According to a top DOJ official, the politically driven and contrived hush-money case against Donald Trump is a “perversion of justice.” Additionally, more scandalous information came out about Judge Merchan. By its nature, lawfare is corrupt, so none of what we recorded here should be a surprise. Steven Crowder posted an undercover video of the […] The post The Fraudulent NYC Hush Money Case Hit the Rocks appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

The U.S. Department of Justice has announced that Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, a 20-year-old Pakistani living in Canada, was arrested on September 4th while attempting to enter the United States, where he intended to conduct terrorist attacks in the name of ISIS on Jewish Institutions in New York City. Donald Trump stated the obvious that dictator Maduro […] The post Terrorists, Jew Killers, Prisoners, and Maniacs Coming to the US appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov released a statement late this week addressing the numerous criminal charges that he faces in France after he was arrested there last month. French authorities detained the 39-year-old Russian billionaire late last month when his private jet landed in the country as part of an investigation into alleged offenses stemming from his refusal to cooperate with law enforcement officials investigating crimes occurring on the encrypted communication platform. Durov said in a statement that the allegations that he was not complying with law enforcement requests were “surprising” for multiple reasons, including: Telegram has an official representative in the EU that accepts and replies to EU requests. Its email address has been publicly available for anyone in the EU who googles “Telegram EU address for law enforcement.” The French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance. As a French citizen, I was a frequent guest at the French consulate in Dubai. A while ago, when asked, I personally helped them establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself. Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a simplistic approach. Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools. Durov was charged with complicity in the administration of an online platform that allows organized crime groups to conduct illicit transactions; refusal to cooperate with law enforcement when he is required to by law; complicity in organized fraud, distributing hacking software, child pornography, and illicit drugs; and other crimes. Tickets for “Am I Racist?” are on sale NOW! Buy here for a theater near you. He claimed that his company tries to work with governments to strike the right balance between cooperating with law enforcement entities and protecting users’ privacy, but sometimes there are disagreements to the point where Telegram pulls out from a country altogether. He claimed that authorities were “confused by where to send requests” to his company. “But the claims in some media that Telegram is some sort of anarchic paradise are absolutely untrue,” he said. “We take down millions of harmful posts and channels every day. We publish daily transparency reports. We have direct hotlines with NGOs to process urgent moderation requests faster.” He said that the company’s rapid growth has made it harder to keep up with clamping down on criminal activity, but vowed that the company was seeking to do better.

Podcaster Joe Rogan absolutely destroyed a recent New York Times headline that warned about the dangers of the U.S. Constitution, suggesting that there’s no amount of “gaslighting” the news organization could do to make him see their side. During “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast, Rogan and his guest evolutionary biologist, podcaster, and author Dr. Bret Weinstein talked about the headline that read, “The Constitution Is Sacred. Is It Also Dangerous?” “One of the biggest threats to America’s politics might be the country’s founding document,” the subheadline added. “This isn’t the Babylon Bee,” Rogan told his guest, referencing the satire news source. “This is an actual New York Times article.” “This is so crazy. It’s really hard to believe that someone would print this and the New York Times would say ‘yeah we like it, put it out there,'” he added, reading the headline and subhead. “What the f*** are you talking about?” “One of the biggest threats to America’s politics might be one of the greatest documents that any country was ever founded on if not the greatest ever,” Rogan continued. “That could be a threat to America’s politics? What politics are we talking about?” Rogan asked how the NYT could “possibly gaslight me enough to go along with you on this?” Tickets for “Am I Racist?” are on sale NOW! Buy here for a theater near you. Weinstein called it “incredible,” noting how on one hand, it was “completely predictable” because “there’s obviously an authoritarian force there that just grinds its teeth at night over the Constitution and the fact that it prevents it from doing things that it just wants to do.” “So, of course they’re, like, scratching their heads like, ‘can we come up with an argument for why it might be time to get rid of that thing?’ And of course, if you’re a normal thinking person, this is complete insanity,” he added. “But if you’re a New York Times reader, I’m sure that fits with the kind of ethos that’s been cultivated.” The podcast host then suggested this is why a person like former President Donald Trump is so important to the Left because they can claim his return to the White House is a so-called “imminent threat,” allowing them to justify headlines that claim the Constitution is “dangerous” or that it’s time to get rid of things like the First and Second Amendments.

An Islamic man from Pakistan was arrested in Canada this week for allegedly planning a terrorist attack against Jews in New York City. The U.S. Department of Justice said late on Friday that Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, 20, was charged with attempting to provide material support and resources to ISIS, a designated foreign terrorist organization (FTO). Khan “attempted to travel from Canada to New York City, where he intended to use automatic and semi-automatic weapons to carry out a mass shooting in support of ISIS at a Jewish center in Brooklyn, New York,” prosecutors said. He began posting on social media and on an encrypted messaging platform late last year that he supported ISIS and began distributing their propaganda, the DOJ said. He allegedly told undercover law enforcement sources that he was working with a U.S.-based ISIS terrorist to carry out the attack and that he was trying to create an “offline cell” of ISIS terrorists who could launch a coordinated attack killing Jews at synagogues. He wanted to carry out the attacks on either October 7 — the anniversary of Hamas’ unprecedented terrorist attack in Israel last year in which 1,200 people were murdered — or on October 11, which is the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur. He was originally targeting a city only referred to as “City-1” in the indictment, but changed the target to New York City. Khan said that the Muslims were “going to NYC to slaughter them,” which he planned to do by shooting them with rifles or using knives to “slit their throats.” “Khan repeatedly reiterated his desire to carry out the attack in support of ISIS, and discussed planning for the attack, including by identifying rental properties close to Location-1 and paying for a human smuggler to help him reach and cross the border from Canada into the United States,” the DOJ said. “During one communication, Khan noted that ‘if we succeed with our plan this would be the largest Attack on US soil since 9/11.” The DOJ only charged him with a single count of attempting to provide material support and resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization, which carries a maximum of 20 years in prison. “The defendant was allegedly determined to kill Jewish people here in the United States, nearly one year after Hamas’ horrific attack on Israel. This investigation was led by the FBI, and I am proud of the terrific work by the FBI team and our partners to disrupt Khan’s plan,” said FBI Director Christopher Wray. “The FBI will continue to work closely with our partners to investigate and hold accountable those who seek to commit violence in the name of ISIS or other terrorist organizations. Fighting terrorism remains the FBI’s top priority.”

'don't believe these guys'

The chase ended a minute and a 50 seconds later, police said

Violent Crime Creating 'Dystopian Hell' Despite Biden's Claim America Is Safer

'this is basic humanitarian aid we’re asking for'

DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION—A top public university’s law school is offering a class this fall that aims to explore the U.S.’ political shift toward “authoritarian Christianist nationalism” in the “age of Trump,” according to an email obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The University of Colorado at Boulder’s Law School class, titled “Statutory Interpretation,” is offered to second-year law students and will hinge on topics of relevance in the current election season, including former President Donald Trump’s legal battles and the Supreme Court’s supposed “legitimacy crisis,” professor Paul Campos told students in an email obtained by DCNF. Campos noted in the email that the course could be more aptly named “The Crisis of the American Legal System in the Age of Trump.” “[It] isn’t surprising that [the school would] offer such a course, but it is disappointing,” a law student who alerted the DCNF of the course said, mentioning multiple instances of similar bias experienced at the school. The student requested anonymity in order to “avoid retaliation” from the school. “When I learned constitutional law, I learned it from a professor that openly called for the rewriting of the Constitution. Students in that same class complained about the fact that “non-college educated” voters in rural America could affect elections at all,” the student told the DCNF. Professors at the university, he said, “tout the likes of [the liberal late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader] Ginsburg and [current liberal Justice Sonia] Sotomayor, reading their opinions as though it were Gospel. I have yet to hear critiques on the liberal justices, but I often hear critiques on the likes of [conservative Justice Neil] Gorsuch, who once taught at the school.” Course topics will include abortion and the “current legitimacy crisis” of the Supreme Court and will discuss how they create a “fundamental threat to social and political national stability,” according to the email. Crisis-of-the-American-Legal-System-in-the-Age-of-TrumpDownload The course will also examine “the extent to which the American legal and political systems are being pushed toward some variety of authoritarian Christianist nationalism, with potentially fascistic overtones” and “the perils of presidentialism.” Some of the required readings for the course include several books on fascism, as well as Ta-Nehisi Coates’ 2017 Atlantic article, “The First White President,” which attributes the election of Trump and other white presidents to the “bloody heirloom” of “whiteness.” “It is absurd that a public university in this age would push the narrative that there is a secret cabal being pushed by members of a religion to overthrow the government,” the student said. “I’ve heard professors and students alike joke and insult Christianity for being backwards. It’s no wonder that someone is now teaching to fear it as a course.” Campos, an ardent Trump critic, wrote in 2016 that the former president is a “total moron” who represents “every horrible personality trait and political instinct that fueled the Reagan revolution.” When then-President Trump was hospitalized briefly with COVID-19 in 2020, Campos wrote in a blog post that the president’s death would be a “blessed event,” saying, “I just want him to die,” according to Campus Reform. The University of Colorado settled a lawsuit in February with Campos, in which he received a six-figure payout, according to the Denver Post. Campos had sued the university after he received a low annual review score, which he attributed to discrimination. “The university is creating activists, soon to be sheathed in the power of the law,” the student warned. “Those activists are being taught to despise conservatives and view them as lessers through courses like this one.” The university and Campos did not respond to the DCNF’s requests for comment. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post Law School Offers Course That Explores Rise of ‘Authoritarian Christianist Nationalism’ in ‘Age of Trump’ appeared first on The Daily Signal.