YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 w

THE WHITE RABBIT - ?URGENT AUSTRALIA REPUBLIC NEWS?
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

THE WHITE RABBIT - ?URGENT AUSTRALIA REPUBLIC NEWS?

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/a-matter-for-the-australian-people-charles-to-stay-out-of-republic-debate-during-royal-visit/news-story/b921071cb9a472c6837221e0631709da UTL COMMENT:- King Charles is here because he is Freemason, Rothschilds Pawn & WEF tool... With thanks to:- https://rumble.com/user/THEWHITERABBITAUSTRALIA
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
42 w

“That doesn’t sound right to me”: The classic song Billie Joe Armstrong thought sounded ugly
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

“That doesn’t sound right to me”: The classic song Billie Joe Armstrong thought sounded ugly

The ugly sounds of pure rock. The post “That doesn’t sound right to me”: The classic song Billie Joe Armstrong thought sounded ugly first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

‘Republicans Against Perry’ Are Not Republicans
Favicon 
spectator.org

‘Republicans Against Perry’ Are Not Republicans

Well of course. Here in the heart of Pennsylvania’s 10th congressional district, we are lucky enough to be decidedly well represented by Republican Rep. Scott Perry. The congressman is a decided conservative, willing and able to take on the Washington Swamp and its various swamp dwellers in their various incarnations. The congressman never hesitates to speak out — which is exactly why Democrats have targeted him for defeat.  This time around, Democrats have been joined by a group calling themselves “Republicans Against Perry,” with the group sprinkling their signs around the district. But, pray tell, who exactly are the self-labeled “Republicans”?  Take a close look at the group and one finds — not shockingly — that they are decidedly not Republicans. Oh sure. Some of them may be officially registered as Republicans. But as any politically aware soul has learned long ago, there are, alas, political types out there who claim to be registered in this or that party but who are not in the least hesitant to oppose that party’s decidedly well-known principles. So let’s take a look at “Republicans Against Perry.” To start, the group is laughably lacking a sense of self-awareness. A trip to their website and right there, front center, is Rep. Perry pictured giving a presser behind the podium bearing the sign: “House Freedom Caucus.” The House Freedom Caucus, which at one point was chaired by Perry, is a group of seriously principled conservatives in the House who are unafraid to stand up for conservative principles.  Among other things, Perry and the Freedom Caucus have opposed the Biden administration’s reckless spending that has launched serious inflation. Its members have worked to secure our southern border and, no small thing, defended our constitutional freedoms in the House of Representatives. For doing that, Republicans Against Perry have opposed Perry. The congressman is utterly unafraid to stand up for conservative principle, saying in an ad:   After I voted against every Democrat tax increase, they despise me. And after I opposed my own party’s reckless spending of your money, I lost friends. But here’s the thing, you didn’t send me to Congress to make friends. Tellingly, in the world of Republican politics, there is a member of the group boasting of his support for “H.W.Bush.” Nary a mention of Ronald Reagan, mind you. No, it’s the establishment GOP where these folks hang their hats, not the Reagan conservative folks. Which speaks volumes as to why they can’t abide a Reagan conservative like Scott Perry. One section of the website makes it crystal clear they oppose honest, free, and fair elections, weaponizing the government to shut down opposition to the Washington and political/legal establishment. Which is to say, if they can target Scott Perry — they can target you. But tellingly? Very, very tellingly? Scroll to the bottom of their website, and it says that the “Republicans Against Perry” site is: “Paid for by WelcomePAC”  And a trip here to Welcome PAC reveals that, yes indeed, “Republicans Against Perry” is financed by … Democrats. The Welcome PAC site reads:   We need a Democratic Party that reaches out to mainstream Americans — not just those who pass all the progressive purity tests.  In the 2020 primaries, we welcomed the independent voters who stayed with us to beat Trump. In 2022, we supported leaders who reached out to independents and “future former Republicans” to put flippable red districts into play from Ohio to California.   In 2024, we’re taking the fight for our democracy to more battlegrounds nationwide. Which is to say, “Republicans Against Perry” is financed by … Trump-hating Democrats or those supporting Trump-hating Democrats. And their support for Perry’s Democrat opponent Janelle Stelson is nothing more than Republicans In Name Only (RINOs) supporting a Democrat. And speaking of which? Since this business is entirely dishonest, has it been denounced by Stelson? Answer: Absolutely not. Which itself speaks volumes about Stelson and her unwillingness to be honest with her potential constituents about the real nature of this group supporting her and who is financing them. In short? “Republicans Against Perry” is nothing more than a con job designed to give the impression that Rep. Perry is some sort of extremist, not what he, in fact, actually is: a mainstream Reagan conservative.  Not only are “Republicans Against Perry” decidedly not telling the truth about their group, what they are really about is a clear attempt to mislead voters about Scott Perry in particular — and conservatives in general — in search of their goal to create “flippable red districts” and make them Democrat blue. It not only won’t work — it shouldn’t. The post ‘Republicans Against Perry’ Are Not Republicans appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

Search and Rescue
Favicon 
spectator.org

Search and Rescue

I have spent the last three weeks in the Carolina mountains and in coastal Florida. I’ve been there not as a storm-tossed reporter with a nose for news, but rather as a man blessed with the chance to work remotely who has chosen to live in two of the boskiest dells God ever made. This is a tale of two hometowns. For both, it has been the worst of times. For one of them, it has been unimaginably bad. Here is what I saw, uninformed by media accounts, to which I had no access until last Friday. Over the first eight days of Helene’s rampage through western North Carolina, I did not encounter in or around my mountain town a single representative of the federal government. No house check. No leaflet. No email, no phone call, no text. There were rumors of a FEMA outpost setting up at a shopping center in Brevard, which is in the foothills of the Smoky Mountains 45 minutes to the east. Three of my neighbors, in one formulation or another, had the same reaction to those rumors: “Damn. If I could get to Ingles, why would I need FEMA?” (Ingles is to North Carolina as Publix is to Florida. It’s a beloved supermarket chain that, along with the kitchen staples, offers propane, hydrogen peroxide, prescription drugs, an ATM, and a place to exchange hopeful information.) By day three or four of Helene’s rampage, “FEMA” had become a verb, meaning, of course, to screw people over by overpromising and underdelivering. For some reason, public disdain has been directed not so much at the head of FEMA, or even at our addled commander-in-chief, as at Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. I would advise him not to helicopter in for a self-congratulatory tour. The visuals would not be good and the audio would be X-rated. How bad was Helene’s rampage? Unimaginably bad. A “mountain community” is an area where most of the people live up a mountain road from the interstate. In many cases, there’s one way up and one way down. When rocks slide over the road, or when rushing mudwater tears it apart, or, most frequently, when falling trees block it, there’s no way up and no way down. Your only option is to shelter in place. If you still have a place. So, to answer the first question from you (mostly post-industrial) readers: Yes, you can survive on rainwater and small animals and serving as your own doctor for most injuries. What you may not know is that it will take you all day to do so. Survival is a full-time job, unless, I suppose, you happen to have attended Army Ranger school. And to address your second question: Yes, some people stood up and stood out. My experience has been that you never know who those people will be — those people who will rise to a rough circumstance even as others are defeated by it — and I want to bear-hug them here: Franklin Graham was here, there and everywhere, bringing water and other basics to parched survivors in their battered shelters. Elon Musk fought through bureaucratic barriers to bring his marvelous Starlink technology to some mountain people cut off from family, friends, and co-workers. Local law enforcement — sheriffs and deputies — left their uniforms and squad cars at home, jumped in their pickups, and joined volunteer chainsaw gangs clearing impassable roads. They served and protected lives during long days. And then they saved lives, off the clock. And the Baptists. I will never again look at a Baptist in the same way. Within 24 hours, it seemed that every Baptist church in the mountains had spontaneously morphed into a field hospital, a childcare facility, a food distribution depot, or some other hive of charitable activity. Uninvited, people would stop at a church parking lot and drop off a few bottles of water, a packet of bandages, an armful of firewood. Uninstructed, young families would gravitate to the church, pop the trunk, and pack away as many diapers, as much formula, as the volunteers could spare. People came for a shower, to borrow a satellite phone, to seek tips on missing relatives, or just to embrace another human being. It was a bloody miracle. By last Friday, on our mountain at least, it was all systems go. Internet and cell service had been restored, the power was on, even the plumbing had moved back indoors. A kid with a new toy, I did a bit of channel-surfing and spotted several brand-name TV reporters updating the nation on developments in the “mountain community” of Asheville, North Carolina. It’s a small city, Asheville, with good hotels, fine restaurants, toney art galleries, and a regional airport. It’s full of yoga instructors, aging hippies, affluent retirees, and Harris voters. In other words, it’s unlike every other part of western Carolina. All of those TV reporters telling us about the “mountain communities” were filmed wading through the flooded streets of downtown Asheville. Which should have been a tipoff. In the Smokies, water tends to run downhill. It collects not in the mountains, that is, but at the bottom, in what’s called a valley. I don’t know about you, but there are moments when my confidence in the media wavers. Florida is different. I live on a barrier island that the locals feel no embarrassment in calling Paradise. Life is perfect, but those of us of a certain age know that perfection has never found firm footing in the human condition. Most Floridians suspect that we’re living on borrowed time: Sooner or later a hurricane, inevitably to be known as the Big One, is going to get us. (Which calculation led your shrewd correspondent to buy a mountain home as a refuge from hurricanes. But enough about me…) How bad was Milton’s rampage? For those directly in the path, it was the worst of times. Pets, property, precious things — all gone. Hopes and dreams — most of them gone, all of them deferred. (McDonald’s reopens in 60 days. Mom-and-pop retail, what makes a town a town, disappears.) For the rest of us, those outside the path, it was a feeling of bone-deep relief; it was the exhilaration, as they say, of being shot at without result. We knew that the recovery would begin immediately and that we would be in good hands. Rick Scott, who served as Florida’s governor from 2011 to 2019, set the standard. He enlarged the governor’s job description from chief executive officer to chief executive officer and director of hurricane preparation and recovery. Ron DeSantis has raised the standard by another notch. My wife and I saw his handiwork as we dashed back to the mountains the day before Milton was projected to make landfall. As we made our way up I-95 through Georgia and South Carolina, we saw a tree-removal truck moving in the other direction. Then a linesman in a power company truck. Then trailers with earth-moving gear. Later, there were clusters of trucks, and, finally, a long convoy, all of them heading south to Florida. Ron DeSantis must have been working the phones, calling in help from across the region. When it comes to FEMA, DeSantis had their number a few storms back. The operative word in that Federal Emergency Management Agency name is not, as popularly supposed, “Emergency.” From my personal observation, FEMA doesn’t search for people. FEMA doesn’t rescue people. FEMA provides the “Management” for the people who do that vital and dangerous work. FEMA does the more refined work described by the soft nouns of Washington bureaucracy: FEMA does liaison. FEMA does outreach. FEMA does collaboration. Like clockwork, it convenes meetings to set the time and place for the next meeting. Last week, DeSantis blurted out what he believes to be the truth about FEMA. He says that he sees it as a kind of bank, as an institution that can provide financial resources to those who do the real work of search and rescue and recovery. Everybody needs a bank. It will shake out in due course whether FEMA will be as generous with the bank’s depositors — taxpaying American citizens — as it has been with illegal immigrants. The post Search and Rescue appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

How to Win an Election
Favicon 
spectator.org

How to Win an Election

Whether you’re running for the White House or dog catcher, renowned political consultant Louis Perron’s new book, Beat the Incumbent, brings objective, data-driven, academic eyes to the world of political campaigns. For candidates, consultants, and citizens, Perron peels back the curtain to provide a step-by-step breakdown of winning (and losing) strategies in modern politics. He teaches readers how to do exactly what the title of the book suggests: “Beat the incumbent.” After an election, there’s usually no shortage of opinions or Monday-morning quarterbacks on the outcome. Any outcome awaits an avalanche of commentary (with self-assured certainty) about who won, who lost, and why. In the recently published book Beat The Incumbent (Radius Book Group), Perron takes readers back to the foundations — to proven strategies, tactics, and decisions that lead to victory at the ballot box. Campaigning successfully is a hurdle for everyone: incumbents, challengers, and the professionals who advise and support them. Lengthy wars of words muddy the waters for voters and observers. Many incumbents and their staff fail to read the public mood from one issue to the next, while challengers (and the electorate in general) struggle to comprehend the business of politics and politicians’ behavior. Yet if Brexit, the presidential elections of 2016 and 2020, and the wave of electoral earthquakes still unfolding in 2024 taught us anything, it is that winning modern races is all about managing the chaos and unpredictability of today’s political setting. As the author assiduously notes, “Politics is the mastery of words,” and to master the right word, at the right time, to the right audience, requires preparation, sound strategy, and a plan. Perron observes that more than 100,000 challengers are running for various offices this year all across the country, and based on history, most will lose. Today, everything about candidates gets scrutinized — private lives, relationships, indiscretions from over two decades ago, and even off-the-cuff jokes or remarks. To carry the standard on any issue today is a hazardous job — and as 2024 has shown, it includes physically violent risks. A challenger seeking to serve their ideals should be fully prepared for the “cage match” of modern campaigning.  In Beat The Incumbent, Perron offers readers a full understanding of the ups and downs of running for office. Whether you’re campaigning for the White House or dog catcher, the strategies are similar. Tactics might differ, but the game of winning elections is one of mastery, like professional sports. Skilled competitors make it look easy; only when rookies and spectators step onto the field against professionals do they realize how underqualified they are.  To be effective as a modern politician, one must have a rational mind (to align oneself with data and process) and an intuitive sense to perceive and respect the unseen and unspoken — culture, context, and emotion. With a doctorate-level background in political science and 17 years of advising presidents, senators, and governors, Perron can interpret and dissect both dimensions, giving candidates an impartial and objective guide to victory. For incumbents, where he has a near-undefeated track record as an advisor, Perron offers solid advice for doubling down on strengths, leveraging media, and using the bully pulpit to extend the life of a political career. For challengers, he teaches the art of successful campaign strategies, contrasting themselves with opponents, and assembling a top-tier campaign team.  But for voters and observers, the piece-de-resistance of Beat The Incumbent is Perron’s play-by-play, behind-the-scenes perspective, like a master sports color commentator. Keeping his political opinions to himself, Perron instead breaks down successes and strengths of winning campaigns into bite-sized pieces — on both sides of the issues. Despite the win-lose similarity between politics and sports, Perron notices that few athletes become politicians. Campaigning has far greater appeal for paid rhetoricians such as lawyers, actors, media personalities and speakers. When you finish reading the book, you’ll walk away with an enhanced perspective of how, as Ronald Reagan once said, “Politics is just like show business.”  For his fluency in analyzing and interpreting modern political theater, Louis Perron has earned the trust of politicians and consultants from one end of the spectrum to the other. From Philippine President Bongbong Marcos to prominent US consultants like Mark Mellman and Donna Brazile, the verdict is in: Beat The Incumbent will help you do exactly what its title implies. Craig Shirley is a public relations consultant and a presidential historian. His latest book is The Search for Reagan. The post How to Win an Election appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

The Spectator P.M. Ep. 83: Lab-Grown Meat Proves to Be a Failed Experiment
Favicon 
spectator.org

The Spectator P.M. Ep. 83: Lab-Grown Meat Proves to Be a Failed Experiment

The push for lab-grown meat as an alternative to natural meat is coming to a halt. Recent endeavors in creating lab-grown meat have proved this practice to be infeasible both economically and environmentally. In this episode of The Spectator P.M. Podcast, hosts Ellie Gardey Holmes and Lyrah Margo discuss how the process of cultivating cells to become meat can be hazardous and costly — and yet the elitist Left still wants to fund these experiments. Tune in to hear their discussion! Read Ellie and Lyrah’s writing here and here. Listen to the Spectator P.M. Podcast on Spotify. Watch the Spectator P.M. Podcast on Rumble. The post <i>The Spectator P.M.</i> Ep. 83: Lab-Grown Meat Proves to Be a Failed Experiment appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

Kamala Harris Wants America to Have the World's Highest Death Tax
Favicon 
townhall.com

Kamala Harris Wants America to Have the World's Highest Death Tax

Kamala Harris Wants America to Have the World's Highest Death Tax
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

Israel Made the West. Israel Is Saving the West.
Favicon 
townhall.com

Israel Made the West. Israel Is Saving the West.

Israel Made the West. Israel Is Saving the West.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

Elon Musk Says 'Destiny of America' Is on the Line
Favicon 
townhall.com

Elon Musk Says 'Destiny of America' Is on the Line

Elon Musk Says 'Destiny of America' Is on the Line
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

Unifilth
Favicon 
townhall.com

Unifilth

Unifilth
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 8144 out of 56667
  • 8140
  • 8141
  • 8142
  • 8143
  • 8144
  • 8145
  • 8146
  • 8147
  • 8148
  • 8149
  • 8150
  • 8151
  • 8152
  • 8153
  • 8154
  • 8155
  • 8156
  • 8157
  • 8158
  • 8159

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund