YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Survival Prepper
Survival Prepper  
42 w

Water storage hack you need for emergencies
Favicon 
prepping.com

Water storage hack you need for emergencies

#survival #water #storage #hurricane
Like
Comment
Share
Beyond Bizarre
Beyond Bizarre
42 w ·Youtube Wild & Crazy

YouTube
Most People Don't Even Realize This Is Happening Around The World
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 w

MOLOCH: Who is the Demonic God Worshipped by ARTISTS and Revered by the VATICAN? 10-14-2024
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

MOLOCH: Who is the Demonic God Worshipped by ARTISTS and Revered by the VATICAN? 10-14-2024

MOLOCH: Who is the Demonic God Worshipped by ARTISTS and Revered by the VATICAN? 10-14-2024 - THIS VIDEO IS DIFFERENT THAN MOST VIDEOS ON MOLOCH. WHY? - This Video Appears to Reflect Modern Day Opinions and Beliefs of Occult Practitioners and What Child Sacrifice Represents to them. - This Video Maker Actually Seems Sympathetic to the Entire Subject. SICK... - 8,841 views Oct. 14, 2024 Secret Mind - MOLOCH: Who is the Demonic God Worshipped by ARTISTS and Revered by the VATICAN? Secret Mind is a space created for you to deeply connect with your essence, strengthen your spirit, and better understand the world around you. "The journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step." - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES Mirrored From: https://www.youtube.com/@SecretMind2
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 w

Tiktok DELETING accounts that post about North Carolina and Lithium! Hit By Hurricane
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Tiktok DELETING accounts that post about North Carolina and Lithium! Hit By Hurricane

*ALERT* Tiktok banning and DELETING accounts that post about North Carolina and Lithium! They are censoring vital information and deleting accounts so the main source of info comes form the MSM which is mostly lies. Immediately blocked within an hour. And given a STRIKE. So no warning or demonetization. Straight to ban and strike for the uploader! They are clearly trying to hide information about Helene and it's "Natural" flood that took place #Asheville #tiktok #flood
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 w

THE WHITE RABBIT - ALBO (Australian PM ALBANESE) PROVES that CLIMATE CHANGE is a HOAX!!!
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

THE WHITE RABBIT - ALBO (Australian PM ALBANESE) PROVES that CLIMATE CHANGE is a HOAX!!!

UTL COMMENT:- FYI, The Port Hedland Council vote was 5-2. The Mayor & Cr Ambika Rebello voted against. Good news! And FCUK the Mayor!! With thanks to:- https://rumble.com/user/THEWHITERABBITAUSTRALIA
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
42 w

Got a 20-something at home? Parent coach shares simple rules for a healthy and happy home.
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Got a 20-something at home? Parent coach shares simple rules for a healthy and happy home.

Studies show that today, roughly 45% of people ages 18-29 live at home with their families, the highest number since the 1940s. The top reason these Gen Zers and young Millenials live at home is to save money (40%), while 30% say they can’t afford to live independently and 19% are recovering from emergency costs. By comparison, in 1970, just 7% of adults ages 25 to 35 lived at home with their parents. There are bound to be some struggles when young adults live at home as parents try to understand how to navigate life with their grown children. When you’re raising teenagers, it’s a lot easier to draw the line when it comes to house rules, but how should parents treat their kids when they are grown adults? Mom and parent coach Kim Muench shared some practical advice recently on Instagram for parents who aren’t sure how to create healthy boundaries with their college-age kids. Muench is the mother of 5 adult children and coaches parents of adults to become the “clear, confident, and consistent guide that’s needed in this stage of parenting.” In her video, Muench says parents need to give their children more freedom while expecting them to be more responsible. See on Instagram “Your 20-year-old daughter, who's living at home, does not need a curfew. She does need to communicate whether or not she's going to be home that night,” Muench said in an Instagram video. “Your 24-year-old son needs to do his own laundry. He also needs to move it from the washer to the dryer and back to his room in a timely manner,” she continued. She adds that parents should stop monitoring the daily activities of their adult children. "Your college kid does not need to be tracked. Unless, it's part of an agreement that everyone in the family has, for safety purposes. You don't need to be counting the amount of alcohol or the number of beers in the refrigerator after your son has been home for the weekend. Your son does need to buy his own alcohol and drink responsibly." Parents should also have open lines of communication with their adult children so everyone knows what’s expected of them. “If you're not coming to an agreement on what should be done or what is happening or not happening yet that's supposed to be happening, then you need to sit down together and talk about how you can solve the problem together,” she said. Most of the younger commenters thought this was the exact message their parents needed to hear. “People will freakishly control their kids all their lives into their 20s and be confused as to why their children are still continuing to live at home. It's creating an unhealthy view of boundaries and fear of being on their own,” Ppris0nwifee wrote in the comments. A young adult who lives with her parents praised Muench’s approach because it works in her home. “My parents are this way with me and it makes living here and having a social life so easy with no conflict. I can go out whenever I feel like it for however long. I just have to communicate where i'm going and if I'll be back. other than that they mind their business, it makes living at home really easy,” Strangelydeceased wrote. “Props to the parents who have boundaries but let their adult children live like adults when living at home.” Having a young adult in the house can be hard for parents because they have to break many of the habits they developed while parenting over the past 18-plus years. That’s why it’s great that parenting coaches like Muench are here to help them navigate this tricky stage of life in a way that supports both parent and child’s needs.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
42 w

Someone asked what they should know about having a cat. Thousands of people offered input.
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Someone asked what they should know about having a cat. Thousands of people offered input.

Anyone who's had a cat knows how bringing a feline friend into your life makes a huge impact in both positive and not-so-positive ways. Our pet cats might bring us great delight, but they also come with some quirks, oddities and other things people who are thinking about getting a cat should prepare for. That's why when someone asked, "What does one need to know before getting a cat?" on Reddit, thousands of cat owners chimed in with information and advice. In generations past, cat were seen as largely self-sufficient. That's still somewhat true in comparison to dogs, but we've learned a lot more about cats that has changed (and improved) the way cat owners care for their kitties.via GIPHYHere are the main things people say those considering getting a cat should know before committing:Cats come as they arePeople often joke about how their cats are oddballs, but it's a universal truth. Cats are quirky. If you've never had a cat and think they don't have much personality, you're entirely mistaken. "Every cat has its own personality. It might not match your expectation.""Every cat is at least a bit of a psychopath.""Cats are the best pets for people with control issues... Because nothing is going to give you non stop lessons in something you can't control like a cat.""That their character is complete luck of the draw. You might get one who really enjoys humans...or one who hates them. Or one who only wants to be near them but not touched. Or one that will crawl on your lap every change it gets. You do not know what kind of cat you'll get. If you're willing to take that gamble....go ahead.""Cats have much stronger personalities than dogs do and often times can't be trained out of that personality the way dogs can. If you get a kitten, it's the luck of the draw whether you get a cat that's very cuddly and affectionate or one that's standoffish and doesn't like to be pet. Even two cats who are raised identically together can be wildly different in how receptive they are to people. If you have a specific idea of what you want out of a cat, such as if you like a lap cat who likes to go to bed with you, you should look into rescuing adult cats who already have their personalities developed."Kittens choose violenceIf you think kittens are cute and cuddly, you couldn't be more right. But also, they have razor blades on their feet and they will tear your extremities apart with them. "As babies they sometimes like violence." Kittens are cute, but their tiny claws and teeth are SHARP.Photo credit: Canva"Yeah, they start off cute and then bam—you're covered in scratches, and it’s all because the sock looked at them wrong.""They come with factory installed murder paws.""They all like violence. You can never anticipate when they will choose violence.""Getting a second kitten will help with this!! They can be violent with each other and teach each other boundaries, rather than having one lonely violent kitten constantly slicing up your hands and feet."Cats like routineFor creatures who seem so aloof, cats are surprisingly very routine-oriented and don't like change much. Moving around furniture, going out of town or changing their feeding schedule can throw them off and cause stress. "Cats are big fans of routines. They know when breakfast/dinner is, when playtime is and when you get home. If their routine is disrupted and these things happen sooner or later than they’re used to, they may get upset.They’re also not fans of change in their environment. A new person or pet moving in, furniture being rearranged, new food, new litter, etc. can all unsettle a cat, make them feel unsafe and drive them to hide.""Don't make abrupt changes. It is recommended that all changes should be subtle and in little steps. If you're going to move its bowl, or the litter box, it is advised to do it slowly. They don't react well to abrupt changes. Moving to another house or city can be really traumatic, leaving them stressed out for months." Changes like moving can be hard on cats.Photo credit: CanvaCats like cleanliness—but also chaosCats are naturally clean, barring any health or disability issues. They don't need to be bathed like dogs, and oddly their fur tends to smell really good. But they also want you to keep their litter box clean and will find ways to let you know if you are falling short on that front.Oh, and they also like to make messes for fun, like total hypocrites. "Keep the litterbox clean. They don't like it dirty. Cats like cleaniness.""If you keep the litter box clean, most cats (of course, there are always exceptions) will vastly prefer that to any other location.""If you don't keep their litter box in pristine, shiny, brand new condition, they'll just shit on the floor right in front of it.""They don’t need to be bathed. They are self cleaning!""If you leave a glass of water unattended, that glass will be in a broken puddle on the floor when you come back.""Mine would always wait for me to come back in view, then look me in the eye as she knocked the glass onto the floor."Cats can be taken out by a bouquetThis one may come a surprise to many people, but some plants, especially certain flowers, are highly toxic to cats. And some of them can't help but chew on plants, which makes displaying flowers in your home a challenge. So expect a lot of "Is XYZ plant toxic to cats?" Google searches. "Many ordinary house plants can kill your cat. Same with bouquets of flowers. Lilies are a big one but there are lots of others. Check all existing plants in your house before the cat comes home, don’t let new plants in without checking them.""If you have houseplants, be prepared to part with any that are toxic to the cat. Some will take the risk, but the cats welfare is higher priority than you liking interior decor - which goes for anything breakable or edible also.""Lilies are the real danger. Some lily-like flowers, such as alstroemeria (Peruvian lily), are not true lilies, so they are not as problematic. But true lilies can cause kidney failure in cats." Some flowers can be deadly for cats.Photo credit: Canva"My coworkers cat is in end stage renal failure from being near lilies.""Plants can be a big risk; especially lily’s, but many common house plants are toxic."Cats hide their sufferingCat communicate in all kinds of way—meowing, purring, growling, hissing, ekekekek-ing and more—but they don't tend to let you know when they're in pain or discomfort. Stoic little buggers, so regular vet checkups and watching for subtle behavioral changes are really important."They are really good at hiding symptoms. Make sure to get them checked regularly. If the cat starts showing symptoms of a disease, it's probably already too late to fix.""They do not let you know when something is wrong with them…or, I should say, they do in extremely subtle ways.Dogs usually make it pretty obvious when something isn’t right with them. With cats; if you’re not paying attention - you won’t know until it’s bad.""Sometimes 'behavioral' issues like hiding/going to the bathroom outside the litter box are sign of health issues!"Cats need their clawsSome people declaw cats to try to save their furniture, but it's not a harmless procedure. Major vet organizations recommend against it, providing alternatives for discouraging problematic clawing behavior."Do not declaw your cat. Ever. That's horribly painful and is the equivalent of cutting off the first joint of all your fingers.""If you intend on declawing a cat, do NOT get a cat.""This so much. A friend of mine was thinking of getting her 1 year old kitten declawed and I had to tell her what they do and she was appalled. She has since trained him to use his scratching post and not her couch and she occasionally trims them or has the vet do it." Trimming, yes. Declawing, no. Photo credit: Canva"Trim your little kitten's claws regularly, even if all you take off is a hairsbreadth. Gets them used to having their paws handled that way."Cats often do better in pairsCats can be solitary, but they often prefer to have furry friends of their own. Paired cats will often play together, groom one another and provide an outlet for their "zoomy" energy. "They typically do well in pairs! People don’t often think they need companionship but they do.""Consider getting two. Hear me out. As kittens, two are far less work for the human because they can play with and entertain each other, and they will naturally teach each other boundaries like how to not bite or scratch too hard. As adults, I would not say it’s a huge increase in work or cost as far as litter box and food goes.Cats are naturally very social animals, despite pop culture representing otherwise. Some cats choose to be solitary, some cats have simply adapted to solitude because they have never had a friend. Two cats are truly better than one."Cats should be indoorsPeople have differing opinions on this one, but it's generally recommended that cats be kept indoors for their own well-being as well as the safety of wildlife. Cats are predators pose a danger to bird populations especially."Please consider making your cat an indoor cat. Outdoor cats have a higher death rate than indoor cats, which is pretty self explanatory as there is a much higher rate of traffic accidents, attacks by other animals, getting lost/stuck places. It’s not fair on your cat, bordering on neglect, to just let it run around unsupervised outside all day.The other thing to say about outdoor cats is how devastating they are for the local ecology. They hunt for fun, and each cat will be responsible for the deaths of probably hundreds of small birds, rodents, insects and lizards every year. Studies have shown that domestic cats have been directly responsible for the extinction of many species.Outdoor cats are not a good idea for us, you, and them…""One important thing to remember is that cats that live exclusively indoors are healthier and live longer. Cats that roam are at risk of being killed by cars and dogs, and injured by getting into fights with other cats, or contracting illnesses from other cats (feline AIDS). Infection from another cats claws in a fight can lead to your cat being maimed or even dying. Roaming cats also kill a huge amount of wildlife, and it's estimated that roaming pet cats are responsible for the deaths of a billion native species in Australia every year.""Keep your cat indoors. Cats that roam have an average life expectancy of 2-5 years due to cars, dogs, poisons, other cats, weather, wild animals, disease.... Indoor cats can live 15-20 years, depending on how dedicated their owner is to regular vaccinations and checkups, quality food and mental, social and physical stimulation." Cats can be sweet companions.Photo credit: CanvaCats are a commitmentIndoor cat live a long time, so if you're starting with a kitten, be prepared for the long haul. But also, be prepared to be attached to your kitty and miss them dearly when they're gone. "It’s a commitment of 12-20 years. Make sure you are:Not allergicFinancially able to provide food and medical care (I recommend getting pet insurance, its saved my cats lives several times)Allowed to have pets where you live.""It can be a 15 - to 20-year commitment. They are also the best companion ever.""Yeah, nobody told me when I was 19 that this cat would be alive when I was 40!""And at the end you'll wish it was longer.""Your cat(s) will become very important to you so make sure you’re ready for some emotional attachment because even when they piss you off, they are now your master and you must provide them the attention and love they require, whatever that entails."That's basically cat ownership wrapped up in a nutshell.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

How Trump Became an American Hero
Favicon 
spectator.org

How Trump Became an American Hero

In my young adulthood — which, roughly speaking, spanned the decades between the Carter presidency and the dawn of the computer age — most Americans, it seemed to me, were patriots, people who never took their liberty for granted. Of course, members of the Greatest Generation, who’d fought in World War II, were still around in massive numbers to remind us by their presence of what they’d done — and what we owed to the memory of their sacrifice. Still, for all our patriotism, the overwhelming majority of Americans didn’t seem to be particularly preoccupied with politics, or to be fiercely partisan. For one thing, the two parties seemed to overlap to an unusual extent: the GOP had its share of liberals like Senator Jacob Javits; the Democrats had Southern conservatives aplenty. For another, very little of what went on in Washington, D.C., made it into the half-hour-long evening news shows or the relatively small amount of space devoted by even major newspapers to political news.  Subscribe to The American Spectator to receive our fall 2024 print magazine, which includes this article and others like it. Back then, the GOP was the turf of the corporate elite and country-club set, while the Democrats were in thrall to the unions and race hustlers. But both parties fought for the support of the ordinary folks in the heartland. For a long time, the GOP’s chief strategy was to promote “family values,” while the Democrats promised handouts in the tradition of the New Deal and Great Society. Still, there were election years in which the two major presidential candidates were both uninspiring and the differences between them seemed minimal.  Meanwhile, largely under the radar of the media and the political establishment, immense changes were taking place in the U.S. Well-paying jobs, the sort that had brought prosperity to the great American middle class, were exported to Mexico and elsewhere, leaving millions of once well-off householders high and dry. And the mass immigration of low-skilled workers put struggling working-class Americans on the unemployment line. Political candidates of both parties scrupulously avoided these issues — issues that mattered desperately to tens of millions of voters — and the so-called journalists who interviewed them failed to press for answers. This article is taken from The American Spectator’s fall 2024 print magazine. Subscribe to receive the entire magazine. Then cable news came along — and, sometime later, the World Wide Web — and an increasing number of ordinary Americans, now exposed to far more political news and commentary than ever before, found themselves drawn into the fray. And along, too, came Donald Trump. To most Americans, he was a TV star. But I’d grown up in New York City, where he’d been a major local media figure long before The Apprentice, so he’d been on my radar since my childhood. From the beginning, he was unique. He seemed to bridge the gap between outer-borough Joes (like me, he was from Queens) and Manhattanite masters of the universe. He spoke his mind, and he spoke like a regular guy. He certainly didn’t come off as a potential politician, although he’d obviously thought very deeply about the ways in which America’s leaders were taking the country in the wrong direction. He brought up issues, economic and otherwise, that most politicians didn’t. And if you actually listened to him, you realized that he was one hell of a smart cookie.  Like most other observers, I didn’t take it entirely seriously when he first declared his candidacy for president in 2015. But then I watched the GOP debates. They were a revelation — not just for me, but for millions who were used to what many of us now recognize as the phony, careful, vacuous, and clichéd language of most professional political discourse. Trump not only violated the old rules. He exploded them into bits. And it struck a chord nationwide. More than any of his competitors, he took on subjects that real people cared about, and he addressed them with a unique candor and bluntness. I started to grasp what some people meant when they talked about the “uniparty” — Republicans and Democrats in entrenched positions of power who had an understanding among themselves that certain topics were off the table. Indeed, Donald Trump helped many of us to realize that the parties were entering a whole new era when it came to whom they really belonged to and what they really stood for. The Democrats, promoted ever since the days of FDR and LBJ as the heroic champions of the working class, had become the ideologically rigid home of corporate globalists and the credentialed elites, not to mention the woke power brokers in Hollywood and Silicon Valley, all of whom seemed determined to turn ordinary Americans into something on the order of feudal serfs. Now Trump turned the GOP — whose Eastern establishment leaders had taken for granted their ability to install a third empty-suited Bush in the White House (“Jeb”) — into the party of constitutional American values and those ordinary Americans. His was an authentically big tent, one in which you were welcome as long as you loved America, put your country first, rejected open borders, and didn’t think that a boy can become a girl.  Trump wasn’t interested in pushing any of the old buttons. Because he wasn’t some cheap political hack. He was in the game for the right reasons. You could feel it. He didn’t need the money. He didn’t need the fame. Yes, he enjoyed the attention. He visibly reveled in his increasing popularity among the people whom Hillary and her ilk smeared as deplorables — but whom he palpably respected and wished to restore to prosperity and pride. Speaking at gigantic rallies to which enthusiastic middle Americans flocked, he talked to them with an unprecedented frankness, understanding, humor, and camaraderie. He talked about the things that mattered to them and that he understood in a way that only a successful businessman with a long history of dealing with elaborate regulations and tax codes, involvement in high-level international business deals, and observing with care the slimy, self-serving machinations of the “Deep State” — the corrupt, unelected permanent establishment inside the Beltway (which he quite properly referred to as the “Swamp”) — could understand. Yes, Trump was a product of the Ivy League, but he wasn’t a creature of it. He’d made major contributions to the Manhattan skyline, but his manner and his accent marked him as a product of the outer boroughs. You began to hear over and over that, unlike other politicians, he was precisely the same in private as in public. And you began to read stories about how he’d grown up mixing with the construction workers who built his skyscrapers. He knew how to talk to them. He didn’t feel uneasy in their presence. In fact, he actually enjoyed their company. He took pleasure in his wealth but had never let it turn him into a snob. Yes, Bill Clinton had come from a dirt-poor Arkansas town, but Yale and Oxford had transformed him into a perfect member of the elite, every bit of a slick operator (recall his nickname “Slick Willie”) as Trump was a straight talker. Hillary, for her part, was famous for changing her accent in front of groups of supporters depending on which part of the country she was appearing in. George W. Bush had posed as a down-home Texan, but he was the son of a president, the grandson of a senator, and the product of Phillips Andover, Yale, and Harvard Business School. Trump was different. No matter where he went, no matter how high- or low-born his audiences, he always wore the same suit and red tie and always talked in exactly the same way.  Trump, in short, was always Trump. Yes, he was sometimes guilty of exaggeration, but he was never dishonest about who he was, deep down, as a person, or about what he stood for. Even as the legacy media branded him a liar and racist, more and more ordinary Americans — people who can recognize a phony when they meet one — discerned that whatever else he might be, he wasn’t a phony. He was the real thing — an authentic believer in the values spelled out in the Declaration of Independence, in the federal system outlined in the Constitution, and in government of the people, by the people, and for the people. He’d walked away from a life of almost unimaginable luxury and into the line of fire in order to serve his nation and help its people. And, as president, he proved it. Repeatedly. Magnificently. Courageously. He created an economic boom, slashed needless regulations, killed unfair trade deals, made America energy-independent, sought to curb the immigration of illegals and potential terrorists, and strengthened our alliances, our military, and our police — all of which directly benefited millions of ordinary American and thwarted the schemes of the elite class. Which is just part of the reason why so many Americans are devoted to him in a way that’s unprecedented in modern history, and why his most powerful political enemies — whose priorities lie elsewhere — have done everything in their power to destroy him. Subscribe to The American Spectator to receive our fall 2024 print magazine. The post How Trump Became an American Hero appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

Obama Treats ‘the Brothers’ Like Babies
Favicon 
spectator.org

Obama Treats ‘the Brothers’ Like Babies

Obama disagrees with the simple, powerful placards that black males held overhead during the Civil Rights Movement. They read: “I AM A MAN.” To Obama, black men cannot decide whom to support for president. In his mind, we are mere boys. Male, yes, but insufficiently mature to choose America’s commander-in-chief. Instead, we should shut up and await Obama’s instructions. “We have not yet seen the same kinds of energy and turnout in all quarters of our neighborhoods and communities as we saw when I was running,” Obama hectored a group of black males in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on Thursday. The low-key support for Kamala Harris, Obama chided them, “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.” “You’re thinking about sitting out or supporting somebody [Donald J. Trump] who has a history of denigrating you, because you think that’s a sign of strength, because that’s what being a man is? Putting women down?” Obama condescended. “That’s not acceptable.” Former President Barack Obama hectors black men (ABC News/YouTube) Obama’s revolting statements were as insulting as Biden’s notorious remarks to radio host Charlamagne the God in May 2020: “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.” As if stripping black men of our moral agency were not bad enough, Obama accused pro-Trump black men of being misogynists. “You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a problem with that,” Obama scolded. “Because part of it makes me think — and I’m speaking to men directly — part of it makes me think that, well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president, and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for that.” Sick! If the only reason that black men support Trump is because we hate women and would put only a man in the Oval Office, then how does Obama explain the exit polls that found Trump’s support among black men rise from 13 percent in 2016 to 19 percent in 2020? That 46.15 percent increase in Trump’s black-male vote occurred when the choices were Trump or Joe Biden — another man. Obama should look into this basic fact: Misogyny does not apply when the Democrat and the Republican nominees are both men. Indeed, before Kamala’s koup d’etat shoved Biden down Air Force One’s staircase and out of the race, the distinctly male president of the United States won 14.3 million votes to become the Democrat standard-bearer, versus zero votes for Kamala. Five months earlier, with no woman in the race, Trump earned 19 percent of black men versus 79 percent for Biden, in a Feb. 21 Quinnipiac survey. Trump matched his 19 percent of 2020’s black-male vote. A March 2 Sienna College poll gave Trump 23 percent of black male ballots (versus 66 percent for Biden). The next day, a CBS/You Gov study also showed Trump convincing 23 percent of black men compared to 76 percent for Biden. “On average, Donald Trump received 18% of the vote from Black voters who expressed a preference for either Trump or Biden in the six national polls,” the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics concluded on March 27. Its scholars reviewed a half-dozen relevant studies of black men and women — four months before any female Democrat presidential candidate was around for black men to dismiss. “If that result were to hold up in November, it would represent by far the highest level of Black support for a Republican presidential candidate in the past 60 years.” Obama has infantilized black men as little boys incapable of choosing between candidates. He baselessly tarred us as women-haters. And Obama ignored the concerns of black men who reject the Tax Queen’s plans to hike levies by $5 trillion, strangle the economy in mandates and red tape, and project even deadlier weakness abroad. Obama did not spend a minute wondering if black men might like Trump’s proposals for no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime, and no taxes on Social Security benefits. Millions of black men understand that renewing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will revive the economy in general and our finances in particular. Black men recognize that a 15 percent corporate tax for companies that manufacture in America (down from 21 percent) means economic growth at home and jobs, jobs, jobs for those who seek more and better employment prospects. While Obama might hate this fact, black men also can ask ourselves this campaign’s key question: “Are you better off under Kamala than you were under Trump?” Most black men remember that our lives were more prosperous and peaceful under the leadership of the man whose policies yielded robust economic output, record-low black unemployment and poverty, decreasing income inequality among rising real wages, four Middle East peace agreements, and zero new wars (a first in 40 years): Donald J. Trump. Obama is too blinded by his left-wing ideology to see this. Rather than lead black men, Obama humiliates us. He should stop the lectures and leave us alone to pick whomever we individually want as the next president of the United States. These votes are ours, not his. Obama should meditate on an expression I often heard at my 90 percent black elementary school in Los Angeles. To paraphrase that admonition: “We ain’t yo’ slaves, bitch!” Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor. READ MORE from Deroy Murdock: Kamala for President … of Lebanon ICE Numbers Offer Chilling Proof of Kamala’s Illegal Alien Crime Crisis The post Obama Treats ‘the Brothers’ Like Babies appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

If Trump Wins…
Favicon 
spectator.org

If Trump Wins…

The presidential campaign of 2024 reached Peak TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) last week on The Howard Stern Show. The world’s top shock jock turned lefty sycophant was interviewing Kamala Harris and said that if Donald Trump wins the presidency, “[T]he sun’s literally going to go out.” That’s right. If Big Orange ascends once again to the Oval Office, the other Big Orange, the one 93 million miles away up in the sky, the one that makes life possible on planet Earth, will go poof. Expostulated Stern, “I really believe we’re in for the darkest skies on the planet.” That’s probably not the way it will happen, though. Scientists say that if the sun stops “sunning” — that is, if it “goes out” — Earth would be engulfed by a greatly enlarged red giant sphere of heat that would burn off the atmosphere and boil away the oceans. Plants would die. Animals as well. Earth would become a scorched, lifeless rock. Then, the skies would get dark and Earth would drift away into space. But what are a few details when the subject is “If Trump Wins…,” eh? Such power being imputed to one man, just for getting elected president of the United States! Having the power to blot out the sun all by himself has to surprise even The Donald. I’ve been racking my brain trying to think of a more dire circumstance for humankind than the sun being extinguished, and, apart from Earth colliding with Mars, I’m coming up short.  We’ve come a long way from lefties merely threatening to skedaddle the country if a Republican made it to the White House. They still do that, of course — it’s become a Democrat tradition. A bunch said they wanted out if Bush II won in 2000; 20 big names threatened departure if Trump won in 2016; and now another cadre are saying they’ll ride out a Trump presidency abroad — with some of the same names as 2016 (Barbara Streisand, for example, and Cher, who at least promises to stay on the planet this time, as she said she’d emigrate to Jupiter in 2016). But even if the “If Trump Wins” game does not portend planetary extinction, some on the left are plenty troubled by the prospect.  Some are worried Trump will prosecute his political enemies and put them in prison. Even Mitt Romney is freaking out! The Left, so attuned to the use and intricacies of irony, seems curiously blind to it in this case. Trump should pledge to do “no more” than his political opponents have done to him. As reported by The American Spectator’s Scott McKay, a Democrat strategist said on CNN that Trump, if elected, would institute a eugenics program to eliminate blacks and gays. The strategist herself, Aisha Mills, worried she was “at risk of being exterminated” by Trump because she was a “black lesbian.”  A couple of writers at Rolling Stone are worried Trump will start executing criminals, publicly, en masse. You know, big spectacular events, “mass executions,” with, one imagines, marching bands and jumbotrons. Allegedly, Trump particularly favors the firing squad. But that is only one of the depredations coming should Trump ascend to the White House. The remainder of the article speculates, with myriad quotations from “experts,” on the ravages perpetrated on the nation by a “Trump unbound, a man whose darkest impulses will not be checked by ‘adults in the room’ — creating potentially catastrophic consequences for the American experiment.”  Trump is looking forward to being “dictator for a day,” to “drill, drill, drill,” and stanch the border flow. But, says Ruth Ben-Ghiat, quoted in the Rolling Stone piece, “They want to have a blitzkrieg — and then all you need to be is a dictator for a day,” she said. “It’s not just a change of methods, it’s a change of political system — a vast expansion of the powers of the executive, so that Trump will be able to rule as an autocrat.” The New York Times worries Trump will remake government entirely. Trump “and his associates have a broad goal to alter the balance of power by increasing the president’s authority over every part of the federal government that currently operates independently of the White House.” Included within this broad sweep of powers are pledges to make it easier to fire government bureaucrats and “unilaterally send federal forces to bring order to Democratic-run cities” — which the Times sees as bad ideas. And we haven’t even got to the “climate changists” yet. The U.K.-based NGO Carbon Brief said, “[A] victory for Donald Trump in November’s presidential election could lead to an additional 4 billion metric tons of US emissions by 2030 compared with Joe Biden’s plans.” Adds environmentalist Bill McKibben, “It’s like finding an extra continent full of greenhouse gases.” Unfortunately, Trump would be messing with the weather for longer than his four years. McKibben continues: “If we elect Donald Trump, we may feel the effects not for years, and not for a generation. We may read our mistake in the geological record a million years hence.” Now, that’s power! And of course, the fallback go-to is the reductio ad Hitlerum. James Carville compares Trump’s planned Madison Square Garden rally on Oct. 27 to an infamous rally held by American Nazis in 1939 at the Garden in the run-up to World War II. Trump’s rally, Carville says, is scheduled “to mimic the Nazi rally of February 10th, 1939.” All of it, though, pales in comparison to solar extinction. Let’s hope we get a chance to see if Stern’s prediction comes true. RELATED: The Race Is Close Due to Our Shameless Media The New York Times Accuses Trump of the Very Traits That Exemplify the Left The post If Trump Wins… appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 8005 out of 56667
  • 8001
  • 8002
  • 8003
  • 8004
  • 8005
  • 8006
  • 8007
  • 8008
  • 8009
  • 8010
  • 8011
  • 8012
  • 8013
  • 8014
  • 8015
  • 8016
  • 8017
  • 8018
  • 8019
  • 8020

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund