YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

The Harris Campaign Is Getting Desperate
Favicon 
townhall.com

The Harris Campaign Is Getting Desperate

The Harris Campaign Is Getting Desperate
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

Obama to the Rescue
Favicon 
townhall.com

Obama to the Rescue

Obama to the Rescue
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 w

Understanding the Dramatic Jewish Shift Towards President Trump and the Republican Party
Favicon 
townhall.com

Understanding the Dramatic Jewish Shift Towards President Trump and the Republican Party

Understanding the Dramatic Jewish Shift Towards President Trump and the Republican Party
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 w

While campaigning for Kamala Harris, Bill Clinton admits if the Biden-Harris regime properly vetted illegal aliens Laken Riley would still be alive.
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

While campaigning for Kamala Harris, Bill Clinton admits if the Biden-Harris regime properly vetted illegal aliens Laken Riley would still be alive.

While campaigning for Kamala Harris, Bill Clinton admits if the Biden-Harris regime properly vetted illegal aliens Laken Riley would still be alive. Clinton also states we need illegals because our country’s birth rate is low. pic.twitter.com/ybiRiyf4pl — Breanna Morello (@BreannaMorello) October 14, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 w

Was Hurricane Milton Tampa’s Stage One For Its Planned 15-Minute Smart City? After All You Cannot ‘Build Back Better’ If You Don’t First Destroy The Existing Infrastructure
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Was Hurricane Milton Tampa’s Stage One For Its Planned 15-Minute Smart City? After All You Cannot ‘Build Back Better’ If You Don’t First Destroy The Existing Infrastructure

by Kathleen Gotto, All News Pipeline: Bill Gates has a plan for Tampa for a new 15-minute city and it sounds . . . well, great! Kind of like how wonderful and equitable Agenda 2030 collectivism goals are. Except for the fact that history teaches us what happens when gullible citizens trust wolves in sheep’s clothing for a fair and just […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 w

EXTORTION 17: HIGH CRIMES & MURDER — Nick Noe
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

EXTORTION 17: HIGH CRIMES & MURDER — Nick Noe

from SGT Report: Whistleblower Nicholas Noe returns to SGT Report to discuss the treason of Hillary Clinton and Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama with Extortion 17 and the premeditated murder of Seal Team 6 and the stand down which allowed for the killings of 4 American men in Benghazi, Libya. It all ties together with […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 w

Code Name Cobalt: MI6’s latest smear campaigns against Russia
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Code Name Cobalt: MI6’s latest smear campaigns against Russia

by Declan Hayes, Strategic Culture: No sooner had I filed this piece about MI6’s criminality in Ireland, but MI6’s mouthpieces were at it again, this time alleging that some Russian spy operating out of their Irish embassy caught some Irish political non entity in a honey trap. If we digress to the height of the Cold War, […]
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
42 w

The Second Punic War: How Hannibal Almost Conquered Rome
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

The Second Punic War: How Hannibal Almost Conquered Rome

  Historians grimace at the word “inevitable,”  but in the same way that the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 laid the groundwork for further conflict, so too did the treaty between Rome and Carthage that ended the First Punic War.   While Carthage was left damaged territorially, economically, and militarily, it sought to heal. But one family would turn recovery into revenge. The conflict began with Hamilcar Barca, and would see his son Hannibal take the conflict to the Romans on their own soil. The Second Punic War would be devastating for Rome’s armies, but they would eventually beat the Carthaginians into submission for a second time. But it is Hannibal who would earn a reputation as one of the greatest military commanders ever known.   Growing Carthaginian Influence in Iberia Portrait of Hamilcar Barca, French engraving and etching, c. 18th century. Source: British Museum, London.   For many Carthaginians, the terms of the Treaty of Lutatius reached with Rome in 241 BCE were egregious. Most notable among the treaty’s detractors was Hamilcar Barca. The general and statesman was undefeated during the First Punic War, but he and the Carthaginians were forced to cede Sicily and Sardinia to the Romans. Hamilcar was not ready to retire and turned his attention to expanding Carthaginian power in Spain.   For centuries the Phoenicians had maintained a presence in the Spanish Iberian peninsula, particularly on the southern coast, establishing trading colonies within its natural harbors.   Hamilcar, with the help of his son-in-law Hasdrubal and his young son Hannibal, carved out a pseudo-monarchical state on the peninsula. Reaping the benefits of Iberia’s ample silver mines and agricultural potential, the Carthaginians began to regain their commercial strength that had been lost.   The ancient historians Cassius Dio and Cornelius Nepos tell us that it was on one of these Iberian campaigns that Hamilcar fell in battle at the hands of a people called the “Vettones.”   Despite the death of the patriarch, the Barcid’s power persisted under the command of Hasdrubal. Wary of their old enemies and their growing power, the Romans signed a new treaty with the Carthaginians in 226 BCE to establish the boundary of Carthage’s sphere of influence at the Ebro River in northern Spain.   Hasdrubal’s time in Iberia was cut short by his subsequent death. His successor would have little respect for boundaries, and far less for Romans.   Provoking War The Oath of Hannibal, by Benjamin West, 1770. Source: Royal Collection Trust, London (ID: RCIN 405417).   The ancient historian Polybius attributes these words to Hannibal as evidence of Hamilcar’s indoctrination of his young son against Rome.   “When my father was about to go on his Iberian expedition I was nine years old: and as he was offering the sacrifice to Zeus I stood near the altar… he then bade all the other worshippers stand a little back, and calling me to him, asked me affectionately whether I wished to go with him on his expedition. Upon my eagerly assenting, and begging with boyish enthusiasm to be allowed to go, he took me by the right hand and led me up to the altar, and bade me lay my hand upon the victim and swear that I would never be friends with Rome.”   Born in the waning years of the First Punic War, Hannibal would be raised in a society that had been thoroughly humbled by the Romans. From an early age, Hannibal was on campaign with his father. Spain became his training ground, leading the cavalry and learning the ways of war.   Taking over for his brother-in-law, Hannibal was leery of moving on the town of Saguntum (modern Valencia) before he was totally prepared. The Saguntines had entered talks with the Romans despite the town lying south of the Ebro River. According to the treaty of 226 BCE, Saguntum lay within the Carthaginian sphere of influence. Nevertheless, Hannibal besieged the city in 218 BCE, simultaneously claiming the role of liberator and attacker.   The Saguntines resisted, hoping that a Roman relief army would appear as an answer to their letters. It never came. Hannibal stormed the city and wiped out the entire adult population. Rather than an army, Rome sent a declaration of war.   The March Into Italy Map of the western Mediterranean at the outbreak of the Second Punic War. Source: Dickinson College, Pennsylvania.   Hannibal wasted little time. He had learned the lessons of the First Punic War and was unwilling to let the Romans fight on the offensive in Iberia, or even worse, in Africa. Bereft of a navy by the terms of the Treaty of Lutatius, he gathered his forces at Nova Carthago (modern Cartagena), and decided to take the war to the Romans and march overland to Italy.   He began his journey crossing the Pyrenees and coming into contact with many Celtic tribes, whom he had hoped to recruit to his cause. The Romans, hearing of his progress, made plans of their own. They deployed one consul, Publius Cornelius Scipio, to Iberia, and the other, Tiberius Sempronius Longus, with the invasion of Africa.   As Hannibal crossed the Rhone River, Scipio disembarked his men at Massalia (modern day Marseille), assuming that Hannibal’s march would follow the coast. The two armies’ cavalries skirmished briefly, but Hannibal side-stepped the larger engagement, and despite the onset of winter, disappeared into the Alps.   Harried by treacherous footing, fickle Gallic tribes, brutal cold, and thick snow, Hannibal marched his army through the Alps. For two weeks they suffered, losing many men, horses, and war elephants to ambushes, starvation, freezing temperatures, and steep cliff faces. Finally, his army began their descent into Italy. Having circumvented Scipio’s army, Hannibal appeared in the province of Cisalpine Gaul (modern-day northern Italy) with 20,000 infantry of varying ethnicities including Libyans, Iberians, Numidians, and Gauls.   First Battle of the Second Punic War Snow Storm: Hannibal and His Army Crossing the Alps, by J.M.W Turner, c. 1812. Source: Tate Museum, London (Ref: N00490).   Now November 218 BCE, no one had foreseen Hannibal’s audacity. Still short of his 30th birthday, Hannibal had made an enormous gamble. His army had been battered, exposed to the elements, and left short of food. But they were now on Roman soil.   Publius Scipio scrambled back from the Rhone Valley to try to head off Hannibal once again. Alerted by the oncoming dust cloud of the cavalry, each side prepared for what would become known as the Battle of the Ticinus River. Promising his men grants of land, money, or citizenship, Hannibal exhorted his men onwards, arranging his Carthaginian cavalry in the center and his Numidians on the flanks.   Scipio, holding a low opinion of the Numidians from their skirmish in the Rhone Valley, advanced. The Roman javelinmen (velites) hurled their projectiles at the enemy line and quickly retreated. A stalemate developed until the Numidians, using their famed mobility, circled around the flanks and hit the Romans in the rear. Panic ensued as the lightly armed velites were cut down by the horsemen.   As the Numidians closed in, Publius Scipio was wounded and Hannibal was close to sealing his victory with the death of a consul. Had it not been for a stunning act of bravery by the consul’s son, also named Publius Cornelius Scipio, who rode through the enemy lines to save his father, Hannibal’s victory would have been complete. Albeit stunned, the Romans retained their consul, and withdrew.   Panic in Rome and the Battle of the Trebia River Annibale in Italia, by Jacopo Ripanda (attr.), c. 16th century. Source: Capitoline Museum, Rome.   Following this defeat on Roman soil, panic ensued in the Roman Senate. Sempronius Longus was recalled to defend Italy. He rushed north to join his consular colleague, the wounded Scipio, who, despite his defeat, had continued to shadow Hannibal’s army.   Having captured a grain depot at Clastidium in Cisalpine Gaul, Hannibal approached the River Trebia in December 218 BCE. Holding the high ground on the other bank, Longus and Scipio funneled cavalry of their own across the shallow river to meet Hannibal’s Numidian scouts. Unprepared for a serious engagement, the Carthaginians withdrew, under a hail of javelins, having lost a significant number of men to the quick-acting Romans.   With Scipio still too ill to lead the men himself, Longus sought to escalate the engagement with Hannibal, despite Scipio’s weary words of warning.   Picking a thicket sufficient to conceal part of his army, Hannibal laid his trap. He sent a contingent of Numidian horsemen across the river to draw out the Roman forces. Longus hastily took the bait. He drew up the entirety of his consular army (approximately 40,000 men: four legions and 20,000 socii allies) and advanced across the river despite the cold and driving rain.   Hannibal arranged his men, 20,000 infantry of Iberians, Celts, and Libyans, in one long line with his Numidians and war elephants on either wing. Hannibal allowed Longus’ advance guard to draw near. Once the signal was given, the Carthaginian army descended upon the Romans. It was then that Mago, Hannibal’s brother, emerged from the thicket with his own forces, attacking the Romans from behind.   Seeing their flanks crumbling, the rest of the Roman army (perhaps as much as half according to Polybius) was cut down and trampled by the Numidians and war elephants as they tried to flee back towards the river. The combined consular army of Scipio and Longus was halved before midday.   The War Reaches Italy: The Battle of Lake Trasimene The fields surrounding Lake Trasimene, July 2023. Source: Copyright Christopher Nelson.   With two victories now in hand, the Carthaginians broke camp for the winter in June 217 BCE and began their march south. Hannibal circumvented the Romans yet again by trudging through uninhabitable marsh and appearing in Etruria (modern Tuscany and Umbria). His daring maneuver worked but he lost the function of one eye to disease.   Outside the walls of Arretium (modern Arezzo), Hannibal, famous for his insight into the personalities of his Roman counterparts, knew that the new consul, Gaius Flaminius, holed up behind the walls would not be able to sit back and watch as he ravaged the countryside.   Flaminius sallied out and chased after Hannibal, who had positioned himself in the hills surrounding the town of Cortona. His troops overlooked a valley and a thin road on the banks of Lake Trasimene. This created a defile that would force opposing troops to march in a narrow column. Shrouded amongst the undulating hills, the Carthaginian army stretched the entire length of the defile, waiting for the eager Flaminius to fall into the trap.   The next morning, Flaminius came upon the defile. With the hills further shrouded by a persisting misty rain, Flaminius marched his army down the narrow road. When the bulk of the Roman army was confined within the defile, Hannibal gave the signal to attack, and “delivered an assault upon the enemy at every point at once” (Polybius).   The Roman soldiers were set upon so quickly that many did not have a chance to defend themselves. They were cut down where they stood. Others were pushed into the lake, or jumped in and began to swim, only to be dragged to the bottom by their heavy armor.   When the mist broke, a small group of Romans, who had managed to push their way out one end of the narrow passage, looked back and saw the devastation that had occurred. Over 20,000 of their comrades lay dead, including the consul Flaminius.   The Fabian Strategy   Statue of Quintus Fabius Maximus “Cunctator,” by J.B. Hagenauer, 1777. Source: Schönbrunn Palace, Vienna.   Word of Flaminius’ carelessness soon made it back to Rome. The annihilation of yet another army “threw the city into a great commotion,” according to Plutarch. In their desperation, they appointed a dictator to serve for the term of six months. The man they chose was Quintus Fabius Maximus.   Having seen the devastation Hannibal had wrought, Fabius concluded that to confront him was suicide. Instead, supply lines would be cut, foraging parties intercepted, farmsteads or other potential sources of supplies would be burned, but Hannibal was not to be engaged directly.   For Fabius, the only prudent course of action was to let the effects of disadvantageous terrain, hunger, and time slowly whittle down and break apart Hannibal’s multinational coalition. Hannibal knew that, given enough time, Fabius’ strategy could obstruct his ultimate goals. He feigned attacks on Fabius, continually trying to draw him out. But Fabius waited patiently until Hannibal finally made a mistake.   Mixing up the name of a nearby town, Hannibal marched his men into a valley surrounded on all sides by mountains. Fabius sprung into action, blocking off the pass and stationing his skirmishers on the high ground. Thinking they were completely surrounded, the Carthaginian army began to waver.   Hannibal, however, steadied his men, instructing them to tie torches to the horns of cattle. They drove the beasts of burden, at first slowly, towards the Roman lines, imitating the form and pace of marching soldiers. When the wood burned down and hit the skin of the oxen, they jolted forward, throwing themselves in an anguished panic at the Romans. While the Romans broke rank, Hannibal slipped through their grasp.   Roman Forces Divided Model of archaic Rome. Source: Museo Della Civiltà Romana, Rome.   With his men hungry and feeling vengeful, Hannibal ravaged the countryside, making certain that Fabius’ country villa remained intact, implying a secret coalition between the two.   Many Romans had had enough of the eponymous “Fabian Strategy.” They called him cowardly, “Hannibal’s pedagogue,” cunctator (the delayer), all for his stubborn refusal to attack the enemy even as the countryside burned.   Chief among the critics was his second-in-command Marcus Minucius; the magister equitum (master of horse). Contrary to Fabius’ orders, Minucius attacked the Carthaginian camp while Hannibal was away. This victory, albeit small, was lauded by the Roman Senate. Fearful of Fabius’ power to punish his subordination, the senate voted Minucius equal powers to the dictator. With the Roman forces now divided and Hannibal well aware of the animosity between the two men, he seized the initiative. Hannibal split the forces of the Romans by occupying a hill in between them.   During the night, Hannibal stashed a contingent of men behind the undulating terrain, out of sight of either Roman force. In the morning, he challenged Minucius to battle. Minucius obliged and the two forces fought savagely for sole possession of the hill. As Hannibal’s cavalry squeezed the heavy Roman infantry, the signal was given for the hidden Carthaginian contingent to emerge and hit the Roman flank. As Minucius’ forces crumbled away, Fabius, the ever-cautious commander, mustered his men and made a desperate march to save his colleague. The ever-prudent Hannibal, knowing he was outmatched, quickly withdrew.   Fabius’ quick reaction prevented a larger disaster. But it would not matter. Rome was tired of his perceived inaction. His term expired and he was maligned rather than praised for keeping the war effort afloat. The only man that seemed to see the prudence in Fabius’ strategy had just slipped through the Roman’s fingers yet again.   A New Roman Army and the Battle of Cannae Diagram of the Battle of Cannae. Source: Dickinson College, Pennsylvania.   With Fabius out of the way and a winter to regroup, in August 216 BCE the Roman war machine roared back to life. While Fabius had waged his guerilla war against Hannibal, the Senate issued a decree to muster an unprecedented eight new legions. With this massive force, the Romans sought to bring Hannibal to heel once and for all at the battle of Cannae.   For the task at hand, they assigned the two consuls, Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terentius Varro. They marched towards Hannibal’s encampment. Paullus urged caution, citing the long, flat plain in front of them. Hannibal’s Numidian cavalry would be too effective there. As was the custom, however, the command of the army when two consuls were present switched off each day. Ignoring his colleague, Varro ordered an advance. With cavalry on his flanks, Varro stacked the maniples with greater depth to take full advantage of the weight of his numerical advantage.   Hannibal, whose army made up little more than half of the Romans, countered with his Iberian and Celtic cavalry alongside the river on his left, his heavy Libyan and Celtic infantry, wearing Roman armor taken from the dead at Trebia and Trasimene, in the middle, and his Numidians on the right. Rather than a standard battle line, Hannibal arranged his men in a convex formation, the belly of the arc pointed directly at the Roman infantry.   The Darkest Day Bronze Montefortino Type Helmet similar to what the Roman soldiers would have worn in the Second Punic War, Etruscan, c. 4th-3rd century BCE. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (L.2018.51).   Under a hail of projectiles launched by his Balearic slingers, Hannibal’s cavalry slammed into their Roman counterparts on the wings. The Roman cavalry collapsed and the Carthaginians gave chase, leaving only the infantry on the field.   Varro’s massive columns marched directly at Hannibal’s crescent formation, hoping to overwhelm it with sheer numbers. As the two lines met, Hannibal’s center slowly gave ground, drawing more and more Romans into the fray. Even as their center gave ground, Hannibal’s flanks held. Varro, hoping to smash through the Celtic center and encircle the rest of Hannibal’s army, fed more men into the breach.   Hannibal’s arrangement now became concave with the Roman’s pushing so deeply into the center that the Libyans on the flanks were now behind them. As Hannibal had planned, the Libyans turned inwards and the Numidians hit the Romans in the rear and completed the encirclement.   With so many men in such a dense formation, the enveloped legions were compressed to the point that they could lift neither shield nor sword to defend themselves. For hours the Romans could only wait to be cut down or trampled. The largest army in Roman history was slowly and methodically massacred.   Not until the mechanized killing of the 20th century, would the world see such a bloody day. Polybius tells us that by the end of the day, 70,000 Romans were killed or captured. Yet another consul, Lucius Paullus, was killed in action.   In two years, since his arrival in Roman territory, Hannibal had reduced Rome’s male population by 20%. To put that in perspective, during the Great War, France lost nearly 5% of its total population in four years.   The War in Spain: A Battle of Brothers  Bust of Publius Cornelius Scipio, later to be called “Africanus,” in the Capitoline Museum, Rome. Source: Copyright Christopher Nelson.   Having failed to defeat Hannibal at the River Ticinus, Publius Cornelius Scipio and his brother Gnaeus were sent to Iberia to disrupt the base of Carthaginian power from which Hannibal had launched his invasion.   In 211 BCE, the Scipio brothers redoubled their offensive. Publius led his forces against Hannibal’s brother Mago while Gnaeus took the remaining Romans and Celtiberian mercenaries against another Hasdrubal Barca. Deceitful tribesmen and Carthaginian bribery left the two Roman armies isolated. Publius found himself ambushed, and in a daring night escape, he was slain by a javelin. Like carrions circling their prey, the three Carthaginian armies engulfed the remaining legions under Gnaeus.   Without competent leadership, the Iberian front was on the verge of collapsing. Eager to prove himself and reclaim his family’s honor, the younger Publius Cornelius Scipio, son of the now dead Publius, appeared before the Comitia Centuriata (committee of centurions) and was unanimously elected to lead. Known for saving his father’s life at Ticinus, the youth was still only in his mid-twenties. A veteran of Ticinus, Trasimene, and Trebia, the younger Publius had experience, but had seen only defeat.   The wide dispersion of the three main Carthaginian armies in Iberia led Publius to adopt a bolder plan of action. Unlike his uncle and father’s campaign, which had lasted for seven seasons, Publius sought to strike a decisive blow. He set his eyes on the Carthaginian regional capital: Carthago Nova.   Coordinating his attack with the Roman navy, Scipio launched a feint to pull the defenders away from the north wall. As Roman casualties mounted, a group of 500 soldiers waded across a lagoon at low tide and seized the undefended gatehouse.   Scipio now possessed a major logistics hub on the southern coast of Iberia. It would be a perfect stepping stone for what he had planned next.   The Sword of Rome and the Siege of Syracuse Roman Denarius portraying Marcus Claudius Marcellus, 50-49 BCE. Source: Art Institute of Chicago (Ref: 1922.4846a).     During the long reign of Hiero II of Syracuse (Sicily), the Syracusans had been a staunch ally of the Romans. Following the Roman defeats and the death of Hiero in the following year, Syracuse descended into chaos, second guessing their alliance with Rome. It was in this chaos that Marcus Claudius Marcellus, elected consul for a third time in 213 BCE, was sent to Sicily. A veteran of the First Punic War, Marcellus was an experienced statesman, soldier, and winner of Rome’s highest honor, the spolia opima.   Marcellus surrounded Syracuse, bringing the full might of Roman engineering to bear against its massive walls. Plutarch tells us that large siege towers, fastened to the decks of his warships, were sailed into the harbor. Countering Marcellus and his great machines of war was the famed philosopher and mathematician Archimedes. Plutarch reports an iron claw, wielded from the walls, plucking Roman ships from the water and large projectiles being hurled at the attackers, convincing them they were fighting “against the gods.”   The siege dragged on for months. It was not until a diplomatic ceasefire was called and the stalemate was broken. As Marcellus entered the city to parlay with the stubborn defenders, he noticed a vulnerability in the defenses. Taking advantage of the festivities of a public sacrifice, Marcellus made his move and entered the city with a small group of men.   Unaware of the Roman infiltration, no defenses were marshaled. It is said that Archimedes was killed in the middle of a particularly thorny mathematical problem. Having lived in the squalid conditions of siege for over a year, the Romans burst into the city with rapacious zeal. The city, known for its beauty, exquisite works of art, and great wealth, was summarily looted. So great was the theft and influx of Greek art into Rome that Marcellus was credited by Plutarch with teaching “the ignorant Romans to admire and honor the wonder­ful and beauti­ful productions of Greece.”   The Final Battle at Zama The Battle Between Scipio and Hannibal at Zama, by Cornelis Cort Netherlandish, after Giulio Romano Italian, c. 1550–78. Source: Metropolitan Art Museum, New York (59.570.439).     The war entered its 15th year in 203 BCE. Following his successes in Iberia, Scipio sought to end the war decisively, eying Africa. There were many in Rome who thought this was too risky, given Hannibal’s continued presence in Italy.   Scipio embarked on his plan, landing in Africa with 25,000 men. Hannibal was recalled by the Carthaginians, and the two men, having fought each other at the Ticinus River, were to meet on the plains of Zama, on Carthaginian soil, to decide the fate of the war.   At the battle of Zama, Hannibal’s force was pieced together from three separate armies. In the front, he placed his 80 war elephants and his mercenaries. Behind them were the Carthaginians and Libyans, and in the rear was his army that he brought with him from Italy. Battle-hardened and undefeated by the Romans, they were to prevent a retreat by the less experienced men.   As the two armies marched towards each other, Hannibal sent his war elephants charging at the Roman infantry. The Roman skirmishers parted, leaving gaps in their lines for the elephants to charge through. As they passed, the great beasts were inundated with projectiles, sending them into a frenzied stampede back into the Carthaginian lines.   Then, the first line of each army charged. The hastati (infantry) and the mercenaries careened into one another. Panicked by the Romans’ discipline and order, the mercenaries fled, leaving Hannibal’s Libyans to meet the oncoming threat. They pushed the Romans back before Scipio sent his principes (legionaries) into the fight. Hannibal’s third line of veterans steadied the line, but the advancing Romans proved too much. Coupled with the timely return of Massinissa, a Numidian king allied to Scipio, the Carthaginians were routed.   The Death of Hannibal Statue of Hannibal Barca, by Sebastian Slodtz, 1704 CE. Source: Louvre Museum, Paris   Following the Battle of Zuma, Carthage capitulated. But Hannibal would remain a prominent figure, serving as a sufete (Carthiginian magistrate) in 196 BCE. Despite the financial burden of Rome’s war indemnity, he was able to return a level of solvency to the state. Nevertheless, many Carthaginians remained hostile to the Barcid name.   Hannibal advocated for term limits on the judges that served in the Court of the Hundred and Four from life to one year in an attempt to break the oligarchic grip the body had on Carthage. This was seen as too drastic by those in power and he was duly exiled.   He found refuge in the court of the Anatolian Seleucid king Antiochus III, serving him in his ongoing conflict with the Romans. Following a naval defeat, he fled yet again to Bithynia, in modern day Turkey. He was received at the court of Prusias. Cornelius Nepos tells us that during a diplomatic dinner in Rome, an envoy of Prusias let it slip that the Carthaginian resided in Pontus with the king. The Romans immediately intervened, sending soldiers to surround the complex where Hannibal lived. Prusias was incapable of denying the Romans, and while they stormed his citadel, Hannibal uncorked a small bottle of poison which he always carried with him and emptied the poison into his mouth.   According to Livy, as he died, Hannibal said: “Let us relieve the Romans from the anxiety they have so long experienced, since they think it tries their patience too much to wait for an old man’s death.” Never forgetting the oath he made to his father, Hannibal, the greatest enemy of Rome, took his own life, unwilling to ever submit to the Romans.   Rome Unreachable The Meeting of Dido and Aeneas by Sir Nathaniel Dance-Holland, 1766. Source: Tate Museum, London.     After Hannibal’s victory at Cannae, the road to Rome lay open. Instead of marching on the capital of his sworn enemies, Hannibal, known for his aggressive maneuvers, paused. Stunned by this, his cavalry commander, Maharbal, remarked, “Hannibal, you know how to gain a victory; you do not know how to use it.”   However, Hannibal knew the truth. He could not take the city. No matter how many consuls he killed in the field, there would always be another. Then there were the walls of Rome itself, too formidable for his small, albeit experienced, and undersupplied army.   Chastised by his fellow Romans, Quintus Fabius had been right. He knew the advantages of fighting a war on your own soil would be too much for the Carthaginian, as brilliant as he was. It would not be until the discovery of gunpowder that the walls of the Roman capital would finally fall.   The Romans had a history of stubbornly refusing to give in to external threats. After their disastrous defeat at the Caudine Forks in 321 BCE, the Romans spurned peace talks with the Samnites and war would rage for two decades. In the third century BCE, the fatiguing victories of the invader Pyrrhus of Epirus would not coax the Romans to the bargaining table. Pyrrhus left the Italian peninsula exhausted. After watching multiple fleets sink to the bottom of the sea in the First Punic War, the Romans raised yet more and more ships. In Rome’s darkest moments, when Hannibal approached the very gates of the city, they did not yield. It was Roman conviction and stubbornness that saw them through to victory.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
42 w

Third Punic War: Carthage Must Be Destroyed
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Third Punic War: Carthage Must Be Destroyed

  While Rome won the Second Punic War, it struck a fundamental blow to Rome’s martial manpower and military resolve. The Republic was haunted by the ghosts of Carthage and Hannibal’s campaign on Italian soil. The Romans would initiate the Third Punic War to finally put an end to the conflict between the two Mediterranean superpowers.   Balance of Power Map of Carthaginian and Roman territory on the eve of the Third Punic War. Source: Dickinson College, Pennsylvania.   The Punic Wars began in 264 BCE. At that time, Rome had yet to send a legion outside the confines of the Italian Peninsula. In contrast, Carthage’s commercial influence stretched from the Levantine Coast to the Straits of Gibraltar, and beyond if we are to believe the reports of an explorer named Hanno, skirting the Atlantic Coast of West Africa. The Carthaginians regularly mustered multitudinous armies (as many as 300,000 men according to the dubious tallying of the Greek historian Diodorus Siculus) and sent them overseas to combat the rival power of Syracuse in Sicily.   But that was then. After the dust of the Second Punic War (218-201 BCE) had settled, Carthage was a shell of its former self. Hannibal’s defeat at Zama and the following peace treaty robbed the Carthaginians of all their overseas holdings and saddled them with an indemnity that was to be remitted over the course of the next 50 years.   Rome, meanwhile, was ascendant. After their pyrrhic victory over Hannibal, they would turn to the east, scoring stunning victories over the Diadochi, the successor kingdoms of Alexander the Great. First, Macedon was subdued by Lucius Aemilius Paullus, the son of the consul Paullus who fell at Cannae. Next, was the Seleucids. The Battle of Magnesia in 188 BCE against the Seleucid dynasty cemented the superiority of Rome’s legions over the traditional Macedonian phalanx. The Treaty of Apamea was signed shortly thereafter expelling Alexander’s successors from Europe and extending Rome’s political sphere into Asia Minor (modern Turkey).   In less than a century, the two Mediterranean powers had completely swapped fortunes. Rome, once confined by rival powers within the center of the Italian Peninsula, was now sending legions into Syria. Carthage, once the master of “the Middle Sea,” was now relegated to the confines of her own walls, on a small North African peninsula.   Carthage Must Be Destroyed Patrizio Torlonia bust of a man, sometimes attributed as Cato the Elder, c. 80 BCE. Source: Torlonia Collection, Italy. Source: Wikimedia Commons.   In 153 BCE, the Roman statesman Cato the Elder was sent to arbitrate a dispute between the Carthaginians and the Numidian king Massinissa, who helped Rome in the final battle of the Second Punic War.   A veteran of the Second Punic War, Cato had seen firsthand the horrors of Hannibal’s generalship. However, upon visiting Carthage, to his amazement, he did not find a dilapidated metropolis crippled by two major defeats as he expected, but a vibrant, flourishing city. Not only was Carthage able to finally pay off the war indemnity to Rome in 151 BCE, but commerce flourished and their army was rebuilt.   Cato returned to Rome, warning of a resurgent Carthage by ending every speech he made, related in subject matter or not, by exhorting the Romans to destroy their old rival once and for all: “Carthago delenda est” (Carthage must be destroyed).   Carto, almost certainly, was not alone in his sentiment. During the conflict, Hannibal culled one-fifth of the entire adult male population of Italy. There would have been few in Rome who would have been unaffected by his devastating campaign. Decades after his death, Hannibal’s legacy still haunted the Romans.   Citing passages from the treaty of 201 BCE, the Romans used the conflict with the Numidians to censure their old foes. It should not be seen as a coincidence that the cessation of the Carthaginian debt payments immediately preceded Rome’s hawkishness.   In typical Carthaginian fashion, the generals who had taken part in the conflict with Numidia were condemned to death. But this was not enough to expiate their sins in the eyes of the Romans. Sending a delegation to Africa, the Romans offered harsh terms to the Carthaginians to stop the escalating conflict. Knowing their terms, including the abandonment of Carthage, would be unacceptable, Rome prepared for war. Fear propelled them more than any real transgressions on the part of the Carthaginians.   The Invasion of Africa (149 BCE) Scene 79 from Trajan’s Column showing the transportation of Roman soldiers to Dacia by boat, Rome, c. 106-113 CE. Source: Trajan’s Column in Rome.   The First Punic War was largely fought on the waves. The Second Punic War was decided by large, decisive battles in the field. The Third Punic War was little more than a single, drawn-out siege.   Carthage’s overseas empire had been confiscated. There was no threat of an overland invasion from Spain. Their navy had been disbanded. Punic sails would not be seen harrying Roman ships off the coast of Italy. The army that the Carthaginians could muster was commanded by a general named Hasdrubal and it was used primarily for the defense of the city.   According to the Greek historian Appian of Alexandria, Rome was able to field a massive expeditionary force, which it dispatched to Africa. His estimate of 80,000 men ferried on 150 ships is likely an exaggeration, but if the real figure was even half that, it was a significantly larger force than what Scipio Africanus had with him at Zama during the Second Punic War. There was an eagerness and zeal amongst the population to join this expeditionary force and see the completion of its mission.   The fate of Carthage depended on its walls. Three lines of defense ringed the city, anchored by a wall 30 feet wide and 60 feet tall. It was, in and of itself, a barracks, capable of housing 20,000 soldiers and stables of horses and war elephants. The seaward walls on the peninsula had a single wall connecting with the famous circular harbor in the southeastern corner. Towering over it was the Byrsa, the citadel of Carthage, and the spot on which, according to legend, Carthage’s mythic founder, Dido, first cut the oxhide to lay claim to her dominions.   The Siege of Carthage and the Rise of Scipio A Bronze Statue of a Hellenistic Prince, sometimes attributed to be Scipio Aemilianus, Rome, c. 2nd century BCE. Source: Museo Palazzo Massimo alla Terme, Rome.   Under constant harassment from the Carthaginians and their swift cavalry, the Romans moved against the formidable walls, constructing battering rams that required 6,000 men each to operate, and filling in lakes to allow for the construction of ramps. Fighting for their survival, the Carthaginians sallied out to destroy the Roman’s engines.   The fighting was vicious, but the commendable actions of a military tribune salvaged the day. His name was Scipio Aemilianus. The son of Lucius Aemilius Paullus, the conqueror of Macedon, and grandson of the consul killed at Cannae, he was adopted by the Scipio family, officially becoming the grandson of Scipio Africanus. He rose quickly through the ranks. The lex Villia annalis, the law requiring a minimum age for senior magistracies, was set aside for his election as consul in Rome.   Scipio returned to Carthage in 147 BCE to find the Roman war effort sputtering. Incompetence among the commanders and inexperience amongst the legions had drawn out the conflict. The admiral Mancinus had maintained the blockade of the city. Upon Scipio’s arrival, he consolidated his army for a major assault. Finding an abandoned tower, Scipio’s men scaled the facade and stormed the rampart. The Romans fought their way onto the walls before gaining control of a gate. The rest of Scipio’s army poured into the city, but darkness and unfamiliarity with the terrain led Scipio to ultimately withdraw his forces out of fear of a counterattack.   Hasdrubal, equally afraid of defections, marched Roman prisoners out onto the wall and tortured them to death in full view of the Roman camp. Scipio would not forget this Carthaginian cruelty.   The Last Voyage of the Carthaginian Empire  Remnants of the Marsala Shipwreck, a Punic naval ship from the 3rd century BCE. Source: Museo Archeologico Regionale Lilibeo, Italy.   Scipio knew the siege would continue as long as Carthage had access to the sea through their famed circular harbor. Setting his soldiers to work, they dug ditches and built earthenworks under the constant harassment of projectiles.   The isthmus, a narrow strip of land dominating the entrance to the harbor and abutting the weaker seaward walls, was enveloped by Roman engineering. A mole was constructed across the harbor, constricting Carthage’s last line of resupply. It was as much a symbolic action as it was a strategic one. Carthage was now cut off from the very waves that had sustained her people for over six centuries.   The populace predictably panicked. Under the veil of darkness, men, women, and children set to work cutting a new channel to the sea and constructing a new, makeshift fleet. Much to the surprise of the Romans, they awoke to see a flotilla of fifty Carthaginian ships floating out to sea. It would be the last fleet the Carthaginian Empire would ever put to sail.   Demonstrating their continued naval prowess, the Carthaginian ships fought adeptly, harassing the larger Roman ships. For hours they were locked into a stalemate. But as the detritus from the wrecked ships began to accumulate, the Carthaginians were cut off from retreating into their own harbor. With nowhere left to go, the Carthaginians scrambled to pull their ships to shore while many were rammed by the larger Roman ships or dashed against the rocks.   Cut off from all access to the sea, the inhabitants of Carthage would soon starve. But for all the martial skills that Scipio possessed, he lacked the patience to watch Rome’s old enemy wither away. He would deliver the final blow himself.   The Final Assault Mosaic from the Dominus Julius, a Roman village in Carthage, c. 5th century CE. Source: National Bardo Museum, Tunisia. Source: Wikimedia Commons.   From their position on the newly constructed mole, the Romans bombarded Carthage’s seaward walls with their siege engines. Yet unbroken by their besiegers, many Carthaginians waded naked through the waters at night, bearing unlit torches. They swam up to the quay where Scipio’s machines were positioned. Emerging from the water, they lit their torches, immediately revealing their position in the dark night. They were fired upon and killed with barbed arrows and spears, but the siege engines went up in flames.   Despite the setback, Scipio, leading the cavalry in person, pushed the Carthaginians back. After taking the adjoining town of Nepheris, Scipio planned his attack on the Byrsa, the ancient citadel of Carthage.   Eschewing their siege engines, the Romans set about taking the city center block by block. Buildings, six stories tall, served as platforms from which the defenders harassed the Romans with projectiles. Through brutal urban warfare, the Romans seized each building one by one, laying boards from one roof to the next to cross. Remembering Hasdrubal’s earlier cruelty, Scipio ordered the remaining buildings be set alight, killing their occupants and turning the streets to rubble.   For six days the city burned in this manner. From the rubble of what remained, 50,000 men and women appeared before Scipio bearing olive branches from the Temple of Aesculapius. He granted the people clemency while Hasdrubal and his family remained inside the temple. Appian tells us that Hasdrubal’s wife then set the temple on fire and killed her own children to prevent them from falling into the hands of the Romans.   The End of the Old World  Scipio beweent Carthago, by Ludwig Gottlieb Portman, after Jacobus Buys, 1797. Source: Rijksmuseum, Netherlands (RP-P-1905-2181).   Looting gripped the city as Scipio allowed his soldiers to take what they had earned, according to Roman custom. As the Byrsa Hill and the famed Temple of Aesculapius burned, Polybius, the Greek historian and slave of the Aemilianus family, is said to have approached his master, who gazed upon the flames. He asked the victorious general why he shed tears. Scipio answered him, quoting the following lines from Homer’s Iliad:   The day shall come in which our sacred Troy And Priam, and the people over whom Spear-bearing Priam rules, shall perish all   Scipio did not cry for the Carthaginians. But as he watched the last vestiges of a once great empire descend into ruin, he could not help but be gripped with anxiety and dread that one day the same fate would befall his beloved Rome.   For now, however, Rome ushered in a new age. The same year (146 BCE) that Carthage fell, also saw the destruction of Corinth, the last free city of the Achaean League. After decades of indirect rule through puppet rulers, Rome now destroyed any semblance of Greek freedom. Greece, once the home of democracy, was subsumed by Roman hegemony.   For centuries the rivalry between the Carthaginians and the Greek world defined the central and western Mediterranean. Now, they both bowed to Roman might. The Mediterranean had always been connected by its trade routes, but now the sea, once home to many different cultures and languages, was quickly becoming Roman. It was now mare nostrum (“our sea”).   The Legacy of Carthage The Decline of the Carthaginian Empire, by J.M.W Turner, c. 1817. Source: Tate Museum, London (N00499).   Contrary to some stories of Carthage’s fall, the fields were not sown with salt. The Romans were retributive but practical. While much of the Carthaginian fingerprint (e.g. literature, art, and architecture) was erased, Carthage was a supremely positioned node on a larger commercial network. Completely destroying its infrastructure would have required significant investment to rebuild.   The new Roman city, lying near the modern capital of Tunis, served as the capital of Rome’s African province. The agricultural infrastructure in the hinterland built by the Carthaginians in the 5th century BCE fed the ever-growing city of Rome as it became more reliant on its provinces.   The province flourished and North Africa would become a great pipeline of generals, politicians, and thinkers. The future Roman emperor Septimius Severus was born in Leptis Magna (modern Libya). Two of the great early Christian thinkers Tertullian and St. Augustine were born in Carthage and Numidia respectively. There is some archaeological evidence that certain Carthaginian religious practices would persist into the Christian period and in the deserts of North Africa. But the Carthaginian Empire as antiquity knew it would never rise again.   Despite this, their story continues to be told. In the 19th century, as Napoleonic France and the British Empire were locked in a titanic struggle of their own, Napoleon would refer to the British as the “Carthaginians,” referencing their similar reliance on naval strength.   The Tunisians have not forgotten their own history either. If one were to find themselves in a Tunisian market today, they may pay with a five dinar note featuring the tragic yet heroic gaze of Hannibal Barca. It is a rather innocuous reference to antiquity and one missed by many. But how different would things be if Hannibal had proved to be successful?   The Punic Wars Motya Charioteer, Siculo-Punic statue, c. 5th century BCE. Source: Museo Giuseppe Whitaker, Italy. Source: Wikimedia Commons.   A letter from the Mamertines, a group of Italian mercenaries, to both the Romans and the Carthaginians would unwittingly draw them into a conflict that would span three wars and over a hundred years.   What the First Punic War and the First World War, more than two millennia later, have in common is that they both ended with a “Carthaginian peace” with punitive pecuniary measures that would make future conflict all the more likely, rather than preventing it.   The Carthaginians were never able to effectively use their naval advantage to deal with Rome’s greater military manpower. In contrast, historian Lawerence James attributed Britain’s success in the 18th and 19th centuries to William Pitt’s strategy of the “corrective use of seapower.” Aided by booming overseas trade, the British strangled France’s overseas possessions and relegated France’s numerically superior army to the continent where the British bogged them down by funding other nations to fight a ground war.   The upstart Romans had shown a willingness to learn, adapt, and innovate. When the First Punic War broke out, they did not have a navy. By the end, Roman ships dominated the Mediterranean. When Hannibal crushed every army put before him, Fabius Maximus broke with tradition and effectuated a guerilla war, buying the Romans much-needed time.   Carthage, on the other hand, was fractious. Their society was fraught with squabbling families vying for influence. Hannibal’s campaigns were grossly underfunded and many other less successful generals were executed by their own state rather than falling to a Roman blade.   In war, the Carthaginians sought to maintain the commercial status quo. The Roman endgame was total subjugation. Saying nothing of the moral implications, in this struggle, the stronger convictions won.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
42 w

Can This Person Really Be Trusted? –  Encouragement for Today – October 15, 2024
Favicon 
www.godupdates.com

Can This Person Really Be Trusted? –  Encouragement for Today – October 15, 2024

October 15, 2024 Can This Person Really Be Trusted?LYSA TERKEURST Lee en español "Whether you turn to the right or to the left, your ears will hear a voice behind you, saying, ‘This is the way; walk in it.'" Isaiah 30:21 (NIV) "Can I trust this person?" is a big question. The more we feel pressured, internally or externally, to give a definitive answer, the riskier the outcome seems. How can I know that someone who has broken my trust is now in a place to be responsible with my trust? It will take time. The bigger the betrayal, the longer the repair will take. How can I know if a new person in my life is trustworthy? That will also take time. How do I know I can trust myself to properly discern trustworthiness when I've gotten it wrong before or I’ve been made to feel "crazy" for asking questions when things didn't make sense? Again, it will all take time. But time itself isn't enough. Building or rebuilding trust requires a combination of three things: Time. Believable behavior. A track record of trustworthiness. Taking baby steps allows for all three things to happen. For me, I knew if I was going to be able to reengage with people who had broken my trust in the past, or if I was going to consider a new relationship, it wasn't going to happen overnight. I also knew if I was going to learn to trust in my ability to have wise discernment and reestablish my confidence in hearing from the Lord, it would need to happen slowly. Isaiah 30:19-21 has been such a comfort for me as I've started taking baby steps toward trust: "People of Zion, who live in Jerusalem, you will weep no more. How gracious he will be when you cry for help! As soon as he hears, he will answer you. Although the Lord gives you the bread of adversity and the water of affliction, your teachers will be hidden no more; with your own eyes you will see them. Whether you turn to the right or to the left, your ears will hear a voice behind you, saying, ‘This is the way; walk in it'" (NIV). The principle of these verses is that God does respond to us when we cry out to Him. The "right" and "left" mentioned mean that as long as we stay within the will and command of God, we're headed in His direction, and we're going to hear Him. He will guide us. In other words, the goal is to live lives of congruity where our lives line up with God's Word. But what about the slowness of this whole trust process? What about how painful it can be to wait to see if someone is trustworthy? The historical context of these verses gives me great comfort in the face of these understandable questions. Isaiah was addressing the Israelites in a season of waiting. Waiting can be lonely, and at times we can feel defeated. Waiting can also make us feel incredibly anxious when there are so many unknowns. But remember this: Whenever we are waiting on God, we are actually waiting with God. The fact that the Teacher is behind us brings to mind the nearness of God. When I asked my friend Dr. Joel Muddamalle about these verses, he said, "The attentive nature of the follower of God who desires to be led by God is important here. The New Testament develops this further with the concept of the Spirit-filled life of believers. We are led by the Holy Spirit based not on our own ambition but the vision and direction of God." (See Galatians 5:16-25 and John 16:13.) What if we get it wrong by turning left or right outside of God's will? When this takes place, God will call out and get us back on track. One of the things often overlooked in today's key verse is the fact that Isaiah didn't expect perfection. He assumed there would be moments of error, times when we would go astray - but as long as our hearts are willing to receive correction, we can be sure God will redirect us. Friend, whatever it looks like for you to take baby steps toward building or rebuilding trust, I pray you cling to the God who is right there with you. Lord, You know my desire to have close relationships based on truth and goodness. You also see my tendency, because of what I've been through, to isolate from the people around me when things look scary and unknown. Help me step forward as the healed version of myself - the one You're making me into. This feels messy and unpredictable, but I know I can trust You and the ways You are working on me and for me. In Jesus' Name, Amen. OUR FAVORITE THINGS Broken trust complicates every bit of the parts of love that should be comforting. Maybe a friend let you down. A family member betrayed you. A spouse cheated on you. A leader deceived you. And now you're wondering: If God let all of this happen, can He even be trusted? Lysa TerKeurst deeply understands. She's learned the truth that having your trust broken can be life-altering, but it doesn't have to be life-ruining. Start taking baby steps of trust with Lysa in the pages of her new book, I Want to Trust You, but I Don’t: Moving Forward When You’re Skeptical of Others, Afraid of What God Will Allow, and Doubtful of Your Own Discernment. Buy now! ENGAGE Find real-life encouragement when you connect with Lysa TerKeurst here on Instagram. FOR DEEPER STUDY John 10:27-28, "My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand" (NIV). How does knowing Jesus is with you on your journey bring you comfort? What do you hear His voice saying today? We'd love to hear from you! Share your thoughts in the comments. © 2024 by Lysa TerKeurst. All rights reserved. Proverbs 31 MinistriesP.O. Box 3189 Matthews, NC 28106 www.Proverbs31.org The post Can This Person Really Be Trusted? –  Encouragement for Today – October 15, 2024 appeared first on GodUpdates.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 8145 out of 56667
  • 8141
  • 8142
  • 8143
  • 8144
  • 8145
  • 8146
  • 8147
  • 8148
  • 8149
  • 8150
  • 8151
  • 8152
  • 8153
  • 8154
  • 8155
  • 8156
  • 8157
  • 8158
  • 8159
  • 8160

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund