Continental Gaslighting: EU Releases Alarming Report - Europe Is Too 'White' and 'European'

Israel Will and SHOULD Ignore Calls for Cease Fires

After the ban in 2014, the number of disposed plastic bags increased in California.

Could the new approach eradicate the need to mine for gems?

Some of the regions of the Red Planet keep a record of what the planet was like in the past.

Let’s tackle this key defense issue.

On Thursday morning, MRC founder and president Brent Bozell laid into the latest softball-laden Harris interview while appearing on FBN’s Varney and Co. The show’s titular host, Stuart Varney, began with a clip of President Biden’s cozy Wednesday appearance on ABC’s The View. “Softball questions, no serious questions, no follow-ups — but does it work with voters?” he inquired. Bozell led off with a nonsensical quote from co-host Whoopi Goldberg to Biden: “You stepped up to lead us out of a dark and very divisive era, and became one of the most substantial Presidents in the past half-century.” “That wasn’t a question, that was a statement,” Bozell argued, adding: “The day my children put me in an old folks home, and they tell me that I’ve got to be put away, they’re going to be just as nice to me. And this is really what’s going on with Joe Biden. They feel sorry for the man… They’re trying to make him feel nice now that he’s been put into a closet.”   Bozell then turned his sights on MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle, who conducted the Wednesday interview with Vice President Harris: “Where Kamala Harris is concerned, she was interviewed by a reporter who a week ago said on the Bill Maher show that [Harris] did not have to take any policy questions, and she did not need to do interviews. And that reporter went on to call Donald Trump a threat to democracy.” “She allowed no policy positions to be given, and she allowed Kamala Harris to attack Donald Trump,” he concluded. “So, no, there’s nothing serious going on.” Varney also cited the MRC’s recent study which found Google search results deliberately favor Harris over Trump. “How do you stop the left-wing push on these platforms?” he asked. Bozell pointed out that according to polling data, 15 percent of the public rely on Google for information about political candidates. “Google is deliberately playing with the algorithms to change the electoral count. If that isn’t tampering with democracy, I don’t know what is,” he concluded.

Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich now makes videos, like I do. In fact, his channel, Inequality Media, is very much like Stossel TV. He also reaches people via social media platforms, gets millions of views and covers economic topics. Reich does almost exactly what I do, except ... Reich is repeatedly wrong. It’s understandable. Despite being frequently introduced as “economist Robert Reich,” Reich has no economics degree. He’s another liberal lawyer. His videos reflect that. “Inequality Media” is a catchy name. Americans dislike inequality. But my new video points out that inequality isn’t a conspiracy. It’s simply what happens when people are free. Taylor Swift’s a billionaire. Should government force you to listen to me sing to make life more fair? Reich wants to “ban billionaires” like Jeff Bezos. I don’t much like Bezos, but his creation, Amazon, is wonderful. It’s lowered prices so much that it cut America’s core inflation. Reich claims Amazon is a monopoly. But Amazon is far from a monopoly. It has to compete with Walmart, Target, eBay, Alibaba, etc. Where there are free markets, we have choices. If we buy from Amazon, it’s only because we think it’s cheaper or better Reich says it is bad that billionaires “get money from rich relatives.” But the biggest study of millionaires found few do. Bezos got some money from his parents, but most of what he needed to grow Amazon he got from investors. Media “experts” sneered at them for years, because at first, Amazon lost so much money. Capitalism rewards such risk-taking. Progressives and liberal lawyers like Reich believe rich people take most of America’s wealth and leave little for the poor. Like the Hollywood writers for the movie “Wall Street,” they call our economy “a zero-sum game -- somebody wins, somebody loses.” But that’s just dumb. Capitalists create new wealth. They don’t take a big slice of the pie and leave us a sliver. If they get rich, it’s because they find ways to bake lots of new pies. That’s what’s happened in America. Its why today, even poor Americans have access to things European kings only dreamed about. Capitalists can get rich only by making all of us better off. Actual economist Dan Mitchell explains, “Billionaires only kept 2.2% of the additional wealth they generated ... the rest of us captured almost 98% of the benefits.” Reich also mocks trade. In one video, he sneers, “Global trade is good for everyone. That’s bunk!” Of course it’s bunk. Few things are good for everyone.  But trade makes almost everyone richer by allowing us to specialize in what we do best. It’s called comparative advantage. Reich complains, “What if a country’s comparative advantage comes from people working under ... exploitative conditions?” “Exploitation” would be bad, but people in poor countries aren’t forced to work in factories. They took those jobs because their alternatives were worse. Trade allowed a billion people to lift themselves out of poverty. Still, trade does take away some Americans’ jobs. Donald Trump complains about other countries “ripping us off and taking our jobs.” He and Reich don’t understand that trade creates more jobs. It’s why unemployment is low. Companies engaged in global trade created 60% of America’s new jobs. Finally, Reich says it’s “rubbish” that President Joe Biden’s huge spending increases caused Inflation. He claims it’s “corporate greed ... Mega corporations raise prices to increase their profits.” That’s just silly. When prices fall, did companies suddenly get less greedy? My video cites actual economists like Nobel Prize winner Milton Friedman, who explains, “Inflation is made in Washington because only Washington can create money. Any other attribution of other groups to inflation is wrong.” Robert Reich’s videos are wrong about almost everything. It’s sad that colleges pay this fake economist to deliver foolish propaganda to students. His “progressive” ideas would leave all of us poorer. And less free.

Google-owned YouTube is expanding its artificial intelligence tool despite its parent company’s notorious track record of infusing leftism into its AI and search algorithms. Google’s Gemini AI has made headlines multiple times for its racist and anti-American bias, including bias exclusively exposed by MRC Free Speech America, such as providing reasons for Americans not to celebrate the Fourth of July. Despite these scandals, however, Google is charging ahead with AI, most recently by opening up its YouTube AI tool for U.S. YouTube Premium users on Androids.  Team YouTube posted on X on Sept. 23, “our conversational AI tool is expanding to all U.S. YouTube Premium members w/ Android devices[.] use it to dive deeper into the content you [love] by asking questions about what you’re watching or for recs for similar videos!!” The post included a video on how to use YouTube’s AI chatbot feature to ask questions and “dive deeper” into video content. What’s disturbing about this latest development is YouTube itself is particularly notorious for its explicit leftist bias and acute obsession with censorship.  In 2022, then-YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki bragged about YouTube’s censorship while simultaneously touting abortion as a “right.” Indeed, Alliance Defending Freedom, then-GOP candidate Chris Christie, and EWTN Español are among those censored for pro-life content on YouTube. YouTube has also shown election bias, as Republican and Independent presidential candidates, including Donald Trump, RobertKennedy Jr., Vivek Ramaswamy, Nikki Haleyand Chris Christie, were censored on the platform. Will YouTube’s AI prove as woke as Google’s Gemini AI? It would be a safe bet to assume so. MRC Free Speech America found in July that Gemini returned ten anti-American responses to researchers’ prompts. For instance, when asked if Americans should celebrate Independence Day, the chatbot replied this was “complex with no easy answer” due to America’s “flawed history” of racism. Gemini also cited the historically debunked 1619 Project to claim 1619 was possibly America’s birth year, as “it marks the arrival of the first enslaved Africans in British America, which would become the United States.” But that’s not all.  MRC Free Speech America researchers confirmed Gemini generated images upon request for scientists of all racial backgrounds except white people. The chatbot became infamous for being so “diverse” in its image generator that it excluded white people almost entirely, even depicting Vikings and the Founding Fathers as non-whites. Gemini even engaged in direct election interference to benefit President Joe Biden when he was still running for reelection. For example, MRC Business researchers also found in March that Gemini was programmed to cover for President Joe Biden’s economic failures, falsely claiming personal savings increased under Biden but decreased under President Donald Trump. Will YouTube’s AI prove to be any better? Not likely.  Conservatives are under attack. Contact Google here and demand that it be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on “hate speech” and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us using CensorTrack’s contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.

Javier Milei, Argentina's self-proclaimed "anarcho-capitalist" president, took office in December 2023. In the months since, he has taken a "chainsaw" to his predecessors' failed leftist policies as well as to some critics' doubts. This week, he shredded globalist hopes that the Argentine Republic would be party to the United Nations' "Pact for the Future," telling the General Assembly, "Argentina will not back any policy that implies the restriction of individual freedoms or trade, nor the violation of the natural rights of individuals." Milei — whose debut address to the U.N. took place within hours of reports indicating that Argentina's economic activity beat estimates, growing 1.7% in July — invited other nations to join him not only in "opposing this pact, but in the creation of a new agenda for this noble institution: the freedom agenda." After noting that the U.N. served a noble purpose in the wake of World War II, Milei stated it has since "stopped upholding the principles outlined in its founding declaration and begun to mutate" — from an organization that once defended human rights to "one of the main drivers of the systematic violation of freedom." Milei dragged the U.N. for its support of "global quarantines during the year 2020," which he suggested qualify as crimes against humanity, as well as its appeasement of "bloody dictatorships," such as Venezuela, and criticism of Israel. According to the Argentine president, the U.N. was created "as a shield to protect the realm of men" but has "transformed into a multi-tentacled leviathan that seeks to decide not only what each nation-state should do but also how all the citizens of the world should live." 'It is basically an attempt to build a totalitarian system of conformity across the business sector.' Milei suggested that instead of seeking peace, the U.N. now seeks to impose an ideology on its members. Distinguishing himself from a great many onlookers as a "libertarian liberal economist" rather than a politician, Milei warned of the threat posed by "collectivist policies" baked into the U.N.'s doomed 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The U.N.'s 2030 agenda includes 17 interlinked global goals designed to "transform the world." Paul Tice, an adjunct professor of finance at the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New York University, indicated in his recent book, "The Race to Zero: How ESG Investing Will Crater the Global Financial System," that: Climate action (SDG #13) provides the intersectional glue for the entire progressive agenda embedded in the UN's sustainability program, with each individual cause drawing strength and further validation from the moral imperative of saving the planet from fossil fuels because, in the UN's telling, climate change also affects global health, poverty, hunger, and national security, and 'its adverse impacts undermine the ability of all countries to achieve sustainable development. Tice emphasized that sustainability is part of a broader anti-capitalist campaign that "borrows elements from both the totalitarian and reformist approaches of the past." "It is basically an attempt to build a totalitarian system of conformity across the business sector based on moral suasion, thereby avoiding the administrative cost and public sector responsibility associated with outright state ownership or direct government intervention," wrote Tice. '[The sustainability agenda] is nothing more than a super-national socialist government program.' The professor noted further that "it embraces both state and progressive priorities but is mainly the fabrication of a permanent supranational bureaucracy of technocrats residing at multilateral agencies led by the UN and international NGOS such as the WEF, which effectively insulates it from accountability at the ballot box." Sharing similar concerns about the U.N. agenda and its broader sustainability push, Milei suggested that the U.N. is now effectively a model of "super-national governance by international bureaucrats who intend to impose a certain way of life on the citizens of the world." According to Milei, the "Pact for the Future," which 143 countries approved Sunday, is par for the course. The pact overlaps with the 2030 sustainability agenda, laying out objectives for a multilateral approach to addressing changing weather patterns, so-called reproductive rights, and digital cooperation. "Although well-intentioned in its goals, [the pact] is nothing more than a super-national socialist government program that aims to solve the problems of modernity with solutions that undermine the sovereignty of nation-states and violate the right to life, liberty, and property of individuals," said the Argentine president. "It is an agenda that aims to solve poverty, inequality, and discrimination with legislation that only deepens these issues." Milei suggested that the pact is another poorly conceived utopian program that will not withstand or tolerate humans' incompatible nature and choices. "We want to officially express our dissent regarding the 'Pact of the Future' signed on Sunday," said Milei, concluding with a version of a quote from Thomas Paine: "Those who wish to reap the blessings of freedom must, as men, endure the fatigue of defending it." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!