'The time has come for credible investigations'

'China is fielding new nuclear capabilities at a faster pace than any time in its history'

News Presence We Are All the Ghost in the Trailer for Presence Nothing good comes of mirror scenes in horror movies. Nothing. By Molly Templeton | Published on October 31, 2024 Screenshot: Neon Comment 0 Share New Share Screenshot: Neon Say what you will about Steven Soderbergh—you’ve got to give the man credit for always trying something new. In the last few years alone he’s made Magic Mike’s Last Dance, the cyberthriller Kimi, and two TV miniseries. And now he’s returning to theaters with the haunting Presence, in which the camera takes the POV of a … honestly, I think the title is pretty clear. If you are a person who struggles with the camera style of first-person shooter style videogames, this will not be the movie for you. (The trailer alone made me a little queasy.) The camera is the presence, and it moves through the home of a grieving family accordingly. It’s a clever, intimate idea; Soderbergh told Variety, “Everything is revealed through the glimpses of this family that this presence sees. And the whole ghost genre element is a Trojan horse to show a group of people in danger of falling apart.” The movie stars Lucy Liu, Chris Sullivan, Callina Liang, Eddy Maday, Julia Fox, and a cozy-looking house that is never very well-lit. It’s written by David Koepp, who also wrote Soderbergh’s Kimi (Koepp also co-wrote Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny and the utterly forgettable Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit). Meet the Presence in theaters on January 24th, 2025.[end-mark] The post We Are All the Ghost in the Trailer for <i>Presence</i> appeared first on Reactor.

Movies & TV Agatha All Along Agatha All Along Brings the Witches’ Road to Its End What’s the truth behind the Witches’ Road? By Emmet Asher-Perrin | Published on October 31, 2024 Image: Marvel Television / Chuck Zlotnick Comment 0 Share New Share Image: Marvel Television / Chuck Zlotnick Who doesn’t love a good con? Recap Image: Marvel Television / Chuck Zlotnick “Follow Me My Friend / To Glory at the End” We see the end of episode five from a different perspective first as Alice “comes to” after her death and Rio is there to help her cross over. While Alice is dismayed over dying after breaking her family curse, Rio points out that she is a protection witch who died protecting someone. In the present, Jen is clawing at the door from the last trial, trying to get Lilia back. On the Road, Rio has a talk with Agatha, upset that she tried to hide Billy from her. Agatha realizes that Rio wants him because she views him as an abomination for taking over another’s body. But she can’t take him because he’d just reincarnate again—he needs to hand himself over. Agatha agrees to deliver him if Rio promises to leave her alone for a long, long life, and then not show her face when Agatha eventually dies. Rio agrees to the terms. Billy and Jen join Agatha on the Road and they come upon their shoes again. The Road is a circle and Agatha has no idea how to get off, so she suggests just running it again. Billy decides that taking their shoes off out of respect for the Road was a mistake and puts his shoes on. The trio wake up in body bags in an empty room. The lights are going out slowly to time the final test. Jen is determined to save them, and Billy points out that she’s already saved lives on this journey without magic. It’s revealed that Agatha is the one who bound Jen; she didn’t know it was her, she was paid to do it by the doctors. Jen takes a lock of Agatha’s hair and does the unbinding ritual, denying Agatha’s power over her. Then Jen vanishes, having received what she wanted from the Road. The next is Billy: Agatha knows he wants his brother back, so they need to find Tommy a body to occupy, like Billy did for himself. They sit together on the floor and Agatha encourages Billy to remember his life from before, at the moment they both “died,” and Agatha guides him to find a body for Tommy. They find a boy being drowned by his peers—it’s not in a good place, the boy has no family to love him, and Billy wants to know if he’s killing this boy so his brother can live. At the moment Tommy enters the body, Billy vanishes from the Road. Agatha assures the air that sometimes boys just die. She opens her locket containing a lock of her son’s hair and a seed. The lights are going out, but she suddenly has the idea to plant the seed in a crack in the floor using magic. When it grows, the lights come back and she rushes to the door insisting that she’s passed the trial. She emerges onto her lawn and Rio is there: Agatha didn’t bring her Billy, so she has to offer herself. They begin to fight, Agatha using Lilia’s advice to avoid a killing blow. Before Rio can kill Agatha, Billy shows up to aid Agatha. He asks her not to take all of his power and begins siphoning it to her. Agatha takes a great deal of it, but does manage to stop before she kills Billy. Agatha tosses Billy away to fight Rio properly, but she’s losing. Billy rushes to Agatha’s side, but she insists that it should be her to die. Billy won’t allow it and offers himself up to Rio… just as Agatha promised. She turns to go, but Billy projects his voice into her mind and asks if this is how her son died. Agatha stops, turns back to Rio, and kisses her—Agatha dies. Billy drives home to worried parents and insists he’s fine. He heads into this room and realizes that all the components of the Road journey are in there. Billy is the one who created the Witches’ Road, and the signs were there all the way through (mainly in Agatha’s commentary). He hears a voice behind him, turns, and screams. Image: Marvel Television / Chuck Zlotnick “Maiden Mother Crone” Agatha Harkness is in the woods in 1750. She’s pregnant and about to give birth when Rio shows up. Agatha insists that Rio leave her child alone, which Rio cannot do—all she can do is give Agatha time. She won’t say how much time, however, and Agatha has Nicholas alone. She uses him to get sympathy from other witches so that she can take their power and continue on. Six years on, Nicholas is part of the gambit more actively; he leads the witches to his mother so she can siphon from them. He’s beginning to question the plan, however, wanting to know why they can’t stay with the witches and survive alongside them. Agatha insists that the witches would try to kill them instead. Nicholas begins to sing to a tune he invented about the wind-y road. The song transforms over time into the Witches Road song, which Nicholas sings in taverns for coin. One night they’re sleeping in their camp by the woods and Rio appears to the boy. When Agatha wakes, Nicholas is dead. After Agatha buries him, a witch approaches asking if she knows how to get to the Witches’ Road because she heard her singing the song. Agatha realizes that she’s created the perfect con: She can tell witches that she’ll get them onto the Road; they can sing the song together. When the path doesn’t appear she can goad them into attacking her and steal their power, killing them all. She tried to do the same to the group with Billy, but his power created the Road for real. Back in the present, Agatha appears in Billy’s room as a ghost. He asks about the Road and Agatha explains that he’s the one who made it real. Billy panics because he believes this makes him a murderer. Agatha points out that she killed Alice, and Lilia made her own choice to face the Salem Seven, though she can’t say anything for Mrs. Davis. She points out that Billy did save one life, however: Jen is alive and well and has her power back. Billy heads back to Agatha’s house and tries to do a banishing spell for Agatha’s spirit over the door to the Road. Billy is using Agatha’s locket for the spell, and wants to know why she won’t just die. Agatha admits that she can’t face her son, and makes contact with the locket, taking it and keeping it on her person. Billy wonders if maybe it isn’t good for Agatha to be a ghost; Agatha thinks they might make a great team. They agree to be a coven of two while acknowledging that they both have a tendency to get their coven members killed. Billy closes the door he created to a Road and leaves the cement as a memorial to those they lost, and the duo leave together. Commentary Image: Marvel Television / Chuck Zlotnick Normally I’d be mad that Agatha died, but in this instance it was so clearly done as a way to keep her attached to Billy’s hip to cause maximum chaos in the future, that I’m not sure I’m bothered? It’s a pretty clever way to keep her as a mentor to him, the way she was to Wanda in the comics. This finale is extremely weird in its pacing, and there have been rumors about a shuffle on the flashback stuff, so I’m curious as to whether or not that’s a part of it. That said, the show has won a personal award from me for being the only Marvel series not to end on an endless drag-out brawl that completely destroys the character and tone of everything that proceeded it. And, in fact, it resulted in far more emotional moments in episode eight than I was expecting, starting with Jen releasing herself from the binding Agatha (kinda unknowingly) put on her. There’s a bit of a Labyrinth-esque “you have no power over me” aspect to the unbinding, but the choice to linger on the repetition, to move through the stages with Jen as she realizes this curse is ending, was incredibly powerful. Sasheer Zamata really dug in there with her heels and drove it home. And I do appreciate that if anyone was going to make it out of the venture relatively unscathed, it was her. (Even if I still can’t deal with the show completely glossing over how old Jen is and how different her experience of the world would have been even compared to women much older than her, living as a Black woman in the United States.) That said, Billy’s journey to get Tommy back took things up a notch, and that’s largely down to the immediacy provided in the Road mechanics. (Which just twists that knife harder when you remember that it’s Billy making himself rush through this trial faster, according to his own imagined rules about how the Road should behave.) The result sees him leaving his brother in a comparative hell, nothing like the loving family that he received in taking over William Kaplan’s life. And because he did this retroactively, at the same time he took over William’s body, Tommy has now had years in that life with even less understanding of how he got there than Billy had. Then we have Agatha, who, mercifully in all of this, doesn’t become an antihero in search of a better purpose. I fully admit to being a sucker for a redemption arc, but Agatha is delicious exactly as she’s presented: A lying, scheming, con artist slash serial killer who’s in love with Death. Does she clearly have a super tragic backstory that makes sense of her proclivities? If her dear old ghost mom was anything to go by, absolutely. But having her renounce all her evil ways doesn’t make her a better character. (Also, it’s still rare enough for women to get the fun villains. Let us keep her.) There are so many things that are never explained, and I (mostly) like the fact that they don’t spell it all out. We have no idea how Agatha met Rio or why. We don’t know how she became pregnant or why she wanted a child. We never learn why Nicholas was marked for death ahead of time. We don’t find out much about Agatha’s power-draining abilities aside from what she insists and what we’re shown, so we have no way of knowing if there is (or was) any truth to her claim of not being able to control it. The thing I don’t like is that we get far less of Rio’s character once her identity is revealed, which feels like a mistake? The reveal doesn’t make her less interesting, but the show seems to think it does, or conversely seems to think that there’s no point in giving her much thought after that. My biggest surprise for the entire show was being pleased at how they handled the backstory with Nicholas, even if the placement of the flashback was off: The series managed to make motherhood important for Agatha without making it the reason for the majority of her actions. He matters to her in a way that feels consistent and meaningful, but most of her behaviors are clearly informed by much earlier events. Where Multiverse of Madness ruined that for Wanda’s character in a big way, Agatha is a great example of how to use motherhood as a piece that makes up an entire human being, rather than focal point being used because some writers can’t think of any other reasons for women to have motivation. But the lineage of this series with WandaVision is a straight line, when you come right down to it. Both shows are treatises on different types of grief, and also the ways grief often makes itself into a generational talisman: Billy and Tommy were created out of Wanda Maximoff’s grief, and both carry that grief with them. Billy literally uses the same tools his mother used to try and work through his own pain… and to better overall results, in fact. (Progress!) Whether or not a family reunion ever occurs, Billy and Tommy’s entry into this story comes from a markedly different place than any other characters in the MCU. I hope they use them well going forward. Tarot Readings and Witchy Thoughts Image: Marvel Television / Chuck Zlotnick Say it with me: It’s never Mephisto. (Yes, I will be pleased about this for a month.) I love that the Witches’ Road was a con, but I might love even more that Agatha’s abilities make her kind of like a vampire? The way she needs to be invited in, the way she drains people of their life-force. Also loved that they do the old-fashioned birthing method of just squatting up against a tree in the woods and bearing down onto a blanket. While I do enjoy Billy’s Labyrinth-y bedroom (Sarah’s bedroom also contains all the pieces of her adventure in the film, manifested from her imagination), the thing I enjoy most is that they’ve given Billy broad enough taste that I’m guessing some younger viewers might find new favorites by staring at his walls: Rocky Horror Picture Show, Buffy, Carrie, and so on. Also, they saw an opportunity to put up the largest Trans Lives Matter banner that they could, and went for it. Beats the random little pin in Multiverse of Madness by a stretch, I’ll say that. One thing I need to know: Does kissing Rio always lead to dying? Because… if so, that puts a very different spin on the moment earlier in the show where Agatha almost kisses her and Rio stops it from happening. They still went with the usual MCU Leather-and-Metal Special for Wiccan’s look, but I loved how bright his colors are? Maybe Wolverine’s yellow suit finally warmed the right people up. And that’s a wrap! Thanks for walking the Road.[end-mark] The post <i>Agatha All Along</i> Brings the Witches’ Road to Its End appeared first on Reactor.

The Biden-Harris administration’s border crisis has had negative implications for all Americans, but one group that has suffered more than most—but received less attention than others—are American Indians living on reservations along the border. As part of their efforts to smuggle drugs and traffic human beings across the southern border, Mexican cartels have specifically targeted and devastated these reservations. Jurisdictional issues, insufficient law enforcement, and the open border all allow cartels to exploit tribal land and proliferate deadly substances like fentanyl on American Indian land. Testifying before Congress earlier this year, Verlon Jose, chairman of the Tohono O’odham Nation in Arizona, revealed his tribal police force spends nearly half its time tending to immigration, drug smuggling, and other border issues. Indian Reservation Drugs testimony_joseDownload In fact, the Tohono O’odham Nation spends $3 million of its own funds each year on border security. In 2020, the tribe’s drug-trafficking task force led an investigation into a cell of the Mexican Sinaloa cartel that seized 140 pounds of heroin and 20 pounds of fentanyl powder. Just three years later, in December 2023, thousands of newly arrived illegal immigrants camped out on the Tohono O’odham reservation, angering tribe members as the massive group left behind trash and chopped down local mesquite trees for firewood. That reflects a standard cartel tactic of funneling large groups of migrants across the border in one sector, distracting law enforcement while they smuggle drugs across elsewhere. The Tohono O’odham reservation has been uniquely vulnerable to such issues due to its location on the Mexican border. But they’re not the only American Indians suffering at the hands of the Biden-Harris administration’s border policies. Even tribes in far-flung Montana have felt the consequences of—and spoken out about—the border crisis. In February, the devastation the cartels had brought to the state and its reservations came to light. Montana’s isolation has resulted in drug prices 20 times higher than in major cities, attracting powerful cartels able to establish a monopoly on the trade. “Right now, it’s as if fentanyl is raining on our reservation,” said Marvin Weatherwax Jr., a tribal business councilman in the Blackfeet reservation and member of the Montana state House of Representatives.  “There is no doubt that the Mexican drug cartels are playing a major role in this crisis,” testified Bryce Kirk, a councilman for the Assiniboine and Sioux tribes of the Fort Peck, Montana, reservation. “They have found their way to the Fort Peck Indian Reservation and embedded themselves in our communities and our families.” Indian Drug testimony_kirkDownload Stacy Zinn, a former Drug Enforcement Administration official in Montana, testified before Congress in June that drug networks associated with both the Jalisco New Generation and Sinaloa cartels had been discovered and dismantled on several reservations and across the state. Over the past few years, these discoveries led to the prosecutions of several dozen cartel affiliates. Furthermore, Zinn claimed her DEA office was seriously unequipped for the monumental drug problems in Montana, with only four officials covering the entire eastern portion of the Big Sky State. One of the reasons that cartels gravitate to Indian land is that it is more difficult to arrest them there. Tribal law enforcement officers only have the authority to arrest and prosecute fellow tribe members, while local and state law enforcement generally lacks jurisdiction on tribal lands without explicit permission from the tribes. That has forced reservations to rely on the slow work of the FBI and other federal officials to secure warrants and arrests for cartel members. The criminals can thus move in and out of Indian land without fear of quick law enforcement action. In an April congressional hearing, President Jeffrey Stiffarm of the Fort Belknap Indian Community in Montana specifically blamed the crisis on the inaction of the federal government. testimony_stiffarmDownload “The FBI doesn’t do anything on the reservation unless we have a death or serious crime,” he said. “They are reactive, not proactive.” Fort Belknap’s chief of police in June called on the Biden-Harris administration to secure the southern border and asked Congress to enact harsher penalties on fentanyl and methamphetamine. “We are fighting a losing battle. The cartels are winning. The drug dealers are winning,” Stiffarm said. The post Drug Cartels ‘Are Winning’: Border Crisis Ravaging Arizona, Montana Indian Reservations appeared first on The Daily Signal.

This week, I had the pleasure of sitting down for a cordial debate with Sam Harris, host of the “Making Sense” podcast, to discuss the question of the hour: Donald Trump vs. Kamala Harris. The conversation was moderated by Bari Weiss of The Free Press. Sam Harris is, of course, an incredibly intelligent person. He’s also a person with a core set of values. He freely acknowledged his own discomfort with many of Kamala Harris‘ positions in the campaign. But in the end, he said that he would vote for Harris because of one dispositive argument: Trump could not be president, thanks to his antics surrounding Election 2020. I took the opposing view. While freely acknowledging that Trump’s behavior between Nov. 4, 2020, and Jan. 6, 2021, was wrong, I argued that the constitutional checks and balances had held and would continue to do so. What is more, I argued, Trump should be elected because his presidency was far more successful for America than her vice presidency. Under Trump, the economy boomed, inflation remained low, job growth was robust. Under Trump, the border remained relatively calm and became increasingly so over time. Under Trump, the Middle East was beginning to flower into actual peace, thanks to the Abraham Accords and a contained Iran. Under Harris, the economy had experienced the highest inflation rates in four decades; the border had been purposefully left wide-open, with at least 6.5 million illegal immigrants entering the country; Afghanistan had been handed over to the Taliban in the most cowardly and ignominious fashion possible, resulting in billions in lost military technology and 13 American service people killed; Iran had unleashed its proxies against Israel, beginning on Oct. 7, continuing through a wave of rocket fire from Lebanon via Hezbollah, and culminating in multiple Iranian attacks directly against Israel; the social fabric had been rent by intersectional wokeness, dividing Americans along racial and sexual lines; and the federal government had been weaponized against political opposition and militarized on behalf of friends of the Democratic Party. So, in short, Sam Harris argued against Trump; I argued for Trump and against Kamala Harris. You may notice an argument missing in this formulation: The argument for Kamala Harris. That’s because the argument doesn’t exist. You can argue against Trump; you can argue for him. But nobody can credibly argue in favor of Kamala Harris. Not even Kamala Harris. That’s been the story of her campaign—what she’s not. She’s not Donald Trump. Fair enough. She’s not Joe Biden. Fair enough. But she can’t answer how she would be different from Biden, other than not physically being Biden. She can’t answer what she would do to improve the country. Every time she’s asked, she resembles a 10th-grader informed there’s a pop quiz on a book she hasn’t read. And it is absolutely unclear whether Americans are willing to make Kamala Harris president just because they dislike Donald Trump. They tried that formula in 2020, and it resulted in the single worst presidency since Jimmy Carter’s. It turns out that this time, the American people might want to hear a convincing affirmative case in favor of the Democratic candidate for president—a candidate who, unlike Biden, did not win a single vote in the primaries, and who was shoehorned in at the last minute to prevent Biden’s impending collapse in the polls. Will Kamala Harris become president? If she does, it won’t be because of Kamala Harris. She’s a nothing, an empty vessel, a fresh coat of paint slapped on the beat-up jalopy of the Biden administration. And with the choice starkly before them, Americans might be able to answer the question between Trump and Harris quite simply: Were you better off in 2019 than in 2024? COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post ‘Final Argument’: An Open-and-Shut Case appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Florida’s Attorney-General Ashley Moody has been named in a federal lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida against a state law that blocks children from accessing social media. We obtained a copy of the lawsuit for you here. Tech trade groups Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice are behind the filing, which alleges that the law – Florida House Bill 3 – violates First Amendment rights. The law has received bipartisan support (30-5 in the Senate and 109-4 in the House.) It allows 14 and 15 year-olds to sign up to social platforms provided they do it with parental consent, but bans those 13 and under. The lawsuit’s goal is to make sure the legislation does not go into effect as planned, on the first day of 2025. According to NetChoice and CCIA (their members include Google and Meta), the new state rules incorrectly accuse social media of representing a risk to children, and compare this stance to similar past accusations against books, music, video games, etc., and the internet itself. In other words, this time, Big Tech (via the groups suing on their behalf) take up for the First Amendment, arguing that this part of the US Constitution makes it clear the government should not get involved in “resolving” issues concerning social media – but add that the government, nonetheless, “should have a say in the debates over topics such as social media.” That’s an interesting way to carefully approach the overall massive and ongoing controversy that is the government involvement/collusion with Big Tech; but at least in this case, clearly with an eye – if not both eyes – on the bottom line, these companies want the First Amendment respected. “It (the law) covers only the websites that minors like to use regularly, effectively punishing those users – and their favorite websites,” the filing reads, and accuses the law of doing this “in a manner wholly inconsistent with the First Amendment.” In this case, it is the parents that should be able to decide what their children can access online, the lawsuit continues, adding that the plaintiffs believe that other ways to protect minors from online harms already exist. And, these are built into their apps by the Big Tech platforms themselves, the two groups claim, citing various forms of restrictions that can be imposed from the apps’ settings. Florida AG Moody’s office stated they are at this time reviewing the lawsuit – but that Moody will, “as a mother, fight aggressively in court to ensure the ability to protect Florida children.” If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Florida Faces Lawsuit Over Age Digital ID Verification Law for Social Media appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Washington Post: Michigan is Tied

New observations of merging galaxies show a pair of “blood-soaked” eyes.

Down to the last few days before the election, CNN's Kasie Hunt has dropped any pretense of even-handedness, and has let her pro-Kamala flag fly. Three days ago, we caught Kasie saying that Trump-hater par excellence David Frum's attacks on Trump were "correct." Today, Hunt was clearly worried by Trump's entertaining, attention-attracting moves of working in a McDonald's and riding shotgun in a garbage truck. She insisted instead that voters focus on Trump's history of election denial and hints that he might do it again this year. Hunt insisted that the garbage truck/McD's events were: "Designed to get us to look away from what we shouldn't ignore. To distract from what Trump is saying about what happens after polls close on Tuesday." Hunt then rolled clips of Trump responding to questions as to whether, if he lost, he'd recognize the results of the election. But whereas Hunt was surely trying to suggest that Trump would refuse to accept a defeat, his answers did little to support her hypothesis. To the contrary, Trump told one reporter that whereas there had been some "smaller" election misconduct in Pennsylvania, "I think it's been taken care of." And when another reporter asked if he'd accept the results of the election, he replied: "Sure. It's a fair election." Trump's response was in line with what Democrats are saying. Indeed, some of them are going even further, as Axios reports, suggesting that Trump is planning to cheat. Thus, Dem Rep. Jamie Raskin has said that if Trump "won a free, fair and honest election, then we would obviously accept it." However, Raskin said he "definitely" doesn't assume that Trump would use free, fair and honest means to secure a victory. Trump "is doing whatever he can to try to interfere with the process." Along similar lines, "Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, a senior chief deputy whip who voted to object to George W. Bush electors in 2005, said of Trump, 'I don't know what kind of shenanigans he is planning,' adding: 'We would have to, in any election ... make sure that all the rules have been followed.'" And House Rules Committee Ranking Member Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), who also objected to Trump electors in 2017, said Democrats would certify a Trump victory "assuming everything goes the way we expect it to." Funny how Hunt never mentioned the Democrats' statements. Instead, Kasie concluded on this ominous note: "When you're out on the trail, covering a political campaign -- I've done a number of them -- the job is to report what the campaign is doing. Sure. That's the part that they want you to see. "But it's also to make sure you're reporting what they don't want you to cover or pay attention to. Not to miss the forest for the trees." Translation: The "trees" that should be disregarded are Trump's photo-ops. The "forest" to which attention must be paid is Trump's 2020 election denial and his supposed threats to do it again. Note: Trump isn't known for self-deprecating humor. So his joking with a rally crowd that he took his aides' suggestion that he wear the orange vest he had worn in the garbage truck, because it would make him look thinner, was both unusual -- and perhaps a sign that he is in the good humor of a man who believes he's going to win. Here's the transcript. CNN This Morning 10/31/24 6:01 am EDT KASIE HUNT: Garbage in, garbage out. We are five days from election day in an incredibly tight race where anything could make a difference. Donald Trump, climbing into a garbage truck. Shall we say, striking visual designed to capitalize on President Biden's remark that Trump's supporters are garbage. DONALD TRUMP: How do you like my garbage truck? This truck is in honor of Kamala and Joe Biden. HUNT: Trump even went onstage at his rally in that bright orange vest. TRUMP: And they said, it would be unbelievable if you could wear it on stage. I said, there's no way I'm wearing it onstage. They said, okay, sir. I said, get me my jacket.  But if you did, you know, it actually makes you look thinner [crowd goes wild.] I said, ooh. And they got me. I said, I want to  wear it onstage. HUNT:  Biden, of course, has said he was only referring to a single Trump supporter who called Puerto Rico garbage in a joke.  . . .  So, this garbage truck thing, not the first time that Donald Trump, the former president, but also the former reality TV star, has produced events to drive a message in a way that's hard to look away from. That's the point, right?  But here's the thing. These events are also designed to get us to look away from what we shouldn't ignore. To distract from what Trump is saying about what happens after polls close on Tuesday. MALE REPORTER: Can you imagine any circumstance under which you would be defeated, but not say that the election was stolen? TRUMP: If it was a corrupt election, that could happen. But so far we're doing pretty well. They found a lot of smaller things in Pennsylvania, as you know, and I think they've been corrupted. And they're taking care of it. They were corrupt. They were corrupted. But I think it's been taken care of. FEMALE REPORTER: Either way, will you accept the results of the election? TRUMP: Sure. It's a fair election. HUNT: IF it's a fair election, he says. So, does he think it's going to be a fair election? BRIAN KILMEADE: What worries you the most?  TRUMP: Cheating. KILMEADE: Which one, though? Which state? TRUMP: All of them. I mean, they cheat. All of them. HUNT: All of them, he says. ALL of them! So when you're out on the trail, covering a political campaign -- I've done a number of them -- the job is to report what the campaign is doing. Sure. That's the part that they want you to see. But it's also to make sure you're reporting what they don't want you to cover or pay attention to. Not to miss the forest for the trees.