While Donald Trump’s landslide victory has a large swath of the country in glorious celebration, liberal women have never been more distraught — to the point that they’ve adopted a new movement. Specifically, the 4B movement, which is shorthand for four Korean words that start with “Bi,” or the Korean word for “no.” “Ladies, we need to start considering the 4B movement like the women in South Korea and give America a severely sharp birth rate decline: No marriage No childbirth No dating men No sex with men We can’t let these men have the last laugh… we need to bite back,” one woman wrote in a now extremely viral post on X. “I’m not really sure if that’s a major problem that some of these women are having, that men are just so all over them that they have be like, ‘No, Donald Trump won, don’t touch me,’” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable" comments, amused. Some women have begun filming themselves shaving their heads in retaliation on TikTok, with one user telling her audience, as she chops off all her hair, to “divorce your husbands” and “leave your boyfriends.” Stuckey, while she disagrees with Trump’s plan to leave abortion up to the states, can’t see why these women don’t understand that nothing is going to happen to their “right” to an abortion. “If it is so important to you women to live in a place where you can have an abortion, if that is really as important as you people think that is, which I think is sick and depraved, then you can move to a state that allows it,” Stuckey explains. “There are eight states that tragically allow abortion through all nine months,” she continues. “If you think that this is the most fundamental issue, the greatest issue, then why don’t you flee like a refugee to California or to Washington or to Oregon or to Illinois or to New York if this is so important to you?” “I don’t believe you when you say it’s that important if you’re not even willing to move within your own country for that so-called right to choose. And so, are you just being dramatic? Really think about that. And think about the fact that those babies that you are crying and dying to kill are human beings with rights,” she adds. Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

On Thursday, a federal judge dealt a significant blow to the Biden-Harris administration’s plan to provide mass amnesty to at least 550,000 illegal aliens currently residing in the United States.Earlier this year, a coalition of 16 Republican-led states, spearheaded by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and America First Legal, filed a lawsuit against the administration for its “Keeping Families Together” program. The program would have granted amnesty to illegal immigrant spouses and stepchildren of American citizens, Blaze News previously reported. 'Once again, we have stopped the Biden-Harris Administration’s radical attempts to destroy America’s borders and undermine the rule of law.'Additionally, the program would have permitted beneficiaries to parole in place, allowing them to remain in the country while their status is adjusted.The lawsuit, filed by the 16 state attorneys general, argued that the administration’s claim that it would apply to roughly 550,000 illegal aliens was “likely a significant underestimate,” projecting that it could be closer to 1.3 million.The complaint contended that the process was unconstitutional because it circumvented Congress and would “irreparably harm” the states’ communities.U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker, a Trump-appointed judge, sided with the states’ lawsuit, striking down the program.In his 74-page ruling, Barker stated that the administration’s program “focuses on the wrong thing in identifying ‘significant public benefits’ — the benefits of aliens’ new legal status, rather than their presence in this country.”“The Rule exceeds statutory authority and is not in accordance with law for this reason as well,” he concluded, adding that the “defendants’ view stretches legal interpretation past its breaking point.”“The court declares that defendants lack statutory authority … to grant parole ‘in place’ to aliens,” Barker wrote. America First Legal Executive Director Gene Hamilton stated, “Since day one, the Biden-Harris administration has dedicated itself to the decimation of our immigration system and the erasure of our borders.”“Time and again, the states stood up. And today, the great state of Texas and the courageous Ken Paxton, alongside a coalition of other brave attorneys general, succeeded in stopping an illegal program that would have provided amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens and paved the path for the largest administrative amnesty in American history,” Hamilton added.Paxton wrote in a post on X, “Once again, we have stopped the Biden-Harris Administration’s radical attempts to destroy America’s borders and undermine the rule of law. This unlawful parole scheme would have rewarded more than 1 million illegal aliens with citizenship and incentivized millions more to break into our country. I look forward to the day when the federal government starts following the law again.”The administration’s Department of Justice can decide to appeal Barker’s ruling.Neither the White House nor the Department of Homeland Security responded to CBS News’ requests for comment.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Several professors at Ivy League schools canceled classes, excused absences, and allowed exams to be rescheduled because former President Donald Trump decidedly won the 2024 election. The Harvard Crimson reported that the school's dean, Rakesh Khurana, told students to “let yourself feel a bunch of emotions about how this is going to impact us in the future, and listen to other people and how they feel about it too.”'[If] you don't feel up for class, absences today will be excused.'The outlet noted that following Trump's election victory, instructors for courses such as Statistics for Social Sciences, Solving and Optimizing, the Ancient Greek Hero, and Popular Culture and Modern China had canceled their Wednesday classes, made attendance optional, or extended assignment deadlines.Economics lecturer Maxim Boycko allegedly sent an email to students in an Intermediate Microeconomics course that in-class quizzes would be optional.“As we recover from the eventful election night and process the implications of Trump’s victory, please know that class will proceed as usual today, except that classroom quizzes will not be for credit,” Boycko reportedly wrote. “Feel free to take time off if needed.”Physics professor Jennifer E. Hoffman purportedly wrote in an email to students and faculty that her office would be “a space to process the election.”“Many in our community are sleep-deprived, again grieving for glass ceilings that weren't shattered, fearful for the future, or embarrassed to face our international colleagues,” Hoffman reportedly wrote. “I stress-baked several pans of lemon bars to share.”Citing internal emails, the Washington Free Beacon reported that a Columbia professor granted students permission to skip class."I hope you are hanging in there. I have been think of you over the last few days," the Columbia professor reportedly wrote to her students. "[If] you don't feel up for class, absences today will be excused."Meanwhile, because of the election results, a professor at Columbia University's sister school, Barnard College, allegedly offered students a chance to "replace" an exam on which they performed poorly. "In recognition of the increased stressed [sic] some of you might be feeling because of the election results, I will offer to replace your midterm Exam 2 grade with your Final Exam grade if better," a Barnard professor reportedly wrote to students. Campus Reform reported that Michigan State University Professor Shlagha Borah canceled classes because Trump won the election.Borah, an assistant professor in the Department of Writing, Rhetoric, and Cultures, allegedly told her students in a memo on Wednesday night, "I am cancelling class today to grieve the presidential election results. As a queer, immigrant woman of color, I cannot, in good conscience, go on about my day like everything is alright."”This is a major historical event that we are witnessing," Borah added. "I hope you take this time to take care of yourself."Michigan State University spokesperson Mark Bullion told the College Fix on Thursday that campus leaders are “aware of the situation and are addressing it through the appropriate leadership channels.”The Daily Pennsylvanian reported that several professors at the University of Pennsylvania canceled classes in response to the election. Economics professor Anne Duchene told the outlet she made attendance optional to her class in advance of the election results. “I thought maybe, [having an optional lecture] can help everyone pretend it’s business as usual, instead of just looking at your screens constantly, trying to understand what [happened],” Duchene reportedly stated. “I just wanted to acknowledge the wide variety of emotions that were in the classroom and also to respect these emotions,” Duchene allegedly said. “It's really hard to know how the students are, what the students are really thinking, but my interpretation is that they wanted to have a normal class.” Neuroscience professor Michael Kaplan also pre-emptively canceled his Wednesday classes, according to the report. Anthropology professor Caroline Jones allegedly rescheduled an exam after “a slew of emails” from students expressed concern about preparing for an exam scheduled right after the election. The Phoenix, a student-run newspaper at Swarthmore College, where annual tuition and room and board cost about $65,000, reported on the reaction to the election results:As the Swarthmore community came to terms with the news, an outpouring of resources flooded their inboxes. Some professors canceled classes, the Office of Student Engagement encouraged students to use Sharples Commons as a "safe space to land," and the department of political science promoted its pre-scheduled panel discussion set for Wednesday afternoon, "Election Night 2024: What Just Happened and What’s to Come."As Blaze News reported this week, Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy established "self-care suites" following Trump's decisive 2024 election victory. Georgetown University attempted to soothe liberal students by offering them milk and cookies, hot cocoa, Legos, and coloring books. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Despite RPGs being ostensibly about inhabiting a particular role, one core requirement is that you’ll continually grow in strength. It doesn’t matter if you’re playing Dragon Age Origins, Baldur’s Gate 3, or even Disco Elysium, the idea that down the line you’ll be stronger or more capable than you are right now is a tenet of the fantasies they embody. Brighter Shores, the new RPG from RuneScape creator Andrew Gower, is daring to do it differently, and it’s fair to say it hasn’t gone over entirely well with fans. In response, the developer has taken to Steam to justify its decision in the face of this backlash, begging players to “please give it a chance.” Continue reading Brighter Shores creator begs players to give the fantasy RPG a chance MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best MMORPGs, Best free PC games, Best fantasy games

MSNBC Panelist: 1 Reason Dems Lost Is Because They Don't Have a Feminist Version of Joe Rogan

VA Del. Nick Freitas Takes PANICKED, Anti-Trump Lefties APART in Write-Up Welcoming Them BACK to America

Calm DOWN Little LADY! Comedian Pete Dominck Trying to Save Face After Scott Jennings OWNED Him Backfires

Biden Biographer Blisters Lame-Duck President for Harris Loss, Says Trump Win Is Joe's 'Legacy'

BREAKING: Unsealed Indictment Details Iranian Plot to Assassinate Donald Trump

Will Donald Trump Shape the Supreme Court for a Generation?