45th President Donald Trump called Vice President Kamala Harris “lazy as hell” on Tuesday for essentially having no campaign events on her schedule just two weeks before election day.

A recent report from Christopher Rufo detailed the parts of Vice President Kamala Harris‘ 2009 book that appear to have been plagiarized — but according to a new report from The Washington Free Beacon, the story doesn’t end there. A new report from the Free Beacon’s Aaron Sibarium showed that in 2007 — while she was the San Francisco District Attorney — Harris lifted text from a Republican state attorney and then presented it as her own when testifying before Congress on a loan repayment program for prosecutors. From The Free Beacon: Virtually her entire testimony about the bill was taken from that of another district attorney, Paul Logli of Winnebago County, Illinois, who had testified in support of the legislation two months earlier before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Both statements cite the same surveys, use the same language, and make the same points in the same order, with a paragraph added here or there. They even contain the same typos, such as missing punctuation or mistaken plurals. One error—a “who” that should have been a “whom”—was corrected in Harris’s transposition. Sibarium posted a lengthy thread to X along with screenshots of Logli’s testimony — from several months earlier — alongside Harris’ testimony, which was submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee in April. “In 2007, Kamala Harris plagiarized pages of Congressional testimony from a Republican colleague. And in 2012, she plagiarized a fictionalized story about sex trafficking—but presented it as a real case. It’s not just one book; it’s a career-long pattern,” he began the thread. On April 24, 2007, Harris testified before the House Judiciary Committee in support of a student loan repayment program. Virtually her entire testimony about the program was taken from that of another district attorney, Paul Logli of Winnebago County, Illinois. pic.twitter.com/FmJX5KBu8z — Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) October 22, 2024 According to Sibarium’s report, nearly 1,200 of the 1,500 words she submitted as her testimony matched Logli’s verbatim. He went on in the thread on X to lay out several other instances in which she had submitted work that was not her own, changing only minor details. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 “As California attorney general, she didn’t just copy boilerplate language without attribution. In one of the lengthier passages reviewed by Free Beacon, she lifted a fictionalized story about a victim of sex trafficking—and presented it as a real case,” Sibarium continued. The story came from Polaris Project, a nonprofit that runs the National Human Trafficking Hotline. By June 2012, the project had posted vignettes on its website that were "representative of the types of calls" the hotline receives and "meant for informational purposes only." — Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) October 22, 2024   “The story came from Polaris Project, a nonprofit that runs the National Human Trafficking Hotline. By June 2012, the project had posted vignettes on its website that were ‘representative of the types of calls’ the hotline receives and ‘meant for informational purposes only.'” “A plagiarized speech and now she is Truly Biden,” Phil Kerpen remarked as the story began to spread. “She wasn’t content stealing his 2024 nomination, she’s now stealing his 1988 campaign,” Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro added. She wasn't content stealing his 2024 nomination, she's now stealing his 1988 campaign https://t.co/bH6dawI00q — Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) October 22, 2024

In order to win the election, Kamala Harris has suggested Donald Trump is unserious. She stated on Monday that Donald Trump is fundamentally an unserious candidate, but the consequences of his presidency will be so serious. “In many, many ways, Donald Trump is an unserious man, but the consequences of him being president of the United States are brutally serious,” she whined. “There are things that he says that will be the subject of skits and laughter and jokes, but words have meaning coming from someone who aspires to stand behind the seal of the president of the United States.” Harris and Trump are virtually polar opposites. Trump says a lot of stuff. He makes jokes about Arnold Palmer’s business and he says funny things about McDonald’s and he makes jokes all the time. He says things that are really out of the box and it’s hard to take them fully seriously because he’s not fully serious when he says them. And even when he is fully serious, does he really mean them 100%? Half the time, no. But — his actual policy is quite serious. That has always been the gap for Donald Trump: his image is sort of buffoonish and goofballish, but his actual policy is hard-nosed.  His actual policy accomplishments are quite real, namely: a functional economy, growing innovation, low inflation, a foreign policy record that is second to none in the annals of American history. No major foreign wars, new peace deals in the Middle East, intimidation of our enemies, strengthening our alliances, particularly in the Middle East. And despite all the talk about how he weakened our alliances with NATO, that’s actually not true. He simply requested and succeeded in getting those countries to pay a larger share of their own GDP toward national defense. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show So Donald Trump has a patina of unseriousness, and underneath he’s a very serious policy candidate. That is why he is running the way he’s running in this election. Kamala Harris is precisely the opposite. She tries to pose as serious, but underneath it is a deep unseriousness. Beneath that façade is total emptiness. She’s a shell of a politician, and below it is just a vacuum.  Every day she betrays the fact that there ain’t nothing there. There’s just nothing there. Yesterday, for example, she was doing a presser. She couldn’t even call on the reporters herself. Her campaign has to stage-manage her the way they were stage-managing Joe Biden. You could actually hear one of her campaign aides calling out the reporters because she can’t do it herself.  Why are her aides hauling out their reporters? Why isn’t she doing it? Because she’s not capable. In fact, we are now learning that she has reduced her time on the campaign trail. According to Breitbart, “Kamala Harris’s campaign reduced her time on the campaign trail this week, opting to prepare for an interview with NBC and a CNN town hall.” These are not things you have to take time off from the campaign trail to do. They’re not. These are not things that require extra time off. It’s one thing to say I’m taking two days off to prepare for a debate, so I have to study my opponent’s moves. I need to do a sort of lightning round with somebody playing Donald Trump. That would be understandable. But an interview with NBC means you have to take time off the campaign trail? She has to take two days off the campaign trail, two weeks before the election, to prepare for an interview with NBC News, which has been overwhelmingly favorable to her, because she blew it with Bret Baier on Fox News? A CNN town hall. How do you prepare for that? What does that preparation look like? But here’s the thing about Kamala Harris: She has to prepare for everything. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 The reason that the Left is so worked up about Donald Trump going to McDonald’s is because when Donald Trump went to McDonald’s, he was very comfortable in his own skin. By masquerading as a worker at McDonald’s, Trump was showing respect to people who work at McDonald’s and people who eat at McDonald’s, and he likes those people. Kamala Harris is the kind of person who literally has to be prepared by her staff to do a small donor dinner. They’d put a fake dinner together so she could learn to speak with humans without downing an entire bottle of rosé. Underneath the façade of a serious politician, there is nothing serious there.

CNN analyst fact-checked Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate Democrat Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz‘s lie about the loss of manufacturing jobs under former President Donald Trump. Walz appeared on “The View” Monday and said, “Donald Trump lost more manufacturing jobs than any president in American history. That’s simply factual.” Not one of the hosts of the ABC talk show pushed back on the lie, but CNN did and reported that “Walz’s claim is false.” “Well, if you’re going to say something is simply factual, it should be factual,” CNN analyst Daniel Dale said. “This is not. It’s not true that the Trump presidency lost more manufacturing jobs than any other presidency.” HOLY SHT! CNN just fact checked Tim Walz and exposed a blatant LIE! He tried to say that Trump “lost more manufacturing jobs than any president in American history” Daniel Dale: “If you’re going to say something is simply factual, it should be factual. This is NOT true.”… pic.twitter.com/GB3SNqNiE2 — Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) October 22, 2024 “Under George W. Bush, there were about 4.5 million manufacturing jobs lost,” he added. “Under Trump, it was about 178,000. There are also more manufacturing jobs lost, than under Trump, under Eisenhower, under Ford, under Reagan, so Trump does not have the record.” ​​“I think it’s also worth pointing out for context that these Trump job losses in manufacturing overwhelmingly occurred because of the COVID pandemic,” the analyst continued. “Pre-pandemic under Trump, there was a gain of about 414,000 manufacturing jobs.” MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 A CNN report noted that official statistics show that significantly more manufacturing jobs were also lost during the presidencies of “George H.W. Bush (1.27 million)” and under former President Barack Obama (195,000) than under Trump, providing the numbers under Eisenhower (1.2 million), Ford (767,000), and Reagan (582,000). The CNN report also pointed out that because Trump only had one term so far, his loss of jobs does not even set a record among those presidents who only served once. During the 2024 campaign, Trump has focused much of his attention on the economy, blasting the Biden-Harris administration’s record on the issue. Voters also list the economy and inflation, which reached 9.1% under President Joe Biden, as the top issues heading into the election. Harris has also focused on addressing Americans’ economic woes during her campaign and has largely blamed corporate greed for a rise in prices. In August, Harris proposed “the first-ever federal ban on corporate price-gouging,” a policy that was compared to Soviet-style price controls on food. Zach Jewell contributed to this piece.

Daily Wire host Michael Knowles sat down with actor Kirk Cameron to play a game of “YES or NO,” touching on a host of controversial issues including problems with public schools, the Left’s attacks on men, and more. Knowles and the 54-year-old conservative actor traded questions in the game, wherein opponents win points by accurately guessing which way their opponent will lean on topics ranging from politics and religion to pop culture and more. Cameron and Knowles agreed that “it’s more of a risk to send your teenager to public school than it is to buy them a motorcycle,” prompting a discussion on how American public education has become “religious” in the way that it drills students in left-wing ideologies. Knowles pointed to a recent CDC study that came out saying, “1 in 30 American high school students today identify as transgender. One-in-eighteen is gender questioning…to subject your kid to that you are 1-in-18 chance, you are really rolling the dice with your kid’s life.” The “Growing Pains” star talked about how he and his wife chose to homeschool their six kids, calling public schools today “far too religious.” “At the end of the day, public schools have become so unsafe for your children, in my opinion,” Cameron explained. “And the value of the sacrifice they demand from you to their priests and their elders is just not even…and I think that they’ve created their own worship, called ‘secular humanism.’” “Which has become the church of secular culture,” he added. “And it’s the worship of corporate man or human beings and they have their own twisted Ten Commandments, LGBTQIADEI. And if you don’t fall in line with that dogma, that is grounds for banishment from their society.” Knowles agreed, labeling it effectively a “conversion therapy” to their religion. “Ironically, they say they hate conversion therapy,” the DW host said. “But it’s conversion therapy to their false religion.” Later, Cameron posed a question to Knowles asking whether “the media’s war on masculinity is really an attack on Biblical manhood.” Both agreed yes, with the Daily Wire host suggesting it is also an attack on the natural things about being a man, what he called “the Christian understanding” of manhood and fatherhood. Cameron agreed, adding that “much of the media wants to depict men as defective women.” “And I think that is because there is inherent value to being masculine that is very scary to the Left,” the Hollywood star said. “Men who so love their wives, children, their God and their family and their future that they are willing to defend it with their own lives. That’s something that stands in the way of consolidating power in the government and advancing Marxism …” Watch the entirety of Michael Knowles’ sit-down with the “Lifemark” star here.

'Republicans could see a massive windfall come November'