A new letter obtained from transgender killer Audrey Hale revealed that prior to killing three adults and three nine-year-olds at the Covenant Christian School in Nashville, Tennessee, she wrote about her “imaginary penis” and how she would “kill” to get puberty blockers. Back in March of 2023, Audrey Hale shot and killed three individuals before being shot down by law enforcement. Now, just over a year later, four dozen pages of Hale’s writings have been obtained. Those writings include notes of her delusional sense of identity and mental confusion, which led to her attack on the school.  The Tennessee Star obtained the papers and exposed some of the writings after police recovered them. “My penis exists in my head. I swear to god I'm a male,” the diary/journal read. Other parts of her diary were about Hale’s sexual fantasies, including being her “stuffed boy doll” named Tony. “I can pretend to be them [and] do the things boys do [and] experience my boy self as Tony,” Hale wrote, noting that the doll “is like the boy I am in another form.” Reports also indicate that Hale admitted to wanting a penis so she could have sex with a woman and noted that being raised as a girl was “torture” and she had a fear that her classmates in school would call her a “dyke or a f****t.” Hale went on in the diary to explain feeling freed in college when she learned about transgenderism. She wrote, “I finally found the answer — that changing one’s gender is possible,” before she wrote about how her mother wasn’t on board with the idea.  “I hate parental views; how my mom sees me as a daughter – and she’d not bear to want to lose that daughter because a son would be the death of Audrey,” Hale wrote. Hale also noted that she’d “kill” to have had puberty blockers as a child so she didn’t have to go through female puberty.  The Tennessee Star noted that the first entry was written just 16-days before Hale conducted her attack on the Covenant School. If you really think that these people aren’t mentally ill, wake the hell up.

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin (R) didn’t hesitate to choose his constituents over a CNN audience.  During the June 6 edition of The Lead with Jake Tapper, CNN anchor Jake Tapper attempted to guilt trip Youngkin over his decision to take Virginia off the bureaucrat-imposed, draconian California emission standards. Youngkin let the smarmy anchor finish whining about climate change, then spoke up for the freedom and finances of Virginians, drivers, and auto dealers. The governor wasn’t willing to limit freedom for climate change: “The reality is that mandates are misguided. Let's trust innovation and let's put that trust in the American consumer as opposed to mandating what people can and can't buy.”  Largely ignoring Tapper’s argument for tyranny, Youngkin made his case against the mandate. “The decision that we made yesterday was to no longer be subjected to the California mandates on which car you can buy,” Youngkin said. He went on to explain that these standards would not just limit Virginian’s choices, but also impact their budgets. Youngkin said that his administration made a decision that “having California with unelected bureaucrats, mandate which car people can buy was wrong, but we also made a decision to protect people's pocketbooks and to give them the benefit of choosing which car they think is best for their needs.”  Youngkin was referencing the fact that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved draconian regulations in August of 2022 to phase out sales of gas-powered cars. According to CARB, the state has mandated that “all new passenger cars, trucks and SUVs sold in California will be zero emissions” by 2035. CARB also demands that the states following the group’s standards sell 35% electric vehicles by the rapidly approaching date of 2026.  Youngkin made the point that electric vehicles are “$10,000 to $50,000” more expensive than normal gas cars. The governor pointed out that this higher cost puts an incredible burden on Virginians. Youngkin noted that only nine percent of cars recently sold in Virginia are electric vehicles, vastly less than the 35% Virginia would be expected to achieve by 2026. Youngkin emphasized the cumulative cost of forcing Virginians to buy more expensive vehicles: “That's upwards of $1.2 billion of economic penalty being placed on Virginians.” The Virginia governor also discussed his decision during a June 5 appearance on CNBC. Youngkin told Last Call anchor Brian Sullivan that “we are declaring Independence from California electric vehicle mandates.” Sullivan, for his part, frankly admitted that “the consumer is speaking and speaking loudly,” since only nine percent of vehicles purchased by Virginians are electric vehicles.  [WATCH: Governor Youngkin Tears Into California Emissions Standards on CNBC] Conservatives are under attack! Contact ABC News at 818-460-7477, CBS News at 212-975-3247 and NBC News at 212-664-6192 and demand they hold the left accountable for attempting to restrict  the Americans people’s automobile choices.

A St. Louis judge this week expunged misdemeanor convictions against Mark McCloskey and his wife, Patricia, after the couple in June 2020 famously stood outside their home with guns while facing a mob of Black Lives Matter protesters.Now McCloskey wants his firearms back, saying in an interview that "it's time for the city to cough up my guns," the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. He added that he'll sue if the city doesn't cooperate, according to the paper.'We were all alone facing an angry mob.'McCloskey surrendered the two guns he and his wife possessed that day — a Colt AR-15 rifle and a Bryco .380-caliber pistol — as part of an agreement in which he pleaded guilty to fourth-degree assault and she pleaded guilty to second-degree harassment, both misdemeanors, the Post-Dispatch said. They originally were charged with felonies.Republican Missouri Gov. Mike Parson later pardoned the couple, and McCloskey sued in 2021 to get his guns back, the paper said, adding that judges denied that request and a subsequent appeal.The McCloskeys in January petitioned to expunge their misdemeanor convictions, the Post-Dispatch said, testifying during a March hearing and arguing that they have been upstanding citizens since their guilty pleas. McCloskey said he has continued to work as a lawyer, fighting for his clients, the paper added.More from the Post-Dispatch:Attorneys for the city's public safety department, however, asked protesters to testify about how the McCloskeys' actions affected them. They also quizzed the couple on advertisements for Mark McCloskey's subsequent political campaign that featured footage from the incident.The city and St. Louis Circuit Attorney Gabe Gore's Office argued that the couple represents a continued threat to public safety and has shown no remorse for the impact of their actions. But Judge Joseph P. Whyte wrote in an order that the testimony of the protesters showed a threat to public safety on June 28, 2020 — not in the time since.The purpose of an expungement, he wrote, is to give people who have rehabilitated themselves a second chance. McCloskey's campaign rhetoric is protected by the First Amendment and not evidence of a continued threat, Whyte said.What's the background?On Sunday evening, June 28, 2020, the McCloskeys confronted a mob that reportedly had broken through gates in their private community. Mark McCloskey soon afterward said the mob rushed toward their home "and put us in fear of our lives," adding that mob members told the couple that they "would be killed, our home burned, and our dog killed. We were all alone facing an angry mob."Days later police said they were investigating whether the mob of protesters, which numbered approximately 500, committed fourth-degree assault by intimidation, as well as trespassing. By September, law enforcement officials said they wouldn't prosecute nine Black Lives Matter protesters who were arrested and charged with trespassing.That was not the case with then-St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, who filed charges against the McCloskeys a month after the incident, stating that the couple waved their guns in a "threatening manner" at "peaceful, unarmed protesters." But Gardner at the time was accused of having a history of politically motivated decisions, and then-state Attorney General Eric Schmitt also called out her "political prosecution" of the McCloskeys and filed for dismissal of the charges. By December a judge dismissed Gardner from the case because the George Soros-backed attorney used it in fundraising emails.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Donald Trump is facing jury after jury and trial after trial — some of which happen to be in the deepest blue courts in the country. The Manhattan hush-money trial was an example of this, where the jury voted to convict the former president despite many conservatives believing justice was not served. In fact, they believe it was the opposite of justice. Now, one of the juries he will be facing is in Washington, D.C., where only 6% of the population voted for him. The other trials will take place in Florida and Georgia. “If you were advising,” Glenn Beck says to Dr. Phil, “how do you get them to understand the case from his perspective? What would you be advising his attorneys?” Dr. Phil recently interviewed the former president and believes he has an answer. “I would absolutely do what I call plaintiffing the defense. You have got to put the prosecution on trial. You don’t want to go in there and defend Donald Trump. You want to put the other side on trial,” he explains. “You’re going to come off a whole lot better if you can flip the script and say, ‘We need to decide what the motives are of the other side of this case,’” he continues. “You’ll do a whole lot better by plaintiffing the defense, instead of defending the defense.” “6% voted for your guy,” he adds, shrugging.Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

22 years ago a game was released which went under the radar for many. A sequel to the 1982 classic horror film The Thing, it didn’t review overwhelmingly positively but those who played it found something special in those frozen, terror filled halls. Innovative and chilling, it nevertheless lay forgotten for over two decades. That is, until now. Continue reading Cult classic horror game next to be remastered by Nightdive Studios MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best horror games, Best classic games, Best action-adventure games

Hunter was unreachable for nearly three days while his daughter tried to see him in New York City.

A juror later dismissed from the case received a $120,000 bribe to vote in favor of the fraudsters.

Time to Play 'Biden Campaign Press Release or Politico Playbook Headline?'

Border Patrol Detail Most Common Excuses Human Smugglers Give When Stopped by the Authorities

Image: Alex Choi A YouTuber was arrested after posting a video showing two people in a helicopter shooting fireworks at a Lamborghini. On Thursday, the US Department of Justice charged Suk Min Choi — known as Alex Choi on YouTube — for allegedly breaking the law against having an explosive or incendiary device on an aircraft. The now-deleted video, titled “Destroying a Lamborghini With Fireworks,” was posted on July 4th, 2023. Choi, who has more than 924,000 YouTube subscribers, is shown driving the Lamborghini as two women begin shooting fireworks in the direction of the car. Law enforcement officials believe Choi filmed the video at El Mirage, a dry lake bed in San Bernardino County, California. The Federal Aviation Administration began... Continue reading…