A slew of New Hampshire school districts have policies about trans-identifying children that keep parents in the dark about their child’s gender identity. At least three school districts in the blue state explicitly forbid staff from informing parents about a student’s gender identity change, Parents Defending Education found. Those districts are the Portsmouth School District, the Keene School District, and the Exeter Region Cooperative School District. “School personnel should not disclose information that may reveal a student’s gender identity and expression to others, including parents, and other school personnel, unless legally required to do so or unless the student has authorized such disclosure,” the Portsmouth district’s policy reads. The Keene district’s policy is worded similarly — it specifically prohibits disclosing to parents, and so is the Exeter school district’s policy. “Transgender and gender nonconforming students have the right to discuss and express their gender identity and expression openly and to decide when, with whom, and how much to share private information,” the Keene district’s policy adds. The Manchester School District’s policy does not mention parents specifically, but it does say school staff must hide a student’s new name and pronouns unless the student has given permission. Several other New Hampshire districts have policies that suggest a student could talk to school administrators about their gender identity without involving a parent. The Nashua School District, the Concord School District, and the Dover School District all have policies like this. The Nashua district’s policy states that “parents and/or students are encouraged to discuss with building administrators any issues that may arise in relation to student’s transgender and non-conforming status.” MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ Students might discuss privacy, official school records, names and pronouns, using the restrooms and locker rooms of the opposite sex, sex-segregated activities like sports, the dress code, and “safety and support,” the policy says. The Concord district says either a student “or” their parent can ask for a “Gender Support and Transition Plan,” and the Dover district says a trans-identifying student “and/or” their parent can contact the student counselor about gender identity issues. Gender ideology in schools exploded as a hot-button issue several years ago. Many tweens and teens discovered gender ideology online during the pandemic, and later, parents realized their children’s schools were keeping them in the dark about their child’s gender identity change. A wave of parents across the country pushed back, calling for schools to adopt parental notification policies, and many districts did so. Transgender medicalization of children, such as breast and genital surgeries, puberty blockers, and cross-sex hormones, continues to be a fiercely controversial issue this presidential election cycle. “Parents first and foremost know what is best for their children,” Casey Ryan, investigative reporter for Parents Defending Education, said in a statement to The Daily Wire. “The fact that New Hampshire school districts have adopted policies to strip parents of their rights is nothing short of despicable. If these school districts practiced what they preached in caring for their students, parents would be involved in every decision they make,” Ryan said.

Joy Behar called for a list of the people who attended former President Donald Trump’s Sunday rally at Madison Square Garden, which she referred to as a “Nuremberg Rally.” Behar made the comments during Tuesday’s broadcast of “The View” on ABC, and she began by complaining about some of the jokes told by one of the speakers at that rally. Effectively declaring herself the arbiter of what constituted real comedy, she claimed it was “a rule in comedy” to never “punch down.” While calling Trump and his supporters Nazis, The View cast have a meltdown over "Tampon Tim" Walz jokes."You guys are pooping your pants because you guys [are facing Kamala]," Whoopi proclaimed. pic.twitter.com/6JRocbVPPb — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) October 29, 2024 Just moments after her cohost implied that Trump’s supporters were literal Nazis, Sara Haines complained about the Trump campaign referring to Governor Tim Walz (D-MN) as “Tampon Tim” — a nod to a Walz policy that put menstrual products in men’s bathrooms in order to appease trans activists. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ NOW STREAMING ON DAILYWIRE+ Cohost Whoopi Goldberg claimed that Republicans were resorting to such name-calling because she believed Trump was terrified of running against Vice President Kamala Harris. The cohosts then turned their ire toward Dr. Phil McGraw, lashing out at him for making an appearance at the MSG rally even though his primary message was that Americans needed to stand up to people who bullied Trump supporters. At least Alyssa Farah Griffin admitted she's "a psychopath." pic.twitter.com/UHnREQVy7W — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) October 29, 2024 Sunny Hostin continued the attack on the MSG rally, saying that the people who weren’t usually “otherized” found it too easy to tell people who were that they should not be offended. Her implication was that the rally attendees — who have been written off as actual “Nazis” by pundits across legacy media in addition to her show — were the privileged group in that scenario. “I’m offended. I’m offended. I think we need to call that rally what it was, it was a white nationalist rally with a white nationalist platform,” she continued. Joy Behar wants the names of the Trump supporters who attended the MSG rally: "Who are these people who went to that rally? I want to know." pic.twitter.com/NiPSm5wmbT — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) October 29, 2024 Behar jumped back into the conversation, saying she’d really like to know who would associate themselves with an event like that: “Who are these people who went to that rally? I want to know.”

“Am I Racist?” has officially become the most successful release in DailyWire+ history, performing even better on its first day of streaming than previous hits including Matt Walsh’s 2022 documentary “What is a Woman?” and the comedy “Lady Ballers” in 2023. The film’s success was celebrated by its star Matt Walsh, who wrote on X, “The streaming launch of ‘Am I Racist?’ on Daily Wire was the biggest launch in the history of our platform. This is after it had the best box office performance of any documentary in the past five years. Blown away by the support. Thank you.” The streaming launch of "Am I Racist?" on Daily Wire was the biggest launch in the history of our platform. This is after it had the best box office performance of any documentary in the past five years. Blown away by the support. Thank you! — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) October 29, 2024 Even before it headed to the DailyWire+ streaming platform, “Am I Racist?” was a huge success as the company’s first theatrical release for an in-house production. It outperformed expectations at the box office, grossing more than $12 million and debuting in the top five films in the country on its opening weekend. “Am I Racist?” also became the top-grossing documentary of the decade.  The film featured Walsh going undercover in the world of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to expose the grift of the race hustlers profiting off people’s emotions through deception. WATCH MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ ON DAILYWIRE+ “Am I Racist?” has a 96% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes with more than 2,500 verified reviews. Despite the overwhelming popularity of the movie, mainstream critics have largely ignored it. Podcast host Joe Rogan said “Am I Racist?” was hilarious.  “Your movie is really funny. It’s really funny,” Rogan told Walsh during an interview last month. “By myself, laughing out loud hysterically today,” he went on. “I watched it in the sauna, I watched it in the gym. … It’s one of the best comedies I’ve seen in a long time because there’s so many moments in it that are so uncomfortable.” On Monday, Walsh also announced that he had submitted the film to the Oscars. “Excited to announce that we have officially submitted ‘Am I Racist’ for Academy Award consideration. I’ve told my team that there’s no reason to wait until we actually win or even get nominated to put it on the movie poster,” Walsh wrote on X. Excited to announce that we have officially submitted “Am I Racist” for Academy Award consideration. I’ve told my team that there’s no reason to wait until we actually win or even get nominated to put it on the movie poster. pic.twitter.com/bP0hjPnvGX — Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) October 29, 2024 The Oscar submission was also discussed by Donald Trump Jr. during a conversation on his “Triggered” podcast. “They actually have to put you up for an Academy Award,” Trump Jr. said, referencing how Walsh was able to keep a straight face while talking with the self-described DEI experts featured in the film.  “I’ve already written my Academy Award acceptance speech,” Walsh replied.  .@DonaldJTrumpJr: "They actually have to put you up for an Academy Award."@MattWalshBlog: "I've already written my Academy Award acceptance speech." https://t.co/gdC3QQ3UAo pic.twitter.com/eWsj261dtb — Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) October 29, 2024 If you missed the theatrical release of “Am I Racist?” or if you want to watch the film again, you can do so now by becoming a DailyWire+ member. Get 35% off an annual membership by using code DEI.

Rudy Giuliani faces the loss of his cherished Manhattan apartment amid a $148 million defamation ruling in favor of Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss. “America’s mayor” has lost his home. Giuliani’s Legal Troubles and Financial Losses A court has ordered Rudy Giuliani to relinquish his Manhattan apartment and other assets after losing a $148 million defamation lawsuit. Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, who were wrongfully accused by Giuliani during the 2020 presidential election, were awarded the judgment. These accusations led to multiple threats against them, prompting the lawsuit for defamation and false accusations. Giuliani must surrender not only the Manhattan apartment, valued at over $5 million, but also an interest in $2 million owed by Trump’s 2020 campaign. This step is part of an effort to liquidate assets quickly to maximize their sale value for the plaintiffs. Despite Giuliani’s protests over the sentimental value of these items, such as a watch given by his grandfather, the court maintained its decision, emphasizing the necessity of liquidation. Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to turn over his Manhattan apartment, a 1980 Mercedes and more to two Georgia election workers who won a $148M defamation judgment against him. But, he gets to keep his Florida condo and Yankees World Series rings — for now. https://t.co/uMUlyvGfEx — Michael Scoop (@mikesisak) October 22, 2024 The Court’s Rationale and Further Litigation Among the possessions to be handed over are memorabilia, including a signed shirt and picture by Yankees legends, a diamond ring, costume jewelry, and 26 watches including a Rolex. Notably, Giuliani will retain three New York Yankees World Series rings and a Florida condominium due to their involvement in other ongoing litigation. A hearing is scheduled to address the condominium’s status. “We are proud that our clients will finally begin to receive some of the compensation to which they are entitled for Giuliani’s actions. This outcome should send a powerful message that there is a price to pay for those who choose to intentionally spread disinformation.” Giuliani filed for bankruptcy following the ruling, but the case was dismissed due to his failure to comply with court orders. His appeal to delay asset sales was denied, reflecting the court’s determination to ensure Freeman and Moss receive proper compensation. Critics have pointed to Giuliani’s inability to pay and described his conduct as uncooperative. The court stressed that luxury living should not continue in parallel with debt obligations. Rudy Giuliani has been ordered to turn over his Manhattan apartment and valuables to the former Georgia election workers he defamed. https://t.co/4ybBF949YV — Breaking News (@BreakingNews) October 22, 2024 Public Reaction and Broader Implications This ruling sets a precedent for addressing the spreading of misinformation. Judge Lewis Liman remarked, “The Court also does not doubt that certain of the items may have sentimental value to Defendant. But that does not entitle Defendant to continued enjoyment of the assets to the detriment of the Plaintiffs to whom he owes approximately $150 million. It is, after all, the underlying policy of these New York statutes that ‘no man should be permitted to live at the same time in luxury and in debt’.” This emphasizes the importance of accountability in the dissemination of false claims. The case serves as a notable example of the legal and financial repercussions of spreading information that is proven to be false. The outcome underlines a critical period in political discourse, reflecting a broader societal push for accountability and the challenge of combating misinformation. Sources: Giuliani must hand over apartment. Giuliani and his bankruptcy saga. The post Giuliani Faces Major Consequences in High-Stakes Defamation Lawsuit appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

'I am Beyoncé, always'

The rich just got richer

'Never spoken to or met'

'We're going to get it done'

Maybe it's simple

'Ignored by our current administration'