Something smells fishy here ... and it's not the Filet-O-Fish. On Sunday, former President Donald Trump -- the Republican presidential nominee -- dropped by a McDonald's in Pennsylvania for a well-received campaign stop and photo-op amid a whirlwind weekend of activity in the key swing state. (Well, mostly well-received campaign...

Transgender golfer Nicole Powers has decided to retire from women’s sport after “taking a step back” and realizing the “biological reality” makes competing against women unfair. “I had to take a step back and realize [...] The post Trans Golfer Quits Women’s Sports, Admits ‘Biological Reality’ Makes Competition Unfair appeared first on The People's Voice.

45th President Donald Trump called Vice President Kamala Harris “lazy as hell” on Tuesday for essentially having no campaign events on her schedule just two weeks before election day.

A recent report from Christopher Rufo detailed the parts of Vice President Kamala Harris‘ 2009 book that appear to have been plagiarized — but according to a new report from The Washington Free Beacon, the story doesn’t end there. A new report from the Free Beacon’s Aaron Sibarium showed that in 2007 — while she was the San Francisco District Attorney — Harris lifted text from a Republican state attorney and then presented it as her own when testifying before Congress on a loan repayment program for prosecutors. From The Free Beacon: Virtually her entire testimony about the bill was taken from that of another district attorney, Paul Logli of Winnebago County, Illinois, who had testified in support of the legislation two months earlier before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Both statements cite the same surveys, use the same language, and make the same points in the same order, with a paragraph added here or there. They even contain the same typos, such as missing punctuation or mistaken plurals. One error—a “who” that should have been a “whom”—was corrected in Harris’s transposition. Sibarium posted a lengthy thread to X along with screenshots of Logli’s testimony — from several months earlier — alongside Harris’ testimony, which was submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee in April. “In 2007, Kamala Harris plagiarized pages of Congressional testimony from a Republican colleague. And in 2012, she plagiarized a fictionalized story about sex trafficking—but presented it as a real case. It’s not just one book; it’s a career-long pattern,” he began the thread. On April 24, 2007, Harris testified before the House Judiciary Committee in support of a student loan repayment program. Virtually her entire testimony about the program was taken from that of another district attorney, Paul Logli of Winnebago County, Illinois. pic.twitter.com/FmJX5KBu8z — Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) October 22, 2024 According to Sibarium’s report, nearly 1,200 of the 1,500 words she submitted as her testimony matched Logli’s verbatim. He went on in the thread on X to lay out several other instances in which she had submitted work that was not her own, changing only minor details. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 “As California attorney general, she didn’t just copy boilerplate language without attribution. In one of the lengthier passages reviewed by Free Beacon, she lifted a fictionalized story about a victim of sex trafficking—and presented it as a real case,” Sibarium continued. The story came from Polaris Project, a nonprofit that runs the National Human Trafficking Hotline. By June 2012, the project had posted vignettes on its website that were "representative of the types of calls" the hotline receives and "meant for informational purposes only." — Aaron Sibarium (@aaronsibarium) October 22, 2024   “The story came from Polaris Project, a nonprofit that runs the National Human Trafficking Hotline. By June 2012, the project had posted vignettes on its website that were ‘representative of the types of calls’ the hotline receives and ‘meant for informational purposes only.'” “A plagiarized speech and now she is Truly Biden,” Phil Kerpen remarked as the story began to spread. “She wasn’t content stealing his 2024 nomination, she’s now stealing his 1988 campaign,” Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro added. She wasn't content stealing his 2024 nomination, she's now stealing his 1988 campaign https://t.co/bH6dawI00q — Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) October 22, 2024

In order to win the election, Kamala Harris has suggested Donald Trump is unserious. She stated on Monday that Donald Trump is fundamentally an unserious candidate, but the consequences of his presidency will be so serious. “In many, many ways, Donald Trump is an unserious man, but the consequences of him being president of the United States are brutally serious,” she whined. “There are things that he says that will be the subject of skits and laughter and jokes, but words have meaning coming from someone who aspires to stand behind the seal of the president of the United States.” Harris and Trump are virtually polar opposites. Trump says a lot of stuff. He makes jokes about Arnold Palmer’s business and he says funny things about McDonald’s and he makes jokes all the time. He says things that are really out of the box and it’s hard to take them fully seriously because he’s not fully serious when he says them. And even when he is fully serious, does he really mean them 100%? Half the time, no. But — his actual policy is quite serious. That has always been the gap for Donald Trump: his image is sort of buffoonish and goofballish, but his actual policy is hard-nosed.  His actual policy accomplishments are quite real, namely: a functional economy, growing innovation, low inflation, a foreign policy record that is second to none in the annals of American history. No major foreign wars, new peace deals in the Middle East, intimidation of our enemies, strengthening our alliances, particularly in the Middle East. And despite all the talk about how he weakened our alliances with NATO, that’s actually not true. He simply requested and succeeded in getting those countries to pay a larger share of their own GDP toward national defense. WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show So Donald Trump has a patina of unseriousness, and underneath he’s a very serious policy candidate. That is why he is running the way he’s running in this election. Kamala Harris is precisely the opposite. She tries to pose as serious, but underneath it is a deep unseriousness. Beneath that façade is total emptiness. She’s a shell of a politician, and below it is just a vacuum.  Every day she betrays the fact that there ain’t nothing there. There’s just nothing there. Yesterday, for example, she was doing a presser. She couldn’t even call on the reporters herself. Her campaign has to stage-manage her the way they were stage-managing Joe Biden. You could actually hear one of her campaign aides calling out the reporters because she can’t do it herself.  Why are her aides hauling out their reporters? Why isn’t she doing it? Because she’s not capable. In fact, we are now learning that she has reduced her time on the campaign trail. According to Breitbart, “Kamala Harris’s campaign reduced her time on the campaign trail this week, opting to prepare for an interview with NBC and a CNN town hall.” These are not things you have to take time off from the campaign trail to do. They’re not. These are not things that require extra time off. It’s one thing to say I’m taking two days off to prepare for a debate, so I have to study my opponent’s moves. I need to do a sort of lightning round with somebody playing Donald Trump. That would be understandable. But an interview with NBC means you have to take time off the campaign trail? She has to take two days off the campaign trail, two weeks before the election, to prepare for an interview with NBC News, which has been overwhelmingly favorable to her, because she blew it with Bret Baier on Fox News? A CNN town hall. How do you prepare for that? What does that preparation look like? But here’s the thing about Kamala Harris: She has to prepare for everything. MATT WALSH’S ‘AM I RACIST?’ COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28 The reason that the Left is so worked up about Donald Trump going to McDonald’s is because when Donald Trump went to McDonald’s, he was very comfortable in his own skin. By masquerading as a worker at McDonald’s, Trump was showing respect to people who work at McDonald’s and people who eat at McDonald’s, and he likes those people. Kamala Harris is the kind of person who literally has to be prepared by her staff to do a small donor dinner. They’d put a fake dinner together so she could learn to speak with humans without downing an entire bottle of rosé. Underneath the façade of a serious politician, there is nothing serious there.