The post Why Do Cats Fall Over in a Harness? Facts & Outdoor Tips by Catster Editorial Team appeared first on Catster. Copying over entire articles infringes on copyright laws. You may not be aware of it, but all of these articles were assigned, contracted and paid for, so they aren't considered public domain. However, we appreciate that you like the article and would love it if you continued sharing just the first paragraph of an article, then linking out to the rest of the piece on Catster.com. Click to Skip Ahead The Harness Response Teaching Your Cat to Wear a Harness Preparing Your Cat to Spend Time Outside Training your cat to walk with a harness and leash is an excellent option if you want your kitty to enjoy outdoor adventures. However, the first time many cats wear a harness, they simply fall over on their side. But why does this happen? Generally, cats fall over because the harness feels like being grabbed by a predator. Falling over and freezing is an instinctive survival response. If you want your cat to learn to walk on a leash, you must help them overcome this instant reaction. In this article, you’ll learn why wearing a harness can cause your cat to fall over. Plus, we’ll give you tips on teaching your cat to wear a harness and how to prepare them for spending time outside. Getting to the Root of the Harness Response Take a look at where your cat’s harness places pressure on their body. Most of the time, much of the pressure falls between the shoulder blades and around the chest. For adult cats, being grabbed or held in this area can be a traumatic experience. Mother cats regularly carry their babies by the scruff of their necks. At that age, being scruffed triggers the kitten to relax. However, adult cats lose this instinct as they grow. Adult cats are typically only grabbed by the scruff during mating or by a predator, which can be a stressful experience. With this knowledge, it makes sense why a cat might react to a harness by freezing and falling over. Photo Credit: Abi’s Photos, Shutterstock Teaching Your Cat to Wear a Harness So, how do you help your cat overcome their natural fear and learn to wear a harness? The answer is usually A) slowly and B) with a lot of treats! First, make sure you buy the right size harness for your cat. It’s best to follow the sizing and measuring directions for the harness you’re considering. Try to purchase an adjustable harness to make the fit as close and comfortable as possible. Introduce the harness indoors where your cat is safe and comfortable. Start by allowing them to sniff and interact with the harness. Try using catnip or a cat pheromone spray on the harness to hold your kitty’s attention and keep them calm. Once your cat is familiar with the sight of the harness, start getting them used to it touching their body. Hold the harness against them and reward your cat with treats or praise if they stay calm. Slowly practice placing the harness over their head or beneath their body. Work your way up to placing the entire harness on the cat, rewarding them generously for staying calm. Your cat should be able to wear the harness indoors with no fuss before you move on to leash training. Adjust the harness as needed to ensure it fits snugly and won’t slip off. Every cat will progress through the stages of harness training at their own pace. If your cat shows signs of fear or discomfort, including falling over, repeat the previous step in the training process. Are you looking for the perfect cat harness? We suggest Hepper's Cat Harness & Leash Set, which includes a nicely designed, machine-washable harness made from soft, sturdy velvet and mesh. Hepper Cat Harness and Leash Escape Proof Set -... Escape Proof - Cat leashes and harnesses for walking aren't all equally secure. Our double aluminium...Superior Comfort - Our cat harnesses are lightweight, made with premium velvet fabric, breathable...Free Extra Strength Leash - You don't need to worry about your cat escaping this harness. This cat... Check Price on Amazon This harness is easy to put on and take off and features reinforced stitching, reflective stripes, and quick-release buckles. This set also includes a great leash made from durable nylon climbing rope. At Catster, we’ve admired Hepper for many years and decided to take a controlling ownership interest so that we could benefit from the outstanding designs of this cool cat company! Preparing Your Cat to Spend Time Outside Training your cat to wear a harness is only one step in the process of preparing your cat to spend time outside. The first thing you should do is make sure your pet is current on their vaccinations and appropriate parasite prevention. Talk to your vet about whether your cat is healthy enough to handle outdoor exercise, especially if they’re older or overweight. Speak To a Vet Online From the Comfort of Your Couch! If you need to speak with a vet but can’t get to one, head over to PangoVet. It’s an online service where you can talk to a vet online and get the personalized advice you need for your pet — all at an affordable price! Click to Speak With a Vet For indoor cats, the world outside can be overwhelming at first. The sights, sounds, and smells outside are far more stimulating than those found in the safety of a house. Even the most well-adjusted cat may be frightened the first few times they venture outside. To help ease your cat into the outdoors, try letting them spend time on a screened porch or in a “catio.” These enclosed areas help your cat feel secure while introducing them to the stimulation of the outside world. Portable cat yards or tents are another option if more permanent structures aren’t available. By the time you take your cat outside wearing a harness and leash, they should be comfortable and confident with the stimulation they’ll encounter there. Conclusion Despite what you might think, cats don’t fall over in a harness simply to provide you with viral social media content. Instead, they react this way because the harness triggers a survival response like they were grabbed by a predator. With patience and training, your cat can learn to overcome this reaction. Remember, not every cat will enjoy walking on a harness and leash. Consider your cat’s personality carefully before attempting to turn them into an adventurous kitty. See also: Are Emotional Support Vests Necessary for Cats? Recommendations & FAQs Sources “How to Put a Cat Harness On” “Outdoor Cat Controversy: Is It Ever Okay to Let Them Roam?” “How to Leash Train a Cat” “Feline Kryptonite: Kitten’s Reaction to Harness Delights Internet” “Is Scruffing the Best Way to Handle an Upset Cat?” Featured Image Credit: Sari ONeal, Shutterstock The post Why Do Cats Fall Over in a Harness? Facts & Outdoor Tips by Catster Editorial Team appeared first on Catster. Copying over entire articles infringes on copyright laws. You may not be aware of it, but all of these articles were assigned, contracted and paid for, so they aren't considered public domain. However, we appreciate that you like the article and would love it if you continued sharing just the first paragraph of an article, then linking out to the rest of the piece on Catster.com.

President Donald Trump’s choice of national security adviser is a combat veteran who has been a strong opponent of DEI in the military and advocated U.S. sanctions on China. Trump announced Tuesday that he chose Rep. Mike Waltz, R-Fla., to be national security adviser in his second term, a Cabinet-level position that doesn’t require Senate confirmation.  A booster of the Trump-created Space Force, the former Green Beret and retired colonel in the Army National Guard has overseen military readiness in the House, where he has criticized diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, or DEI, in the military. “I am honored to announce that Congressman Mike Waltz (R-FL) is hereby appointed to serve in my Cabinet as my National Security Advisor,” Trump posted on Truth Social, his social media platform.  “Mike is the first Green Beret to have been elected to Congress, and previously served in the White House and Pentagon,” Trump wrote. “Mike served in the Army Special Forces for 27 years where he was deployed multiple times in combat for which he was awarded four Bronze Stars, including two with Valor. Mike retired as a colonel and is a nationally recognized leader in national security, a bestselling author, and an expert in threats posed by China, Russia, Iran, and global terrorism.”  The position of national security adviser is the principal White House adviser to a president on national security policy and chairs meetings of the National Security Council. Taking on China is a key national security priority for Trump in his second term.  Waltz, 50, has characterized China as America’s “toughest adversary.”  Waltz is a member of the House China Task Force, which is made up of 15 House Republicans who represent 14 committees of jurisdiction overseeing U.S. policy related to China. He has sponsored legislation to reduce U.S. reliance on China’s critical minerals. He sponsored legislation to guard American universities and colleges from Chinese spying.  Waltz, who was elected in 2018 to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ former seat in the House, has been highly critical of Chinese espionage against the United States and how the Biden-Harris administration handled it.  In 2022, Waltz wrote an op-ed for Fox News arguing that the Biden-Harris administration should take a more active stance in Ukraine, saying: “We’ve helped the Ukrainians defend themselves against this invasion. It’s now time we help them go on offense to retake the Russian-occupied parts of Ukraine.” Just before the election, however, Waltz told NPR, “It’s perfectly reasonable that this is going to come to some type of diplomatic resolution.” “And first and foremost, you would enforce the actual energy sanctions on Russia,” he added. “Russia is essentially a gas station with nukes. … So I think that will get [Russian President Vladimir] Putin to the table.” Waltz saw combat in the war in Afghanistan. He went on to become defense policy director for Defense Secretaries Donald Rumsfeld and Robert Gates during the George W. Bush administration.  Waltz will leave his post as chairman of the House Armed Services Committee’s readiness subcommittee, where he has pushed proposals to restoring the military to a merit-based system.   He is also a member of the Foreign Relations and the Oversight and Accountability committees.  As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, Waltz is a member of subcommittees that oversee the CIA and the National Security Agency.   Waltz is co-chairman of the House’s Space Force Caucus, which champions the armed force launched by Trump in his first term. He also is a member of the Taiwan and Venezuela Democracy caucuses. The post China, Anti-DEI, Ukraine: What You Need to Know About Trump’s Pick for National Security Adviser appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of the accompanying video from professor Peter St. Onge. Mass deportations are coming. Which feels about right given we’re a democracy and nearly 60% of Americans want mass deportation of illegals. Who are, after all, breaking the law by trespassing on our republic. So, how fast and who goes first? After Joe Biden’s communist handlers let perhaps 20 million illegals into our country—many of them murderers and rapists because, sadly, some countries did not send their best—President-elect Donald Trump has promised the largest mass deportation in U.S. history. The current record-holder is Franklin D. Roosevelt, who deported 2 million aliens, overwhelmingly Mexican. I mentioned in a recent video how FDR’s deportations included citizen children of illegals, so that is perfectly legal—they will pretend it’s not. The active deportations will start with criminals and will essentially be arrests. But the real magic happens in the background, the self-deportations. I mentioned in a recent video how up to 90% of FDR’s deportations actually self-deported to avoid forced deportation. Today, we’d be looking at 15 million self-deportations if the message is clear. Wall Street Silver recently suggested some ways to get the self-deportations rolling. Including cutting all financial benefits, from food stamps to rent subsidies, from free apartments to Obamaphones. This would, of course, free up resources for, say, homeless combat veterans. Next, cancel the so-called temporary refugee status that hands out work permits like candy and is apparently killing the ducks in Springfield, Ohio. Then the big one: Crack down on employers who hire illegals. Which is already illegal, with up to six months in prison, but is not enforced. Next up is the border. To both stop the flow of new illegal immigrants and ensure that deportations aren’t a revolving door, Donald Trump plans to finish his wall, of course, and to restore his “remain in Mexico” policy that made illegals stay in Mexico while they’re processed—which can take years. After all, beggars don’t get free caviar, and a true refugee should be perfectly happy with Mexico, a country over a million Americans retire to. In case Mexico doesn’t play ball, Trump’s threatened a 25% tariff on everything Mexico exports to us if Mexico doesn’t get illegal immigration under control. So, Mexico may not pay for the wall, but it will be the wall. Beyond deportations, Trump wants more screenings for immigrants, so we continue to attract the best and brightest without getting swamped by criminals and welfare cases. Ideally, we’d replace our current bubble gum and baling wire immigration system with a points system like Japan uses, where you get points for education, income, career achievements, and age so you’re not a burden on our health care system. Prove enough points and you’re in. Fail and you’re out for good. Finally, what does mass deportation do to the economy? In short, millions of jobs open up for Americans, along with millions of houses. The Americans will get higher wages, lower rents, and, of course, we’re not spending hundreds of billions on welfare for illegals. Inflation and gross domestic product depend on magnitudes—how high are the wages, how low are the rents, how many people leave, and what were they contributing, if anything. So what’s next? Mass deportations will begin once Trump takes office Jan. 20, starting with criminal migrants. For the rest, simply enforcing existing laws will, going by history, do almost all the work. As for those who refuse to go, the American military has a million and a half men. They’d probably love to get a mission that actually protects the country. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Get Ready for the Largest Mass Deportation Since FDR appeared first on The Daily Signal.

On the latest episode of “The Tony Kinnett Cast,” we dive into the star-studded cast of nominations President-elect Donald Trump has announced so far for his second administration. They include Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.; Gov. Kristi Noem, R-S.D.; Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y.; former Gov. Mike Huckabee, R-Ark.; border czar-to-be Tom Homan; and more by the minute. Why pick a power-packed posse of prominent pals to staff the Cabinet of an administration? It all comes down to three things: experience, expectations, and expedience. These three characteristics are most likely to define the first 100 days of the second Trump administration. Former CIA officer Kevin Shipp joins us to discuss his new book, “Twilight of the Shadow Government: How Transparency Will Kill the Deep State.” What changed to make President Harry Truman regret founding the Central Intelligence Agency only two years later? Where does America’s intelligence apparatus need to be, and why can’t it live up to what Americans expect of it? Catch the live radio show and livestream weeknights at 7 p.m. ET on The Daily Signal’s YouTube, X, or Facebook—and subscribe to the podcast so you never miss an episode or exclusive interview. The post An Inside Look at Trump’s Dream Team appeared first on The Daily Signal.

San Francisco Ousted Its Lone Democratic Socialist City Supervisor

Whoopi Goldberg: 'I'm a Working Person Too'

On Saturday afternoon, CNN anchor Fredricka Whitfield promoted a clip of Congressman Jim Clyburn (D-SC) from the day before when he tied the election of Donald Trump to racism and suggested that it was similar to the end of the Reconstruction era and the beginning of new Jim Crow era. Ultimately, he smeared America by saying his "real problem now is not Democrat versus Republican," but rather "this country and what we can expect from this country." After speaking with CNN political analyst Julian Zelizer about former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-CA) recent criticism of President Joe Biden for not dropping out of the election earlier, Whitfield brought up Congressman Clyburn's comments: "And then there's veteran member of Congress Jim Clyburn. He was a lot more philosophical about what the election outcome means -- perhaps in, you know, using your terminology, he was thinking bigger picture. Listen to what he had to say."     Then played a clip of the South Carolina Democrat from when he appeared on CNN Friday afternoon with host Boris Sanchez. After a clip of him complaining about slurs being used against Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris and former Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, he then moved to implicate racism as he took aim at the Project 2025 plan by conservatives for a Trump administration agenda: I've studied the history of this country all of my life. I lived through Jim Crow. And I know that Project 2025 is Jim Crow 2.0. I am wondering whether or not we are coming out of this election the way the country came out of the 1876 presidential election which led to the end of Reconstruction and led to the beginning of Jim Crow. Is that where we are today? Whitfield then accepted the liberal narrative that there was widespread racism and sexism as she posed: "He's talking about, you know, what now seems to be an enlightenment among many about the racism and sexism that continues to exist if not flourish. So what does this election, in your view, the outcome, say to you about where our country is right now?" Zelizer went along with the premise in his response: Well, I think that argument will be widespread, meaning this election, unlike 2016, there was tremendous clarity about where the President-elect stood, what his coalition stood for, and these issues were front and center. You don't have to scratch beneath the surface to hear them, to see them, to read them on issues such as immigrants. There is a reactionary element to the new MAGA coalition, and that coalition affirmed itself and its role in American politics right now. So I think that's part of what is troubling many Democrats not simply who has power, but what this election means about the character of the United States. And some will be resigned and despondent, but I think you'll also see slowly others kind of resist allowing this to be the direction of what is America. In the original interview with Sanchez, Clyburn had gone on to claim that the U.S. Supreme Court was allowing racist congressional districts to be used. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: CNN Newsroom with Fredricka Whitfield November 9, 2024 1:12 p.m. Eastern FREDRICKA WHITFIELD: And then there's veteran member of Congress Jim Clyburn. He was a lot more philosophical about what the election outcome means -- perhaps in, you know, using your terminology, he was thinking bigger picture. Listen to what he had to say. CONGRESSMAN JIM CLYBURN (D-SC) (from a November 8 CNN appearance): You heard the rhetoric during the campaign. I certainly heard it. And the day or two before the campaign, there were references to women -- one to the former Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi with the B word. Another time, I heard references to Kamala Harris with a C word. And these were done openly in wide open spaces with children in the audience. My real problem now is not Democrat versus Republican. It's about this country and what we can expect from this country. I've studied the history of this country all of my life. I lived through Jim Crow. And I know that Project 2025 is Jim Crow 2.0. I am wondering whether or not we are coming out of this election the way the country came out of the 1876 presidential election which led to the end of Reconstruction and led to the beginning of Jim Crow. Is that where we are today? WHITFIELD: He's talking about, you know, what now seems to be an enlightenment among many about the racism and sexism that continues to exist if not flourish. So what does this election, in your view, the outcome, say to you about where our country is right now? JULIAN ZELIZER, CNN POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, I think that argument will be widespread, meaning this election, unlike 2016, there was tremendous clarity about where the President-elect stood, what his coalition stood for, and these issues were front and center. You don't have to scratch beneath the surface to hear them, to see them, to read them on issues such as immigrants. There is a reactionary element to the new MAGA coalition, and that coalition affirmed itself and its role in American politics right now. So I think that's part of what is troubling many Democrats not simply who has power, but what this election means about the character of the United States. And some will be resigned and despondent, but I think you'll also see slowly others kind of resist allowing this to be the direction of what is America. (...) CNN News Central November 8, 2024 3:19 p.m. Eastern BORIS SANCHEZ: So you consider, Congressman, that misogyny and perhaps racism had a lot to do with her loss despite that Hillary Clinton received -- she won the popular vote -- and Barack Obama obviously won not only the presidency but reelection as well? CONGRESSMAN JIM CLYBURN (D-SC): Absolutely. He was not subjected to the kind of misinformation and disinformation that we've got going on now. We all know that. The fact of the matter is, as well as Hillary did, she still did not win. And I think that Kamala still suffers from that. You heard the rhetoric during the campaign. I certainly heard it. And the day or two before the campaign, there were references to women -- one to the former Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi with the B word. Another time, I heard references to Kamala Harris with a C word. And these were done openly in wide open spaces with children in the audience. My real problem now is not Democrat versus Republican. It's about this country and what we can expect from this country. I've studied the history of this country all of my life. I lived through Jim Crow. And I know that Project 2025 is Jim Crow 2.0. I am wondering whether or not we are coming out of this election the way the country came out of the 1876 presidential election which led to the end of Reconstruction and led to the beginning of Jim Crow. Is that where we are today? I used to tell my students when I used to teach this stuff: Anything that's happened before can happen again. And I can see us with these kinds of Supreme Court decisions that are now saying it's all right to run congressional races though the facts are they (the districts) are racially biased, but you can run in those districts anyway. That's what the Supreme Court just did. And so we are facing a court that could be a throwback to Plessy versus Ferguson rather than Brown v Board of Education. SANCHEZ: Congressman James Clyburn, we have to leave the conversation there, but we very much appreciate the time and perspective. Thanks for joining us. CONGRESSMAN CLYBURN: Thank you very much for having me.

CBS’s abortion-obsessed political correspondent Caitlin Huey-Burns joined Tuesday’s CBS Mornings Plus to answer for the liberal media’s despondent reactions to Vice President Kamala Harris’s blowout loss coming despite abortion ballot amendments/initiatives/referendums passing in seven of ten states where the issue went before voters (and four went red for President-Elect Trump). As she would admit, voters were able to separate out their political views to vote in favor of supporting abortion while not necessarily voting for Democrats, the primary political party behind the ending of unborn lives.     Co-host Adriana Diaz began by briefly calling out liberal pundits: “[R]emember when Democratic pundits thought that the fight over abortion rights could push Vice President Kamala Harris to victory? Well, they’re now thinking again. Because voters who wanted expanded abortion access did not necessarily think they had to vote for Harris.” Ooof. After sharing some of the vote totals between Trump and abortion measures, Huey-Burns was brought in by co-host Tony Dokoupil as someone who’s “reported on this issue for many years and followed President-elect Donald Trump on the campaign trail and has spoken to him about this very topic.” Huey-Burns started by asking the question herself about how the two didn’t translate. That took awhile as she initially argued “Republicans did recognize that they did have to have better answers to address the fallout” from the end of Roe v. Wade, including Vice President-Elect JD Vance arguing the GOP had “to do a better job talking to women and messaging on this issue and doing more for women who have children.” But upon being prompted by Diaz to explain how Democrats didn’t also receive the greenlight from voters, she acknowledged previous abortion measures weren’t in presidential election years and thus voters had a different calculus. Nonetheless, she tried to put a positive spin on the election for the left: So, if you think about it, with the exception of Georgia, all of the battleground states either had less restrictive measures, measures on the books already protecting access, or a ballot measure, or a Democratic governor who they thought wouldn’t support abortion restrictions, or, you know, perhaps some combination of all of them and when you look at some of these key battleground states, like Arizona and Nevada, for example, Donald Trump won them, but those abortion access measures, preserving access in the state constitution, also passed. So, if you think about it, if you cared about abortion access, but you also were concerned about the economy, the border, other kind of more immediate concerns for your everyday life[.] She concluded with the reality that, believe it or not, “voters can think about a lot of different things at once heading into an election” and can “exercise their, you know, or show their opinions on a variety of different issues.” Reacting to all that, Diaz put a cap on the discussion by conceding “it was the economy that really drove people” and that James Carville’s line about an election being on “the economy, stupid” was again proven to be true. To see the relevant CBS transcript from November 12, click here.

A comedienne on "Saturday Night Live" revealed that tech billionaire Elon Musk was the host who made her cry because he was really mean about her sketch proposal. Chloe Fineman posted a video in which she recounted the story and said she decided to reveal the information after Musk complained about the impression made of him on the show. Prior to her admission, another cast member had said an unnamed host had made several cast members cry. 'I was like damn my SNL appearance is going to be so f***ing unfunny that it will make a crackhead sober!!'Fineman posted the video on social media and then deleted it hours later. “Guess what? You made I, Chloe Fineman, burst into tears because I stayed up late writing a sketch. I was so excited. I came in, I asked if you had any questions, and you stared at me like you were firing me from Tesla and were like, ‘It’s not funny,'" she said. "I waited for you to be like, 'Ha ha, JK.' No. Then you started pawing through my script, like, flipping each page being like, 'I didn't laugh. I didn't laugh once, not one time,'" she added. She went on to say the sketch made the show, and it did well despite Musk's misgivings. "I actually had a really good time, and I thought you were really funny in it, but, you know, have a little manners here, sir!" Fineman continued. Although she deleted the video, it was copied and circulated on social media. Musk's appearance on "SNL" was praised by some, but some of the cast members refused to appear with him based on vague criticisms of his support for right-wing causes. He has since become far more open about his politics and supported President-elect Donald Trump in the election. The billionaire responded in a message on X, the platform he owns. "Frankly, it was only on the Thursday before the Saturday that ANY of the sketches generated laughs. I was worried," he explained. "I was like damn my SNL appearance is going to be so f***ing unfunny that it will make a crackhead sober!! But then it worked out in the end." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Pat Gray was initially concerned when over the weekend an “unnamed source” suggested that Trump was already beginning to distance himself from RFK Jr., who was said to be poised to “make America healthy again.” However, Donald Trump Jr.'s recent appearance on “The Megyn Kelly Show” suggests otherwise. “Would RFK Jr. have an actual Cabinet position now that the Republicans are going to control the Senate, as opposed to being a non-confirmed czar-type guy?” Kelly asked. “We definitely do want to honor the promise that we made, make sure that he's involved in whatever capacity sort of he wants,” Don. Jr. stated, adding that he believes Kennedy would “do an incredible job on the stuff as it relates to health.” “I love what RFK can do to health. I have five young kids; I want to make sure I'm not poisoning them when they have a meal,” he told Kelly, who nodded in agreement. “I'd love to let him go wild on some of these things, or at least shed some light so the American public understands exactly why we are where we are, exactly why we're so fat, exactly why we're so unhealthy, and why it seems like so many people are trying to keep us that way rather than let us be healthy,” he explained. He also confirmed the administration’s plans to include Elon Musk, whom he called “the Einstein of our era,” in matters related to the Department of Government Efficiency. “I'm going to make sure that the people that surround my father are both loyal to him and competent. … I think this time around we actually know who those people are; we're going to bring in a lot of people from outside,” Trump Jr. told Kelly. “So it sounds like both Elon and Robert Kennedy will definitely be a part of this administration,” says Keith Malinak. “What we hoped would happen is in fact happening,” says Pat. To hear more of the conversation, watch the clip above. Want more from Pat Gray?To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.