Trump's campaign is surging

'It's very much a Rorschach test'

'What is one policy that you would have done different?'

'Her responsibly is to give Trump a fair trial'

Heh - Guess Who's Growing on People?

Desperation in PA: Senate Dem Bets On Trump

“Men for Kamala” is the name of Harris’ latest campaign ad. The title alone is enough to ignite a conflagration of mockery and criticism online, which it has. However, the content of the ad is where it gets really, really bad — so bad that comedian Dave Landau saw it not as Harris’ desperate plea for male support but rather as an opportunity to have some fun. In the original ad, six men explain why they’re “man enough” to vote for Kamala. These men include a morbidly obese cowboy/farmer, a muscled-up guy in the gym, a bearded biker, a random dude with a horse, another random dude in a leather jacket and sun hat, and finally — by far the best character — a very effeminate man sitting with his legs crossed on a tailgate. The commercial starts out with three of the men stating their specific reasons for why they should be regarded as men. “I’m man enough to cook my steak rare,” said the tailgate queen. “I’m man enough to deadlift 500 and then braid the s*** out of my daughter’s hair,” said the gym bro. “You think I’m afraid of carburetors? I eat carburetors for breakfast,” said the corpulent man, who seems to have confused carburetors with carbohydrates. Then the ad transitions into the characters explaining what they’re all not afraid of — supporting women. Several liberal talking points are repeated, including abortion, IVF, and the right to be “a childless cat lady.” Some of the best snippets from this segment include the lines: “Full-throated endorsement,” “raw-dog a flight,” and “emotional in front of my horse.” Such an utterly ridiculous skit is a gold mine for a comedian like Dave. In his “man enough” remake, Dave stars in the role of an effeminate “macho, macho man,” who wears a leather jacket and pants, no shirt, a stick-on mustache, a dog collar, and a beret and says things like, “You had me at full-throated endorsement,” “pound me like a chicken breast,” and other things we can’t put in print. Check it out above. Want more 'Normal World'?To enjoy more whimsical satire, topical sketches, and comedic discussions from comedians Dave Landau and 1/4 Black Garrett, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Former athletes and activists spoke this week at a United Nations assembly urging the international body to encourage sanctions on men who try to compete in women's sports.Olympic silver medalist Sharron Davies and former West Virginia athlete Lainey Armistead were among those who spoke at the Wednesday event in New York City, describing the obvious advantages men have over women in athletics.'NO males at all in women's sport.'"I'm here today because we've all seen what happens when males are allowed to compete on women's teams. ... It's demoralizing and unfair, and just plain wrong," Armistead said.The soccer player explained that while West Virginia has laws that ensure only biological women can compete in women's sports, she still heard stories at her university about women getting hurt during competitions against men in female athletics."In just the last three years, the one male athlete who has been allowed to compete against girls in West Virginia has already displaced nearly 300 girls. And that's just one athlete."Davies was much more blunt in her speech, speaking on the simple biological differences that should be seen as "common sense.""Females are at a physical disadvantage," she said. "This doesn't mean that we're worse or better; it just means that we’re biologically different."Davies is a former Olympic swimmer who won silver in Moscow in 1980, competing in three Olympics in total. She also won two gold, two silver, and two bronze at the Commonwealth Games between 1978-1990. "I don't know a single person that wants to exclude anybody. However, we do want to see women have fair and safe sport. And we cannot wait until a woman is seriously injured or worse still, killed, to be able to deal with the science and the obvious and the common sense," she added.Davies has consistently called for sex screening to return to the Olympics, stating explicitly that even in the 1970s it was a simple process."A sex screening test takes one minute once in your life only (because humans can't change biological sex) which is a simple swab to the inside of your cheek. I had one at the Montreal Olympics. Not at all intrusive especially when Olympic athletes have to consent to drug testing," she wrote on X in July."NO males at all in women's sport," she urged in September. "Inclusion is now exclusion of females from their own races by males!" — (@) Lawyers from the Alliance Defending Freedom — including Kristen Waggoner and Reem Alsalem, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women and Girls — joined the athletes.Both called for the international sports community to ensure women can participate in athletics without being at risk of harm from men. "Our plea to the world is to learn from the mistakes that have been made — and that are now being corrected — so that your daughters can walk into a future of fair and safe sports," Waggoner asked.Alsalem, a longtime advocate in the space, said that the failure to protect the female category has been one of the most egregious forms of discrimination against women.She added that the essence of being female has been "willfully pushed aside" despite the pain, distress, and humiliation women are facing at the hands of men who want to beat them in their own competitions.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

On Thursday, United States District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected a request from former President Donald Trump's legal team to delay special counsel Jack Smith's public release of additional documents pertaining to a federal case against the Republican presidential nominee, claiming he attempted to overturn the 2020 presidential election.In the defense's request to delay, Trump's lawyers stated that releasing the prosecution's alleged evidence just weeks before the presidential election and amid "early voting creates a concerning appearance of election interference."'Radical Democrats are hell-bent on interfering in the presidential election on behalf of Lyin' Kamala Harris.'However, according to Chutkan, withholding the release of documents to the public would have amounted to "election interference.""There is undoubtedly a public interest in courts not inserting themselves into elections, or appearing to do so," Chutkan stated. "But litigation's incidental effects on politics are not the same as a court's intentional interference with them. As a result, it is in fact Defendant's requested relief that risks undermining that public interest: If the court withheld information that the public otherwise had a right to access solely because of the potential political consequences of releasing it, that withholding could itself constitute — or appear to be — election interference."Hundreds of pages of documents from Smith's investigation were released on Friday.A second federal case lodged against Trump was tossed in July by Judge Aileen Cannon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Southern Florida after she concluded with the defense that Smith's appointment as special counsel was "unlawful" because it circumvented Congress. Cannon's decision came just weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court found that Trump does have some presidential immunity for actions taken in his official capacity.Since then, Smith has been desperately grasping at straws to keep the federal election case alive and revive the classified documents case dismissed by Cannon.Trump's team has repeatedly called all the cases filed against him — including Smith's federal prosecutions, the New York criminal case, and the Georgia case — a sham and a witch hunt. Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung told Fox News Digital on Friday, "Radical Democrats are hell-bent on interfering in the presidential election on behalf of Lyin' Kamala Harris.""With just over two weeks until Election Day, President Trump is dominating this race, and crazed liberals throughout the Deep State are freaking out," Cheung continued. "As mandated by the Supreme Court's historic decision on presidential Immunity and other vital jurisprudence, this entire case is a sham and a partisan, unconstitutional witch hunt that should be dismissed entirely — as should all of the remaining Democrat hoaxes."Much of the material unsealed to the public on Friday was previously released in other forms or already publicly available information, Fox News Digital reported. Most of the alleged evidence compiled by the special counsel remains sealed.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Personal finance guru Dave Ramsey said on his show that he is voting for former President Donald Trump, and he pre-emptively mocked his critics who might seek to cancel him. Ramsey is an influential financial counselor who often bases his teachings on his Christian faith. In a segment of "The Ramsey Show" published Wednesday, he told his viewers how he decided whom to vote for.'When you have to vilify or destroy a person because you disagree with their idea, you've already lost the argument.'"I'm looking at ideas and which ideas land on each side of the aisle. Where am I most likely to get a tax policy I like, an immigration policy I like, a foreign policy I like? Where am I most likely to get a gun policy I like? A climate change policy I like? A woke policy I like, that I agree with?" said Ramsey. "Where am I most likely to get that? I can check those boxes very clearly, very quickly on these two candidates. So I'm gonna tell ya, I'm voting for Donald Trump," he added, "because I've checked those boxes and more of them are on that side than on the other side." He went on to ridicule people who might try to cancel him over his vote. "That's OK, I can deal with that. That's happened to me for over 30 years. 'I'm going to cancel you!' That's hard to do, I own the show," he said. "And so you're not gonna get to cancel me. You can leave but you can't cancel me." Ramsey has criticized the overheated rhetoric in politics previously when he reminded people that the Bible orders them to pray for their leaders. "Some of you are really too serious about what happens in the White House. If you'd concentrate half as much on what happens in your house, you’d be in a whole lot better shape. That's really the common denominator of success. It hasn't got anything to do with those guys up there," said Ramsey on social media. "Concentrate on fighting for or against ideas," he added. "When you have to vilify or destroy a person because you disagree with their idea, you've already lost the argument because you've lost the high ground. You don't have to destroy people for your idea to win."Ramsey's comments can be viewed as part of his video on YouTube. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!