, wipe Israel off the map.’” Originally published by The Washington Stand The post Expert: Harris’ ‘Two-State Solution’ Would ‘Wipe Israel Off the Map’ appeared first on The Daily Signal.

For Some Reason Nobody Has Taken Up This $1,000,000 Offer to Hold Pride Rally in West Bank or Gaza

TikTok Fights US Ban in Court, But Judges Are Skeptical

The Brazilian Supreme Court, as part of its war against free speech, has reportedly punished another of Elon Musk’s companies for his refusal to censor more on X. Justice Alexandre de Moraes has been in a power struggle with X that resulted in him effectively banning the platform in Brazil since the company refused to comply with overreaching censorship orders. De Moraes’s court has reportedly gone so far as to seizeabout $2 million from Musk’s Starlink company and over $1 million from X to punish him and his companies. X Global Government Affairs stated that X refused to censor De Moraes’s political opponents, including an elected senator, despite the Justice’s demands, and so faces massive fines. One of those demands reportedly required that X have a “duly authorized legal representative,” Reclaim the Net reported. But X Global Government Affairs posted that it previously did have Brazillian legal representation until Judge de Moraes “threatened” her with “imprisonment” and later “froze all of her bank accounts” after she resigned.  By seizing assets from Starlink De Moraes has now tied X’s suspension to Starlink’s ability to operate in Brazil.  Musk posted on September 4 in response to the Starlink assets freeze, “There is no legal basis for this whatsoever. Starlink is a different company with different shareholders. Moraes, the charlatan in judges robes, cannot even cite a law that Starlink has broken!” Reclaim the Net reported on Sept. 14 that De Moraes’s seemingly retaliatory actions include a fine of 18.5 million reais ($3.2 million). And De Moraes reportedly approved Starlink’s local funds being impounded to “ensure the settlement of fines.” Without specifying the amount of money impounded, Starlink confirmed the news in an August 29 X thread. “Earlier this week we received an order from Brazil’s Supreme Court Justice @alexandre de Moraes that freezes Starlink’s finances and prevents Starlink from conducting financial transactions in that country,” the post announced. The Starlink thread continued, “This order is based on an unfounded determination that Starlink should be responsible for the fines levied — unconstitutionally — against X.” Starlink said that the order “was issued in secret and without affording Starlink any of the due process of law guaranteed by the Constitution of Brazil. We intend to address the matter legally.” With over a quarter of a million Brazilian customers, Starlink concluded by noting, “the Starlink team is doing everything possible to ensure their service is not interrupted.” Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on “hate speech” and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

“You want to talk about a banana republic gang? We're here,” sighs Glenn Beck, who’s sickened that we’ve witnessed yet another attempt on Donald Trump’s life. When it comes to the first assassination attempt by Thomas Matthew Crooks, Glenn says, “God saved him.” “God may have saved him from this one as well, but this one was a miracle in the darkest of ways,” he says. On Sunday at approximately 1:30 p.m., shots rang out at the Trump International Golf Club in Florida where Trump was golfing when a Secret Service agent spotted the barrel of a gun pointing out from the bushes toward the course. He then fired in the direction of the gunman, who immediately fled, leaving behind a sniper’s nest, complete with an AK-47, backpacks containing ceramic plates, and a GoPro camera. Ryan Wesley Routh, the suspect in the apparent assassination attempt, was later detained in Martin County, which is about an hour’s drive from the golf course. He is currently in jail awaiting his trial. Highly suspicious, Glenn lists out several questions that the state-run media won’t: - YouTube www.youtube.com “Why would you have [a GoPro camera] unless you were planning on recording it so your deeds would live forever?” he asks rhetorically. “Now, my question is: Is there anything else already recorded on the GoPro? Is there maybe a statement because why would you record your deeds without recording a message for all to hear?” If there was some kind of manifesto, would the public even be allowed to see it though? To hear more of Glenn’s reaction regarding Routh’s son, his criminal history, and the ongoing investigation, watch the clip above. Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Alleged would-be assassin Ryan Wesley Routh was located along the fence line where he made his sniper’s nest nearly 12 hours before a Secret Service agent fired at him from inside the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Fla., a criminal complaint said. Routh, 58, a native of Greensboro, N.C., who has also lived in Kaaawa, Hawaii, was charged in a federal criminal complaint with single counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number. Those charges carry potential prison time of 15 and five years, respectively. Routh made a 10-minute appearance in federal court in West Palm Beach, where charges were read to him. An arraignment is scheduled for Sept. 30. A detention hearing will be held Sept. 23, according to the court docket. The FBI is investigating the incident as the second attempted assassination of former President Donald J. Trump since July 13. A probable-cause affidavit filed by the FBI said Routh first appeared along the fence line outside Trump International at 1:59 a.m. Sept. 15, based on geolocation data from Routh’s T-Mobile cell phone. He left that location at 1:31 p.m. when the Secret Service fired in his direction after an agent spotted a rifle poking out of the chain-link fence, the complaint said. Routh fled the scene, leaving behind an SKS-style 7.62x39 caliber rifle, a GoPro camera, backpacks containing anti-ballistic plates, and a plastic bag filled with food, police said. A witness saw Routh run away from the fence line and get into a Nissan SUV, which left the area at a high rate of speed, the criminal complaint said. The vehicle had license plates belonging to a stolen white 2012 Ford truck. Officers from the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office and the Martin County Sheriff’s Office located the Nissan traveling north on I-95 and initiated a traffic stop at 2:14 p.m., the criminal complaint said. “Routh was asked if he knew why he was being stopped; he responded in the affirmative,” wrote Special Agent Mark A. Thomas of the FBI’s West Palm Beach Resident Agency. Routh was convicted in December 2002 on a North Carolina charge of possession of a weapon of mass death and destruction, a Class F felony. Police have said the weapon in question was a fully automatic machine gun. Man with gun barricades self inside business www.newspapers.com Greensboro Police stopped Routh about 10 p.m. on Dec. 15, 2002, for a traffic violation. Police said he put his hand on a firearm before driving away and barricading himself at United Roofing. Routh was arrested after a three-hour standoff, according to a Dec. 17, 2002, article in the Greensboro News & Record. In March 2010, Routh was convicted in North Carolina of multiple felony counts for possession of stolen goods, the FBI said. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!