TRUMP-RFK JR JOIN FORCES... ROCKSTAR ENTRANCE FOR JR... RFK Jr. Joins Trump Rally After Suspending His Campaign (VIDEOS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made an appearance Friday at an Arizona rally supporting former President Donald Trump after ending his independent presidential campaign. The rally, held at Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale, Arizona, saw Kennedy receive a warm reception from the crowd, chanting his name.

Costner made a terrible movie but probably an epic television series

A video shared on Threads claims 2024 Republican nominee and former President Donald Trump thought he was in North Carolina during a recent campaign rally in Pennsylvania.   Post by @michelestillman View on Threads   Verdict: False The claim is false. According to the original video of the rally, Trump was addressing a group of […]

'How ‘bout Dubón racing forever and then crashes hard into the wall'

Cotton to ABC's Karl: How Do You Know What Kamala's Positions Are?

Harris Features Trump Border Wall in Campaign ad to Great Mockery

Alien abductions are widely debated subject within the field of ufology. These incidents typically involve individuals who claim to have been taken by extraterrestrial beings, often against their will, and subjected to various experiments or examinations. The experiences are usually characterized by missing time, strange dreams or memories, physical marks, and a deep sense of trauma or confusion. While mainstream science often dismisses these accounts as sleep paralysis, psychological disturbances, or hoaxes, many researchers and experiencers believe that alien abductions are genuine phenomena. Gare Allen is an author known for his work on paranormal topics, including alien abductions. His writings delve into various aspects of the phenomenon, drawing from both his own experiences and the broader body of research and testimonies related to extraterrestrial encounters. Allen’s approach combines personal narratives, scientific inquiry, and metaphysical perspectives. One of the key areas where Gare Allen contributes to the discussion of alien abductions is in his exploration of the emotional and psychological toll these experiences take on individuals. Abductees often report feelings of fear, confusion, and helplessness, both during and after the encounters. Some experience long-lasting trauma, similar to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while others develop a fascination or obsession with the phenomenon, seeking out more information or even experiencing repeated abductions. Under hypnosis, many unfortunate abductees recall terrifying memories involving horrific alien encounters and painful, physical experimentation. Their recollection includes time spent aboard an alien space craft while paralyzed, often by unseen restraints, frozen in cold, metal beds. Often, they recall the images of strange and grey-colored extraterrestrial creatures peering and probing them, seemingly in search of scientific information. An understandable dismissal of these memories is favored over the acceptance of a frightening reality of abduction and invasive procedures. However, there can be other indications of alien abduction to be found outside of hypnosis, in the waking state. 1. Unexplained Blood Alleged abductee Sylvia Wineroth, now in her mid-forties, underwent a light hypnosis and recalled multiple abductions by short, grey creatures in the summer of 1999. She explains one of the reasons she sought regression therapy to uncover the truth. “Each night I go to sleep, I completely covered myself with the bedding. However, I started to wake up in the morning and I was lying on top of my sheets and blanket. Several times I looked down and saw little red spots near my feet. As I looked closer, I discovered it was blood. I looked all over my legs but couldn’t find any wounds or cuts. Then, I inspected my entire body for the origin of the blood but found nothing that could explain it.” While she found no visible signs of bleeding, a visit to the doctor after a dizzy spell would reveal a possible explanation. “After almost fainting from dizziness, my son took me to the doctor. They ran tests and discovered that I was suffering from exsanguination.” Exsanguination is a severe loss of blood. 2. Sleep Walking Millions of people have reported that they have witnessed their loved ones sleep walking. A common belief is that the mind continues to work while the body rests and commands the body to perform tasks perhaps scheduled for the next day or simply out of desire. Abductees have reported a sudden experience of sleep walking. Family and significant others would find them in various places in their home and safely guide them back to their bed. Upon wakening, they would not recall their movements or actions throughout their house. In Sylvia’s case, her sleep walking episodes became so frequent that her son, Brian, would not retire to his bedroom until his mother had her nightly walk. He explained that she performed the same action each time. “My mom would walk out of her bedroom with a terrified look on her face. She would be rubbing her hands together as if she was freezing and trying to warm herself although the temperature in the house was comfortable. I could hear her mumbling to herself and saying, “It’s time to go, it’s time to go.” Every night for months she would walk out of her bedroom and go straight to the hall closet. Without unfolding her hands, she would swat at the doorknob and become frustrated that the closet door wouldn’t open. “I gently guided her back to her bed where she would fall back to sleep. After many weeks, I decided to find out why she was so intent on getting into that closet during her sleep walking episodes. One night, I purposefully left the closet door open. “As usual, she emerged from her room around midnight and walked straight to the closet. I watched as she reached down with her hands still pressed together and used the tips of her fingers to lift a small suitcase from the floor of the small closet. Where did she think she was going?” 3. Lost Time A common sensation linked to abductions is the loss of time. Abductees have reported missing minutes or hours and in some extreme cases, days in which they cannot account for or recall their whereabouts. Sylvia had many such occurrences and described one of the more startling incidents. “I had been invited to lunch by one of my closest friends who was in town on business and remember being so excited to see her. After getting dressed I made my way to the front door. “It was half past noon and the restaurant was only ten minutes away so I was sure I would be on time for our one o’clock lunch date. I remember pulling my keys from my purse and reaching for the front door handle. The next thing I knew, I woke up on my bed, my keys still in my hand, and the time on my alarm clock was 3:20pm. I had lost almost three hours.” Sylvia quickly went to her phone and checked the messages on her machine. “My friend had called me twice wondering where I was as I had obviously missed our lunch together. To this day, I still don’t know what to tell her.” 4. Medical Dreams Another frequent sign of possible abduction is the occurrence of dreams where the individual sleeping is undergoing some form of treatment or procedure. Often terrifying and always confusing, abductees state that they not only views the dream images but are subject to the action of poking, prodding, cutting and invasive needles. Usually, the dreamer is a frozen witness to the horrific torture, paralyzed and unable to even cry out for help. Sylvia recalled one of her many medical dreams. “The most unsettling dream, or nightmare I should say, was one in which I was looking up into darkness. There was no light anywhere around me but I could hear movement and whispers. A second later I felt a sharp pain in my stomach. “I wanted to reach out for my belly but I was unable to move. Then, I woke up from the dream, sitting up in my bed with my hands over my stomach, crying. The pain in my belly was so overwhelming that I vomited several times over the next hour or so. I had no idea what was wrong but I was certain something had been done to me.” Alternately, she also recalls another nightmare that had a much more pleasant outcome. “In another nightmare, I was again in complete darkness and felt long needles inserted into my eyes. I can’t even count how many times the sharp needles entered my eyeballs. The next morning, I reached for my glasses on the nightstand and found that my vision was much less blurry and while I didn’t have perfect site, I was able to go through my day, without the need of my glasses. They, up there, fixed my vision.” 5. Bright Lights During hypnosis, alleged abductees have been known to react with extreme fear at the recall of a bright light appearing before them or beaming through one of their home’s windows. This occurrence has been documented by regression therapists as a precursor to the actual abduction and instills, understandably, panic and anxiety in their patients. Sylvia is no stranger to the bright light. “Under hypnosis I recalled that I would be elevated from my bed and almost blinded by a bright, white light. I would only see it for a second before I lost consciousness and awoke again on the cold, metal bed. Once I remembered the light, I was forced to remain at home when it was dark outside. “Headlights, street signs and anything bright would send a shiver down my spine and I would freeze in terror. It’s hard to explain but I was filled with a strong sense of dread that something bad was going to happen to me. It’s been years since I left the house after dark.” Sylvia tells us of the time she spent the night in a hotel. “My son and I were travelling to visit his sister, my daughter. We drove for a day and then spend the night in a hotel. I went to bed early and quickly fell asleep while my son slept in the adjoining room. I woke the next morning on the floor. My nightgown had been torn down the back and put back on me, inside out. At first I felt like I had been attacked but the door to the hallway and to my son’s room was locked form the inside and I was alone. “After I composed myself I got dressed and we went downstairs for breakfast. As I passed the hotel front desk, I heard two guests complaining about the bright, white lights that flashed into their windows in the middle of the night. The desk clerk apologized but explained that there were not lights on outside of the hotel. Of this he was certain, as he worked through the night, having been there since midnight.” Allen suggests that these experiences may have a deeper purpose or meaning, possibly related to the evolution of human consciousness or the awakening of latent psychic abilities. Some abductees report profound spiritual insights or a heightened sense of connection to the universe following their encounters, which Allen interprets as evidence that these experiences may be part of a larger, cosmic plan. Whether or not you believe in the actual occurrence of extraterrestrial abduction, the signs often remain unexplained and the accompanying fear is very, very real. The post 5 Warning Signs You May Have Been Abducted By Aliens appeared first on Anomalien.com.

Texas lawmakers have launched what may prove to be the most extensive probe of Big Tech election manipulation to date. While still in its early stages, the investigation could uncover further damning evidence of Big Tech’s election interference as Americans prepare to head to the polls this November.In May, I testified alongside two Facebook and Google whistleblowers in Austin about how Big Tech platforms suppress and boost political content to shape public opinion and influence voter behavior, frequently discriminating against conservatives.If Texas prevails, the resulting disclosures could prove damning for the tech giants and create a powerful incentive for them to remain neutral in the lead-up to the November election.Following our testimony, the Texas Senate Committee on State Affairs voted unanimously to investigate Big Tech for potential election interference.Now, committee chairman Sen. Bryan Hughes is turning up the heat on the platforms. Alphabet, Meta, TikTok, and X have been given until August 30 to produce a host of internal documents and communications detailing how they curate, moderate, and target political content. If they refuse to comply, a state court could compel them to disclose the information.This investigation is the most extensive probe of Big Tech election manipulation since July 2019, when a U.S. Senate subcommittee examined Google’s ability to influence votes.Psychologist and researcher Robert Epstein testified at the time that Google alone shifted at least 2.6 million votes to Hillary Clinton in 2016. The company did so through highly personalized search results and “ephemeral experiences,” such as voter registration and go-vote reminders.Epstein’s more recent research confirms that Google likely shifted millions of additional votes during both the 2020 presidential election and the 2022 midterms using similar means. For example, Google targeted Democratic users with go-vote reminders at a far higher rate than Republicans in certain areas. Epstein concludes that absent Google’s algorithmic distortions, some races would likely have turned out differently.Despite concerning evidence of bias, Google and its Big Tech counterparts remain unimpeded in their ability to shape political discourse and potentially shift millions of votes again this November. But Texas’ investigation could turn the tide.Under Texas law, the platforms can be held in contempt and brought before a grand jury for action in state court should they fail to comply with the records request. This procedural detail matters because the subpoena gives the committee authority to obtain the companies’ actual documents and communications, rather than rely on vague, generic responses. Moreover, since the probe is not limited to the platforms’ state-specific activities, its findings could have national significance.If Texas prevails, the resulting disclosures could prove damning for the tech giants and create a powerful incentive for them to remain neutral in the lead-up to the November election. Platforms could finally be forced to answer for countless decisions to shadow ban and demonetize sites and content creators for spreading so-called “mis/disinformation.”A whistleblower previously exposed Alphabet’s Google Search and YouTube for using internal blacklists to ban and down rank political content. But the company has never been held accountable and its censorship apparatus remains in operation.At the same time, Facebook “whitelists” certain high-profile users and exempts them from standard “community guidelines” through its XCheck program. This effectively advantages “whitelisted” political candidates over opponents who are not similarly exempted on the platform. XCheck functions much like a digital caste system for users. Yet, the company still operates it with little transparency.TikTok is no better. Aside from its biased censorship of political content, the U.S. Justice Department slammed the platform for collecting data on the sensitive social views of its American users ahead of a contentious election year.These are just some of the manipulative practices that could finally be examined and unpacked for the world to see.The probe might also shed light on how Big Tech wields content-ranking algorithms as well as tools like suggested search prompts, AI-generated responses, and targeted “nudges” to influence election outcomes.According to Tech Watch Project’s real-time analysis, the three top search engines — Google, Bing, and Yahoo — currently register a “significant” or “extreme” liberal bias. That is enough to tip the scales, especially in close races this November.Polling indicates extremely tight presidential and U.S. Senate contests in swing states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona, with candidates often between one to five points of each other.Republicans and Democrats agree that Big Tech’s power to shape our political discourse and elections must be reined in, regardless of which candidates win in November. That’s why all three Democrats on the Texas Senate panel voted with their GOP colleagues to support the committee’s investigation, even in a contentious election year. This investigation might be America’s best hope of protecting our elections from Big Tech this November.

Capitol Police officers met the hoodie-wearing person suspected of planting a pipe bomb near the Republican National Committee office during the alleged bomb-drop operation but did not detain or arrest the person, Blaze News has learned. Despite apparently having the suspect next to two squad cars for nearly three minutes on Jan. 5, 2021, the officers did not detain or arrest the alleged bomber and allowed the person to go back to the crime scene and ostensibly finish the alleged bomb drop, previously undisclosed security video shows. Apparent police interactions with the bomber were never disclosed by Capitol Police or the FBI, which has failed to identify the suspect despite nearly 44 months of investigation and a $500,000 reward. The bombshell video was discovered and assembled by social media user “Armitas,” who shared the findings exclusively with Blaze News. Armitas asked to remain anonymous. Blaze News has confirmed the individual’s findings using Capitol Police CCTV files made public over the past several months by the Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight. The video discovery raises serious questions about what was discussed during the nearly three-minute apparent meeting between police and the alleged bomber — and why the officers didn’t detain the person or publicly report the incident after the RNC bomb was found the next day. 'I see no possible non-nefarious scenario in what I just saw.' It also raises the question of why the FBI never shared the video with its own agents or the public and did not disclose or explain the bomber’s seeming interaction with Capitol Police. “I see no possible non-nefarious scenario in what I just saw,” said former FBI Special Agent Kyle Seraphin, who worked on the bomber case in 2021 but was pulled off the assignment as his surveillance team was closing in on someone possibly linked to the hoodied suspect. Seraphin said he was never shown the video while working on the case. Blaze News shared the video with Seraphin and asked for his analysis. The video from Armitas and subsequent investigation by Blaze News showed the alleged bomber emerged onto First Street Southeast from an alley between the Capitol Hill Club and the Republican National Committee at 8:14 p.m. Jan. 5. The suspect walked north past the Capitol Hill Club. As the individual passed under the restaurant’s green awning at 8:14:30 p.m., a Capitol Police SUV turned the corner onto First Street. The alleged bomber waved at the squad car and then pointed — it appeared — at the driver as the vehicle passed by. - YouTube youtu.be The new video is much clearer than the grainy security footage from the Capitol Hill Club previously released by the FBI. The suspicious gesture was “too long to acknowledge someone you don’t know,” Seraphin said. “And why would you draw attention to yourself like that if you’re carrying a bomb in your backpack?” Seraphin likened the gesture to an acknowledgment one law enforcement officer would offer another upon passing during a shift change, or the recognition of a buddy on the street during a tour of duty. As the suspect turned east onto C Street, three Capitol Police officers were across the street near the entry to the Library of Congress, security video showed. The suspect appeared to cover his or her face with the left arm. The officers stood in the street near the curb for a time but gave no indication that they saw or were suspicious of the hoodie-clad individual. The alleged bomber walked east and stopped at the entry to Rumsey Court, which runs south from C Street. During a brief pause, what appeared to be the same Capitol Police SUV drove up C Street from the east and pulled over directly across from the hoodied suspect. The officer turned on the vehicle’s red and blue emergency lights at at 8:15:44 p.m., just as the bomber turned and walked south down the Rumsey alley and disappeared from view, security video showed. CCTV zooms in At 8:17:25, the Capitol Police command center began manually operating Camera 4471 at the corner of First and C streets. After zooming in and out several times, the camera captured a second Capitol Police squad car turn onto C Street from First at 8:18:04 p.m. and head toward the police SUV. The command center kept the camera focused on the area of C Street and Rumsey Court for more than 15 minutes. The squad car did a Y-turn and pulled to the curb behind the SUV. The second squad car then engaged its emergency lights. Seraphin said the actions of the Capitol Police squad cars were in effect a “blocking” maneuver. “I see a ‘blocking vehicle,’ then they acknowledge [the suspect] and circle black to set up a blocking position,” Seraphin said. “The other vehicle then doubles back to assist.” The squad cars had their emergency lights on when the hoodied suspect apparently emerged from the alley at 8:19:57 p.m. and crossed the street to where the police were parked, video showed. 'It’s a black pipe-bomb-looking device with a timer attached to it and wires.' The suspect was hidden from camera view for nearly three minutes behind the blinding strobe headlights and emergency beams of the squad cars. At 8:22:53 p.m., the apparent suspect emerged from the spread of light and crossed the street again. The individual was last seen on the security video at 8:23:08 p.m. as he or she walked down the alley a second time. The bombing suspect did not re-emerge, the video showed. The two squad cars remained parked near the alley, one with its emergency lights still on, for another seven minutes. At 8:30 p.m., the driver of the police SUV walked in front of the vehicle’s headlights and got back into the squad car. Both vehicles pulled away at 8:30:29 p.m. The squad cars turned south onto First Street, then turned west onto D Street Southeast and disappeared from view at 8:31:36 p.m. The Capitol Hill Club pipe bomb was discovered just prior to 12:43 p.m. on Jan. 6. A traffic officer put out an urgent broadcast. “I have the head of security for the Republican Club comes up to me and he has what appears to be an explosive in the back of the building,” the officer said, according to Capitol Police dispatch audio. “Can you have some units respond? “Sir, he took a picture of it. It looks like an explosive device,” the officer broadcast. Another officer shortly provided more detail. “Advise HDU [Hazardous Devices Unit] I just saw a picture of the device. It’s a black pipe-bomb-looking device with a timer attached to it and wires,” he said. - YouTube youtu.be After discovery of the RNC bomb, Capitol Police sent counter-surveillance units out to search for other explosives at high-visibility potential targets. One of those officers discovered a second pipe bomb near a park bench behind the Democratic National Committee building at 1:05 p.m. Security video shows that the hoodied suspect visited the DNC location first, passing that building's garage at 7:43:18 p.m. and leaving via the same sidewalk at 7:54:33 p.m. The new security video showing interaction of the bomber with Capitol Police will only add to the growing list of questions about the pipe bombs. As Blaze News reported Aug. 12, congressional investigators are examining the possibility that the DNC pipe bomb was planted at approximately 12:52 p.m. while Vice President-elect Kamala Harris was in the building. Such a scenario would explain why the U.S. Secret Service did not discover the explosive, even though its sweep of the DNC building exterior was deemed substandard by the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General in a report released Aug. 2. While a bomb-sniffing dog was used near the garage entrance to the DNC prior to 10:30 a.m. on Jan. 6, the sweep did not include the immediate area around where the bomb was found. The OIG report faulted the Secret Service for not having an explosives ordnance disposal unit present for its bomb sweeps or putting a technical expert on the scene who would have ensured proper bomb sweeps were done. The FBI has insisted since the bomb investigation began that the pipe bombs were viable, but Seraphin said the briefing he received in the case in March 2021 described the devices as inert. Man or woman bomber? Seraphin said he and other case agents discussed the possibility that the hoodied suspect was a black woman, based on physical characteristics and case evidence. Seraphin’s investigative team was tracking an individual linked to a D.C. Metrorail card as a person of interest in the case. Agents were investigating a 55-year-old Air Force contractor and his possible ties to the Metrorail card when they were pulled from the case. While the military contractor did not match the bomber’s physical description, Seraphin said the hoodied suspect could have been a relative or acquaintance. Being pulled off the bomber case became a major reason Seraphin left his position with the FBI’s Washington field office. He moved to an office in New Mexico, where he became a whistleblower and was later suspended, he believes, for protected disclosures he made to Congress. Seraphin said the new video discovery should increase pressure on Congress to bring in all officers connected to the Jan. 6 bomb response for sworn, transcribed interviews. “All of the Secret Service, Metro PD, and Capitol Police present during the discovery and investigation of both pipe bombs should be subjected to sworn testimonies,” Seraphin said. “That has clearly not happened.” Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!