ABC’s Good Morning America has spent the presidential election as the undisputed worst morning news show of the broadcast networks and, sure enough, it lived up to it Tuesday on Election Day by oozing hope for Vice President Kamala Harris to emerge victorious thanks to “joy” itself and “a message of unity and optimism, promising to be a president for all Americans.” In contrast, they blasted former President Donald Trump as mired in “dark” and “anti-immigrant language” and his team feeling “a vibe shift” of impending doom. Moments after co-host Michael Strahan boasted in a tease Harris is “looking to chart a new course” with America (ignoring the fact she’s been Vice President for four years), Mary Bruce arrived, fulfilling her unofficial duty as Disney’s in-house Njorth Korean news lady for the Harris campaign, gushing over Harris “sprinting across the finish line, closing out her historic candidacy with a message of unity and optimism, promising to be a president for all Americans.” Bruce continued, swooning over Harris as though her candidacy and policy views are unobjectionable: ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’ putting its thumb on the scales for Kamala Harris, boosting voters that she has this election in the bag. Mary Bruce gushed her “historic candidacy” was buoyed by “message of unity,” “optimism,” and “promising to be a president for all Americans”:… pic.twitter.com/8MbsePS8XU — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 The ABC partisan also cheered Harris fake door knocking: ABC's Mary Bruce has no problem with Kamala Harris's staged door knock in Pennsylvania, touting it as genuine campainging and "joining" her team by being on the ground to help knock on one of "five million doors" They didn't say that about Trump's McDonald's visit! pic.twitter.com/G4iv2jnlw3 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 Asked about the mood she’s hearing from her comrades inside the Harris campaign, Bruce was effusive in assuring liberal views that she’s got this: The giddiness for Kamala Harris from ABC and Mary Bruce this entire election has been nauseating. By far the biggest pro-Harris network correspondent: Bruce: “Her campaign telling me she is running through the tape on this race.” Michael Strahan: “Yeah, they are sprinting.… pic.twitter.com/mLtX2IvCak — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 As we’ve seen throughout the election, the stark contrast reared its ugly head with Bruce’s ebullience for Harris giving way to venom toward Trump, whining the “twice-impeached former president who was convicted of a crime” has a “dark” “closing message”: ABC’s @RachelVScott uses her ‘Good Morning America’ report on the Trump campaign to attack the “twice impeached former President who was convicted of a crime” for spending a final day hurling “insults,” using “dark” rhetoric, “spreading false claims about election integrity,”… pic.twitter.com/OLWqzuL0D9 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 Scott also huffed about Trump as “anti-immigrant” and denounced his promises of mass deportation of illegal immigrants. She also made a direct plea to women voters thinking of backing Trump by boasting Harris “has seized on the former President’s comments that he would protect women whether they like it or not and Trump’s own statements that he would put Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has pushed a range of conspiracy theories, in large of women’s health.” Scott gave an ominous answer about the mood of the Trump campaign, suggesting they’re screwed: More nonsense from ABC’s Rachel Scott kicking dirt on Donald Trump’s election chances, touting Tony Hinchcliffe and lying about his Liz Cheney comments: “[The Trump campaign] feel[s] good about what they’re seeing in the early voting numbers. But there have been a vibe shift in… pic.twitter.com/Tcre8VQgZo — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 In the second half-hour, co-host and former Clinton official George Stephanopoulos had a mini-roundtable with longtime ABC News political analyst and Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, former Trump chief of staff Reince Priebus, and former New Jersey GOP Governor Chris Christie. All three gave predictable answers, including Christie repeatedly trashing Trump and his campaign to bury them before the voters are counted: Chris Christie goes on ABC's 'Good Morning America' to downplay Donald Trump's election chances, arguing his unfavorables are too high, campaign officials have felt like puking b/c Trump "may have lost it" with the MSG rally, and dismisses GOP early vote gains pic.twitter.com/0EDBuFenVC — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 Chris Christie tells ABC's 'Good Morning America' he'd put money on Kamala Harris winning the election, arguing Trump's not going accept the results when he loses pic.twitter.com/HeGQ6DqWFe — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 With commercials and local news breaks, the first hour and 18 minutes were almost exclusively 2024, including stories at the top of the second hour on both the Harris and Trump camps. Instead of bringing back Bruce and Scott, the show had weekend co-host Eva Pilgrim spin for Harris: More last-minute election interference for Kamala Harris on ABC’s ‘Good Morning America.’ This time, weekend co-host Eva Pilgrim, arguing she has on her side a message of “[u]nification, joy, and the future”: “Kamala Harris is waking up in D.C. after what's been an all-out… pic.twitter.com/7geECubkUy — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 As for Trump, that fell to weekend co-host and Saturday World News Tonight anchor Whit Johnson: ABC’s ‘Good Morning America’ weekend co-host Whit Johnson denounces Trump’s “very dark picture” in is final rallies, adding there’s “signs of anxiety” within Team Trump to imply he will lose: “Overnight in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Trump delivered his closing message in what is… pic.twitter.com/yj2UAcgCcs — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 5, 2024 To see the relevant ABC transcript from November 5, click here.

Election Day is finally here, and one of the last outrageous comments we’ll hear from a leftist celebrity before the decision is made will not soon be forgotten as not only was it completely untrue but extremely sexist. And it came from former Trump supporter Mark Cuban. “Donald Trump, you never see him around strong intelligent women ever. It’s just that simple,” Cuban said in an interview on “The View.” While Trump-supporting women were offended by the comments, the former president’s response to Cuban’s insane remarks made it all better. “Mark Cuban, a really dumb guy, who thinks he’s ‘hot stuff’ but he’s absolutely nothing, is now out there saying that I don’t surround myself with strong women,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “Actually, he is very wrong, I surround myself with the strongest of women - with the understanding that ALL women are great, whether strong or not strong.” Trump went on to explain that Cuban would call him “incessantly” while he was in office to the point where he had to explain that he had "a lot of things to do" and couldn’t be "taking so many pointless calls" from the celebrity. “In any event, that affected him greatly, because he’s a very insecure guy, and a Major LOSER, always has been and always will be! Nobody likes him, nobody respects him, and he’s unattractive both inside and out! He should go back to talk about the person he was forced to support, because I didn’t want it, Lyin’ Kamala Harris. Also, he’s got no clubhead speed,” Trump continued. “He attacked his golf game,” Pat Gray of “Pat Gray Unleashed” laughs. “That’s below the belt.” Want more from Pat Gray?To enjoy more of Pat's biting analysis and signature wit as he restores common sense to a senseless world, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Nate Cohn, chief political analyst at the New York Times, predicts a Donald Trump victory on Election Day could reveal the death of the Democratic Party as we know it.In his Election Day newsletter, Cohn outlined what he believes are the four possible election outcomes: a big Kamala Harris victory, a repeat of 2020 (tight election with small margins in swing states), a repeat of 2022 (in which Republicans won the popular vote but lost key races), or a decisive Trump victory. 'This scenario would reveal the extent that it destroyed the Democratic Party as we knew it, too.'That final outcome, Cohn explained, could be more impactful on the future of American politics than people realize.According to Cohn, this election "should be a Republican victory" if analyzed on paper. The reasons? The poor economy, President Joe Biden's unpopularity, and the fact that voters believe the country is headed in the wrong direction. Cohn, moreover, explained the "signs of a Republican victory have been building for years," citing Republican advantages in party identification, party registration, and Election Day turnout in battleground states.What's worse, Cohn said the polls — like they did in 2016 and 2020 — could be once again underestimating Trump."The pollsters never found a convincing explanation for what went wrong, and the simplest one is that they just can’t reach enough of Mr. Trump’s less engaged supporters. Despite their efforts over the last eight years, there may simply be no fix for this problem," he wrote."In this scenario, Ms. Harris’s apparent strength among white and older voters, or her resilience in the Midwestern battlegrounds, is nothing more than another polling mirage — in exactly the same states where the polls got it wrong four and eight years ago," Cohn explained. "Add in Mr. Trump’s gains among young, Black and Hispanic voters and you end up with a decisive victory for him."If this scenario plays out on Election Day, Cohn predicted that it would initiate a "new era of politics," one defined by a historic voter realignment."The rise of Mr. Trump's brand of conservative populism has transformed American politics. It redefined the basic political conflict between the two parties. It led to major demographic shifts, first with Mr. Trump making huge gains among the white working class and now with nonwhite voters, while Democrats gained among white college graduates," Cohn wrote. "If the shifts endure after Mr. Trump, historians might well look back and say that the 2024 result was the culmination of the populist realignment he unleashed a decade ago."The result of that realignment, according to Cohn, is not only a Republican Party that does not resemble the GOP of old, but the death of the contemporary Democratic Party."It has long been clear that Mr. Trump’s rise destroyed the Republican Party as we knew it," Cohn wrote. "This scenario would reveal the extent that it destroyed the Democratic Party as we knew it, too."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A new study suggests that Vice President Kamala Harris received the most lopsided news coverage in the country's history when comparing reports from major networks surrounding the presidential election.Media Research Center evaluated coverage of Harris on ABC, CBS, and NBC and found that 78% of the coverage for the vice president was positive versus 22% negative.Donald Trump, on the other hand, received a whopping 85% negative coverage and just 15% positive.This equates to a 63-point advantage in positive coverage for Harris, the largest gap in history, according to the study.The report analyzed 660 stories from the major networks' evening newscasts beginning on July 21, when President Joe Biden withdrew from the race, until October 25.Research was divided fairly evenly between the three major networks: Eight hours, 20 minutes for NBC; eight hours, 13 minutes for CBS; and seven hours, 42 minutes for ABC.Out of 753 minutes dedicated to Trump in that time, approximately 230 minutes of coverage (almost one-third) was dedicated to his personal controversies.Comparatively, just 28 of 583 total minutes of coverage of Harris was spent on similar topics.Harris' coverage was described as being full of enthusiastic quotes from her voters, and overall, attempting to create a positive "vibe" for the Democratic candidate. Credit: NewsBusters/Media Research CenterIt may be hard to believe, but the 63-point difference in coverage for Vice President Harris was far wider than when Trump went up against Hillary Clinton. For 2016, coverage for both candidates was overwhelmingly negative. Clinton received 79% negative coverage, while Trump was hit with 91% negative coverage.For Trump, those numbers more closely represent what he faced in 2020, which was also the second-highest discrepancy for positive coverage in election history.Trump received a shockingly low 8% positive coverage rating against Biden in 2020, while the now-sitting president saw networks give him 66% favorable airtime.This 58-point difference in 2020 along with the 63-point difference in 2024 showcase a stark contrast in how coverage has been extremely negative since Trump jumped into politics.This is further shown by what is considered the third-biggest difference in positive coverage, which was only a 35-point spread between Democrat Barack Obama (68% positive coverage) and Republican John McCain (33% positive).The fourth-widest margin was in 1992 when Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton (D) had a 23-point advantage in positive coverage over incumbent President George H.W. Bush (R). Rounding out the top five was John Kerry's 22-point slant in positive coverage over incumbent President George W. Bush in 2004.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Grand Theft Auto series of games have become such a cultural juggernaut that it’s easy to forget there’s a reason why pretty much everyone on the planet has played them. The amount of freedom they offer is unparalleled, giving players not only a huge landscape to explore with a million things to do, but also letting them take their own routes to their objectives. That attitude should be continuing in GTA 6, as one ex Rockstar dev reckons that’s exactly what the game team will be working on right now. Continue reading Ex GTA 6 dev says this core aspect will be Rockstar’s top priority right now MORE FROM PCGAMESN: GTA 6 release date, Best open-world games, GTA 5 cheats

The Metro games focus on cultivating atmosphere about all else. Carefully making your way along the hazard-filled train tracks of a post-apocalyptic metro station, or narrowly escaping mutated creatures while your broken gas mask impairs your vision, is what it's all about. So, with VR’s immersive capabilities, Metro Awakening seems like a logical next step for the series. I'm happy to say that besides some bugs and performance hiccups on the Meta Quest 3, it's a must-play survival horror concoction. Continue reading Metro Awakening review - a must-play VR survival FPS

COPIUM Alert: Former WH Comms Director Ignores Reality, Says Trump Failed to Expand His Coalition

BOOM: Insurrection Barbie Reminds Us Why We Need to Vote Trump for Our Daughter's Rights

The Real Life 'Tony Stark' Proclaims Men Are Coming to Save America with their Votes

RUN A PICK SIX! Tim Walz Tried a 'Game Day' Tweet for Election Day and That Did NOT Go Well, LOL