'Press is always asking me'

'It's just unfortunate'

Trump Makes a Visit to Dearborn

I remember her best from "Girl Meets World," the delayed sequel to the Disney classic "Boy Meets World."I was 11 years old and the 15-year-old girl on my TV named Sabrina Carpenter seemed like the pinnacle of cool — and the epitome of beauty. When Carpenter’s music video for her single 'Feather' dropped, the outfits were predictably risqué. What I wasn't prepared for was how gory and violent it all was.I was hooked. I followed her career from Disney to her Netflix movies to her music. I knew all the words to her debut single and listened to the hits from every album release. Full 'Send'When I first heard her 2022 album “Emails I Can’t Send,” I was shocked at the contrast with her previous work. The music was catchy, the range of emotion was palpable, and the lyrics had the perfect mix of relatable and made-for-screaming-in-the-car-with-your-girls. It was instantly on repeat in my car. After that, I was anxiously awaiting the next album. In the meantime, she was receiving accolades for her style: a throwback, old Hollywood glamour reminiscent of Marilyn Monroe. Her hair was always impossibly perfect, her outfits — while provocative — were ultra-feminine. In an era of androgynous pop stars, the way Carpenter leaned into her womanhood was a breath of fresh air. Disney detachment syndromeBut just before the release of her 2024 chart-topper, “Short n’ Sweet,” I started to notice something change. Sabrina’s image began evolving in the all-too-familiar edgy way that we have come to expect from ex-Disney girls. In her case, the transformation was particularly disturbing. When Carpenter’s music video for her single “Feather” dropped, the outfits were predictably risqué. What I wasn't prepared for was how gory and violent it all was. I can’t lie, I was shocked. The upbeat, cheerful music is paired with a montage of men being run over, beaten bloody, and killed by an elevator. I’m not squeamish, I just don’t understand how that vibes with her girly-pop music genre. Edgy is as edgy does, I guess. Altar crawlThe blood spatter was not the most concerning thing, however. In the video's climax, Carpenter attends what is supposed go be a funeral for these men filmed in an actual Catholic church in Brooklyn. Wearing a lace veil and a skimpy black dress, Carpenter gyrates before the altar, which is flanked by a number of pastel coffins. The pastor who approved the video shoot was demoted and the church reconsecrated. But that’s not where Carpenter's interest in Christian imagery stops. When she performed at Coachella this year, she wore an oversized white T-shirt that said “Jesus was a carpenter too.” Both she and her boyfriend, Barry Keoghan, can also be seen wearing a cross necklace in her “Please Please Please” music video. 'Taste' for violence Her latest music video, “Taste,” indulges in even more violence, this time graphic enough to require a parental advisory. Carpenter and actress Jenna Ortega are impaled, stabbed in the eye, electrocuted, tortured with a voodoo doll, burned alive, stabbed again, dismembered, strangled, and murdered with a chainsaw. In that order. Don’t worry, they make at the end while at the funeral of the boy they were fighting over. For a performer who has come to represent retro femininity with her blown-out, bombshell blonde locks and her fabulously girlish outfits, this detour into gore and anti-Christian mockery comes as a bit of a surprise. It could be for shock and awe, or it could be a sign of something more sinister. X-spressoWhile I generally advise mindful consumption, I’m also not one to assume evil intentions in an artist. Carpenter's trajectory from seemingly wholesome entertainer to shameless provocateur, however, is all too familiar. Lil Nas X — who began his career appealing to a young audience only evolve into a literal stripper for the devil — comes to mind. Maybe if the audience at large had paid closer attention to the warning signs, we could’ve caught that sooner. It seemed so innocuous in the beginning.I’m not writing off Sabrina Carpenter just yet. It could be that the Disney detachment syndrome is rearing its head as she tries to build her own brand. The pendulum tends to swing too far for the Disney girls, and sometimes they calm down and go on to have perfectly normal careers (Zendaya, Selena Gomez, Vanessa Hudgens, Hilary Duff). Or she could take a darker turn. Moms, be on the lookout. We just have to wait and see.

With Game 5 of the World Series looming and the Yankees facing the Dodgers at home, you can bet millions of Americans are wagering on the outcome of the game — including from the comfort of their homes. Some politicians would like to change that.U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and U.S. Rep. Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.) recently held a press conference to announce their introduction of the SAFE Bet Act, which would ban sports betting nationwide until states adopted their preferred regulations on it. Let’s hope these lawmakers strike out.Virtually every form of entertainment has some social cost associated with it. Gambling is no exception.Online sports betting has become immensely popular. Americans spent about $11 billion on online sports bets alone last year, plus another $7 billion in wagers at casinos. Thirty-eight states have legalized it and, on November 5, Missouri residents will vote on it.For many years, Congress only allowed Delaware, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon to have legal sports betting. Then, in 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down that federal ban, and state legislatures started legalizing it.Even prior to that, in the 2010s, companies like DraftKings and FanDuel began offering daily fantasy sports on smartphone apps. They work by awarding prizes to winners, funded by participants’ entry fees. This model was a legal gray area; some states banned the apps as illegal sports betting, and others did not.Whatever the legal differences between fantasy sports and sports betting, in both cases, participants win or lose money based on their correct forecasts of sports outcomes. Recognizing this, many state legislatures have legalized both daily fantasy sports and traditional sports betting, while a handful of states continue to ban both.But sports betting is basically entertainment. The enjoyment that bettors get is a good thing. The average Gen Z sports bettor spends $268 a month on bets. That’s less than what many young people spend going out for dinner or drinks, traveling, dating, or many other entertainment activities.Sports betting also has a rational function. If you’re a big sports fan, you can hedge your psychic losses by betting against the teams you want to win. You can also make watching games more entertaining by placing a small wager on the outcome. It can be a social activity — something you talk about with friends.But anti-gambling advocates want to roll back the progress we’ve made and return us to the bad old days of prohibition.They point to data showing that between one-sixth and one-third of all gambling revenue is produced by “problem gamblers.” Since problem gamblers are by definition spending a lot of money, you can bet that the percentage of people who gamble without becoming problem gamblers is an even larger majority. Furthermore, sports bettors, who generally have to do a lot of research on their picks, are less likely to be problem gamblers than, say, people who play slots or state lotteries — which typically have the worst odds of all forms of gambling.The Manhattan Institute’s Charles Fain Lehman is a card-carrying member of the Coalition Against Fun, making a career of inveighing against the legality of weed, betting, and even alcohol. A running theme of his work is that the intrinsic pleasures of an activity are worthless; all that matters are the costs.Lehman points to three new, non-peer-reviewed studies on the effects of legal sports betting on different outcomes. One finds that households reduce saving at least dollar for dollar when they begin betting on sports. Another finds that average credit scores decline by 0.3 points when sports betting is legalized in a state, corresponding to an increase in consumer debt and bankruptcies. The final one finds that “the effect of NFL home team upset losses on intimate partner violence” increases by 10 percentage points where sports betting is legal.But the effects of sports betting found in these new papers are quite small. For instance, the second paper mentioned above finds no effect of legal sports betting in general on bankruptcies, just online sports betting. And the effect of online sports betting is to increase the risk of bankruptcy by merely 1 in 10,000 per person per quarter.Virtually every form of entertainment has some social cost associated with it. Gambling is no exception. American families and cultural leaders could do a better job teaching the young that gambling is a foolish way to make money, that it should be treated as entertainment, like buying tickets to a concert, and that just as you shouldn’t spend more on such tickets than you can afford, you shouldn’t gamble more than you can afford to lose.Instead of trying to keep citizens from entertaining themselves as they see fit by banning gambling, government could address the social problems it can cause by doing things like making it easier for problem gamblers to remove themselves permanently from their temptation. There should be a way for them to put themselves on a “do not contact” list that would exempt them from marketing by gambling outfits and voluntarily restrict their access if they try to sign up gambling accounts. Empower people to make good choices for themselves rather than taking away their freedoms.Let’s deal with the downsides instead of going back to prohibition. When it comes to online sports betting, government needs to take the W.

Trump Brings Peace and Prosperity Message to Muslims in Battleground State of Michigan

All We Have to Do is Vote! Powerful Closing Message From the Trump Campaign

Bombshell Revelations in Daniel Penny Trial Turn Entire Prosecution on Its Head

Tucker Carlson Brutally Mocks NY Times Reporter Who Asked About 'Proud Boys' Ties

GOP Victory for Election Integrity With New PA Supreme Court Decision on Misdated Mail Ballots