It seems that in addition to being a U.S. senator, Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn is also a prophet. The conservative from the Volunteer State asked Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson to define the word “woman” during her confirmation hearing in 2022, but the judge who was celebrated as the first black woman to be nominated to the nation’s highest court said she couldn’t define her sex because she is not a biologist. Skip ahead two years, and Justice Jackson is hearing arguments in United States v. Skrmetti, a case that will determine whether states can prohibit “gender-affirming care” for minors, the progressive euphemism for puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical procedures for children who “identify” as the opposite sex. At one point, Jackson drew a comparison between Tennessee banning medical treatments that can sterilize children to the ban on interracial marriage that was eventually overturned in Loving v. Virginia.The color line determined the society our ancestors endured. The gender binary will determine the society our descendants inherit.Tennessee’s solicitor general had to inform the justice that giving “testosterone to a boy with a deficiency is not the same treatment as giving it to a girl who has psychological distress with her body.” He correctly noted that the former helps a boy develop according to his sex while the latter renders a girl infertile. The entire exchange should be the stake in the heart of superficial identity politics. Joe Biden appointed Jackson to the Supreme Court because he pledged to make history by putting a black woman on the bench. His black supporters — especially women — celebrated her nomination at the time. To them, her appointment was another milestone in America’s quest to become a more inclusive and tolerant nation. W.E.B. DuBois famously said that the problem of the 20th century was “the problem of the color line.” To the people who think in superficial identity categories, putting a black woman on the highest court in the land was another step in destroying that barrier. But the fight of the 21st century will be preserving the sex binary, and only a racial idolater would consider legalizing child sterilization progress if a black woman casts the deciding vote.The color line determined the society our ancestors endured. The gender binary will determine the society our descendants inherit.The future will be painful for the children failed by parents, doctors, journalists, activists, and politicians who refuse to tell them the truth about who they are. The Biden administration and its progressive allies believe that counseling gender-confused children to accept their bodies as they were created is “conversion therapy” but puberty-blocking drugs, mastectomies, and hysterectomies constitute “gender-affirming care.” Denying basic biology is now required to be in good standing on the left, which is precisely why Ketanji Brown Jackson’s refusal to define “woman” during her hearing was so telling. Unfortunately, the politics of racial allegiance blinded even the black Christians who otherwise hold to biblical sexual ethics. One pastor in Chicago whose church was formerly part of the Southern Baptist Convention said Justice Brown Jackson’s confirmation was a moment to be “celebrated” and a “gift of grace.” But I’m not sure how any preacher can attribute God’s goodness to a judge who refuses to affirm Genesis 1:27 or gives legal support to child sterilizations done in the name of civil rights. In a sane world, the Tennessee case would result in a unanimous decision with a short summary clearly stating that men cannot become women (or vice versa), therefore, any hormonal and surgical treatments done under the guise of “transitioning” a person promises a medical outcome that can never be achieved.Every man who has ever purchased an engagement ring knows that calling a cubic zirconia a diamond — regardless of its cut, clarity, or color — doesn’t change it into one. Composition and presentation are not the same thing.This same principle applies to sex. A cross-dressing male doesn’t switch sexes by taking pills and putting on makeup. The reason why is quite simple: Women are born, not worn. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson needs to know that mutilating and sterilizing children in the name of civil rights is not loving.

That Didn't Take Long: Days After Passing Assisted Dying Law, U.K. Tax Plan Incentivizes Death by Age 75

White Out! Barack Obama’s Identity Laundry List is Missing Something Important

This Is the Way: Lawmaker Wants to Award Daniel Penny With Congress' Highest Civilian Honor

WATCH: Lawmaker Touts Bill on $1K Bounty to Report Illegals: ‘Gift Wrapped And Ready For Deportation’

Andrea Barber and Jodie Sweetin took a trip down memory lane during a recent episode of their How Rude, Tanneritos! podcast. They reflected on a spooky episode from Full House season three, which featured the dream sequence both actresses can hardly forget. The “Bye Bye Birdie” episode aired in 1990, with the youngest of the Tanner household, Michelle, starting preschool. The family, including Danny, Jesse, and Becky, put Michelle to bed the night before, and she has the creepiest dream ever, according to Andrea and Jodie. What did Michelle Tanner dream of? FULL HOUSE, John Stamos, Mary Kate Ashley Olsen, Bob Saget, Dave Coulier, Season 3 / Everett Michelle’s dream commences with her in a pink princess dress, complete with frills and a cute headband. She stands in a room with huge toys, Lori Loughlin’s Becky playing hide-and-seek in a sailor outfit, and her hair is in pigtails. Bob Saget’s Danny looked like Alfalfa from the Little Rascals movie, while Jesse, played by John Stamos, shows up as a cowboy. Behind a terrifying large bug was Dave Couiler’s Joey, who had a toy horse attached to him. Jodie joked that Lori looked like Edith Ann from Laugh-In in the ‘70s. Full House / Everett Why was the episode so eerie? Andrea recounted her confusion at the episode, saying she was not sure what the rest of their co-stars, except for the Olsen twins, were meant to be. Michelle looked bigger than them, suggesting that her family were her new toys at preschool; however, Sweetin felt the intention was to make the adults look kid-sized. ULL HOUSE, (from left): Jodie Sweetin, Bob Saget, Candace Cameron, John Stamos, Ashley/Mary-Kate Olsen, Dave Coulier /Everett Andrea added that the dream sequence was of no benefit to the plot, and Jodie joked that the show writers were probably pissed at Saget, Stamos, Lori, and Dave that they decided to depict them that way. She recalled that Stamos looked uncomfortable while filming the scene and most likely confronted showrunner Jeff Franklin about it. Next up: Your Favorite Holiday-Themed Classics Are Making A Comeback On MeTV The post The ‘Full House’ Dream Sequence That Left Jodie Sweetin And Andrea Barber Traumatized appeared first on DoYouRemember? - The Home of Nostalgia. Author, Peace A

Once again, leftists are redefining a word right before our very eyes in order to move their agenda forward.We all know how the leftists of long ago redefined the word “gay” from its traditional meaning…

Why were people surprised? He lied to us about the “laptop from Hell” not belonging to his son Hunter. He lied to us about never withdrawing from the 2024 presidential election. Why should we have…

Just in time for Christmas, a media group founded by former Obama regime staffers is selling left-wing domestic terrorist merchandise for babies, toddlers, youth and adults in its online store. Crooked…

Italian police arrested a nun known for her prison work and 24 other people on Thursday as part of an investigation into the ‘Ndrangheta mafia in the northern city of Brescia, three sources with direct…