England’s Labour Party ACTIVELY INTERFERING in the US Presidential election. This is illegal.

We’re Not Supposed to Talk About Voting Irregularities

‘Redneck Air Force’ helping relief efforts for Helene victims

When HELP Doesn’t Arrive

Glenn Beck shares SHOCKING Hurricane Helene Damage Details He Saw

Kamala's Campaign Pitch: Make America Detroit

Have aliens ever set foot on our planet? If any organization would know the answer, it’s the Pentagon, and now the verdict is in. According to the U.S. Department of Defense, no evidence has been found to suggest that aliens have ever visited Earth. During a recent Pentagon press conference, Major General Pat Ryder faced tough questions, including a cleverly crafted inquiry from Jeff Schogol, a journalist with the military news outlet Task & Purpose. Schogol used the opportunity to indirectly ask if aliens had ever visited Earth, saying, “Given the news cycle, you could announce anything about aliens or extraterrestrial life, and no one would care.” Ryder gave a nod to the epic sci-fi series The X-Files through its tagline ‘the truth is out there’, which opens every episode, before schooling Schogol. He said: “The truth is out there, Jeff, and the truth is, we have no evidence to indicate extraterrestrial life has visited the planet.” The U.S. government, often linked to rumors about UFOs and the infamous Area 51, has officially stated that it has never encountered extraterrestrial life on Earth. In 2022, the Department of Defense established the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to investigate the possibility of alien visits. After extensive research, the report concluded that none of the U.S. government’s investigations to date had uncovered evidence of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP, also known as UFOs) linked to alien technology. The report further clarified that certain top-secret national security programs were often mistakenly identified as UFO-related. Additionally, AARO found no supporting evidence for claims that the U.S. government had engaged in reverse engineering alien technology, and most claims from interviewees were debunked. “So, here’s your answer—an unequivocal ‘no,’ at least for now,” the report concluded. The post Pentagon Reaffirms: No Evidence of Alien Visits to Earth appeared first on Anomalien.com.

For our first annual Free Speech Awards, the Media Research Center (MRC) is honoring 35 champions of the First Amendment, including five members of the U.S. Senate today, 10 members of the U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday, 10 additional public officials on Wednesday and 10 outstanding advocates of free speech in non-governmental organizations on Thursday. Today MRC is honoring the five senators who have stood strong for Americans’ free speech rights, especially on social media. The winners of the MRC’s 2024 Free Speech Awards are as follows: Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Mike Lee (R-UT), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Rand Paul (R-KY) and Eric Schmitt (R-MO). While Big Tech companies and leftists across the spectrum of politics and society have spoken out against free speech, these five senators have distinguished themselves in the fight to preserve it. In announcing this year’s winners, MRC Founder and President Brent Bozell said: “Today marks the beginning of the MRC Free Speech Awards with the 2024 Top 5 Senators to defend free speech. While the Senate is far from being under conservative leadership, their efforts have stopped massive government censorship.” Bozell continued: “Senators Mike Lee and Rand Paul led the charge against provisions in the Kids Online Safety Act that would have increased government censorship and decreased parental rights. Ted Cruz fought to reform Section 230 to prevent Big Tech platforms from censoring average Americans. Eric Schmitt launched the case against the federal government for censoring Americans and continues the fight in the Senate. Senator Roger Marshal continues to hold Google and other Big Tech platforms accountable. We at the MRC applaud these virtuous efforts.” All five of the Senators have faced online censorship, and MRC has documented cases of censorship from all five in our exclusive CensorTrack database. ♦ 2024 MRC Free Speech Award Winner: Sen. Ted Cruz Sen. Cruz is a former Solicitor General of Texas who argued nine cases before the Supreme Court before becoming one of the greatest fighters for free speech in Congress.  As a senator, Cruz has led the effort to reform Section 230 to prevent Big Tech platforms from censoring constitutionally-protected speech and for consistently applying constitutional principles to protect the First Amendment.  He has relentlessly called out platforms like Google, GoFundMe, Facebook and Twitter for their relentless censorship, leftist bias and election interference. Cruz’s record includes holding Google accountable for its abuse of market dominance. Cruz also thwarted an attempt in the Senate to allow the legacy media to ignore antitrust laws and jointly negotiate with social media companies on content distribution.  Cruz also went to bat for free speech when the stakes were highest, writing to then-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in 2020, calling for answers on the rampant censorship from the platform during a presidential election year.  The Texas Senator has also been vigilant against new threats against free speech as they emerge, condemning a DHS-backed censorship operation exposed by the MRC.  ♦ 2024 MRC Free Speech Award Winner: Sen. Mike Lee Sen. Lee has represented Utah in Congress since 2011. He has led the fight against Sen. Richard Blumenthal’s (D-CT) censorship provisions in the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and consistently applied constitutional principles to protect free speech rights. His relentless fight for liberty as a public official has included not only legislation and intense advocacy during hearings but also being a voice against censorship in the media and on social media. Lee was such a fierce fighter against Big Tech censorship that he was censored by Google alongside other Big Tech critics. Google buried Lee’s website during his reelection campaign in 2022. Lee has also worked to hold Meta and pre-Elon Twitter accountable for the suppression of free speech. Lee has even taken on government efforts to censor free speech, working to defund the Biden-Harris administration’s now-defunct Disinformation Governance Board.  ♦ 2024 MRC Free Speech Award Winner: Sen. Roger Marshall Sen. Marshall is a veteran, a doctor, a former congressman and a U.S. Senator from Kansas who refuses to be silent about Big Tech’s constant efforts to suppress free speech.  Marshall has highlighted abuses by Google and other Big Tech platforms and held these companies accountable for depriving Americans of their free speech rights. He has used his background as a doctor to speak up for the right to life and to push back against censorship during the COVID-19 pandemic that threatened Americans’ civil liberties. For the latter stance, Facebook even censored Marshall.  Marshall has fired back against the Big Tech titans for silencing him and others for exercising their right to free speech, from defending Live Action from censorship on TikTok to taking up the case of independent journalist Alex Berenson after the Biden-Harris administration targeted him for censorship. Marshall has also led the charge in demanding answers from Google over whether the search giant suppressed searches for the first assassination attempt on Trump.  ♦ 2024 MRC Free Speech Award Winner: Sen. Rand Paul Sen. Paul was raised to be a defender of free speech as the son of another champion of liberty, former Rep. Ron Paul (R-KY). He is also a doctor who pushed back against the censorship of so-called misinformation and disinformation that the government, the media and Big Tech attempted to justify during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Paul has fought against Big Tech platforms such as YouTube, which have censored him and so many other Americans. He has called for governmental officials, like Dr. Antony Fauci, to be held accountable for their role in promoting censorship. Alongside other senators, Paul has also fought to end Big Tech-government collusion to censor speech. Paul has been a fierce opponent of Blumenthal’s drive to censor speech through KOSA.  ♦ 2024 MRC Free Speech Award Winner: Sen. Eric Schmitt Sen. Schmitt was a champion for free speech even before he was elected to the U.S. Senate. As attorney general of Missouri, Schmitt launched the historic Murthy v. Missouri litigation against the Biden-Harris Administration and has continued his fight for the First Amendment in the US Senate.  Schmitt has also consistently defended the right to free speech as a senator. In August, Schmitt used his influential position to warn Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg against engaging in censorship ahead of the 2024 election.  In addition, Schmitt called for legislation to protect Americans’ rights when the Supreme Court refused to: “Now, Congress must step up and do our job to make sure Americans’ right to freedom of speech is not eroded any further. I call on Congress to pass my Censorship Accountability Act and my COLLUDE Act immediately.”

CBS News put out a statement of self-defense on Sunday night about the obvious differences in editing of their Kamala Harris interview. The word salad aired in a Face The Nation promo didn’t match the shorter, more coherent answer that aired the next night on a 60 Minutes special. It began like a PolitiFact evaluation: "Former President Donald Trump is accusing 60 Minutes of deceitful editing of our Oct. 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. That is false.” If the two different answers aren't "deceitful," they're sneaky. The one in the program clearly makes Harris sound more in command of the English language than the larger answer did. CBS insisted it was "Same question. Same answer. But a different portion of the response." But CBS still refuses to release the full transcript (or partial transcript of this specific question and answer), which can only arouse suspicion. Let's just guess they cued her up for a second try at the answer.  They proclaimed: "When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate and on point. The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide ranging 21-minute-long segment." It also makes her look more in command of the issues. It's putting a thumb on the scale for the Democrats.  Then the statement tried to attack Trump for backing out of a hostile interview with Scott Pelley, who as an evening-news anchor in 2017 slammed Trump for "presidential statements devoid of reality" and "tweeting tantrums and falsehoods." “Remember, Mr. Trump pulled out of his interview with 60 Minutes and the vice president participated,” they proclaimed, as if CBS didn’t have a double standard. “Our long-standing invitation to former President Trump remains open. If he would like to discuss the issues facing the nation and the Harris interview, we would be happy to have him on 60 Minutes.” They're trying to imply Trump is a coward, when they won't display the courage to let the public see how they manipulated these video clips.  The Trump campaign issued its own statement, which read in part:  60 Minutes just admitted to doing exactly what President Trump accused them of doing. They edited in a different response -- from another part of her answer -- to make Kamala Harris sound less incoherent than she really was. Their statement is not a denial, it is an admission that they did exactly what they were accused of.

CBS News broke its silence Sunday, addressing President Donald Trump and other critics' concern that its "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris was deceptively edited in hopes of portraying the vice president as more coherent than the original footage would otherwise suggest. Rather than admit the difference between previews of the interview and the final that ultimately aired on Oct. 7 amounted to strategic changes in Harris' favor, CBS News instead suggested it was par for the course and that Trump was in the wrong. "Former President Donald Trump is accusing 60 Minutes of deceitful editing of our Oct. 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. That is false," the network said in a statement, released just one week after Gallup revealed Americans continue to register record-low trust in the media. Trump previously suggested: I've never seen this before, but the producers of 60 Minutes sliced and diced ('cut and pasted') Lyin' Kamala's answers to questions, which were virtually incoherent, over and over again, some by as many as four times in a single sentence or thought, all in an effort, possibly illegal as part of the 'News Division,' which must be licensed, to make her look 'more Presidential,' or a least, better. It may also be a major Campaign Finance Violation. This is a stain on the reputation of 60 Minutes that is not recoverable — It will always remain with this once storied brand. CBS News, which has yet to release the undoctored transcript, said further in its Sunday statement, "60 Minutes gave an excerpt of our interview to Face the Nation that used a longer section of her answer than that on 60 Minutes. Same question. Same answer. But a different portion of the response." "When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate and on point," continued the statement. "The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide ranging 21-minute-long segment." 'The extent of their deceptive edits must be SIGNIFICANT for them to refuse to release the actual transcript.' Contrary to its suggestion, CBS News appears to have ventured beyond Harris' actual response for a usable answer in an effort to make the vice president come across as "clear, accurate and on point." Blaze News previously reported that in one preview for the interview, CBS News' Bill Whitaker asked the vice president whether America lacks influence over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his strategic decisions in the Middle East. After a labyrinthine response from Harris, Whitaker stated, "It seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening." Harris then responded, "Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region." The vice president's response was widely mocked as another word salad when previewed by CBS' "Face the Nation" — such that its absence was hard to miss when the final version was released the following day. The final makes it look as if Harris responded by saying, "We're not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end." Karoline Leavitt, press secretary for the Trump campaign, said in response to CBS News' Sunday statement, "60 Minutes just admitted to doing exactly what President Trump accused them of doing. They edited in a different response — from another part of her answer — to make Kamala Harris sound less incoherent than she really was." Leavitt noted that "their statement is not a denial, it is an admission that they did exactly what they were accused of." "Release the transcript!" added Leavitt. Numerous other critics have demanded the release of the transcript and speculated about the true nature of Harris' responses. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has himself been subjected to deceptive edits on CBS News, wrote, "@60Minutes has now confirmed what we all know: they edited the video. Now release the FULL transcript and video." "60 Minutes continues to conceal the unedited transcript of its interview with Kamala Harris. Here, they also lie about the controversy surrounding that transcript. The extent of their deceptive edits must be SIGNIFICANT for them to refuse to release the actual transcript," tweeted Federalist editor in chief Mollie Hemingway. Curtis Houck, managing editor of News Busters, asked, "What are you all hiding?" 'When broadcasters manipulate interviews and distort reality, it undermines democracy itself.' The Center for American Rights has filed a formal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission over its edits to the Harris interview, noting that "CBS crosses a line when its production reaches the point of so transforming an interviewee's answer that it is a fundamentally different answer. This CBS may not do." Daniel Suhr, President of the Center for American Rights, said in a statement, "This is about the public's trust in the media on critical issues of national security and international relations during one of the most consequential elections of our time. When broadcasters manipulate interviews and distort reality, it undermines democracy itself. The FCC must act swiftly to restore public confidence in our news media." CBS News' treatment of Harris prompted a former guest to conclude the network is politically motivated. "I can testify from our personal experience that @60Minutes is not honest in their journalism," wrote Moms for Liberty co-founder Tina Descovich. "They came to our interview with a predetermined narrative & when we pointed to truth they used tactics & editing to tell the story they were determined to tell." Descovich and fellow Moms for Liberty co-founder Tiffany Justice spoke to "60 Minutes" host Scott Pelley in October 2023 about their organization and its work reinforcing parental rights and combating grooming efforts in the classroom. Noticeably absent from the final, released in March, was footage of Descovich and Justice describing the graphic sexual content contained in the books that Democrats wanted to keep in public school libraries — footage that would have damaged CBS News' preferred narrative. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!