Workers were given no notice at all. Continue reading…

Irish post-punk rockers Fontaines D.C. share details of their 2025 run across the US

Listen to the article if you prefer As Michael Caputo states about this after-hours Northampton ballot drop, always assume the worst. The groups that ballot harvest find many ineligible voters and don’t care. We found that out in Lancaster, where about 60% so far have proven to be ineligible voters. The man in the clip […] The post If You See Something This Election, Say Something appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

A groundbreaking theory may reconcile two massive explanations of how the universe works that have been at odds with one another. Professor Jonathan Oppenheim and his team at University College London have proposed a theory reconciling the differences between quantum physics, which has been used to explain how the smallest particles in the universe work, and Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which explains how gravity affects spacetime. Quantum theory propounds that we do not know any particle’s position or velocity at the same time and we cannot know their position or velocity until they are measured. Quantum physics also contends that information is permanent; thus, when an object enters a black hole, the information it carries should be emitted back out. But general relativity argues that the information would be destroyed. “Quantum theory and Einstein’s theory of general relativity are mathematically incompatible with each other, so it’s important to understand how this contradiction is resolved,” Oppenheimer writes in the scientific paper published in Physical Review X (PRX). “Spacetime experiences random and violent fluctuations that exceed the expectations set by quantum theory,” Joseph Shavit notes at TheBrighterSide. “These fluctuations, if measured precisely enough, render the apparent weight of objects unpredictable.” MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ “There is no strong case that gravity is exceptional, and the overwhelming consensus has been that we must quantize it along with all the other fields,” Oppenheimer states in the paper. “In part, this is due to a number of no-go theorems and arguments over the years purporting to require the quantization of the gravitational field.” A result of the new theory is the “measurement postulate,” which posits that if you measure a quantum system, its wave function collapses and is eliminated. The supposition argues that “quantum superpositions naturally localize through their interaction with classical spacetime, obviating the need for this postulate,” Shavit explains, adding, “The postquantum theory offers a unique perspective, suggesting that the fundamental breakdown in predictability inherent to spacetime allows for information to be destroyed, resolving this long-standing paradox.” “Experiments to test the nature of spacetime will take a large-scale effort, but they’re of huge importance from the perspective of understanding the fundamental laws of nature,” Professor Sougato Bose of UCL stated. “I believe these experiments are within reach – these things are difficult to predict, but perhaps we’ll know the answer within the next 20 years.”

The Republican National Committee and the Republican Party of Virginia have filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States to stay a decision by a Biden-nominated judge who blocked an effort to keep non-citizens from voting. After Virginia GOP Governor Glenn Youngkin ordered election officials to identify and cancel suspected non-citizens’ voter registrations on August 7, the Biden-Harris administration claimed Youngkin’s actions violated the 1993 National Voter Registration Act. On October 25, two weeks before the national election, U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles ordered the state to restore more than 1600 voters’ registrations which had been removed as part of Youngkin’s efforts. “With only one week to our country’s most important election, Democrats are now taking extraordinary measures to keep non-citizens on voter rolls,” RNC Chairman Michael Whatley stated. “Kamala’s Administration sued Virginia and is now arguing to the U.S. Supreme Court that non-citizens must remain on the voter rolls. We are supporting Governor Youngkin’s efforts in the Supreme Court and fighting for only Americans to determine the future of our country.” MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ As the amicus brief noted, “The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 was passed to ‘increase the number of eligible citizens who register to vote in elections for Federal office,’ ‘protect the integrity of the electoral process,” and “ensure that accurate and current voter registration rolls are maintained.’ The district court’s ruling, affirmed by the Fourth Circuit, cuts directly against these purposes. Rather than increasing participation by eligible citizens, and ensuring the integrity of our elections, the ruling below prohibits states from preventing self-described non-citizens from illegally registering to vote. This is not, and cannot be, correct.” “Due to the proximity to the 2024 election, there will be irreparable harm if the order below is permitted to stand unabated. The consequence of that order is that non-citizens — who all agree cannot legally vote — will be added back on the voter rolls at the last minute, diluting legitimate votes and exposing those non-citizens to a substantial risk of criminal prosecution should they misunderstand the lower courts’ order as a green light to vote unlawfully.”

The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a push from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to remove himself from the ballot in Michigan and Wisconsin, two critical 2024 battleground states. Kennedy had hoped the court would grant him an emergency ruling that would order election officials in the two Midwest states to remove his name from the ballot. How the justices voted was unclear, but Justice Neil Gorsuch offered a brief dissent in Kennedy’s Michigan appeal.  In a statement posted to X after the ruling, Kennedy said that election officials in Wisconsin and Michigan were playing politics by forcing him to stay on the ballot. Kennedy endorsed Trump in August and has since campaigned across the country for the former president.  “The Supreme Court has unfortunately today sided with the Secretary of State of Michigan and Wisconsin, both Democrats, to undermine election integrity and leave my name on the ballot in both those states,” he said. “It is a purely political move in the hope that folks who would have otherwise voted for Trump will throw away their vote by voting for me instead.” “Don’t let them undermine this election. Don’t be fooled. I am off the ballot in every other state I have sought to get of​f of other than Michigan and Wisconsin,” Kennedy added. “So, if you are in Michigan or Wisconsin, please make sure to vote for ​Donald Trump — DO NOT VOTE FOR ME. Together we will ​Make America ​Healthy ​Again!” In his petition to the court, Kennedy’s lawyers argued that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and the Wisconsin Election Commission were violating his First Amendment rights by forcing him to stay on the ballot.  “By recertifying the ballot to include Kennedy’s name as a presidential candidate, the Secretary has compelled his speech in violation of the First Amendment,” Kennedy’s lawyers wrote of Benson. “A review of the aforementioned facts clearly demonstrates that Secretary Benson has compelled Mr. Kennedy’s speech and, therefore, violated his Constitutional rights.” MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ This First Amendment argument was included in a dissenting opinion from Justices Chad Readler and Amul Thapar when Kennedy’s case was heard at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. In his dissent, Gorsuch indicated that he agreed with Thapar and Readler.  “This case presents a question of exceptional importance: Does forcing a person onto the ballot compel his speech in violation of the First Amendment? The repercussions of that question are enormous,” Thapar wrote. “If a candidate can’t stop his name from appearing on the ballot, could battleground states put President Joe Biden back on their ballots?” Benson and the Wisconsin Election Commission argued that it was too late to remove Kennedy from the ballot and would create a burden for election workers.  Both Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have spent significant time campaigning in Michigan and Wisconsin. According to recent polling, Trump and Harris are in a statistical tie in both states.