Informed by childhood memories, Louise Patricia Crane's new album is an intensely personal dark fantasia

Embracing their roots on record for the first time, The Cold Stares' seventh album The Southern shares a vision of the South you won't see from other musicians or the media

The director of operations for The Coalition For The People’s Agenda in Georgia, Joel Caldwell, explains how elections are stolen in this conversation with an undercover reporter. They use numerous tactics, including kicking Republican poll watchers out of the State Farm Arena in 2020 because of an alleged water main break to ballot harvesting in […] The post This Is How Democrats Steal an Election appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, a far-left Democrat who was backed by Democrat megadonor George Soros, filed a lawsuit on Monday to stop Elon Musk’s $1 million a day giveaway to people who signed a petition with his America PAC. America PAC states that one winner is being chosen daily in one of the seven swing states if they sign the PAC’s petition pledging their support for the First and Second Amendments. “America PAC and Musk are lulling Philadelphia citizens – and others in the Commonwealth (and other swing states in the upcoming election) – to give up their personal identifying information and make a political pledge in exchange for the chance to win $1 million,” the lawsuit claims. “That is a lottery. And it is indisputably an unlawful lottery.” Democrats are trying to stop Musk’s giveaway because one of the requirements is that those who signup must be registered voters. The requirement is leading to a lot of people registering to vote, particularly Republicans, in the crucial swing state that could determine the winner of next week’s presidential election. Krasner alleged that the giveaway’s rules were “deceptive” because those who had won had attended Trump rallies and thus were not selected at “random.” The Biden-Harris administration threatened Musk last week with criminal prosecution for helping to drive voter turnout in the upcoming election. The New York Times reported that the letter from the Biden-Harris Department of Justice warned that the giveaway “might violate federal laws against paying voters.” The report said that the letter is intended to threaten “a criminal investigation” if Musk does not stop, even though it’s not clear if the petition even violates the law. The letter comes after a group of anti-Trump Republicans sent a letter to the Biden-Harris DOJ this week demanding that they stop Musk’s efforts. The move from the Biden-Harris administration comes after they have demonized Republican election integrity laws across the country by falsely claiming that they are Jim Crow‑era laws designed to suppress the vote. Earlier this month, the Biden-Harris administration filed a lawsuit to stop the state of Virginia from removing non-citizens from the voter rolls before the election, even though the effort was in compliance with a law that was supported by Democrats. “I think it straddles the line, and it’s a little unclear whether it goes over the line or not,” John Fortier, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who specializes in election administration, told NBC News of the Musk giveaway. Nate Persily, a professor at Stanford Law School, told the network that there really has never been a case like this before, thus “we’re in new legal territory here.” “The relevant legal question is whether this is payment to induce people to register. If it is, then it violates the law,” he said. “If it’s payment to induce people to sign a petition, then it’s not a problem.” Michael Morse, an assistant professor of law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, told NBC News that he would be surprised if the Biden-Harris DOJ tried to stop Musk before the election because they should have more pressing matters before the election. He said that he viewed this as an effort “to build up an email list for contacts, for campaigning, for mobilization.”

'That's who the Obamas are, the Clintons are, the Harrises are'

Bezos acknowledged that this choice might appear strategically timed to favor one candidate over another

What the funk was this