YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Jobs Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Jobs

History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

The Origins of the Republican Party: A Comprehensive Guide
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

The Origins of the Republican Party: A Comprehensive Guide

  The Republican Party was created in 1854 out of a coalition of anti-slavery activists, former Whigs, Free Soilers, and Northern Democrats who opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the expansion of slavery into Western territories. While it did not win its first attempt at the presidential election in 1856, its success in 1860 would make history—for good and bad reasons.   Antebellum America The Family of Slaves at the Gaines’ House, photo by G.H. Houghton, 1862. Source: Library of Congress   The period in the United States history between the War of 1812 and the start of the Civil War was one of tumultuous politics and sectionalist divide over the social and economic implications of slavery. While the North had become industrialized on the backs of free labor, the South continued relying on slavery to drive its agricultural economy.   While the institution existed in the United States since its inception, by the 1820s, some states, particularly in the North, began to pass emancipation laws. At the same time, the South’s dependence on slavery only deepened with the invention of the cotton gin in 1793, and hence, so did pro-slavery arguments.   The ardent supporters of the institution now faced a growing abolitionist movement out of the North, advocating for the immediate end of slavery. The surge of westward expansion further exacerbated the North and South divisions and the pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. Passed in 1820, the Missouri Compromise temporarily quelled the rising tensions when it maintained the balance between slave and free states and established a line of latitude of 36°30′ north within the western lands of the former Louisiana Purchase, above which slavery would be prohibited.   The compromise was later amended through the Compromise of 1850 when the Western frontier extended to the Pacific Ocean following the acquisition of new land after the Mexican-American War. By then, the nation’s political landscape was dominated by two political parties, the Democrats and the Whigs. While the former supported the Southern interests, the latter’s division on the issue according to geographical lines ultimately led to the party’s downfall.   Kansas-Nebraska Act and a New Coalition Reynolds’s Political Map of the United States (1856) shows free and slave states and populations. Source: Library of Congress   The real issue came to a head in 1854 with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, proposed by Senator Stephen A. Douglass. This act allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery through popular sovereignty. The delicate balance maintained by the 1820 Missouri Compromise was no more, and the stage was set for the emergence of a new political party.   The outraged Northerners were now afraid that the expansion of slavery, the very thing they had tried to prevent in 1820, would now spread into new territories. Even the more moderate anti-slavery proponents, who only viewed the institution on economic terms and not moral, saw the potential of its spread nationwide, undermining free labor and the ideals of liberty and equality.   In response to the violence, the newspapers dubbed “Bleeding Kansas,” where pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the region to influence the outcome of its first election called to decide the question of slavery within its territory, the social polarization finally entered the political arena.   Pointing to the inadequacy of both the Whig and Democratic Party’s inability to address the pressing issues tearing the nation apart, a new political coalition took shape. It was composed of a diverse array of groups, including the anti-slavery activists for the abolition of slavery, former Northern industrialist Whigs escaping the now-defunct party, and Free Soilers calling for the prevention of slavery’s expansion into western territories. Together with Northern Democrats, who were increasingly at odds with their Southern constituents, the coalition merged into a new political party: the Republicans.   The Republican Party Republican mascot, elephant Judy, taken in 1911. Source: Library of Congress   The Republican Party became a reality on March 20, 1854, in Ripon, Wisconsin, bringing together all those in opposition to not only the Kansas-Nebraska Act but also the expansion of slavery. Chosen for evoking the American Revolution and Thomas Jefferson’s ideal of liberty as expressed in the Declaration of Independence, the name “Republican” came to represent the new coalition’s opposition to the Democratic Party’s pro-South agenda through its commitment to the principles of free labor, individual rights, and equality.   While the party’s platform promoted economic modernization, infrastructure projects, and free labor, it was its opposition to the spread of slavery that would immortalize its place in American history. So as not to alienate those less radical than the abolitionists among them, the party argued that the spread of slavery into Western territories was not just immoral but also a threat to the economic opportunities of free laborers. What is often overshadowed by its adoption of the Free Soil Doctrine was the Republican party’s support of free labor, which its proponents saw as the cornerstone of American democracy, which encouraged innovation, self-reliance, and economic stability.   After quickly gaining traction, the Republican Party put John C. Fremont on the presidential ticket in the 1856 election. Their slogan, “Free Soil, Free Speech, Free Men, Fremont!” resonated with many Northern voters but proved too little to dislodge the Democrats from power. As James Buchanan took up the mantle as the newest president of the United States, the Republicans returned to the drawing board to find another champion. It just so happened that one was already right under their noses.   Abraham Lincoln and the Election of 1860 Picture of President Abraham Lincoln by Moses Parker Rice, November 8, 1863. Source: Mead Art Museum, Amherst, MA   While many constituents saw Fremont as too radical in 1856, Abraham Lincoln, a former Illinois congressman and his Republican replacement on the 1860 ticket, was a moderate on the slavery issue. Having made a name for himself through much-publicized debates against Senator Stephen A. Douglass for a congressional seat in 1858, Lincoln’s expressive opposition to the spread of slavery while allowing it to remain where it already existed garnered him much support, even in border states.   With the Democratic Party divided along geographical lines, between those in the North backing Stephen A. Douglass and those in the South, John C. Breckinridge, the new Republican party’s nominee, won the election despite receiving only 40% of the popular vote. The rest, as they say, is history.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

This Underrated, Historic Small Town Is a Great Alternative to Austin, Texas
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

This Underrated, Historic Small Town Is a Great Alternative to Austin, Texas

  Located about 80 miles west of Austin, Fredericksburg is an underrated Texas gem nestled in the heart of the Texas Hill Country. Famous for its German heritage, art galleries, rolling vineyards, and boutique shops, this small town is all about charm and sophistication. It offers everything from scenic hikes to history museums, making it an attractive destination for those seeking an alternative to Austin’s fast-paced lifestyle. While the latter may be known for its live music and nightlife, Fredericksburg captivates visitors with its historic architecture, serene atmosphere, and vibrant wine culture.   The Rich History of Fredericksburg Rivals the Big City Vibe of Austin Sunday house in the Pioneer Museum, Fredericksburg, Texas. Source: Wikimedia Commons   While Austin has its contemporary cultural hotspots, Fredericksburg offers an entirely different historical narrative. This small Texas town was founded in 1846 by German immigrants and has preserved its old-world charm through well-maintained historical landmarks and museums. For instance, the Pioneer Museum takes visitors on a journey back to the 19th century with a collection of preserved buildings like a one-room schoolhouse, a Sunday House, and even a Blacksmith shop.   The most notable historical attraction in Fredericksburg is perhaps the National Museum of the Pacific War. This is a 55,000-square-foot museum that tells stories of the Pacific Theater of World War II. The museum commemorates the legacy of Admiral Chester W. Nimitz and the U.S. military’s efforts during World War II. When visiting the National Museum of the Pacific War, you can explore interactive exhibits, the Pacific Combat Zone, and the peaceful Japanese Garden of Peace. The latter serves as a tribute to the friendship between Nimitz and Japanese Admiral Togo.   When it comes to Austin, its modern history is mostly focused on its music scene and tech industry. If you head instead to Fredericksburg, you’ll have the chance to see and learn more about German culture and American military history. You wouldn’t usually see these in the capital city.   The Town Is Famous for its Authentic German Heritage Old buildings on Main Street Fredericksburg, Texas. Source: Picryl   The authentic German roots of Fredericksburg give this Texan small town a unique European flair that sets it apart from the rest of the Lone Star State. For instance, the Main Street of Fredericksburg is lined with classic German architecture, specialty shops, and local restaurants. The latter serve traditional fare like schnitzel, bratwurst, and sauerbraten. Popular spots you have to visit in town for a traditional culinary experience include the fine dining establishment Otto’s German Bistro and the iconic Old German Bakery & Restaurant, known for its hearty breakfasts and German pancakes.   If you want to get a taste of Fredericksburg’s German heritage during a celebration, then you’ve got to attend the annual Oktoberfest. It’s a lively festival featuring dancing, polka music, traditional German food, and, of course, lots of beer. The three-day celebration attracts thousands of visitors each fall. It is one of the town’s signature celebrations.   Global cuisines and modern eateries are a thing in Austin. But Fredericksburg will provide you with a more focused cultural experience that celebrates its German roots. Hence, if you want a taste of Europe in the Lone Star State, then Fredericksburg should be next on your list.   Monthly Art Walks and Iconic Local Galleries in Fredericksburg National Museum of the Pacific War, Fredericksburg, Texas. Source: Flickr   Let’s admit it: Fredericksburg does not have the same reputation as Austin when it comes to its arts scene. Still, the small historic town in Texas offers a vibrant cultural experience in its own right. For example, Fredericksburg is home to plenty of top-tier galleries. These include the Insight Gallery and the Charles Beckendorf Gallery. Both of these showcase a diverse range of regional and local artwork.   One of the biggest draws of Fredericksburg is the First Friday Art Walk. This is a monthly event where visitors can meet artists, enjoy local wine tastings, and watch live demos at multiple galleries along Main Street.   If you’re a film enthusiast, then the Hill Country Film Festival is an annual highlight. It features screenings, panel discussions, and events in a more intimate setting compared to larger city festivals.   If you’re looking for something different than the high-energy arts district that Austin is known for, then you should consider Fredericksburg. For instance, the art scene in this town is much quieter and provides you with a more personal experience. The focus is more on local talent, and there are much fewer crowds when compared to Austin. This makes Fredericksburg the perfect spot for art lovers who want to explore unique Texas-inspired art while engaging directly with local artists.   Fredericksburg Is a Wine Lover’s Paradise Becker vineyard lavender field in Fredericksburg, Texas. Source: Flickr   The town has rightfully earned its reputation as the “Napa Valley of Texas” with its thriving wine industry. Fredericksburg is home to over 50 wineries and tasting rooms. Many of these are nestled along the famed Wine Road 290. Some of the standout options include Grape Creek Vineyards, known for its award-winning reds, and Signor Vineyards, offering picturesque French-style tasting rooms.   You might enjoy visiting Rhinory, where you can sample South African-inspired wines while observing a real-life rhinoceros named Blake. This will allow you to combine wildlife conservation and winemaking, which is somehow a one-of-a-kind experience.   If you’re looking to make the most of your wine exploration, book a seat on the 290 Wine Shuttle. The latter provides safe, convenient transportation between some of the most renowned vineyards in the region.   In Austin, you’ll enjoy breweries and craft beer. The culture of these thrives in the city. However, Austin lacks the immersive vineyard experience that you will find in Fredericksburg. So, if you’re a wine enthusiast and you’re looking for a more refined, scenic environment, then the sprawling vineyards of Fredericksburg are the answer. Go to this iconic Texan town and enjoy a peaceful day of tastings without the crowds and Austin’s fast pace.   Texas’ Fredericksburg Is an Outdoor Enthusiast’s Dream Wildseed Farms in Fredericksburg, Texas. Source: Flickr   Anyone seeking an outdoor adventure will definitely appreciate Fredericksburg’s natural beauty. The Enchanted Rock State Park is the highlight of the town, and it’s located just 17 miles north of Fredericksburg. It consists of a massive pink granite dome that provides panoramic views of the Hill Country. It’s a popular destination for rock climbing, stargazing, and hiking.   The Wildseed Farms, the largest working wildflower farm in the United States, is another must-see. Here, you can stroll through 200 acres of blooming flowers, snap some unforgettable shots, and shop for locally made products.   If you’re looking for even more outdoor activities, the nearby Pedernales Falls State Park offers you serene hiking trails along the Pedernales River. It’s a peaceful retreat just a short drive from Fredericksburg.   It’s true that Austin is famous for its popular parks and trails. No one’s denying that. However, the natural attractions of Fredericksburg are actually more expansive and less crowded. Thus, they provide a quiet and scenic experience that connects visitors to the unique beauty of Texas Hill Country.   Fredericksburg’s Seasonal Festivities and Holiday Traditions Trail of Lights in Austin, Texas. Source: Wikimedia Commons   You don’t want to miss Fredericksburg during the holiday season. This is when the town transforms into a festive wonderland filled with events and traditions that embody its German heritage. One standout is the Fredericksburg Christmas Pyramid. The latter is a 26-foot-tall wooden structure that was imported from Germany. It symbolizes Fredericksburg’s commitment to preserving its roots.   There’s also Kinderfest, where children leave their shoes out for Santa to fill with traditional German treats. As for the Holiday Wine Trail, it allows you to tour the best local wineries decorated for the season.   The town also hosts the annual Eisbahn. This is a volunteer-run-ice-skating rink that opens after Thanksgiving and runs through New Year’s. Families from all across Texas flock to the rink, with profits supporting local charities such as the Boys & Girls Club and the Lifeline Foundation.   All of these traditions combined together create a cozy, small-town atmosphere that is so different that it actually feels a world apart from the bustling holiday events in Austin.   The capital of Texas, Austin, on the other hand, hosts a lively array of holiday events, such as the Trail of Lights and the Armadillo Christmas Bazaar. But the holiday season in Fredericksburg offers a more intimate and culturally rich experience. The small-town community spirit and German traditions of Fredericksburg combined together provide a heartwarming alternative for those seeking a holiday experience that’s authentic, family-friendly, and less commercialized.   Though a Small Town, Fredericksburg Boasts Big-Town Entertainment Jam session in Luckenbach, Texas. Source: Picryl   Fredericksburg is small in size. However, if you’re a party lover, then this is the place to be for an exciting night. The town is famous for its dance halls, live music, and unique venues like Luckenbach, a ghost town turned honky-tonk just 14 miles away. Country music icons such as Willie Nelson were hosted at this legendary spot. Luckenbach continues to be a favorite for live music and dancing. Within Fredericksburg, you can also find popular bars such as the Altstadt Brewery and 78624 The Bar, which offer live music and local brews in a lively atmosphere.   Now, you probably already know that Austin is the “Live Music Capital of the World.” And that’s true. However, Texas’ capital’s high-energy venues can sometimes be overwhelming. This is why Fredericksburg might be a better fit for you, as its smaller, more intimate settings offer a different take on the music culture of Texas. So, if you enjoy live performances in a more laid-back, welcoming environment, you know now where to go in Texas.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

Who Won the Seven Days Battles?
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Who Won the Seven Days Battles?

  Early in the American Civil War, having the Confederate capital of Richmond, Virginia so close to the Union capital of Washington DC made a quick seizure of Richmond a popular goal of the Lincoln administration. The Union wanted to seize Richmond and end the war, and the Confederates needed to defend it. The Seven Days Battle was a large showdown that would show whose will and skill would carry the city.   Victory Goes to the Confederacy Confederate infantry attacking during the Seven Days Battles in the summer of 1862. Source: American Battlefield Trust   Despite the presence of almost 120,000 Union soldiers in the area, the end result of seven days of brutal fighting was that the Confederate capital city of Richmond, Virginia was secure. A new Confederate general, Robert E. Lee, had taken command of the Army of Northern Virginia after the death of his predecessor, Joseph E. Johnston. The South needed to engage in skillful tactics and strategy to overcome a much larger opponent, which was focused on seizing Richmond and ending the Civil War swiftly. Lee’s task was to push the Union army under General George McClellan back from Virginia and give the Confederacy some much-needed breathing room.   Despite starting his offensive poorly and losing far more men than the Union, Lee continued his multi-pronged attack and achieved results. Over several days of fighting, the Confederates successfully pushed back McClellan’s army, though suffering greater casualties. Although the Union won the last individual battle at Malvern Hill, it was clear that seizing Richmond was impossible. By July 1, 1862, McClellan knew he needed to retreat and regroup, leading his army back home the next day. The Confederate capital was secure, and a long and bloody Civil War awaited.   Timeline of the Seven Days Battles A map drawn in 1885 showing the positions of Confederate (solid) and Union (striped) forces in the final battle of the Seven Days Battles in summer 1862. Source: American Battlefield Trust   In June 1862, Union General George McClellan was on the offensive in the Peninsula Campaign, hoping to seize Richmond, Virginia and end the war. The Confederate general-in-chief, Joseph E. Johnston, was wounded during the Battle of Seven Pines on May 31 and relieved of his command.   Johnston’s replacement, Robert E. Lee, decided to go on the offensive rather than prepare for a siege of Richmond. In late June, both Lee and McClellan prepared for battle, with Lee having the upper hand in intelligence-gathering thanks to fast-moving Confederate cavalry under J.E.B. Stuart.   On June 25, McClellan attacked first, clearing out some Confederate units in the area to install siege guns to target Richmond.   After maneuvering on the 26th, fighting resumed on the 27th, with the Confederates making some gains but suffering heavy casualties.   On June 28, McClellan retreated, with Lee in pursuit through the 29th.   On June 30, the Union turned the tide at the Battle of Malvern Hill and settled into a strong position.   Confederate attacks on July 1 failed to break through, but McClellan chose to retreat that night, ending the Seven Days Battles as a Confederate victory.   What Caused the Seven Days Battles? A map showing the geographic closeness of the Union (Washington DC) and Confederate (Richmond, Virginia) capital cities during the American Civil War. Source: Virginia Humanities   Having the Confederate capital less than one hundred miles from the Union capital made its seizure a tantalizing goal. General George McClellan engaged in the Peninsula Campaign to approach Richmond from the southeast by moving up the Virginia Peninsula from the Atlantic coast. McClellan thought this route would be more successful, as the Confederates would know to heavily reinforce the side of Richmond facing Washington DC. The Union also benefited from controlling Fort Monroe on the Virginia Peninsula, a massive installation and the only one not to fall to the Confederacy after the Battle of Fort Sumter. Thus, McClellan could build up a large force with ease and then march it across the peninsula toward Richmond.   However, McClellan’s march was delayed by terrible weather and unexpectedly strong Confederate defensive lines. This delay gave enough time for Confederate armies to arrive from North Carolina, leading to small battles that the Union largely won. Despite the Union victories, progress toward Richmond was slow, and McClellan’s forces only approached the outskirts of the city at the end of May. On June 1, newcomer Robert E. Lee took command of the Confederate forces and planned to attack, wagering that McClellan was planning for a lengthy siege of Richmond and not anticipating a counterattack.   Why Were the Seven Days Battles Significant? A photograph of the Virginia state capitol building, which also served as the Confederate capitol building during that country’s brief existence. Source: Virginia Humanities   The Seven Days Battles were significant in that they saved Richmond from being captured by the Union, prolonging the Civil War and giving the Confederacy a narrow window of opportunity to gain political and economic support from European powers. Domestically, the victories were a tremendous morale booster for the South, which had been suffering defeats in the Western Theater, such as the Battle of Shiloh. Conversely, the Union was shocked by its defeats, as McClellan’s Army of the Potomac had been on the verge of taking Richmond.   Additionally, the Seven Days Battles began the illustrious career of Robert E. Lee, who had previously been working on coastal defenses. Now a prominent field commander, Lee would become known as one of the most successful generals of the Civil War. Following his victories in the Seven Days Battles, Lee would continue his offensives until the Battle of Antietam, when he unsuccessfully invaded Maryland in hopes of spooking the North into armistice negotiations. Without his victories in the Seven Days Battles, Lee likely would not have been such a formidable force during the conflict.   5 Facts About the Seven Days Battles A map showing Confederate defenses built around the capital city of Richmond, Virginia during the American Civil War. Source: Library of Congress   1. Casualties Casualties during the week of fighting were unprecedented, totaling some 20,000 Confederate casualties versus roughly 16,000 Union casualties. The most intense battle of the week was the Battle of Gaines’ Mill, which caused a combined 15,000 casualties. The sheer volume of wounded soldiers overran hospitals in nearby Richmond, shocking the public.   2. Commanders Union forces were led by General George B. McClellan, a West Point graduate and Army engineer who served in the Mexican-American War and later worked for the railroads. When war broke out in 1861, McClellan volunteered to return to service and was commissioned as a major general. Briefly, McClellan was named general-in-chief of all Union armies but lost this title to focus on his Peninsula Campaign with the Army of the Potomac. After failing to pursue Lee following the Battle of Antietam, McClellan was replaced as commander of the Army of the Potomac but later returned to prominence as governor of New Jersey in 1878.   Confederate forces were led by General Robert E. Lee, who was named commander of the Army of Northern Virginia on June 1, 1862. Like McClellan, Lee was a West Point graduate and veteran of the Mexican-American War. After the Seven Days Battles, Lee began a streak of military victories that elevated him to legendary status among Confederates. In April 1865, Lee ultimately surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia at Appomattox, hastening the end of the Civil War.   3. Number of Forces Involved A map of the Seven Days Battles that occurred during the summer of 1862 near Richmond, Virginia. Source: Defense Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS)   Under McClellan, the Union had roughly 120,000 men engaged in the Peninsula Campaign. A similar number of troops were available for the Confederacy. At the peak of fighting during the Seven Days Battle, about 95,000 men were engaged in combat. At the time, this was by far the largest engagement in the American Civil War to date.   4. Visiting Sites of the Seven Days Battles Today Today, visitors can visit many of the sites of the Seven Days Battles, many of which are part of the Richmond National Battlefield Park. Visitors can stay in the city of Richmond and drive out to many battle locations, including Gaines’ Mill and Malvern Hill. Both sites have walking trails with historic signposts, and the Malvern Hill site also has an available audio podcast.   5. Trivia: Lee’s First Battlefield Victory Comes at Gaines’ Mill During the Seven Days Battles, Confederate General Robert E. Lee achieved his first battlefield victory on June 27, 1862 during the Battle of Gaines’ Mill. With almost 60,000 men, Lee outnumbered his Union foes and overran them with a large frontal attack. This contrasts with Lee’s better-known victories, where he defeated larger Union armies and was praised for unique and daring strategies.   Aftermath of the Seven Days Battles: A Political Time Bomb for McClellan A political cartoon criticizing 1864 Democratic presidential nominee George McClellan for his wartime leadership in the Peninsula Campaign. Source: Library of Congress   The defeat of McClellan during the Seven Days Battles would come back to haunt him in 1864 when he ran as the Democratic presidential nominee against Republican incumbent Abraham Lincoln. Despite his background as a general, McClellan was in the awkward position of riding the anti-war platform of the Democratic Party, which wanted to negotiate peace with the Confederacy. As a candidate, McClellan faced criticism over his wartime record, being considered ineffective as a general by many Northerners.   Ultimately, McClellan and the Democratic Party were easily defeated by Lincoln in November 1864. Although Lincoln may have been on somewhat shaky political ground going into 1864, the rapid accumulation of Union military victories that summer and autumn shored up the president’s popularity, especially the Battle of Atlanta. Seizing the major Confederate city was a public relations boon for Lincoln’s administration and effectively sank the anti-war Democratic platform.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
1 y

First Nations of the Canadian Subarctic: A Brief History
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

First Nations of the Canadian Subarctic: A Brief History

  The Canadian Subarctic is one of the six cultural regions that define Canada’s cultural, geographical, and historical landscape. The Chipewyan, the Dogrib, the Hare, the Dane-zaa, the Slavey, the Kaska, the Tlingit and the Wet’suwet’en are just a few of the Athapaskan-speaking groups who call the Western Subarctic home. The Innu First Nation people (not to be confused with the Inuit) have occupied the northeastern Subarctic since time immemorial. For the past few centuries, they have been known in the Western world by the names assigned to them by the French, namely, the Montagnais and theNaskapi. Until recently, their cultures and history have been relentlessly downplayed (or even declared non-existent) by dominant white, non-Indigenous Canadian society.   What Do We Mean by Subarctic?  The country now known as Canada can be divided into several physiographic regions. Source: The Canadian Encyclopedia   The Subarctic can be divided into two broad regions, the Eastern Subarctic and the Western Subarctic, both immediately south of the High Arctic. Let us begin with the Eastern Subarctic. This portion of the Subarctic ecoregion is also called “Eastern Canadian Shield” and covers a large area that stretches from the Atlantic Ocean to Hudson Bay, including much of northern Quebec and Labrador.   The Western Subarctic covers about five million square kilometers (almost two million square miles), making it an extremely culturally and physiologically diversified region. It lies north of the Great Plains and Plateau and extends from Hudson Bay in the east to Bering Strait and the interior of Alaska in the west. The Subarctic itself can be divided into three major regions that are extremely different from each other.   Map of the Canadian Shield. Source: The Canadian Encyclopedia   The Canadian Shield, for instance, encompasses parts of almost all the Canadian provinces: it stretches from the Eastern Subarctic regions, from Labrador, Québec, and Ontario to much of Manitoba, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories, as well as the northern parts of Saskatchewan and Alberta, in central and western Canada. This is a land of small lakes, formed during the last ice age, of waterways and coniferous trees. Some of the most common are mountain maple, white birch, white and black spruce, and the jack pine. The latter has been the subject of many paintings by Tom Thomson and the Group of Seven.   North of the boreal forest, the territories occupied by the Canadian Shield (whose mountains were once as high as those in the Himalayas) are characterized by large areas of permafrost, with low-growing vegetation and virtually no significant trees.   The Jack Pine, by Tom Thomson, 1916-1917. Source: National Gallery of Canada   Overall, this is a land rich in copper (Nunavut and the Northwest Territories), gold, iron, and silver (in Quebec and Northern Ontario), as well as uranium (in northern Saskatchewan, in the Northwest Territories, around Great Bear Lake, and Elliot Lake in Ontario). To the west, the territory of Yukon, the province of British Columbia, parts of the Northwest Territories, and Alberta are characterized by the Cordillera (or Western Cordillera). This is a region of extremes, a landscape of boreal forest-covered mountain ranges, alpine tundra, and flood plains, where rivers abound with salmons and run parallel to the Pacific Ocean from Alaska down to Mexico.   The melting of high-elevation ice patches in southern Yukon has uncovered large amounts of caribou dung, as well as the carcasses of wolves, and several examples of spears and arrows lost by the hunters who ventured into these regions thousands of years ago.   Map of the Cordillera (or Western Cordillera). Source: The Canadian Encyclopedia   Together with local oral histories and the beautiful red ochre pictographs found on the rocks of northern Manitoba and Saskatchewan, such discoveries have allowed Indigenous and non-Indigenous historians and anthropologists to trace the history of the First Nations of the Western Subarctic and to understand their culture and lifestyles. East of the Cordillera and west of the Canadian Shield, the Western Subarctic is characterized by another unique area, the so-called Mackenzie Lowlands, a region of swamps and marshes that occupy northeastern British Columbia and northern Alberta. Most rivers in this area drain into the Pacific Ocean.   The Athapaskans (Dene) of the Canadian Shield  Athapaskan languages are spoken across the whole Subarctic region, from western Hudson Bay to Alaska and southern Alberta and British Columbia. Source: Britannica   The Athapaskan people (also known as the Dene) are a culturally diverse group. The term Athapaskan refers not to the people themselves, but to the (more than twenty) languages they spoke (and still speak), all of which have a common origin. Today they are the third most widely spoken subfamily of North American Indigenous languages in Canada.   The various Athapaskan groups of the Canadian Shield were once all related, both in terms of the languages they spoke (sometimes extremely similar) and the physical proximity of their lands. As was often the case in pre-contact Aboriginal Australia, neighboring groups throughout the whole Subarctic region, from western Hudson Bay to Alaska and southern Alberta and British Columbia, were able to understand each other’s languages and often borrowed certain cultural elements from their neighbors.   Dene people of the Mackenzie Delta, photograph unknown. Source: Assembly of First Nations   The territory of one group bordered the ancestral lands of another, which in turn edged on those of yet another group. The ancestral lands of the Chipewyans (also known as Denesuline) extended west of Hudson Bay and onto the tundra in the west, roughly encompassing what are now Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and the Northwest Territories.   Their livelihood depended on the barren-ground caribou, so much so that they relied on them not just for food, but also for winter clothing and everyday tools such as fishing nets. Just like the Inuit did in the Arctic, the Chipewyan actively modified and domesticated the landscape to trap the large herds of caribou roaming their lands. In addition to navigating rivers and lakes in their light bark canoes and spearing caribou from their vantage point, they often built enclosures to intercept their migratory paths. Hunting brought families together.   Chipewyan would often spear caribou and muskrat from their light bark canoes, photograph unknown. Source: Wikimedia Commons   When the time was right, groups of up to 600 people would pack up their light conical tipis, their moose and caribou skins, or their summer lean-tos, and follow their chief, the most experienced hunter on their mission to intercept caribou herds. The chief, male or female, had earned his/her status through his/her skills and not through family ties. Sometimes hostilities broke out among the Athapaskans, but most fights occurred between the Athapaskans and the Cree.   Culturally similar to the Chipewyans were the Dogrib people (also known as Tilcho or Tłı̨chǫ), stationed between two major lakes, the Great Bear and the Great Slave, east of the Mackenzie River. Their neighbors were the Hare (also called Sahtú or North Slavey), who occupied the lands between Great Bear Lake (Sahtú), and the Mackenzie River and they spoke a language substantially similar to that of the Dogrib. Their livelihood depended mainly on hares, hence their name.   Charlie Yahey, a Dane-zaa Dreamer, holding a drum with the map of the Dane-zaa cosmos. Source: Cabinet   The Great Bear and Great Slave Lakes, as well as parts of northwestern Alberta and northeastern British Columbia, were home to the Slavey (also known as Dene-thah and Dene Tha’), who, unlike their neighbors, relied on both fishing and hunting (mainly moose and woodland caribou). Moose and woodland caribou were also part of the diet of the Mountain Athapaskans: on their lands in the Mackenzie Mountains, they hunted or snared mountain goats.   To the south, the Slavey were neighboured by the Dane-zaa (known for decades by their Western name “the Beaver Indians”), a term which means “real people.” Unlike other First Nations, the Dane-zaa managed to survive the colonial period, but many of them were forced to relocate onto reserves, sometimes from their traditional lands around the Peace River in present-day British Columbia and Alberta.   The Athapaskans (Dene) of the Cordillera Members of the Ulkatcho First Nation, one of the communities of the Dakelh (or Southern Carrier) from British Columbia. Source: Ulkatcho First Nation   The diet of the Cordillera Athapaskans was more varied than that of the Athapaskans of the Shield because their lands were characterized by a more varied ecosystem. In addition to caribou, goats, moose, and mountain sheep, they could also rely on plant food and on the fish they would catch in the waters of the Yukon and Mackenzie Rivers, especially salmon, whitefish, and Arctic chars.   The Tlingit people are one of the most important and influential First Nations from the Canadian Cordillera. They lived in what are now British Columbia, Yukon, and Alaska, both inland and in coastal areas. Hence their name, “Tlingit,” which means “people of the tides” in the Łingít language.   Tlingit people, 1910. Source: Smithsonian Libraries and Archives   Their culture, artworks, and rich oral literature exerted a great influence on many other Cordillera Athapaskans, especially the Tutchone of present-day southern Yukon and the Tahltan, whose ancestral lands lie along the Stikine River plateau. Altogether, they encompass about 11% of British Columbia’s territory.   Like that of the Tutchone, the Tahltan, and the Kaska, Tlingit society was organized through a matrilineal clan system and divided into two moieties: Wolf and Crow. Each clan was further divided into various family groups. All children took their mother’s kinship group. Along with the Gwich’in and Han, the Tutchone belong to the Athapaskan peoples of the northeastern Cordillera.   Tlingit’s Thunderbird House Screen, 19th century. Source: Los Angeles County Museum on Fire   The Gwich’in, who relied mostly on caribou hunting to survive, occupied present-day Yukon, the Northwest Territories, as well as Alaska. The Yukon River Plateau, close to the Yukon-Alaska border, was Han territory.   The Wet’suwet’en, a branch of the Carrier (Dakelh) people, also adopted the matrilinear system. The area now known as British Columbia was occupied by the Carrier (or Dakelh) people. Once again, the term does not refer to a single group but to the many bands living in the central interior of present-day British Columbia, a territory of about 76,000 km sq. (approx. 29,000 sq. miles) bordered on the west by the Pacific Coast and to the east by the Rocky Mountains range.   The Innu of the Eastern Subarctic and the Fur Trade  Group of Naskapi in Voisey’s Bay, Newfoundland & Labrador, 1921-22. Source: Canadian Museum of History   The lands of the Montagnais and Naskapi people are called Nitassinan. While the Naskapis’ ancestral territory stretches east of Hudson Bay, from the interior of Quebec to the central Labrador coast, the Montagnais were located along the St. Lawrence River, occupying a territory that stretched from the northern shores of the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the lower St. Lawrence.   In the 1980s, these two Algonquian-speaking groups asked the world to adopt the term Innu (which means “people” and should not be confused with “Inuit”), the name they call themselves by today. While the term Naskapi is of unknown origin, the name Montagnais is derived from the French word for “mountaineers” or “mountain people,” and reflects their close fur-trading relations with the French. The Montagnais were the first to encounter the early French settlers and explorers, who considered them more “civilized” than the Naskapi.   In 1603 during his first voyage to Canada and up the St. Lawrence River, French cartographer and explorer Samuel de Champlain (1567-1635) managed to secure a strategic alliance with the Montagnais against the Iroquois (also known as the Haudenosaunee): it was the beginning of a trading and business relationship that would last for decades.   The Iroquois, along with the Mi’kmaq and the Inuit, were bitter enemies of the Montagnais: throughout the 17th and 18th centuries these groups vied for control of the St. Lawrence River, then the center of the early fur trade. In 1676 a trading post was established at Chicoutimi, on the route to Tadoussac, which by the early 17th century was the most important trading center in the area. Beginning in the 1830s, the Hudson’s Bay Company opened several trading posts on Innu lands. Both groups moved to the Labrador coast in the summer to fish.   The trading post of Fort Chimo, near Ungava Bay, circa 1884. Source: Bill & Norma Jean Jancewicz   While the diet of the Naskapi in winter was limited to caribou, the Montagnais were luckier: having access to the Gulf of St. Lawrence, they could hunt seals, in addition to moose, bear, beavers, and woodland caribou. Like the Anishinaabeg, the Innu loved and respected the game animals they hunted and killed, to the point of making offerings to their spirits, leaving bones and skulls on the ground or hanging from trees. This was the Innu’s way of thanking and honoring the animals that had sacrificed themselves to ensure the survival of their communities.   After a successful hunt, they would organize ceremonial feasts, carefully ensuring that every part of the caribou, including the marrow of its bones, would not go to waste. Innu culture was (and is) extremely sophisticated, as evidenced by their elaborately sewn winter coats, their colorful design, and by their ceremonial painted robes made to please and honor the animals on whose lives and deaths they so consistently relied.   Fur Trade & the Gold Rush The Hudson’s Bay Company post in Aklavik, NT, 1956. Source: The Canadian Encyclopedia   Beginning in the late 18th century, trading posts sprang up throughout the Western Canadian Subarctic on traditional Indigenous lands. In 1786, the North West Company established Fort Resolution on the southern shore of Great Slave Lake in and around Slavey lands. Two years later, in 1788, Fort Chipewyan was built near Lake Athabasca.   In 1794, the North West Company built the Rocky Mountain Fort, which was later renamed Fort St. John by the Hudson’s Bay Company. A year later, the Hudson’s Bay Company built Fort Edmonton, on the North Saskatchewan River next to the rival North West Company’s fort. In 1804 it was the turn of Fort of the Forks, established by the North West Company (later renamed Fort Simpson), on the Mackenzie River.   The ancestral lands of the Tahltan Nation lie in northern British Columbia, around the Stikine, Nass, and Skeena rivers. Source: Tahltan Central Government (TCG)   In 1805, Fort McLeod was built on Sekani lands. A year later the Carrier saw Fort St. James and Fort Fraser built on their ancestral lands. Beaver, bear, lynx, otter, and marten skins were among the most important trade goods, together with firearms. The latter had a profound impact on Indigenous societies, for better or worse: while they made hunting and fishing easier, they also had the effect of transforming traditional Native goods into useless and unremarkable objects.   Athapaskan communities became increasingly dependent on the fur trade, while their ancestral practices and communal activities such as caribou hunting slowly became obsolete. Their lives became less and less mobile. It is worth remembering that while the impact of traders on the ancestral lifestyles of the Athapaskans was largely a consequence of the fur trade, the (mostly Roman Catholic) missionaries who established their missions near the trading posts actively set out to “civilize” First Nations men, women, and especially their children.   Innu couple from Labrador, 1910. Source: Heritage Newfoundland & Labrador   Trade relations between coastal and inland groups dated way back before the coming of European traders, but with the coming of the Europeans many Athapaskans, especially those closer to the coast, acted as intermediaries between European traders and other inland groups. Similarly, peoples from the Northwest Coast relied on the Athapaskans of the Cordillera, the Tahltan, the Carrier (Dakelh), and the Tagish, to do business with inland peoples. They traveled and guided Europeans along the so-called “grease trails,” major cross-country trade arteries that wound along the Pacific Coast and into the interior in the Pacific Northwest.   Inspecting beaver pelts at the Hudson’s Bay Company’s York Factory, photograph by George Konig, 1946. Source: Maclean’s   The name of the trails originated from the boxes of oil made from the buttery flesh of Eulachon fish (Thaleichthys pacificus) which were considered a delicacy by the local First Nations, and were used as a bargaining commodity. One such trail, the Nuxalk-Carrier Grease Trail, has recently been revitalized through the joint efforts of the Nuxalk Nation and the Dakelh.   Not all trading relations were peaceful, however. The Gwich’in, for instance, acted as intermediaries with the Inuit but also denied them direct access to trading posts. While for some groups the advent of trade meant stability and more direct access to European goods, for others it meant dispossession, warfare, and land impoverishment.   Stampers at the bottom of the Chilkoot Pass (on the left) during the Klondike Gold Rush in Yukon. Source: National Park Service   This, in turn, caused mental health issues that still plague many communities today. The fur trade caused some Athapaskan groups from the Canadian Shield such as the Chipewyan, the Dunne-za, and Slavey, to increasingly lose land and lives in battles against the Cree, with whom relations had been strained for centuries.   Numerous smallpox epidemics, often followed by periods of starvation, did the rest of the damage, along with the series of 19th-century gold rushes in British Columbia, around the Fraser, Thompson, and Bridge Rivers, and in the central Alaska-Yukon area, the latter known as the Klondike Gold Rush. Trading posts were the predecessors of the commercial fisheries and cattle ranches that were established in the 20th century on traditional Athapaskans (Dene) lands and that would once again forever alter the lives of the area’s First Nations.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Why the Far Left Has Worked So Hard to Cancel Christopher Columbus
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Why the Far Left Has Worked So Hard to Cancel Christopher Columbus

The far Left’s obsession with canceling Christopher Columbus does not have as much to do with the man, but rather what he represents, according to historian Jarrett Stepman.  Efforts to cancel men like Columbus come from “cultural Marxists who thought that you need to change American culture to truly change our policies at the highest level,” says Stepman, a columnist for The Daily Signal and author of “The War on History: The Conspiracy to Rewrite America’s Past.”  Stepman joins “The Daily Signal Podcast” to discuss the history of Columbus Day and the role the explorer played in the opening of the “transatlantic exchange that led to the creation of the United States.”  Listen to the podcast below: The post Why the Far Left Has Worked So Hard to Cancel Christopher Columbus appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

UFC's Dana White Shares Video of Kamala Harris That 'Should Scare Everyone' as Election Nears
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

UFC's Dana White Shares Video of Kamala Harris That 'Should Scare Everyone' as Election Nears

Think of a robot programmed to do nothing but generate hackneyed phrases at random. We might call the device a "platitudinator." Simply push a button on the platitudinator and you will hear one such random phrase after another. A device of this nature could produce mild amusement at parties. The...
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
1 y

October 14, 2024
Favicon 
twincitiesbusinessradio.com

October 14, 2024

October 14, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

“Robert Plant was so impressed with the record, he phoned me up and said:Do you wanna support us?”: Meet Forgotten Pharaohs, the rising band making nods to Steely Dan, Neil Young and Led Zeppelin
Favicon 
www.loudersound.com

“Robert Plant was so impressed with the record, he phoned me up and said:Do you wanna support us?”: Meet Forgotten Pharaohs, the rising band making nods to Steely Dan, Neil Young and Led Zeppelin

Forgotten Pharaohs were signed as the result of an egg-and-spoon race and a wayward Croc
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

"The public needs fantasy and escapism": Creeper are gearing up for Devil's Night and a huge, pomp-filled night in North London
Favicon 
www.loudersound.com

"The public needs fantasy and escapism": Creeper are gearing up for Devil's Night and a huge, pomp-filled night in North London

It’ll be fangs, coffins and fake blood at Wembley Arena later this month
Like
Comment
Share
Jihad & Terror Watch
Jihad & Terror Watch
1 y

“We are Hezbollah,” “We are Hamas,” and “Death to Canada” chants heard at anti-Israel hate rallies in Toronto and Vancouver
Favicon 
barenakedislam.com

“We are Hezbollah,” “We are Hamas,” and “Death to Canada” chants heard at anti-Israel hate rallies in Toronto and Vancouver

The Trudeau government is quick to crack down on Canadian trucker protests but supports and gives non-profit status to radical groups that sponsor hate rallies that glorify Islamic terrorists. CBC  Political leaders are condemning what they describe as “hateful rhetoric” from a speaker at a pro-Palestinian rally in Vancouver who told the crowd that “we […]
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 8286 out of 56669
  • 8282
  • 8283
  • 8284
  • 8285
  • 8286
  • 8287
  • 8288
  • 8289
  • 8290
  • 8291
  • 8292
  • 8293
  • 8294
  • 8295
  • 8296
  • 8297
  • 8298
  • 8299
  • 8300
  • 8301

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund