With gold prices hitting record highs again (will it hit $3000 per ounce soon?), more people are looking at investing in gold. When you first start learning about gold as an investment, it’s easy to get overwhelmed. Should you choose Gold ETFs, pooled accounts, individual accounts…? Or, maybe you should just buy gold outright. There are websites that’ll sell gold with a huge markup, and even pawn shops that sell gold around the corner from your favorite taco stand. If you’re new to buying gold, you first need a trusted resource to lay out the plain facts. You need to know a brief history, why gold works, and the options available to you. Thankfully, there’s a new, easy-to-read guidebook that’s opening minds and growing investment accounts. Genesis Gold is offering a free guide that has everything you need to learn about investing in gold and other precious metals. In just a short, 12-page read, you’ll learn what clues the Bible gives about man-made money (paper currency). You’ll even learn the three simple steps to investing in metals like gold. And, you’ll also get a quick tutorial on: Which precious metals are approved by the IRS The different forms of gold, silver and other precious metals – coins, ingots, bars Why the symbology (i.e. olive branches) matters on gold coins Why there are different sized measurements of gold coins and bars And a stunning innovation made by the Swiss Genesis Gold is giving you the tools to make your own decisions. Instead of trusting in fly-by-night investment opportunities, or Wall Street lies, you can learn the long-term strategy that has worked since Moses. As it says in Ezekiel 28:4 – By your wisdom and understanding you have gained wealth for yourself and amassed gold and silver in your treasuries. Click here to get this free pamphlet from Genesis Gold and begin your journey to investing with the wisdom of Solomon. RELATED REPORT: Should Americans Wait for the Election Before Moving into Gold and Silver? With the presidential election around the corner, many Americans who are concerned about the economy are waiting to see the results before making major moves with their money. Is Donald Trump going to win or will Kamala Harris pull it off? If Trump wins, will there be riots worse than the “Summer of Love” following the George Floyd video in 2020? If Harris wins, will the stock market plummet and will precious metals prices skyrocket? “This election is like no other that I’ve seen in over two decades in the precious metals industry,” said Jonathan Rose, CEO of Genesis Gold Group. “Normally there are factors that point to a wide range of possible scenarios for gold and silver prices but this year it’s all pointing to either metals being flat or shooting upward.” According to Rose, this is the first presidential election in which no scenario favors precious metals prices falling. That’s not to say it can’t happen; if we’ve learned anything the past four years it’s that pretty much anything is possible. But precious metals prices have been resistant to interest rate increases, stock market spikes, stock market drops, and even U.S. Dollar indicators. The biggest factor that drives the continuous record-breaking prices for precious metals is debt. Both nationally and globally, massive debt accumulated by the people and their governments has kept gold and silver from dipping for any sustained period. This is why gold prices have risen over 50% just since Election Day, 2022. “The best-case-scenario as we see it is for Trump to win the election and for any resulting turmoil to be minimized,” Rose said. “That will put the nation on the fastest path to economic recovery and long-term prosperity.” Unlike other precious metals companies that “cheer” for Democrats because their policies make precious metals prices rise, Genesis Gold Group prefers stability and is unabashedly supportive of President Trump’s campaign. They are a faith-driven company which compels them to do what’s best for their clients rather than simply looking at their own bottom line. If Trump wins and there is minimal turmoil, precious metals prices will likely stabilize. If Trump wins and there’s turmoil or if Harris wins, precious metals prices will likely go up, according to most reputable economists. “We have always felt it’s best to buy gold and wait rather than waiting to buy gold but that’s never been more true than it is today,” Rose said. “If Trump wins and the forces against him are quashed quickly, then we could see precious metals prices go flat. That’s fine by us because it means our clients are positioned for the long-term. “But in any other election scenario prices will likely shoot up, so either way it behooves Americans to take a serious look at letting us rollover or transfer their retirement accounts into a Genesis Gold IRA sooner rather than later… they definitely want to get everything done before the election.” We are currently experiencing a Wait List for people interested in speaking with Genesis Gold (because demand has been so high recently).  If you’re interested in moving forward, add your name and claim your spot in line.   Reach out to Genesis Gold Group today and receive their free, definitive gold guide. They can help you navigate the current and future state of the economy so you can take advantage of the financial higher ground of physical precious metals. Click here to access the guide: Here is what conservative star Dean Cain says about working with Genesis Gold Group: ==>Click here to contact Genesis Gold Group today and receive a free Definitive Gold Guide and learn more about protecting your life’s savings from the various threats we’re facing today. (Note: Thank you for supporting American businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and working with them through the links in this article which benefit WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to tell you about Genesis Gold!  The information provided by WLTReport or any related communications is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. We do not provide personalized investment, financial, or legal advice.) 

On Wednesday night, the White House held a Halloween party. And, it was extremely bizarre, bordering right on disturbing… First, Joe Biden bit a baby, who was dressed up as a turkey. See for yourself: Did President Biden just bite someone’s baby? pic.twitter.com/rbOu5xCh2W — The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) October 31, 2024 So, Joe Biden bit a baby tonight. pic.twitter.com/8aOEjGOJED — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) October 31, 2024 Later, he appeared to suck on another baby’s toe? Just watch for yourself: Wait, what did we just watch? pic.twitter.com/cPH6HsfhWq — The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) October 31, 2024 The New York Post commented on this: That’s not real poultry, Joe. President Biden playfully bit a stable of adorable, dressed-up tots during a Halloween celebration at the White House on Wednesday night. In a series of awkward interactions, Biden, 81, pretended to chomp down on infant after infant — including a child dressed up as a chicken. The baby giggled in response to the commander-in-chief nibbling on their thigh just as the theme song for “Jaws” began to play, according to video of the celebration. The baby’s mom also didn’t seem to mind — as she and the Democrat made small talk afterward. Meanwhile, Jill Biden was parading around in a full panda costume… Some of you still dont know what Panda Eyes mean… If you think this was just a random costume choice for the Joe Biden White House Halloween Party, you still aren’t awake. pic.twitter.com/mr6CbQZBOv — Redpill Drifter (@RedpillDrifter) October 31, 2024 From Newsweek: Videos of President Joe Biden playfully biting several costumed babies at the White House Halloween party have gone viral on social media. The Halloween event transformed the White House South Lawn into a lively setting with decorations and activities for families, local students, and children of military families. While Jill Biden, wearing a full-body panda suit, handed out copies of the children’s book 10 Spooky Pumpkins, President Biden greeted a line of children and parents and distributed candy in signature White House wrappers. Photographers and videographers captured moments of Biden bending down to interact with the children, including playfully biting the leg of a baby dressed as a turkey. The president also put the toe of a child in an ice cream cone costume in his mouth and nibbled at a third baby wearing a blue dress. Now, some might say that Jill Biden’s costume was just an innocent, if rather strange, choice for a Halloween costume. But, it’s a very odd choice, and one that’s not without a potential hidden meaning — especially when it comes to children and abuse. MJTruthUltra explained: Jill Biden dressed up as a Giant Panda for Halloween last night This is very disturbing, especially given the facts surrounding what Panda Eyes mean.. in regards to children. To throw more disgust on the situation, Joe Biden literally nibbled on a few babies. Not everyone… pic.twitter.com/SJ3OOTWIRK — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) October 31, 2024 In case you don’t know, “Panda Eyes” is a term rumored to be used in sick, Satanic, pedophilic circles to refer to some very disgusting, evil acts they perform on children. I won’t go into too much detail here. The information is online, and you can look it up yourself. But, Shadow of Ezra recalled: Former child actor Orlando Brown claims that “Panda” is a secret code for a ritual practiced within Hollywood circles, targeting children. Last night, Jill Biden dressed as a panda bear—a choice that some suggest seems out of place for Halloween. pic.twitter.com/iPhT2x2nHp — Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) October 31, 2024 I really hope that Jill’s choice of attire was just a coincidence. We can’t say it wasn’t just her idea of a fun, silly costume. As for Joe biting babies…well, that’s just straight-up weird. Speaking of pandas, did you know there’s a very good case to be made that they aren’t even real? Yes, I know it sounds weird but read this: FAKED: Chinese Zoo Admits Pandas Were Actually “Painted Dogs” FAKED: Chinese Zoo Admits Pandas Were Actually "Painted Dogs" You know we love a good "conspiracy theory" around here.... Why? Because in my experience almost every single one I've ever looked into has ended up being true! For example, the alleged Moon Landings that we allegedly pulled off on the very first try in 1969 with a mere fraction of the computing power we have today, and yet we've just decided to never go back since 1972.  Weird! Of course one of the biggest and first red-pills for most people is 9/11. And so many more! But one that I have steered away from covering (until now) is the "conspiracy theory" saying pandas aren't real. In case you haven't heard that one before, yes it is a "real" conspiracy theory in the sense that a lot of people believe it is true that they're not real. As with every single other conspiracy theory, it sounds stupid and insane....until you start looking into it.  And then the more you dig, the more you start to say "wait a minute, maybe this isn't as crazy as it sounds!" And that's what happened to me with this one....and might happen to you too by the end of this article! First, let me tell you why I'm even covering this at all right now...it's because a Chinese Zoo was just forced to admit that their pandas were actually "painted dogs" after one started barking. True story, you can't make this stuff up! Take a look: ?CHINESE ZOO ADMITS PANDAS WERE ACTUALLY "PAINTED DOGS" Shanwei Zoo admitted to the deception after the animals began panting and barking, revealing their true identity.pic.twitter.com/VmXFFToMYV — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) September 21, 2024 A Chinese Zoo was caught painting dogs and passing them off as pandas. What If I told you pandas aren’t real? They were first discovered in the 1920/30s Why hasn’t anyone seen a panda in the wild for thousands of years beforehand? That’s because they are manmade. pic.twitter.com/e3i5pajhf8 — The Maverick Approach (@Maveapproach) September 19, 2024 More here from Collin Rugg: NEW: China zoo forced to admit the truth after one of their “pandas” started panting and barking. The Shanwei zoo admits they painted dogs white and black to make them look like pandas. The zoo initially tried claiming that the dogs were a unique breed of pandas called… pic.twitter.com/MMoQLD7zuR — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 19, 2024 NEW: China zoo forced to admit the truth after one of their “pandas” started panting and barking. The Shanwei zoo admits they painted dogs white and black to make them look like pandas. The zoo initially tried claiming that the dogs were a unique breed of pandas called “panda dogs.” It was later discovered that the “pandas” were Chow Chows who were dyed with white and black paint. As you can see, Twitter has attached a "Community Note" to that Tweet making the following "Fact Check": Hmmmm, ok. But it does beg the question why a Zoo in China would need to fake this in the first place? There are reportedly over 1,800 pandas living in the wild in China, couldn't the Zoo just grab a few? But I'm only just scratching the surface, now let's dig in to see why some people are not convinced pandas are real at all.... I'm not saying that's what I think, I'm just saying I'm going to show you the best evidence out there to support the claim that SOME people think pandas aren't real. Let's start here, with the fact that the "painted dogs" is not the first time this has happened. It also happened recently back in May: Zoogoers outraged to discover ‘panda’ exhibit was actually dogs dyed black and white https://t.co/3eD75K3JWo pic.twitter.com/0HWKMOZwx2 — New York Post (@nypost) May 6, 2024 From the NY Post back in May 2024: A zoo in China sparked all out panda-monium after they dressed dogs as pandas because they didn’t have the genuine artifact, as seen in viral photos. The fake pandas, unveiled May 1 at the Taizhou Zoo in Jiangsu Province, were actually Chow Chow dogs — a big-haired breed from Northern China, Jam Press reported. Zoo officials reportedly trimmed their mane and dyed their faces black to look like China’s iconic bamboo-eating bear. They then put the so-called “panda dogs” on display in an enclosure every day from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., attracting throngs of people despite the obvious bamboo-zlement, per the sanctuary’s staffers. When asked why they had the canines engage in panda cosplay, a rep explained, “There are no panda bears at the zoo and we wanted to do this as a result.” Many visitors accused the sanctuary of animal cruelty; however, zoo officials insist that the dogfishing scheme isn’t harmful to the animals. “People also dye their hair,” rationalized the spokesperson. “Natural dye can be used on dogs if they have long fur.” Many social media users were on board with these canines in panda’s clothing with one fan writing, “They are very small to run that fast! I think they’re lovely.” “I think they’re cute,” said another. A third quipped, “Well that’s an extreme way to get your dogs cared for while you’re at work lol.” [sic] Giving dogs panda makeovers is nothing new. A decade ago, pups dressed as the bamboo-eating bears became such a haute item that pet stores couldn’t meet the demand. Ok, so at this point we know that at least two times in the last 6 months, Chinese Zoos (which should have access to plenty of panda bears) have been caught creating fake panda dogs....is that all you got Noah? Hardly. Let's go deep into why so many people are convinced Pandas aren't real: Pandas aren't real.https://t.co/SFf0KZkurZ — Science 2.0 (@science2_0) September 19, 2024 Perhaps the man best associated with the "pandas aren't real" conspiracy theory is my friend, comedian Owen Benjamin. Owen has been driving this train for a long time now, so I have to go to him first. Here is a short clip where Owen says the whole thing is just one big joke right out in the open, right in your face.... Hard to argue with him on this point, watch this: Pandas are a joke. It’s right in your face. I don’t understand how anyone could not see it. pic.twitter.com/BkP1toYzXu — Owen Benjamin (@OwenBenjamin) April 17, 2024 Ok, so if you can't see that clip for some reason, he shows how "scientists" claim pandas have excellent camouflage for their environments, but then when you actually look it's the worst possible camouflage ever.... It's a big fat joke right in your face! You mean that giant white and black animal is "camouflaged" amongst the brown tree and green grass? LOL...gee, I can barely see it!  I wish someone would circle it with a big red circle so I can find the camouflaged panda: Ok, ok....that all you got Noah? No, I was just slowly getting warmed up. Now let me really hit you with the stuff that started to blow my mind. Watch this second clip with Owen Benjamin just laying it all out in rapid fire. Watch first and then I'll break down (and confirm) each one: Pandas being fake is one of my theories that sounds the most crazy even u first hear it, but when you look into it there’s literally no chance that they’re actual animals pic.twitter.com/TLenPSFpZj — Owen Benjamin (@OwenBenjamin) August 1, 2023 Backup here if needed: Wait...so pandas aren't actually real? pic.twitter.com/hMJ14mLtSM — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) September 21, 2024 Ok, so now let me take them one at a time and start to blow your mind a bit.... Because I assumed I would just Fact-Check this and it would easily be proven wrong. Spoiler alert: I've confirmed almost everything he said. Let's start with this: They were not "discovered" until the late 1800s This one kind of blew my mind.  Surely they've been around in China for centuries right? Well, actually this one is Fact-Checked TRUE. Here's Grok: So they allegedly are native to China and have been around for centuries and yet it took a French man to "discover" them in 1869? What? They're not in Chinese art Ok, this is another one that seems pretty damning for the concept of pandas being real. The Chinese history and culture is EXTENSIVE.... They made art for centuries, and often used nature as inspiration. Surely there are hundreds of examples of pandas in historic Chinese art at any point prior to 1869, right? No. Dozens? No. One? No. They're not in Chinese literature If they're not in any art, surely they're in the books, right? ChatGPT tries to claim that reference to an animal named "mo" could be a panda, but then admits it's actually the tapir: In fact, the more I "chatted" ChatGPT it became clear that there was no clear reference to a panda in any Chinese literature, so I asked it point blank and it confirmed there are none: The are claimed to live in the wild alongside tigers and bears, and yet they have no ability to defend themselves, can't navigate small hills, they're constantly falling over, and they somehow survived all these years out in the wild?  This is just common sense, no ability for me to "Fact Check" this one. But I have to say, watching them constantly fall down and have no known self-defense mechanisms, it does appear to strain credulity to assume these things survived for centuries in the wild. A group of pandas is called an "embarrassment" Fact-Checked true, look it up for yourself. Again, the joke is hidden in plain sight, right in front of your face! More here: One of my more obscure “conspiracy theories” is that Pandas aren’t real. The never made sense to me. When I think things are fake, they usually are. pic.twitter.com/WgYaVL4ltr — Luke (@luke_brocks) April 15, 2024 Ok folks, as usual I'm not going to try and convince you! Heck...I'm not even entirely sure what I believe about them at this point. It appears as though perhaps the most likely outcome is they were "engineered" (via breeding) by the Chinese in the late 1800s? Or they're just entirely fake altogether, I don't know. My head is spinning right now, but I'd love to hear what you think! Can you disprove any of the Facts I listed above? If those Facts are indeed true, then.....are pandas real? Drop a comment below, I have no doubt this is going to be a LIVELY comments section!

Wendy’s announced its plan to close 140 locations in the United States. The closures are in addition to the 100 locations the fast food chain said it would close earlier this year. However, Wendy’s intends to offset the closures by opening 250 to 300 new locations. Wendy's to close 140 morelow performing restaurants by end of the year https://t.co/SeT7jdjmBt — USA TODAY (@USATODAY) November 1, 2024 “We want to further improve our restaurant footprint and overall system health,” Wendy’s president and CEO Kirk Tanner said, according to TODAY. “Following this review, I have made the strategic decision to close additional restaurants this year that are outdated and located in underperforming trade areas. These restaurants have AUVs (average unit volumes) of approximately $1.1 million and operating margins well below the system average,” Tanner added. Wendy's plans to close 140 restaurants in the coming months, but the company says it will also open an equal number in better-suited locations https://t.co/Uy5kQ3Ln3X — CNN (@CNN) November 1, 2024 From the Associated Press: Wendy’s President and CEO Kirk Tanner said the restaurants that are closing are underperforming compared to others. “They’re just in locations that don’t build our brands,” Tanner said. “You look at a brand that’s 55 years old and some of those restaurants are quite out of date.” Dublin, Ohio-based Wendy’s didn’t provide a list of the locations to be closed. But Tanner said they are spread out all over the country. “Our focus is on building new restaurants because we know they deliver well over the average of these poor-performing restaurants,” he said. “We, overall, want the best restaurants for the customers and that customer experience we want to deliver.” Wendy’s just announced they are closing 140 underperforming locations The goal? Focus on quality stores that meet today’s needs for speed and convenience in a competitive market The brand is still growing—200 new, tech-friendly locations were built in 2024 pic.twitter.com/7BlyvBpu2j — Tyler Bindi (@TripleNetTyler) November 1, 2024 TODAY reports: “On our Q3 earnings call yesterday, we shared that the Wendy’s system is incredibly healthy, and we remain on track to meet our goal of 250-300 new restaurant openings for the year,” a Wendy’s spokesperson told TODAY.com via email. “After our strategic review, we now expect a similar number of closures as openings, so we expect net unit growth in 2024 to be roughly flat. As a 55-year-old brand with more than 7,100 restaurants across the globe, closures are a normal activity to maintain a healthy system. By the end of this year, we will have opened more than 500 new restaurants over the last two years and have the confidence we will deliver elevated growth in 2025 and the years to come.” Wendy’s did not provide a list of which locations will close. The closures follow a wave of other national restaurant chains shuttering locations. Late last month, Denny’s announced it will close 150 of its stores, while 7-Eleven also announced plans to close hundreds of locations throughout the U.S. and Canada. Red Lobster also closed 23 restaurants in August, after closing 83 locations earlier this year, as part of its bankruptcy proceedings.

An illegal immigrant accused of shooting a Jewish man while he was walking into a Chicago synagogue is slapped with new hate crime and terrorism charges.

During a Washington Post Live segment, commentator Hugh Hewitt stormed out mid-conversation after a fiery debate over the upcoming election.  The former WaPo reporter confronted Post journalists Jonathan Capehart and Ruth Marcus for their dishonesty. They said that Trump was “laying the groundwork for contesting the election” by raising concerns over election integrity in Pennsylvania. […] The post Hugh Hewitt Storms Out of WaPo Live Propaganda Discussion appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

“Saturday Night Live” alum Will Ferrell made some of the best 21st century comedies even better. “Old School.” “Anchorman.” “Elf.” “Step Brothers.” “Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby.” He only had a cameo in “Wedding Crashers,” but boy, did he make every second count. Now? He’s adrift in an industry that no longer craves R-rated comedies, at least the ones that leave the lectures off screen. He’s pushed his liberal leanings to center stage, from his election pandering to a documentary that ignores the real concerns tied to the trans community. Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly in “Talladega Nights: The Ballard of Ricky Bobby.” (2006). Columbia Pictures. Relativity Media. Apatow Productions. IMDB. At 57, he has plenty of time to course correct and prove he’s got a killer third act within him. For now, all we can do is re-watch his classic comedies and hope he breaks free from that Hollywood groupthink. At least a little. The comic actor’s “SNL” run (1994-2001) gave us indelible characters like his Harry Caray impersonation, cheerleader Craig Buchanan and Steve Butabi (that Roxbury guy). He quickly found his footing on the big screen, partnering with director Adam McKay for smashes like “Anchorman,” “Talladega Nights” and “Step Brothers.” The hits slowed down in the 2010s. Films like “The Campaign” (2012), “Zoolander 2” (2016) and “The House” (2017) failed to break out. The culture curdled around that time, witness the shrieking reaction to his successful buddy comedy “Get Hard” (2015). The film earned an impressive $90 million, but critics complained the film’s premise was problematic. Ferrell plays an ignorant white-collar criminal who hires a black blue-collar Joe (Kevin Hart) to prepare him for a stint in the hoosegow. The writing was on the wall, both for Ferrell’s comedy opportunities and the industry’s bawdy, R-rated romps. Kevin Hart and Will Ferrell in “Get Hard.” (2015). Gary Sanchez Productions. Warner Bros. IMDB. The 2020s found him appearing in smaller films and adding his voice to wacky fare (“Strays”) that got lost in the marketplace. He snagged a bona fide blockbuster with “Barbie” (2023), but his work in the film amounted to a cameo that hardly boosted the film. His Apple TV+ comedy musical “Spirited,” a leading man role alongside Ryan Reynolds, hardly captured the zeitgeist. The other side of Ferrell’s brand started to make itself known along the way. Sure, he imitated President George W. Bush during his “SNL” stint, but the impression seemed good-natured, not vicious. A subsequent project felt anything but gracious. In 2016, word spread that Ferrell’s production shingle had acquired a buzzy script in which he’d play President Ronald Reagan in a “comedy” about the late leader’s Alzheimer’s disease. The plot had Reagan completely checked out in his second term, thinking he was merely an actor going through the White House motions. The script, by first-time feature writer Mike Rosolio, landed in ninth place on 2015’s Black List, having been singled out for praise by 25 Hollywood executives. It was popular enough in Hollywood circles that James Brolin, John Cho and Lena Dunham performed a live reading of the script last March. The script, according to the reliably liberal Hollywood Reporter, was as hard-Left as anyone could image even if the site refused to label it as such. And, yes, it mocked Reagan as a dementia-addled fool. Even the media at time, often blasé about attacks on the GOP, recoiled at the concept. Reagan’s grown children cried foul, too. Ferrell swiftly dropped the project. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ It’s a minor miracle he didn’t suffer any professional fallout from the debacle. Perhaps his comedy canon offered him a measure of protection. That may not be the case much longer. More recently, he filmed a documentary tied to the current culture wars. “Will & Harper” follows Ferrell as he takes a road trip with his longtime friend and comic collaborator Harper Steele. Delirio Films. Gloria Sanchez Productions. Wayfarer Studios. Harper Steele and Will Ferrell in “Will & Harper” (2024). IMDB. Steele previously wrote for “SNL” and transitioned to a woman in recent years. The documentary captures that story, how Ferrell processed the change and finds them uncovering far more love than hate across America. Yet Ferrell played dumb while promoting the movie, saying he didn’t understand why more people don’t accept the trans community. He blamed that on people’s lack of “confidence,” not real concerns about states allowing childhood transitions or sexualized affairs like Drag Queen Story Hours. He even apologized for his old “SNL” bits where he impersonated Attorney General Janet Reno. “That’s something I wouldn’t choose to do now,” adding the bit “hits a false note now.” Left unsaid? Today’s “SNL” uses female cast members to play male politicians without a hint of outrage. NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images via Getty Images Ferrell also gave a generic apology to other “SNL” bits which may be deemed offensive in some quarters today. In recent days Ferrell has teamed up with actor/activist Billy Eichner to revisit the gay comic’s “Billy on the Street” shtick. This time, they’re wearing “Loud White Men for Kamala” (Eichner’s shtick requires plenty of screaming) as they roam the streets of New York.  Among the questions they asked passers by? “Would you have sex with a Trump voter?” It’s unwise to count Ferrell out. His comic instincts remain sound, even if his industry struggles to adequately tap his skill set. Still, Ferrell can ill afford to alienate any more audience members moving forward. He has no current comedy franchise to call his own. Big screen comedies in general are in short supply, and his most recent stabs at the format, like “Strays” and “Eurovision Song Contest” all came and went without making much cultural noise. He’d be better off finding an independent film studio willing to let him be himself, the guy who once ruled the R-rated comedy scene. He could even bring it back to prominence, striking a blow against the woke mob that damaged his career in the first place. * * * Christian Toto is an award-winning journalist, movie critic and editor of HollywoodInToto.com. He previously served as associate editor with Breitbart News’ Big Hollywood. Follow him at HollywoodInToto.com. The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Former President Donald Trump celebrated yet another Catholic feast day in a social media post on Friday. The Republican presidential nominee posted an image of Jesus Christ on the cross, surrounded by saints, angels, Saint John the Apostle, and Mary, Jesus Christ’s mother, in celebration of All Saints Day. The feast day is one of six “holy days of obligation” celebrated by the Catholic Church, days on which all Catholics are supposed to attend Mass. Wishing everyone a Blessed and Happy All Saints’ Day! pic.twitter.com/5VlPkCJ7M5 — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 1, 2024 Polling conducted by the National Catholic Reporter released in late October found that Trump was leading Harris among Catholic voters in the crucial swing states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Fifty percent of respondents said that they would “probably” or “definitely” vote for Trump, asked who they would vote for if the election took place that day, and 45% said they would “probably” or “definitely” vote for Harris. The image also includes a depiction of Our Lady of Guadalupe, who Trump posted about in September. Our Lady of Guadalupe is particularly significant for Catholics in Mexico, where an Aztec man named Juan Diego said that Mary appeared to him several times in visions in 1531. Mary purportedly asked in these visions that a shrine be built to her on Tepayac Hill, now a suburb of Mexico City. .@realDonaldTrump celebrates the birthday of Mary, Jesus Christ’s mother, by sharing an image of “Our Lady of Guadalupe” on Truth Social. pic.twitter.com/21wNj63NLa — Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) September 8, 2024 Trump also shared an image of St. Michael the Archangel in late September, and tweeted the entire prayer that Catholics say to the saint. Saint Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. Be our defense against the wickedness and snares of the Devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray, and do thou, O Prince of the heavenly hosts, by the power of God, cast into hell Satan, and all the evil spirits, who prowl about… pic.twitter.com/Z3RoeGUslh — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 30, 2024 When Trump spoke at the 79th Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner in New York City in October, he discussed his Catholic posts with EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo, who asked the former president whether he is “telling voters something about [his] spiritual journey.” .@RaymondArroyo questions Trump about his recent religious social media posts featuring prayers to St. Michael the Archangel, and the “Ave Maria” sung in honor of Corey Comperatore at the Butler rally. “It’s just beautiful to me,” Trump responds. pic.twitter.com/bNx8P0Kxaz — Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) October 18, 2024 “No, I don’t think so, it’s just beautiful to me,” Trump said. “I look at the whole thing, the words, and the pictures, the pictures are so beautiful. Yeah, I put up some stuff, somebody else asked me that same question, it’s really that I think it’s really beautiful.”