CBS Saturday Morning’s has recently taken it upon itself to deliver gushing interviews of liberal heroes. First there was actress Jane Fonda, then there was Clinton strategist James Carville. This Saturday it was author Margaret Atwood’s turn, and co-host Michelle Miller was there to help her affirm the idea that the conservative-imposed dystopia she wrote about in The Handmaid’s Tale is no longer a work of fiction. Miller, who also conducted the Carville interview and whose husband is the former Democratic mayor of New Orleans and current president of the National Urban League, declared in a voiceover that the book “struck a chord after the 2016 election and a promise to end abortion rights. Although written in the era of another Republican president, Ronald Reagan.”     The premise behind The Handmaid’s Tale is that America has fallen into dystopia, and women have become enslaved and solely exist to get pregnant and have children. It is quite ridiculous to pretend that describes America today, but Atwood claimed it does, “It seemed less of a possibility then certainly to some readers and some reviewers, who said, ‘Don't be silly, this would never happen in the United States.’ And now, they're saying, ‘This should not be an instruction manual.’” Miller played along, “What is that for you to be witnessing?” and Atwood replied, “You know, I would rather have been wrong, given the choice.” The duo then moved into how Atwood’s parents shaped her career, with her claiming their scientific background has led her to be “so picky about particulars.” Except for the particular that life begins at conception. That one gets extrapolated into a wild allegation that a GOP or pro-life-governed America enslaves women. Still, Miller asked, “Is part of your, I don't know if it's drive or mission –“ Atwood finished Miller’s sentence with “compulsion,” which Miller agreed was appropriate. Atwood then continued, “Well, I think I'm interested in the difference between what people say and what they do. I knew a lot of people who had escaped from Europe for one reason or another, so I was very interested in human rights.” Of all the reasons people fled fascism and communism, the “right” to kill babies was not among them. Here is a transcript for the December 7 show: CBS Saturday Morning 12/7/2024 9:04 PM ET MICHELLE MILLER: It struck a chord after the 2016 election and a promise to end abortion rights. Although written in the era of another Republican president, Ronald Reagan. ATWOOD: It seemed less of a possibility then certainly to some readers and some reviewers, who said, “Don't be silly, this would never happen in the United States.” And now, they're saying, “This should not be an instruction manual.” MILLER: What is that for you to be witnessing? ATWOOD: You know, I would rather have been wrong, given the choice. MILLER: Atwood leans on the lessons of history. These are different times we're living in. ATWOOD: They're very different times, but all times have been different from what came before. What you do is surf the wave, do not despair, try to have a clear-eyed view of what is going on, a return to civilized speech is in order, and the ability to listen to what other people are saying and understand, perhaps, why they are saying it. MILLER: A research skill she learned from her parents, both scientists, who raised her in the outdoors of Ontario. ATWOOD: I therefore grew up more with the biologists than with any kind of writer. And that's why I'm so picky about particulars. MILLER: That's why you're so specific about getting things right. ATWOOD: That's a very nice way of putting it. MILLER: Is part of your, I don't know if it's drive or mission – ATWOOD: Compulsion. MILLER: Compulsion? ATWOOD: Well, I think I'm interested in the difference between what people say and what they do. I knew a lot of people who had escaped from Europe for one reason or another, so I was very interested in human rights. MILLER: We spoke to Atwood twice, in New York before the U.S. Election, and in Toronto the day after. So, what do you make of our latest news? She said she was certain of a different outcome. ATWOOD: I'm going to get a lot of inbounds going, boohoo, boohoo, boohoo, and I'm going to say, this is not the end of the world.  

Now that Donald Trump has successfully mounted his political comeback and is set to become the 47th president of the United States, we can finally look forward to seeing how he’ll handle his long list of agenda items for his upcoming administration: inflation, immigration, energy, crime.He’s got his hands full.Both Israel and Turkey are aligned when it comes to sending money and arms to Azerbaijan for the express purpose of whittling the already-tiny Republic of Armenia down to nothing.But for now, let’s focus on his foreign policy — particularly how he’s going to tackle the increasingly complicated situation developing in Israel and the rest of the Middle East.Good guys vs. bad guysTrump has come out firmly in support of Israel in the state’s crusade against Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and the rest of Iran’s proxy terrorist network. But the rhetoric that’s come from both Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu oversimplifies the situation.America and Israel are the good guys.Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah are the bad guys.That’s been the framing of the situation from GOP establishmentarians. Simple, yet effective.But it’s nowhere near as simple as that, and Trump’s recent moves have actually complicated his commitment to that framing as well.You see, the Middle East is, in reality, a smorgasbord of shifting, overlapping, crisscrossing alliances. And that’s because there is so much ethnic and religious diversity within this pocket of the world.No Muslim monolithContrary to common Western perception, the Middle East is not one big, brown, Muslim monolith. The Turks are not the Sunni Arabs, who aren’t the Shiite Persians, who aren’t the Christian Armenians, who aren’t the somewhat secular, somewhat Islamic Azeris, who aren’t the Maronite Lebanese, who aren’t the Coptic Egyptians. Each one of these groups vary drastically from one another in ethnicity, culture, and religion. And therefore, there’s no clear-cut demarcation in the Middle East when it comes to political alliances. Or at least, there’s not a simple “good guys vs. bad guys” heuristic that can be used to assess the situation.And yet, that’s the framing American foreign policy and media sticks with: "The Middle East is full of Muslim bad guys (who are all the same), and we need to protect the lone Judeo-Christian oasis of democracy in the Middle East."Our once and future president did something recently that slightly undermined the legitimacy of that framing.Trump gets Armenia-pilledIn the days leading up to his election, Trump announced his commitment to aiding Christians in the Middle East who had been victims of Islamic persecution. Specifically, he was referring to the 120,000 Armenians who had been ethnically cleansed from their historic homeland of Artsakh by Azerbaijan. He even went so far as calling the patriarch of the Armenian Apostolic Church, his holiness Aram I, about mobilizing an Armenian restoration of Artsakh.From where I’m sitting, this is a clear result of Trump having surrounded himself with advisors like Robert F Kennedy Jr., Vivek Ramaswamy, and Tulsi Gabbard, all of whom have all made statements signaling their support for Armenia against its various regional antagonists. But the simple act of signaling a commitment to aiding the Christian Armenians actually creates a flurry of complications for the Trump administration.And it all has to do with the love triangle between the U.S., Israel, and Turkey.Aiding AzerbaijanAs the entire world knows, Israel launched a war in Gaza after the brutal October 7 attacks by Hamas. What much of the world doesn’t know is that at the time of the attacks, Israel was already embroiled in a different conflict, aiding (along with the U.S. State Department) in its ethnic cleansing campaign against the Armenian enclave of Artsakh. And just one week after the October 7 attacks, a shipment of arms left Tel Aviv headed toward Baku, Azerbaijan.And Israel has not relented. In the midst of all the bombs Israel has dropped on both Gaza and Lebanon, it (along with Turkey) continues to send state-of-the-art weaponry to Azerbaijan, most recently on September 24.If you’ve kept up with the news, you also know that there’s been a fair bit of saber-rattling between Turkey and Israel, as Turkish President Erdogan has been raising tensions with Israel for its offensive against Hamas, recently going so far as hailing the ICC decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli leaders as “courageous” and hosting Hamas in Turkey after the terrorist group was booted from Qatar.It certainly seems like the Islamic Turks are egging on a war with Israel from the outside.But how much of this is theater?After all, Israel relies on Turkey and Azerbaijan for 40% of its oil via the BTC Pipeline (which begins in Baku and ends in Ceyhan, Turkey). And, as I already mentioned, both Israel and Turkey are aligned when it comes to sending money and arms to Azerbaijan for the express purpose of whittling the already-tiny Republic of Armenia down to nothing.But that still doesn’t cover the total extent of Israel’s antagonistic relationship with Armenians.Jerusalem land-grab?You see, the state of Israel isn’t just home to Jews and Muslims. It’s home to about 187,000 Christians, some 5,000 of whom are Armenian. In Jerusalem, the Old City has historically been divided into four quarters: the Christian quarter, Jewish quarter, Muslim quarter, and the Armenian quarter. While this Armenian community dates back to the 4th century, it has recently found itself under siege by a shadowy Israeli corporation called Xana Capital. In dispute is the "Cow's Garden," the last large, open space in Jerusalem's Old City. In 2021, the Armenian patriarchate agreed to a secret 98-year lease of the land — which comprises 25% of the Armenian quarter, to a Jewish-Australian developer. Calling the lease illegal, the community has been fighting to invalidate it in court. Meanwhile, the Grayzone reports that Xana Capital has employed Israeli settlers to intimidate Armenians into vacating the land.The point I’m making is that the framing of the Israel-Palestine conflict since the 10/7 attacks has been that Israel has been in a fight for its survival against the bloodthirsty Muslims and therefore needs as much aid and support from the U.S. as it can muster. But there's one glaring flaw in that narrative: Israel’s direct involvement in the downfall of the Armenian state and diaspora. To recap: Israel has been sending arms to Azerbaijan, before, during, and after October 7.Israel is currently confiscating the historic Armenian quarter of Jerusalem.All of this is happening in the midst of its crusade against Hamas and Hezbollah.My question is: When is the United States going to prioritize Christians in the Middle East priority over the other two Abrahamic faiths? We’re a Christian country, right?Help wantedThis is why Trump’s pre-election commitments to Christians in the Middle East is a complicated matter. It’s not as simple as “Muslims bad, Israel good.”As I mentioned, Trump seems to be stacking his cabinet with pro-Armenia advocates (RFK Jr., Vivek, Tulsi, even Marco Rubio). But he’s also got plenty of pro-Israel people (Elise Stefanik, Kristi Noem, Lee Zeldin, Mike Huckabee, Susie Wiles, Pete Hegseth, and, yes, even Marco Rubio) in the mix. Not to mention the pro-Turkey Dr. Oz as head of Medicare and Medicaid.So for now, it looks like it’ll be a bumpy ride.In a post-election interview with Tucker Carlson, RFK, Jr. recounted the time he witnessed Trump draw from memory an accurate map of the Middle East, including troop strength of each country. It’s apparent from this one exchange that Trump has a sharp understanding of the geopolitical and strategic military dynamics of the Middle East.This means he also knows that stability in the region can never be taken for granted. I would urge him to look at the movements happening between Israel, Turkey, and Azerbaijan and take stock of the Pan-Turanic vision being cooked up by these parties.If he’s serious about helping the Christians of the Middle East, there’s no getting around it.

It’s the Christmas season, and with it comes new Christmas movies. One of those supposedly kid-friendly films is called “Dear Santa” — which stars Jack Black as Satan. And the latter should come as no surprise, as Jack Black has been incredibly outspoken over the past few years regarding his progressive politics and support for Kamala Harris. In the film, his character is summoned by a dyslexic 6th-grader named Liam who had accidentally written “Satan” instead of “Santa” on a letter. Satan then attempts to get Liam to sell his soul for a few granted wishes. Liam then mistakes Satan for the actual Santa Claus and is told that any three wishes he wants will be granted — but the cost is spending eternity in hell. The child reportedly says in the film, “Just because Satan’s come into my life doesn’t mean I worship him now. Meeting Satan may have been the best thing that ever happened to me.” Allie Beth Stuckey of “Relatable” is absolutely disturbed. “What is it about children and demonic ideologies and witchcraft that so many progressives and Hollywood seem to love?” Stuckey comments, adding, “I know there is a dark history there.” “Children are always the un-consenting subjects of progressive social experiments. Satan has always had it out for children. He loves to prey upon children, that’s why there is such a sweet and ironic and beautiful twist to Jesus coming to Earth as a baby and being the one to crush Satan’s head,” she continues. The film attempts to depict Satan, who brings Liam’s brother back from the dead, as having “occasional good will.” “This is a horrible, horrifying message that you should not flirt with at all. You should not even allow your teenagers to watch something like this. It would get them excited about trying to communicate with Satan,” Stuckey says, adding, “I can not think of a worse message to convey to anyone — in particular, children.” Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

After players encountered plenty of issues with the first few Throne and Liberty Arch Bosses, Amazon is finally making up for it. For a limited time, you'll be able to encounter even more Arch Bosses and be in with more of a chance of grabbing their loot. Since launch both the Arch Bosses have been spoiled by server disconnects, broken loot drops, and a plethora of problems. That's why Amazon is increasing how often you can fight the Arch Bosses for a limited time. But don't worry, they won't be leaving for a short while yet. Continue reading Throne and Liberty Arch Bosses will appear more often to make up for server woes MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best MMORPGs, Throne and Liberty codes, Throne and Liberty weapons

Buck Sexton Lists What the WH Would Like Us to Believe Nobody Else Would Have Been Prosecuted For

You Tell 'Em, Lefty! Based Phil Mickelson Speaks Out in Defense of Daniel Penny's Heroism

The gaming industry is filled with long-running JRPG franchises. Many of these tell sequential stories as part of the same saga, while others offer standalone adventures in each entry.

Fat and Sick: Americans Are Dying Younger Than in at Least 50 Other Countries

New York City Mayor Eric Adams draws parallels between his legal troubles and Hunter Biden’s pardon, signaling a potential shift towards Trump’s ideology amidst accusations of bribery and fraud. At…

One of my favorite pastimes here at PJ Media is poking fun at New York Times columnist Paul Krugman. The man has made a career out of being spectacularly wrong, time and again, and pointing it out is…