This week, I had the pleasure of sitting down for a cordial debate with Sam Harris, host of the “Making Sense” podcast, to discuss the question of the hour: Donald Trump vs. Kamala Harris. The conversation was moderated by Bari Weiss of The Free Press. Sam Harris is, of course, an incredibly intelligent person. He’s also a person with a core set of values. He freely acknowledged his own discomfort with many of Kamala Harris‘ positions in the campaign. But in the end, he said that he would vote for Harris because of one dispositive argument: Trump could not be president, thanks to his antics surrounding Election 2020. I took the opposing view. While freely acknowledging that Trump’s behavior between Nov. 4, 2020, and Jan. 6, 2021, was wrong, I argued that the constitutional checks and balances had held and would continue to do so. What is more, I argued, Trump should be elected because his presidency was far more successful for America than her vice presidency. Under Trump, the economy boomed, inflation remained low, job growth was robust. Under Trump, the border remained relatively calm and became increasingly so over time. Under Trump, the Middle East was beginning to flower into actual peace, thanks to the Abraham Accords and a contained Iran. Under Harris, the economy had experienced the highest inflation rates in four decades; the border had been purposefully left wide-open, with at least 6.5 million illegal immigrants entering the country; Afghanistan had been handed over to the Taliban in the most cowardly and ignominious fashion possible, resulting in billions in lost military technology and 13 American service people killed; Iran had unleashed its proxies against Israel, beginning on Oct. 7, continuing through a wave of rocket fire from Lebanon via Hezbollah, and culminating in multiple Iranian attacks directly against Israel; the social fabric had been rent by intersectional wokeness, dividing Americans along racial and sexual lines; and the federal government had been weaponized against political opposition and militarized on behalf of friends of the Democratic Party. So, in short, Sam Harris argued against Trump; I argued for Trump and against Kamala Harris. You may notice an argument missing in this formulation: The argument for Kamala Harris. That’s because the argument doesn’t exist. You can argue against Trump; you can argue for him. But nobody can credibly argue in favor of Kamala Harris. Not even Kamala Harris. That’s been the story of her campaign—what she’s not. She’s not Donald Trump. Fair enough. She’s not Joe Biden. Fair enough. But she can’t answer how she would be different from Biden, other than not physically being Biden. She can’t answer what she would do to improve the country. Every time she’s asked, she resembles a 10th-grader informed there’s a pop quiz on a book she hasn’t read. And it is absolutely unclear whether Americans are willing to make Kamala Harris president just because they dislike Donald Trump. They tried that formula in 2020, and it resulted in the single worst presidency since Jimmy Carter’s. It turns out that this time, the American people might want to hear a convincing affirmative case in favor of the Democratic candidate for president—a candidate who, unlike Biden, did not win a single vote in the primaries, and who was shoehorned in at the last minute to prevent Biden’s impending collapse in the polls. Will Kamala Harris become president? If she does, it won’t be because of Kamala Harris. She’s a nothing, an empty vessel, a fresh coat of paint slapped on the beat-up jalopy of the Biden administration. And with the choice starkly before them, Americans might be able to answer the question between Trump and Harris quite simply: Were you better off in 2019 than in 2024? COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post ‘Final Argument’: An Open-and-Shut Case appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Florida’s Attorney-General Ashley Moody has been named in a federal lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida against a state law that blocks children from accessing social media. We obtained a copy of the lawsuit for you here. Tech trade groups Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice are behind the filing, which alleges that the law – Florida House Bill 3 – violates First Amendment rights. The law has received bipartisan support (30-5 in the Senate and 109-4 in the House.) It allows 14 and 15 year-olds to sign up to social platforms provided they do it with parental consent, but bans those 13 and under. The lawsuit’s goal is to make sure the legislation does not go into effect as planned, on the first day of 2025. According to NetChoice and CCIA (their members include Google and Meta), the new state rules incorrectly accuse social media of representing a risk to children, and compare this stance to similar past accusations against books, music, video games, etc., and the internet itself. In other words, this time, Big Tech (via the groups suing on their behalf) take up for the First Amendment, arguing that this part of the US Constitution makes it clear the government should not get involved in “resolving” issues concerning social media – but add that the government, nonetheless, “should have a say in the debates over topics such as social media.” That’s an interesting way to carefully approach the overall massive and ongoing controversy that is the government involvement/collusion with Big Tech; but at least in this case, clearly with an eye – if not both eyes – on the bottom line, these companies want the First Amendment respected. “It (the law) covers only the websites that minors like to use regularly, effectively punishing those users – and their favorite websites,” the filing reads, and accuses the law of doing this “in a manner wholly inconsistent with the First Amendment.” In this case, it is the parents that should be able to decide what their children can access online, the lawsuit continues, adding that the plaintiffs believe that other ways to protect minors from online harms already exist. And, these are built into their apps by the Big Tech platforms themselves, the two groups claim, citing various forms of restrictions that can be imposed from the apps’ settings. Florida AG Moody’s office stated they are at this time reviewing the lawsuit – but that Moody will, “as a mother, fight aggressively in court to ensure the ability to protect Florida children.” If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Florida Faces Lawsuit Over Age Digital ID Verification Law for Social Media appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Washington Post: Michigan is Tied

New observations of merging galaxies show a pair of “blood-soaked” eyes.

Down to the last few days before the election, CNN's Kasie Hunt has dropped any pretense of even-handedness, and has let her pro-Kamala flag fly. Three days ago, we caught Kasie saying that Trump-hater par excellence David Frum's attacks on Trump were "correct." Today, Hunt was clearly worried by Trump's entertaining, attention-attracting moves of working in a McDonald's and riding shotgun in a garbage truck. She insisted instead that voters focus on Trump's history of election denial and hints that he might do it again this year. Hunt insisted that the garbage truck/McD's events were: "Designed to get us to look away from what we shouldn't ignore. To distract from what Trump is saying about what happens after polls close on Tuesday." Hunt then rolled clips of Trump responding to questions as to whether, if he lost, he'd recognize the results of the election. But whereas Hunt was surely trying to suggest that Trump would refuse to accept a defeat, his answers did little to support her hypothesis. To the contrary, Trump told one reporter that whereas there had been some "smaller" election misconduct in Pennsylvania, "I think it's been taken care of." And when another reporter asked if he'd accept the results of the election, he replied: "Sure. It's a fair election." Trump's response was in line with what Democrats are saying. Indeed, some of them are going even further, as Axios reports, suggesting that Trump is planning to cheat. Thus, Dem Rep. Jamie Raskin has said that if Trump "won a free, fair and honest election, then we would obviously accept it." However, Raskin said he "definitely" doesn't assume that Trump would use free, fair and honest means to secure a victory. Trump "is doing whatever he can to try to interfere with the process." Along similar lines, "Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, a senior chief deputy whip who voted to object to George W. Bush electors in 2005, said of Trump, 'I don't know what kind of shenanigans he is planning,' adding: 'We would have to, in any election ... make sure that all the rules have been followed.'" And House Rules Committee Ranking Member Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), who also objected to Trump electors in 2017, said Democrats would certify a Trump victory "assuming everything goes the way we expect it to." Funny how Hunt never mentioned the Democrats' statements. Instead, Kasie concluded on this ominous note: "When you're out on the trail, covering a political campaign -- I've done a number of them -- the job is to report what the campaign is doing. Sure. That's the part that they want you to see. "But it's also to make sure you're reporting what they don't want you to cover or pay attention to. Not to miss the forest for the trees." Translation: The "trees" that should be disregarded are Trump's photo-ops. The "forest" to which attention must be paid is Trump's 2020 election denial and his supposed threats to do it again. Note: Trump isn't known for self-deprecating humor. So his joking with a rally crowd that he took his aides' suggestion that he wear the orange vest he had worn in the garbage truck, because it would make him look thinner, was both unusual -- and perhaps a sign that he is in the good humor of a man who believes he's going to win. Here's the transcript. CNN This Morning 10/31/24 6:01 am EDT KASIE HUNT: Garbage in, garbage out. We are five days from election day in an incredibly tight race where anything could make a difference. Donald Trump, climbing into a garbage truck. Shall we say, striking visual designed to capitalize on President Biden's remark that Trump's supporters are garbage. DONALD TRUMP: How do you like my garbage truck? This truck is in honor of Kamala and Joe Biden. HUNT: Trump even went onstage at his rally in that bright orange vest. TRUMP: And they said, it would be unbelievable if you could wear it on stage. I said, there's no way I'm wearing it onstage. They said, okay, sir. I said, get me my jacket.  But if you did, you know, it actually makes you look thinner [crowd goes wild.] I said, ooh. And they got me. I said, I want to  wear it onstage. HUNT:  Biden, of course, has said he was only referring to a single Trump supporter who called Puerto Rico garbage in a joke.  . . .  So, this garbage truck thing, not the first time that Donald Trump, the former president, but also the former reality TV star, has produced events to drive a message in a way that's hard to look away from. That's the point, right?  But here's the thing. These events are also designed to get us to look away from what we shouldn't ignore. To distract from what Trump is saying about what happens after polls close on Tuesday. MALE REPORTER: Can you imagine any circumstance under which you would be defeated, but not say that the election was stolen? TRUMP: If it was a corrupt election, that could happen. But so far we're doing pretty well. They found a lot of smaller things in Pennsylvania, as you know, and I think they've been corrupted. And they're taking care of it. They were corrupt. They were corrupted. But I think it's been taken care of. FEMALE REPORTER: Either way, will you accept the results of the election? TRUMP: Sure. It's a fair election. HUNT: IF it's a fair election, he says. So, does he think it's going to be a fair election? BRIAN KILMEADE: What worries you the most?  TRUMP: Cheating. KILMEADE: Which one, though? Which state? TRUMP: All of them. I mean, they cheat. All of them. HUNT: All of them, he says. ALL of them! So when you're out on the trail, covering a political campaign -- I've done a number of them -- the job is to report what the campaign is doing. Sure. That's the part that they want you to see. But it's also to make sure you're reporting what they don't want you to cover or pay attention to. Not to miss the forest for the trees.

In America, we'd like to think that we have a news media but, in fact, what we have is captured corporate propagandists passing themselves off to the public as news media. Anyone needing proof of this need look no further than ABC News Chief White Correspondent Mary Bruce’s interview, if we are to call it that, with Vice President Kamala Harris. But before getting to the interview, which led off ABC World News Tonight, one must first endure another one of David Muir’s long-winded introductions- which have increasingly become the verbal equivalent of a bridge toll. In this case, Muir’s intro is a vehicle with which to promote an outright lie meant to prolong the ongoing grievance narrative over the “garbage” joke at the Madison Square Garden rally: Proving why there is zero trust in the Regime Media, ABC presidential debate moderator and @ABCWorldNews anchor @DavidMuir jumps from giving fake fact checks to attributing fake quotes to @TonyHinchcliffe. pic.twitter.com/JlYJH4qUxq — Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) October 31, 2024 DAVID MUIR: And after days of backlash over that comedian at the Madison Square Garden rally calling Puerto Rico a “floating pile of garbage.” Shortly thereafter, Muir tosses to Mary Bruce for her one-on-one, which basically featured five questions. To wit: Reaction to Joe Biden’s “garbage” remark? Does she need secret Republicans in order to win? What is her top legislative priority? What is the plan if Trump declares early victory? “What do you think about when you envision the history you may make?” Par for the course questions for the Reporter Formerly Known as Biden’s Chief Apple Polisher. But let’s be clear: none of the questions were geared so as to force Harris to answer anything or expound on policy. These were the friendliest of questions in the friendliest format (at a Harris rally), intended to create for viewers the illusion of a candidate who is comfortable answering questions from the media: even if this is not actually the case. I know this to be true because Bruce allowed Harris to skate by with a changed response to the policy priority question. Here is what Harris told Bruce when asked the question: MARY BRUCE: You mentioned that to-do list. You’ve made clear, you're going to be armed with that list if you get into The Oval Office.  KAMALA HARRIS: Yes. BRUCE: But you haven't made clear what is at the very top of that list. HARRIS: Oh, but I have made it clear. My highest priority is to bring down prices and bring down costs. It's one of the biggest issues that is affecting the American people. I've been traveling the country. They know the price of groceries is still too high. I know it's still too high. Bringing down the cost of housing, bringing down taxes for middle class families so they can not just get by but get ahead. Those are my highest priorities. Bruce didn’t even stop to catch a breath before moving on to the election question. Had she done some research, perhaps, she would have discovered that Harris gave another response to CBS’s Norah O’Donnell when asked the same question: Kamala Harris finally (and predictably) articulates to Norah O'Donnell what her first legislative priority would be, if elected: ABORTION. Given her refusal to name any restrictions on abortion, Harris likely seeks to pass some form of the "Women's Health Protection Act". pic.twitter.com/X7lfenS4WN — Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) October 27, 2024 Harris told CBS that enacting unrestricted abortion was her top legislative priority. So, which is it? With the election less than a week away, the Regime Media thought better of having that stand as Harris’s final response. What other narratives will the media try to reset in these next 5 days? Only time will tell. Click “expand” to view the full transcript of the aforementioned report as aired on ABC World News Tonight on Wednesday, October 30th, 2024: ABC WORLD NEWS TONIGHT 10/30/24 6:32 PM DAVID MUIR: Good evening and it's great to have you with us here on a Wednesday night. We begin tonight with the race for The White House, just six days from tonight, Election Day, we'll be on the air right here with our Election Night coverage. We hope you'll be right here with us. Tonight, more than 57 million Americans already casting their ballots. Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump holding dueling rallies in North Carolina and Wisconsin. And tonight, Vice President Harris in Pennsylvania. Vice President Harris and her message of unity in these final days but tonight, Harris forced to respond to what president Biden said last night about Donald Trump's rally at Madison Square Garden. Our Mary Bruce one-on-one with the vice President. What she said about Biden's comments. And tonight, right here, Vice President Harris and her promise to Republicans and independents, and Mary asking her what her number one priority will be if elected. Tonight, Harris on what's at the top of her list. And after days of backlash over that comedian at the Madison Square Garden rally calling Puerto Rico a “floating pile of garbage.” Tonight, Trump seizing on Biden’s words. But Trump getting a warning of his own from Republican Nikki Haley. We have it all covered tonight with Mary Bruce leading us off from Raleigh, North Carolina, her one-on-one with Vice President Harris. MARY BRUCE: Tonight, in the must-win battleground of Pennsylvania, Vice President Kamala Harris promising to unite the nation if she's elected. KAMALA HARRIS: We know we have an opportunity in this election to turn the page on a decade of Donald Trump trying to keep us divided and afraid of each other. That is who he is but Pennsylvania, that is not who we are.  (AT THE ELLIPSE) Good evening, America! BRUCE: It is her closing message. And last night, with 75,000 people there to hear her speak on the Ellipse where Donald Trump gave his speech on January 6th, Harris instead reaching out to independents, and Republicans, too. HARRIS: Unlike Donald Trump, I don't believe people who disagree with me are the enemy. He wants to put them in jail. I´ll give them a seat at the table. BRUCE: But as Harris was speaking, President Biden sparking controversy with his reaction to the speaker at Trump's rally at Madison Square Garden who denigrated Latinos and Puerto Rico. TONY HINCHCLIFFE: I don't know if you guys know this, but there's literally a floating island of garbage in the middle of the ocean right now. Yeah, I think it's called Puerto Rico. BRUCE: Biden lashing out. JOE BIDEN: Well, let me tell you something, I don't -- I don't know the -- the Puerto Rican that- that I know, or Puerto Rico where I’m fr- in my home state of Delaware, they're good, decent, honorable people. The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters, his -- his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it's un-American. BRUCE: Tonight, The White House insisting the president wasn't calling Trump supporters garbage. But his words creating a headache for Harris. And I asked her about that today, when we were given a one-on-one with Harris in the key battleground of North Carolina, with less than a week until Election Day.  What did you think when you heard president Biden make those comments? HARRIS: First of all, I think that the president has explained what he meant, but I said it earlier. I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for, and I've made that clear throughout my career, including my speech last night before I think this all happened. Which is- I intend to be a president for all Americans, and- including those who may not vote for me in this election. I take very seriously my obligation and my oath to concern myself first with the needs of the American people and put them before whatever might be my selfish issues. BRUCE: Now, we know this election is going to be extremely close. Liz Cheney is out there campaigning for you. She's urging Republicans to vote for you. She says they don't have to tell anybody. Do you need Republicans to do that in order to win? HARRIS: Here's how I think about it. I- I really want to bring our country together. We've had about a decade of this Trump Era that has been all about -- you know, there's so much about it that's been about dividing people and having Americans point their fingers at each other, and I think people are exhausted by it. And it's not empowering. And we're going to all have our differences. We're a democracy. That's what we love about being American. You know, we have those differences, and we have those debates at the Thanksgiving table. It's our nature, but not to the point that we're turning our backs on each other and calling each other “the enemy within” because we disagree. BRUCE: Harris says Trump would bring an enemies list to The White House. She would bring a to-do list.  You mentioned that to-do list. You’ve made clear, you're going to be armed with that list if you get into The Oval Office.  HARRIS: Yes. BRUCE: But you haven't made clear what is at the very top of that list. HARRIS: Oh, but I have made it clear. My highest priority is to bring down prices and bring down costs. It's one of the biggest issues that is affecting the American people. I've been traveling the country. They know the price of groceries is still too high. I know it's still too high. Bringing down the cost of housing, bringing down taxes for middle class families so they can not just get by but get ahead. Those are my highest priorities. BRUCE: You know, in 2020 we saw Donald Trump come out and prematurely claim victory on Election Night. I know you've got a whole team of lawyers standing at the ready.  HARRIS: Yes. BRUCE: But what is your plan? What are you going to do if he does that again? HARRIS: Well, we are, sadly, ready if he does. And if- if we know that he is actually manipulating the press, and attempting to manipulate the consensus of the American people based on fiction instead of fact. We're prepared to respond. BRUCE: You are promising to bring people together, even people you disagree with, you say will have a seat at the table. How do you convince Trump supporters of that, though, when you're calling their candidate a would-be dictator, a petty tyrant? HARRIS: I am talking to everyone as an American, regardless of who they voted for in the last election. BRUCE: And one last question. I know you have said that this is a campaign about substance, not identity, but I'm sure it's crossed your mind. What do you think about when you envision the history that you may make? HARRIS: I'm fully aware of my gender and race. Let’s start there. And I- and I know that it will be very significant, in terms of the glass that will be broken. But I do not expect that anyone is going to vote for me because of my gender or race. It has to be because I earn their vote with a plan to make their life better. BRUCE: Harris is now taking this closing message and her pitch for unity on the road, hitting multiple battleground states a day after events a day after events today in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Tomorrow, she heads out west to Arizona and Nevada. David, tonight Harris telling me she isn't taking anything for granted. David. MUIR: Mary Bruce, leading us one on one with the Vice President today. Mary, thank you.  

Comedy Central’s weekly host of The Daily Show, Ronny Chieng, reacted on Wednesday to President Joe Biden calling Donald Trump supporters “garbage” by claiming that the White House’s excuse that he really meant “supporter’s” means that the election is now “Nazis versus grammar Nazis.” After a couple of clips of Biden, including the “garbage” one, Chieng sought to make sense of the remarks, “Oh. I see. This guy's too [bleep] old and his brain is a floating pile of garbage, of course. Now the Dems don't want to admit that the president of the United States should not be using a computer unsupervised, so they went with this explanation.”     In a clip, CNN’s Arlette Saenz recalled, “The White House very quickly tried to argue that when he used the word 'supporters,' he wasn't talking about Trump supporters writ large, but that there was an apostrophe in there that is what is included in the official transcript. They tried to argue that he was specifically referencing the comments from that comedian at the Madison Square Garden rally on Sunday.” Chieng responded, “That's right. In the last week of the campaign, Republicans are calling for a roundup of immigrants and Democrats are like, 'You have to put the apostrophe in the right place!' This election is really coming down to Nazis versus grammar Nazis and if Democrats are relying on Americans to understand how apostrophes work, this election is [bleep].” Beyond the absurdity of tying immigration enforcement to Nazism, Chieng tried to use Biden’s remarks to claim Republicans are too dumb to even know what an apostrophe is: Because have you ever seen a sign outside a bar? I mean, they basically use the apostrophe to mean ‘Here comes an S’ and look, Republicans aren't accepting any of these excuses because they don't know what an apostrophe is, and they think it's intentional that Biden called them garbage, and they could not be more excited because Republicans have been under fire for their garbage thing, and now they're like, ‘Yes! Biden's garbage thing cancels out our garbage thing, and so we're back to neutral!’ ‘Our Garbage Thing’ refers to remarks made by a comedian, and whatever one thinks of the political wisdom of having a roast comic at your rally, comedians like Chieng who rely heavily on race-based roasts, should hesitate before throwing fellow roasters under the bus lest something get lost in translation. Here is a transcript for the October 30 show: Comedy Central The Daily Show 10/30/2024 11:03 PM ET RONNY CHIENG: Oh. I see. This guy's too [bleep] old and his brain is a floating pile of garbage, of course. Now the Dems don't want to admit that the president of the United States should not be using a computer unsupervised, so they went with this explanation. ARLETTE SAENZ: The White House very quickly tried to argue that when he used the word "supporters," he wasn't talking about Trump supporters writ large, but that there was an apostrophe in there that is what is included in the official transcript. They tried to argue that he was specifically referencing the comments from that comedian at the Madison Square Garden rally on Sunday. CHIENG: That's right. In the last week of the campaign, Republicans are calling for a roundup of immigrants and Democrats are like, "You have to put the apostrophe in the right place!" This election is really coming down to Nazis versus grammar Nazis and if Democrats are relying on Americans to understand how apostrophes work, this election is [bleep].  Because have you ever seen a sign outside a bar? I mean, they basically use the apostrophe to mean "Here comes an S” and look, Republicans aren't accepting any of these excuses because they don't know what an apostrophe is, and they think it's intentional that Biden called them garbage, and they could not be more excited because Republicans have been under fire for their garbage thing, and now they're like, "Yes! Biden's garbage thing cancels out our garbage thing, and so we're back to neutral!"

One thing the left is really good at is misinterpreting something Trump said or did and using that twisted lie to bolster their "Trump is racist, sexist, fascist, etc." narrative. For example, CNN’s Van Jones took a section of Trump’s Agenda 47 that laid out plans to combat the rampant crime the Biden administration has allowed to escalate and turned it into Trump is “locking up all the black men.” Dave Rubin plays the clip of Jones explaining why fighting crime is wrong to Bill Maher. “This is what’s on his website. He says he’s going to ‘require local law enforcement to do stop and frisk,’ which 80% goes against black people,” Jones began, reading from Agenda 47. “He says he’s going to ‘instruct the DOJ to dismantle every street gang’ — in other words, the feds are going to be in your neighborhood trying to figure out which one of your kids should go to federal prison.” “He says he’s going to ‘indemnify all cops,’ so you can't sue cops basically,” Jones continued, adding, “Black men are about to get conned.” “The best con artist in the world is going to tell black men, ‘I'm going to lift you up.’ In fact, he's going to lock you up. He's going to lock you up for the stuff that Kamala Harris is trying to decriminalize,” he ranted. Dave points out some irony in Jones’ words. “Van, why do you think that all black men are in street gangs?” he asks rhetorically. Further, “They don’t do these things to lawful people,” he says. “Now, that doesn’t mean that there can’t be a bad cop that might do a stop and frisk unfairly or unjustly — and that should be dealt with.” “What Donald Trump is talking about there is that in cities — like in the city [Van Jones and Bill Maher] shot that very video right there, Los Angeles — the mayor of L.A. is no longer doing proper policing. You can trespass and jump over people's fences and set up a tent and they won't do anything; you can smoke crack outside of city hall,” says Dave. As for Jones’ insinuation that Donald Trump is racist against black men, it’s easily debunked considering “Trump literally had lowest all-time black unemployment.” To hear more, watch the clip above. Want more from Dave Rubin?To enjoy more honest conversations, free speech, and big ideas with Dave Rubin, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Let’s get this out of the way: Kitten Space Agency is not Kerbal Space Program. Nevertheless, its creator, DayZ's Dean Hall, is already calling it a “KSP killer." KSP fans have been desperate for something to come along and succeed where Kerbal Space Program 2 failed, and it looks like KSA might just have the right space juice to get the job done. Continue reading Kitten Space Agency is a new Kerbal Space Program rival from the creator of DayZ MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best space games, Best simulation games, Best management games

If you were hoping your old and dusty gaming PC would meet the Off The Grid system requirements, I have some bad news. This new early access battle royale game demands an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 as the minimum graphics card, and an RTX 4070 as the recommended. It's not often that one of the best graphics cards from the last few years features in the recommended tier of a game system requirements, but Off The Grid is an exception to the rule. As the game is still in early access, this could be down to issues with optimization, and the demands of the game could lessen closer to the final release. Continue reading Off The Grid system requirements demand RTX 3060 as minimum graphics card MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best graphics card, Best gaming PC, Best SSD for gaming